Back to Journals » Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment » Volume 22
Associations of Perceived Parenting Practices with Mother–Infant Bonding at 1-Month Postpartum via Adult Attachment, Depression, and Anxiety in Japanese Mothers
Authors Por L
, Zain E, Fukui N
, Watanabe Y
, Hashijiri K, Motegi T, Ogawa M, Boku S
Received 14 January 2026
Accepted for publication 27 March 2026
Published 8 April 2026 Volume 2026:22 595969
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S595969
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Taro Kishi
Leakhena Por, Ekachaeryanti Zain, Naoki Fukui, Yuichiro Watanabe, Koyo Hashijiri, Takaharu Motegi, Maki Ogawa, Shuken Boku
Department of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
Correspondence: Naoki Fukui, Email [email protected]
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the direct and indirect association between perceived parenting practices to postpartum bonding difficulties, considering the mediating roles of adult attachment, depression, and anxiety.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study conducted at 1 month postpartum, 2901 Japanese women were recruited from 34 obstetric institutions in Niigata Prefecture. Participants completed the Parental Bonding Instrument, the Relationship Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale to examine perceived parenting practice, adult attachment style, anxiety, depression, and bonding, respectively. Structural equation modeling with 2000 bootstrap resamples was used to evaluate both direct and indirect associations between variables.
Results: Participants had a mean age of 32.16 years. The path model demonstrated acceptable-to-good fit (comparative fit index = 0.949, Tucker–Lewis Index = 0.908, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.064). Paternal and maternal parenting were significantly correlated with adult attachment style (r = 0.297 and 0.200, respectively), which in turn was significantly associated with depression (r = – 0.236) and anxiety (r = – 0.307). Sequentially, depression and anxiety were associated with lack of affection (r = 0.313 and 0.172, respectively) and anger and rejection (r = 0.113 and 0.203, respectively). An indirect association was observed between parenting and bonding via two routes: one sequentially through attachment style and depression and anxiety, and another through depression and anxiety alone. Maternal parenting showed a direct negative association with lack of affection (r = – 0.108). All correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Perceived parenting practices were significantly associated with bonding via adult attachment, depression and anxiety. These findings support integrating perinatal screening and interventions into clinical practice. Future longitudinal research is needed to clarify the causal pathways and the role of paternal and maternal intergenerational caregiving in women’s mental health, while also testing motivational parenting interventions.
Keywords: parenting, adult attachment, bonding, postpartum depression and anxiety, path models
Introduction
During the postpartum period, a secure mother–infant bond is essential for maternal and infant mental health, supporting the child’s well-being and laying the foundation for future relationships and social functioning.1,2 Attachment theory, originally developed by John Bowlby3–5 and Mary Ainsworth6–8 and later expanded by Mary Main,9 provides an important framework for understanding early relational experiences and their influence across the lifespan. Bowlby proposed that attachment is an innate biological system that motivates infants to seek closeness to caregivers, forming a unique relationship that supports survival and healthy psychological development.3–5 Ainsworth advanced the theory through empirical research and introduced key concepts such as the caregiver as a secure base from which infants can explore their environment and maternal sensitivity, highlighting how responsive caregiving shapes attachment patterns.6–8 Later, Main extended the theory by demonstrating that adults’ representations of their own childhood attachment experiences can influence the attachment patterns of their children.9
These perspectives highlight the intergenerational transmission of parenting, in which attachment patterns are transmitted across generations; early parental experiences shape later caregiving approaches.10–13 Positive parenting characteristics, such as warmth, responsiveness, and involvement, are more likely to emerge in the context of secure attachment relationships and supportive social environments.14,15 Conversely, exposure to harsh or negative parenting during childhood has been associated with emotional and behavioral maladjustment and may contribute to the continuity of maladaptive parenting patterns across generations.15 Observational learning further contributes to this cycle, as individuals may replicate parenting behaviors they observed in their own caregivers.16,17 Together, these mechanisms illustrate how both positive and negative parenting patterns can be transmitted across generations. Disrupted bonding may impair development and increase the risk of psychological difficulties in children,18,19 with long-term intergenerational consequences. A nationwide survey in Japan found that 26.1% of 6256 postpartum women reported bonding difficulties.20 Despite this prevalence, the mechanisms linking mothers’ early parental relationships to bonding with their own infants remain unclear.
Parenting in Japan has traditionally been characterized by a relational style emphasizing emotional harmony and maternal responsibility.21,22 Mothers are generally viewed as the primary caregivers, while fathers have traditionally played a less active role in daily childcare, reflecting broader gender roles in which fathers are positioned as main financial providers and maternal responsibility for caregiving is emphasized.23 Additionally, long working hours among fathers further limit their time with children and participation in childcare.24 Consequently, recent discussions on public normative attitudes toward diverse parenting practices in Japan have increasingly emphasized the importance of shared parenting responsibilities and greater paternal involvement in childrearing to support family well-being.25
Several studies suggest that women’s perceptions of parenting before adolescence can predict later bonding difficulties with their infants.26,27 Mothers often replicate caregiving patterns internalized from their own parents, shaping how they relate to their children.28 A high level of perceived parental care has been reported as a protective factor, facilitating adjustment to pregnancy and motherhood, reducing distress, and enhancing bonding.29 However, Hall et al found no such association.30 This discrepancy between the findings of previous studies indicates that the link between perceived parenting and bonding may operate indirectly, possibly through adult attachment style.
Adult attachment style, shaped by parental care and overprotection during childhood,31 may play a crucial role in the mother–infant bonding process. Women often revisit memories and perceptions of attachment to their parents,32,33 which can influence how they bond with their infants. Parental care fosters a willingness to meet infants’ needs for proximity, safety, and security.34 Moreover, secure adult attachment supports emotional regulation and healthy relationships, whereas insecure attachment has been linked to bonding difficulties in the postpartum period.35 Although maternal adult attachment style has been shown to directly influence bonding, some previous studies have reported no significant effect.36
In addition to adult attachment style, accumulating evidence indicates that maternal psychological factors, particularly depression and anxiety, contribute significantly to bonding difficulties.37 Perceived parenting has both direct and indirect effects on maternal–infant bonding through depression and anxiety.38 Negative parenting experiences in childhood may foster insecure adult attachment styles,31 which heighten vulnerability to postpartum psychopathology. For example, adult attachment has been shown to influence bonding via postpartum depression and anxiety, each contributing in distinct ways.36 Several studies have highlighted the mediating role of postpartum depression, suggesting that insecure attachment increases the risk of depression, which subsequently disrupts bonding.39,40 In contrast, the role of postpartum anxiety as a mediator between adult attachment and bonding has received little research attention. Moreover, although the direct link between postpartum depression and impaired bonding has been well established,41–43 further research is needed to elucidate the direct association between postpartum anxiety and impaired bonding.44
Although numerous studies have highlighted the roles of perceived parenting, adult attachment, and maternal mental health—particularly postpartum depression and anxiety—in shaping maternal–infant bonding. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have integrated these variables into a single comprehensive model. Our previous study38 demonstrated that perceived negative parenting exerted both direct effects and indirect effects on bonding through anxiety and depression, but adult attachment was not included in the path model. Despite the strong sociocultural emphasis on close mother–infant bonding and maternal responsibility in Japan,21,22 a significant gap remains in East Asian populations regarding these dynamics. Such cultural expectations may shape the ways in which women internalize early parenting experiences and respond to the psychological demands of motherhood. In contrast, Stéphanie et al45 reported that maternal attachment to a partner was influenced by attachment to the father and associated with postpartum depression, which in turn affected mother–infant bonding. However, their model did not account for anxiety or for specific bonding subtypes, such as lack of affection and anger/rejection. Clarifying how attachment patterns evolve from early caregiver interactions, through adult romantic relationships, and into the maternal role, while considering depression and anxiety, may provide critical insights for promoting healthy mother–infant bonding.
Integrating theoretical and empirical perspectives, this study proposes a conceptual framework in which perceived parenting practices influence postpartum mother–infant bonding through psychological and relational mechanisms. Rooted in attachment theory, early caregiving experiences are thought to shape internal working models of relationships, reflected in adult attachment styles. These attachment patterns may influence maternal emotional well-being during the postpartum period, particularly depression and anxiety, which can in turn affect the quality of mother–infant bonding. Within this framework, perceived maternal and paternal parenting practices may influence bonding both directly and indirectly through adult attachment and maternal psychological distress.
On the basis of this conceptual framework, the current study aimed to examine the direct and indirect pathways linking perceived maternal and paternal parenting practices before adolescence to mother–infant bonding at 1 month postpartum, using an integrated path model. We focused on the mediating roles of adult attachment, postpartum depression, and postpartum anxiety. We hypothesized that perceived parental care and overprotection from both parents were indirectly associated with bonding through adult attachment and maternal mental health. Specifically, we expected that adult attachment would mediate the association between perceived parenting and postpartum depression and anxiety. Furthermore, we anticipated that higher perceived parental care and lower overprotection would be associated with more secure adult attachment, lower levels of depression and anxiety, and less difficulty in mother–infant bonding.
Materials and Methods
Participants
This study was conducted as part of the Perinatal Mental Health Research Project, which was conducted from March 2017 to March 2021.31,36–38 Study participants were recruited from 34 affiliated obstetric institutions in Niigata Prefecture, Japan, with random convenience and purposive sampling. Initially, 4586 Japanese women responded to the questionnaires. However, 1685 questionnaires were excluded because they contained incomplete responses. Therefore, in the current study, we included a total of 2901 healthy women who completed the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) at 1 month postpartum, without missing values. Women with serious physical complications or pregnancy-related complications requiring hospitalization, or severe psychiatric disorders for which they were undergoing treatment as documented in their medical records (eg, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and personality disorder) were excluded.
Measures
Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI)
The PBI is a 25-item self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate how individuals recall their parents’ behaviors and attitudes during their childhood up to the age of 16. Respondents assess their mother and father separately using a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“Very unlikely”) to 3 (“Very likely”). The PBI consists of two primary dimensions: care (12 items) and overprotection (13 items). The care category is scored on a scale of 0–36, with higher scores indicating a more loving parental attitude and lower scores indicating an indifferent or rejecting parental attitude. The category of overprotection is scored on a scale of 0–39, with higher scores indicating overprotective or overly interfering parental attitudes and lower scores indicating a parental attitude that values spontaneity and child autonomy.46 The Japanese version of the PBI was translated and created by Kitamura and Suzuki, and its reliability and validity have been confirmed.47
Relationship Questionnaire (RQ)
The RQ is used to assess adult attachment styles in romantic relationships, a widely validated measure grounded in Bowlby’s theory of internal working models.48 The RQ includes four brief descriptions representing distinct attachment patterns, including secure, fearful, preoccupied, and dismissive. Participants were asked to rate each description on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = “Does not apply at all” to 7 = “Applies very much”), on the basis of how well it reflected their relationship with a partner.48 We used the Japanese version of the RQ, which has previously been demonstrated to have reliability and construct validity among Japanese adolescents.49 In this study, we applied the four-category model, which provides separate scores for each of the four attachment styles, as defined by the original RQ.48
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The HADS is a self-report instrument used to evaluate symptoms of anxiety and depression.50 This scale comprises 14 items, with seven items assessing anxiety (A: items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13) and the other seven evaluating depression (D: items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. Some items are reverse-scored, and total scores are calculated by summing responses, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. Although the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most widely used tool for screening postpartum depression, and some studies have also used the EPDS anxiety subscales (EPDS-3A and EPDS-4A) to assess anxiety symptoms,51,52 in the present study we used the HADS because it was part of the routine psychological assessment conducted at the participating clinics and hospitals. This allowed consistent data collection across participants. The HADS has also been widely applied in perinatal populations,43,53–55 including for validation of the Japanese version.56,57 Additionally, the HADS provides separate and well-validated measures of anxiety and depression and excludes somatic symptoms such as insomnia, loss of appetite, and fatigue, thereby minimizing overlap with normal physiological changes during the postpartum period.58
Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS)
The MIBS is a self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess maternal bonding with the baby during the postpartum period. The MIBS was originally composed of eight items,59 and two additional items were later added, resulting in a 10-item scale.60 The MIBS is rated on a four-point Likert scale (from 0, “very much” to 3, “not at all”), with reversed scoring for some items. The MIBS-J contains two subscales: lack of affection (LA: items 1, 6, 8, and 10) and anger and rejection (AR: items 2, 3, 5, and 7).61 The Japanese version of the MIBS has been validated41 and is commonly used to assess mother–infant bonding in Japan.20,62,63
Statistical Analyses
We included all data for the statistical analyses without missing values. First, we calculated the mean and standard deviation of participants’ subscale and total scores of the PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS. We then calculated the Pearson correlation coefficients among variables of the PBI subscales (paternal care, paternal overprotection, maternal care, and maternal overprotection), RQ (secure, fearful, preoccupied, and dismissive), HADS subscales (depression [D] and anxiety [A]), and MIBS subscale (LA and AR) scores. The statistical significance criterion regarding the difference for both tests was set at a P value of < 0.00075 according to the Bonferroni correction for 66 statistical tests.
Second, we performed a structural equation modeling analysis to investigate the relationships among multiple variables of the PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS simultaneously within our proposed model. We performed a path analysis with two latent variables of PBI-father and PBI-mother, a latent variable of the RQ, the observable variables of the HADS-D and HADS-A, as well as the observable variables of the MIBS-LA and MIBS-AR. PBI-father and -mother were derived from the observable variables of paternal and maternal care and overprotection, respectively. Adult attachment (RQ) was formed from four observable variables of secure, fearful, preoccupied, and dismissive. Specifically, we drew paths as follows: (i) from each of PBI-father and PBI-mother to RQ, HADS (D and A), and MIBS (LA and AR) (ii) from RQ to HADS (D and A), and MIBS (LA and AR) (iii) from HADS-D to MIBS (LA and AR) and from HADS-A to MIBS (LA and AR).
We used the bootstrapping method with 2000 resamples and obtained 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for direct and indirect pathways. We set statistically significant paths (P < 0.05) in the final model. Model fit was assessed using the comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). Values of CFI and TLI > 0.90 indicate good fit and > 0.95 excellent fit, whereas RMSEA < 0.05 indicates good fit and < 0.08 acceptable fit.64,65 Third, to confirm the significance of indirect effects in the path model, we employed the bootstrap method using bias-corrected 95% CIs. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 31 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and AMOS version 25.0.0 (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan).
Results
Descriptive Analyses
This study included 2901 mothers (1381 primipara and 1520 multipara) aged 17–49 years (mean ± standard deviation: 32.16 ± 4.69 years) who completed the PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS, without missing data. Table 1 shows the descriptive scores of the PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS at 1 month postpartum.
|
Table 1 PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS Scores (n = 2901) |
Correlation Analyses
All correlations among variables from the PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS were significant after applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted threshold P < 0.00075; Table 2). Parental care, both paternal and maternal, was positively correlated with secure adult attachment and negatively correlated with insecure attachment styles (fearful, preoccupied, and dismissive), as well as with maternal depression, anxiety, and bonding difficulties (LA and AR). Conversely, parental overprotection was positively associated with insecure attachment styles and with higher levels of depression, anxiety, and bonding difficulties. Secure adult attachment style showed significant negative correlations with depression, anxiety, and bonding difficulty variables, whereas insecure attachment styles were positively correlated with these outcomes. Furthermore, both depression and anxiety were significantly positively correlated with bonding difficulties.
|
Table 2 Coefficients Between the PBI, RQ, MIBS, and HADS |
Path Model Examining the Direct Relationships Among PBI, RQ, HADS, and MIBS Scores
The path model demonstrated an acceptable-to-good fit to the data (CFI = 0.949, TLI = 0.908, and RMSEA = 0.064; Figure 1). In the path model, both perceived paternal and maternal parenting were significantly associated with adult attachment style, paternal parenting (r = 0.297, 95% CI [0.180, 0.429], P < 0.001), and maternal parenting (r = 0.200, 95% CI [0.069, 0.322], P = 0.006), as shown in the bootstrap analysis (Table 3).
|
Table 3 Bootstrap Direct Effects |
Postpartum depression was significantly positively associated with bonding difficulties, including LA (r = 0.313, 95% CI [0.268, 0.357], P < 0.001) and AR (r = 0.113, 95% CI [0.056, 0.167], P < 0.001). Similarly, postpartum anxiety was significantly correlated with LA (r = 0.172, 95% CI [0.124, 0.220], P < 0.001) and AR (r = 0.203, 95% CI [0.153, 0.256], P < 0.001). Although paternal parenting was not directly linked to bonding difficulties, maternal parenting was significantly associated with LA (r = –0.108, 95% CI [–0.208, –0.011], P = 0.023).
Bootstrap Analysis of Indirect Effects of PBI on MIBS via RQ and HADS
The bootstrap analysis confirmed several significant indirect effects along the hypothesized mediation pathways (Table 4). Paternal parenting was indirectly associated with LA via the sequential mediators of adult attachment and, subsequently, depression (r = –0.007, 95% CI [–0.011, –0.004], P < 0.001), as well as via adult attachment and subsequent anxiety (r = –0.005, 95% CI [–0.008, –0.003], P < 0.001). Additionally, paternal parenting was indirectly associated with AR via adult attachment and subsequently depression (r = –0.002, 95% CI [–0.003, –0.001], P < 0.001), as well as via adult attachment and subsequent anxiety (r = –0.004, 95% CI [–0.006, –0.002], P < 0.001).
|
Table 4 Bootstrap Indirect Effects |
Likewise, maternal parenting demonstrated a significant indirect association with LA via adult attachment style and subsequent depression (r = –0.005, 95% CI [–0.009, –0.002], P = 0.004), and via attachment and subsequent anxiety (r = –0.004, 95% CI [–0.007, –0.001], P = 0.004). For AR, maternal parenting also showed indirect correlation via adult attachment style and subsequent depression (r = –0.001, 95% CI [–0.003, 0.000], P = 0.002) and via adult attachment style and subsequent anxiety (r = –0.003, 95% CI [–0.005, –0.001], P = 0.004).
Moreover, perceived paternal parenting showed a significant indirect association with bonding difficulties via depression, for both LA and AR (r = –0.010 and –0.002, 95% CI [–0.021, 0.000] and [–0.005, 0.000], P = 0.045 and 0.033, respectively), but not via anxiety. In contrast, perceived maternal parenting demonstrated a significant indirect correlation with bonding difficulties via depression, for both LA and AR (r = –0.013 and –0.003, 95% CI [–0.026, –0.003] and [–0.007, –0.001], P = 0.013 and 0.009, respectively), and via anxiety for both LA and AR (r = –0.009 and –0.006, 95% CI [–0.016, –0.002] and [–0.012, –0.002], P = 0.007 and 0.007, respectively).
Discussion
In the current study, we investigated the direct and indirect pathways linking perceived maternal and paternal parenting before adolescence to mother–infant bonding at 1 month postpartum, using an integrated path model. Prior studies have produced inconsistent findings,66,67 partly because models often examined single mediators in isolation rather than multiple pathways simultaneously. Our integrated model extends this work by considering adult attachment, depression, and anxiety together, providing a more comprehensive explanation of how early parenting influences bonding. The results significantly supported our hypotheses that perceived parenting practices were indirectly associated with bonding through adult attachment style and subsequent postpartum depression and anxiety. Both paternal and maternal parenting were significantly associated with adult attachment. While paternal parenting was not directly related to bonding difficulties, maternal parenting was directly associated with a lack of affection in bonding. Furthermore, paternal parenting was indirectly associated with bonding difficulties via depression, but not via anxiety. In contrast, maternal parenting was indirectly associated with bonding difficulties via depression and anxiety.
Our findings are in accord with developmental and intergenerational models of caregiving,10–13 in which early parental care fosters secure attachment and resilience, whereas overprotection increases vulnerability to insecure attachment and psychopathology. Consistent with prior research, higher parental care was associated with more secure attachment, lower depression and anxiety, and fewer bonding difficulties, while higher overprotection was linked to adverse outcomes.31,38 Maternal attachment style has also been shown to influence mother–infant bonding through parenting stress,35 as well as depression and anxiety.36 Gioia et al29 reported that both perceived maternal and paternal care directly predicted bonding in pregnancy using a regression model, whereas the current findings demonstrated that only maternal parenting was directly associated with bonding. Importantly, our path model emphasized that both positive and negative dimensions of early caregiving are linked to adult attachment and subsequent mother–infant relationships. Given evidence that grandmothers’ parenting predicts observed parenting in mothers and fathers,68 our findings suggest that adult attachment and subsequent depression and anxiety may mediate this intergenerational transmission. Future research is needed to clarify these pathways and the factors that sustain transmission across generations.
Early caregiving experiences from both mothers and fathers play a critical role in shaping adult attachment and later bonding with infants. Previous research has often focused on maternal influences68,69 in shaping attachment and bonding, while paternal influences have been relatively overlooked. Our findings extend this literature by highlighting the importance of considering both parents’ roles, revealing that both paternal and maternal parenting were directly associated with adult attachment style, and subsequently, had an indirect relationship with bonding. This finding is consistent with a recent meta-analysis showing that both maternal and paternal attachment are essential.70 However, in Japanese families, childbirth typically marks a life transition in which the mother’s role intensifies23 while the wife’s role diminishes. Meanwhile, fathers often become isolated from their families after childbirth because of their increased absorption in the provider role and the long working hours involved.24 This lack of partner support places significant psychological pressure on mothers, leading to increasing advocacy for shared parenting and greater paternal participation to enhance family well-being within Japanese communities.25 In accordance with this shift, a recent study by Meerits et al71 implemented training that was aimed at enhancing parents’ motivational parenting behaviors toward their children. Comparing the current results with these previous findings could provide additional insight into how supportive parenting practices influence psychological and relational outcomes. Moreover, these results71 may inform future research aimed at developing and evaluating targeted intervention programs that promote motivational parenting behaviors. Such programs could be guided by established classification frameworks of motivational behaviors, such as those proposed by Ahmadi et al,72 to systematically design programs and assess their effectiveness. Previous studies have shown that abnormal parental bonding can increase susceptibility to mental disorders later in life,73,74 potentially through multiple mediating factors such as abnormal coping mechanisms and personality factors.75,76 In addition, Bernard et al77 reported that low partner support is linked to postpartum depression, underscoring the critical role of partner involvement in maternal mental health. Therefore, future research is needed to elucidate fathers’ roles on perinatal mental health and the development of secured bonding within the Japanese context.
In the current study, the RQ four-category model as a latent variable was used as a parsimonious representation of the shared variance among attachment indicators, rather than assuming that attachment is strictly categorical or fixed, while recognizing that attachment may also be conceptualized dimensionally along a continuum and vary across relational or stressful life contexts.78,79 This analytic approach was informed by our previous study among 4586 Japanese perinatal women, supporting the adequacy of the RQ four-category model as a latent variable.31 However, the findings should be interpreted within the limitations of the cross-sectional design used in the current study.
Taken together, these findings suggest that both fathers’ and mothers’ parenting behaviors were linked to their daughters’ attachment representations, which were subsequently correlated with partner relationships, maternal mental health, and bonding with their infants. In addition, perceived maternal parenting showed a direct association on mother–infant bonding, in accord with the findings of Jamine et al;80 the mothers learned protective parenting practices from their own mothers through instruction, observation, and modeling within social interactions. This highlights the need to address intergenerational patterns by focusing on women across generations because mothers are the primary caregivers who first nurture the baby and form the initial bond. The father’s role is also crucial, because his involvement in the mother’s sense of security fosters a secure attachment to her partner and, in turn, supports bonding with the baby. Furthermore, prevention and intervention efforts may benefit from incorporating both parents into perinatal mental health programs. However, further studies are needed to clarify how paternal and maternal roles interact and uniquely contribute to creating a secure attachment to a partner and bonding to the infant.
Our results also underscore the crucial mediating roles of maternal depression and anxiety in the pathways from adult attachment to bonding. Consistent with prior research, postpartum depression was strongly associated with impaired bonding, particularly lack of affection.39–43 Previous studies also suggest that the intergenerational transmission of a rejective or hostile parenting style is mediated by the caregiver’s mental health, including depression, anxiety, and stress.81 While some studies support our findings by identifying postpartum depression82 as a key mediator, few have examined anxiety. Importantly, our study also highlights the role of postpartum anxiety, which mediated the relationship between attachment insecurity and both bonding subtypes. Anxiety was associated with bonding difficulties, suggesting that anxious mothers may experience difficulties with emotional regulation that directly affect their interactions with their infants. Despite its prevalence and clinical relevance, postpartum anxiety has often been overlooked in comparison with depression. Accumulating evidence indicates that both depression83,84 and anxiety85 further contribute to bonding difficulties. By incorporating anxiety into the model, our study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological pathways leading to bonding difficulties. Clinically, the results highlight the need for perinatal screening and interventions that address both depression and anxiety. Although the statistical significance of these pathways confirms the hypothesized theoretical model between PBI and LA, its small effect size suggests that maternal bonding in the Japanese context is a highly complex construct, in which mediated factors (ie, RQ and D) are likely to make a greater contribution to the variance. Nevertheless, clinical intervention targeting insecure adult attachment, depression, and anxiety may yield more immediate improvements in maternal–infant bonding. Additionally, clinicians may also explore the postpartum women’s history of the parenting they received to gain further insights into how attachment is associated with bonding patterns towards their infants, even though these indirect pathways might have very small effect sizes statistically. Moreover, interventions targeting parenting style and motivation71,72 should be taken into account because they may contribute to a greater impact on relational outcomes in the next generation.
Our study involved several limitations that should be considered. First, the cross-sectional design at 1 month postpartum precludes conclusions about temporal or causal mediation. The results should therefore be interpreted as statistical associations that are consistent with the hypothesized mediation model. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these relationships. Second, the reliance on self-report measures may have introduced recall or response biases. Third, the findings are based on a Japanese sample, which may limit their generalizability to other cultural contexts, although the large dataset provides strong validity. Fourth, although our model included perceived parenting, adult attachment, depression, and anxiety, other factors such as participants’ family structure,86,87 adverse life events,88 social support,89,90 marital relationship quality,91 and education level92,93 were not assessed. Future research should address these limitations by employing longitudinal, multi-method, and cross-cultural approaches, as well as incorporating fathers’ perspectives and direct observations of parent–infant interactions.
Conclusion
The current study provides evidence that both perceived maternal and paternal parenting practices are associated with mother–infant bonding via adult attachment style and subsequent postpartum depression and anxiety. Interestingly, paternal parenting showed a stronger indirect association with bonding than maternal parenting. These findings extend existing models of intergenerational transmission of caregiving. Although the observed indirect associations were small, they are likely to reflect the complexity of the relationship and potential biases; nevertheless, psychoeducational and therapeutic strategies that help women process and reframe early parenting experiences may strengthen attachment security, thereby reducing vulnerability to postpartum psychopathology and bonding difficulties. Further research should adopt longitudinal approaches to clarify the causal pathways of intergenerational transmission of parenting and bonding from both maternal and paternal roles more directly, while also developing and testing motivational parenting interventions.
Data Sharing Statement
The paper provides all relevant data. However, the associated institutions did not give permission to make baseline data available to readers.
Ethics Statement
This study adhered to the principles in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Niigata University Ethics Committee (approval number 2016–0019) and the ethics committees of the associated obstetric clinics and hospitals approved the study protocol. All mothers in this study provided informed consent before participating.
Acknowledgments
We express our deep gratitude to Dr. Takuro Sugai, Dr. Ryusuke Tsuboya, Dr. Koichi Takakuwa, Dr. Masayuki Yamaguchi, Dr. Kazufumi Haino, Rie Araki, and Setsuko Mitome for their collaboration during the early stages of this work. We are also thankful for the support from the study participants, and personnel and stakeholders of the associated obstetric healthcare centers (listed in alphabetical order): Agano City Hospital, Angel Mother Clinic, Arakawa Ladies Clinic, Chihara Clinic, Hirohashi Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Honda Ladies Clinic, Itoigawa Sogo Hospital, Joetsu General Hospital, Kameda Daiichi Hospital, Kashiwazaki General Hospital and Medical Center, Kido Hospital, Ladies Clinic Ishiguro, Murakami General Hospital, Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata Shibata Hospital, Niigata Tokamachi Hospital, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niitsu Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Ojiya General Hospital, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Saiseikai Sanjo Hospital, Sado General Hospital, Saintpoulia Women’s Clinic, Sekizuka Clinic, Tachikawa Medical Center, Takeyama Hospital, Tokunaga Ladies Clinic, Tomita Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Ueda Ladies Clinic, Uonuma Kikan Hospital, Watanabe Clinic, and Watanabe Kinen Clinic. We thank Benjamin Knight, MSc., from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This research project received funding from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI) granted to N.F. (Grant No.: JP19K08040), a grant from the Niigata Medical Association to T.M., and funding from the Medical Association of Niigata City to M.O.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Daglar G, Nur N. Level of mother-baby bonding and influencing factors during pregnancy and postpartum period. Psychiatry Danub. 2018;30(4):433–15. doi:10.24869/psyd.2018.433
2. Hill R, Flanagan J. The maternal–infant bond: clarifying the concept. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2020;31(1):14–18. doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12235
3. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss, Vol 1: Attachment. Basic Books; 1969/1982.
4. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss, Vol 2: Separation: Anxiety and Anger. Basic Books; 1973.
5. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss, Vol 3: Loss, Sadness and Depression. Basic Books; 1980.
6. Ainsworth MD. The development of infant-mother interaction among the Ganda. In: Foss BM, editor. Determinants of Infant Behavior. Wiley; 1963:67–112.
7. Ainsworth MD. Attachment: retrospect and prospect. In: Parkes CM, Stevenson-Hinde J, editors. The Place of Attachment in Human Behavior. Basic Books; 1982:3–30.
8. Ainsworth MD, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Erlbaum; 1978.
9. Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J. Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1/2):66. doi:10.2307/3333827
10. Jarnecke AM, South SC. Attachment orientations as mediators in the intergenerational transmission of marital satisfaction. J Fam Psychol. 2013;27(4):550–559. doi:10.1037/a0033340
11. de Cock ES, Henrichs J, Vreeswijk CM, Maas AJ, Rijk CH, van Bakel HJ. Continuous feelings of love? The parental bond from pregnancy to toddlerhood. J Fam Psychol. 2016;30(1):125–134. doi:10.1037/fam0000138
12. Taccini F, Rossi AA, Mannarini S. Intergenerational transmission of relational styles: current considerations. Front Psychol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672961
13. Van IJzendoorn MH. Intergenerational transmission of parenting: a review of studies in nonclinical populations. Dev Rev. 1992;12(1):76–99. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90004-L
14. Chen ZY, Kaplan HB. Intergenerational transmission of constructive parenting. J Marriage Fam. 2001;63(1):17–31. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00017.x
15. Kerr DCR, Capaldi DM. Intergenerational transmission of parenting. In: Handb Parent. 2019:443–481.
16. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall; 1977.
17. Serbin L, Karp J. Intergenerational studies of parenting and the transfer of risk from parent to child. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12(4):138–142. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01249
18. Galeshi M, Mirghafourvand M, Alizadeh-Sharajabad FSF. Predictors of mother-child bonding. Hayat. 2026;22(1):13–26.
19. Garcia-Esteve L, Torres A, Lasheras G, et al. Assessment of psychometric properties of the postpartum bonding questionnaire (PBQ) in Spanish mothers. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(2):385–394. doi:10.1007/s00737-015-0589-x
20. Chen C, Okawa S, Okubo R, et al. Mother-to-infant bonding difficulties are associated with future maternal depression and child-maltreatment behaviors: a Japanese nationwide longitudinal study. Psychiatry Res. 2024;334:115814. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115814
21. Conroy M, Hess R, Azuma H, Kashiwagi K. Maternal strategies for regulating children’s behavior. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1980;11(2):153–172. doi:10.1177/0022022180112002
22. Kojima H. Child rearing concepts as a belief-value system of the society and the individual. In: Stevenson H, Azuma H, Hakuta K, editors. Child Development and Education in Japan. New York, NY: Freeman; 1986:39–54.
23. Yokoyama Y. Introduction to the Japanese family and their culture values. Japanese J Soc Serv. 2000;2:165–167.
24. Ochi M, Kato T, Kachi Y, et al. Japanese fathers’ work-related factors associated with involvement in childcare. J Occup Health. 2024;66(1):uiae036. doi:10.1093/joccuh/uiae036
25. Elisa Ortensi L, Devi R, Lorek M, et al. General perception of the diversification of child-rearing environments in Japan. Front Soc. 2026;11:1674416. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1674416
26. Macdonald JA, Youssef GJ, Phillips L, et al. The parental bonds of adolescent girls and next-generation maternal–infant bonding: findings from the Victorian intergenerational health cohort study. Arch Womens Ment Heal. 2018;21(2):171–180. doi:10.1007/s00737-017-0778-x
27. Choi H, Yamashita T, Wada Y, et al. Factors associated with postpartum depression and abusive behavior in mothers with infants. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010;64(2):120–127. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02063.x
28. von Mohr M, Mayes LC, Rutherford JV. The transition to motherhood: psychoanalysis and neuroscience perspectives. Psychoanal Study Child. 2017;70(1):154–173. doi:10.1080/00797308.2016.1277905
29. Gioia MC, Cerasa A, Muggeo VMR, et al. The relationship between maternal-fetus attachment and perceived parental bonds in pregnant women: considering a possible mediating role of psychological distress. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1095030. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095030
30. Hall AS, Hoffenkamp HN, Tooten A, Braeken J, Vingerhoets AM, Van Bakel HA. Child-rearing history and emotional bonding in parents of preterm and full-term infants. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24(6):1715–1726. doi:10.1007/s10826-014-9975-7
31. Zain E, Fukui N, Watanabe Y, et al. High care and low overprotection from both paternal and maternal parents predict a secure attachment style with a partner among perinatal Japanese women. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42674-1
32. Handelzalts JE, Preis H, Rosenbaum M, Gozlan M, Benyamini Y. Pregnant women’s recollections of early maternal bonding: associations with maternal-fetal attachment and birth choices. Infant Ment Health J. 2018;39(5):511–521. doi:10.1002/imhj.21731
33. Hinesley J, Amstadter A, Sood A, Perera RA, Ramus R, Kornstein S. Adverse childhood experiences, maternal/fetal attachment, and maternal mental health. Women’s Heal Reports. 2020;1(1):550–555. doi:10.1089/whr.2020.0085
34. Mikulincer M, Shaver P. Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change.
35. Nordahl D, Rognmo K, Bohne A, et al. Adult attachment style and maternal-infant bonding: the indirect path of parenting stress. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s40359-020-00424-2
36. Wahyu MD, Zain E, Watanabe Y, et al. Impact of adult attachment style on bonding mediated by depression and anxiety across the perinatal period. J Affect Disord. 2025;388:119763. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.119763
37. Motegi T, Watanabe Y, Fukui N, et al. Depression, anxiety and primiparity are negatively associated with mother–infant bonding in Japanese mothers. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:3117. doi:10.2147/NDT.S287036
38. Fukui N, Motegi T, Watanabe Y, et al. Perceived parenting before adolescence and parity have direct and indirect effects via depression and anxiety on maternal–infant bonding in the perinatal period. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021;75(10):312–317. doi:10.1111/pcn.13289
39. Nonnenmacher N, Noe D, Ehrenthal JC, Reck C. Postpartum bonding: the impact of maternal depression and adult attachment style. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(5):927–935. doi:10.1007/s00737-016-0648-y
40. Handelzalts JE, Levy S, Molmen-Lichter M, et al. The association of attachment style, postpartum PTSD and depression with bonding- A longitudinal path analysis model, from childbirth to six months. J Affect Disord. 2021;280:17–25. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.068
41. O’Higgins M, Roberts ISJ, Glover V, Taylor A. Mother-child bonding at 1 year; Associations with symptoms of postnatal depression and bonding in the first few weeks. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013;16(5):381–389. doi:10.1007/s00737-013-0354-y
42. Dubber S, Reck C, Müller M, Gawlik S. Postpartum bonding: the role of perinatal depression, anxiety and maternal–fetal bonding during pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18(2):187–195. doi:10.1007/s00737-014-0445-4
43. Moehler E, Brunner R, Wiebel A, Reck C, Resch F. Maternal depressive symptoms in the postnatal period are associated with long-term impairment of mother-child bonding. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9(5):273–278. doi:10.1007/s00737-006-0149-5
44. Ionio C, Ciuffo G, Christiansen P, et al. Postpartum-specific anxiety and maternal-infant bonding: a predictive validity study amongst Italian women. Eur J Investig Heal Psychol Educ. 2024;14(6):1614–1626. doi:10.3390/ejihpe14060107
45. Vanwalleghem S, Miljkovitch R, Sirparanta A, Toléon C, Leclercq S, Deborde AS. Maternal attachment networks and mother–infant bonding disturbances among mothers with postpartum major depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12):6155. doi:10.3390/ijerph20126155
46. Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB. A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol. 1979;52(1):1–10. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x
47. Kitamura T, Suzuki T. A validation study of the parental bonding instrument in a Japanese population. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;47(1):29–36. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.1993.tb02026.x
48. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(2):226–244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
49. Matsuoka N, Uji M, Hiramura H, et al. Adolescents’ attachment style and early experiences: a gender difference. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9(1):23–29. doi:10.1007/s00737-005-0105-9
50. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
51. Matthey S, Fisher J, Rowe H. Using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale to screen for anxiety disorders: conceptual and methodological considerations. J Affect Disord. 2013;146(2):224–230. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.09.009
52. Zain E, Watanabe Y, Takabayashi S, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Japanese Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening postpartum anxiety. Front Psychiatry. 2025;16:1659497. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1659497
53. Sato Y, Kato T, Kakee N. A six-month follow-up study of maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms among Japanese. J Epidemiol. 2008;18(2):84–87. doi:10.2188/jea.18.84
54. Ásbjörnsdóttir B, Vestgaard M, Do NC, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes and the impact on glycaemic control. Diabet Med. 2021;38(3). doi:10.1111/dme.14506
55. Hasanjanzadeh P, Faramarzi M. Relationship between maternal general and specific-pregnancy stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms and pregnancy outcome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):VC04–VC07.
56. Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Okamura H, Uchitomi Y. Screening for psychological distress in Japanese cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28(5):333–338. doi:10.1093/jjco/28.5.333
57. Ogawa M, Watanabe Y, Motegi T, et al. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the hospital anxiety and depression scale across the peripartum period among pregnant Japanese women. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021;17:221–227. doi:10.2147/NDT.S294918
58. Wu Y, Levis B, Sun Y, et al. Accuracy of the hospital anxiety and depression scale depression subscale (Hads-D) to screen for major depression: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021;373. doi:10.1136/bmj.n972
59. Taylor A, Atkins R, Kumar R, Adams D, Glover V. A new mother-to-infant bonding scale: links with early maternal mood. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8(1):45–51. doi:10.1007/s00737-005-0074-z
60. Yoshida K, Yamashita H, Conroy S, Marks M, Kumar C. A Japanese version of mother-to-infant bonding scale: factor structure, longitudinal changes and links with maternal mood during the early postnatal period in Japanese mothers. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2012;15(5):343–352. doi:10.1007/s00737-012-0291-1
61. Motegi T, Fukui N, Hashijiri K, et al. Identifying the factor structure of the mother-to-infant bonding scale for post-partum women and examining its consistency during pregnancy. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;73(10):661–662. doi:10.1111/pcn.12920
62. Kurashina R, Suzuki S. Postpartum mental status in women with social problems at a Japanese perinatal center. Hypertens Res Pregnancy. 2021;9(4):86–90. doi:10.14390/jsshp.HRP2021-011
63. Baba K, Kataoka Y, Kitamura T. Identifying core items of the Japanese version of the mother-to-infant bonding scale for diagnosing postpartum bonding disorder. Healthc. 2023;11(12):1740. doi:10.3390/healthcare11121740
64. Schermelleh-Engel KMH. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.
65. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(4):424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
66. Yazdanimehr R, Aflakseir A, Sarafraz M, Taghavi M. The structural model of mother-infant bonding in the first pregnancy based on the mother’s attachment style and parenting style: the mediating role of mentalization and shame. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01436-4
67. Tavoli A, Doustmohammadi F, Karami Z. The mediating role of mother’s alexithymia in the relation between perceived parenting styles and maternal-fetal attachment in pregnant mothers. Sci J Women Fam Cult. 2024;18:137–160.
68. Madden V, Domoney J, Aumayer K, et al. Intergenerational transmission of parenting: findings from a UK longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(6):1030. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckv093
69. Wilhelm K, Gillis IPG. Parental bonding and adult attachment style: the relationship between four category models. Int J Womens Heal Wellness. 2016;2(1):1353–2474.
70. Madigan S, Deneault AA, Duschinsky R, et al. Maternal and paternal sensitivity: key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2024;150(7):839–872. doi:10.1037/bul0000433
71. Meerits PR, Tilga H, Koka A. Web-based need-supportive parenting program to promote physical activity in secondary school students: a randomized controlled pilot trial. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16528-4
72. Ahmadi A, Noetel M, Parker PD, et al. A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions. J Educ Psychol. 2023;115(8):1158–1176. doi:10.1037/edu0000783
73. Lima AR, Mello MF, De Jesus Mari J. The role of early parental bonding in the development of psychiatric symptoms in adulthood. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010;23(4):383–387. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833a51ce
74. Kidd KN, Prasad D, Cunningham EA, de Azevedo Cardoso T, Frey BN. The relationship between parental bonding and mood, anxiety and related disorders in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;307:221–236. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.069
75. Avagianou PA, Zafiropoulou M. Parental bonding and depression: personality as a mediating factor. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008;20(3):261–269. doi:10.1515/IJAMH.2008.20.3.261
76. Bombay A, Matheson K, Anisman H. The impact of stressors on second generation Indian residential school survivors. Transcult Psychiatry. 2011;48(4):367–391. doi:10.1177/1363461511410240
77. Bernard O, Gibson RC, McCaw-Binns A, et al. Antenatal depressive symptoms in Jamaica associated with limited perceived partner and other social support: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194338. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194338
78. Chris Fraley R, Hudson NW, Heffernan ME, Segal N. Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109(2):354–368. doi:10.1037/pspp0000027
79. Fraley RC, Gillath O, Deboeck PR. Do life events lead to enduring changes in adult attachment styles? A naturalistic longitudinal investigation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021;120(6):1567–1606. doi:10.1037/pspi0000326
80. Jasmine UH, Nduna M, Nkala-Dlamini B. Intergenerational continuity of protective parenting practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2025;20(2):e0300160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300160
81. He Y, Liu C, Chen Y, Huang J, Luo R. Intergenerational transmission of parenting style in rural China and the mediation effect of caregiver’s mental health. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;117:105319. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105319
82. Shieh PL, Tsai TY. The prediction of perceived parenting style on mother-infant bonding. Acta Psychol. 2022;226:103573. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103573
83. Kossakowska K, Śliwerski A. Factors affecting mother-infant bonding in a Polish group of mothers. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023;37:100880. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100880
84. Qi W, Wei Z, Lv H, et al. Postpartum depression and maternal-infant bonding: the mediating role of mentalizing and parenting self-efficacy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07762-2
85. Tolja R, Nakić Radoš S, Anđelinović M. The role of maternal mental health, infant temperament, and couple’s relationship quality for mother-infant bonding. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(4):395–407. doi:10.1080/02646838.2020.1733503
86. Xiao X, Loke AY. Intergenerational co-parenting in the postpartum period: a concept analysis. Midwifery. 2022;107:103275. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103275
87. Schulz ML, Wood CE, Giallo R. Co-parenting and parenting behaviour: the role of parent mental health for mothers and fathers in the postnatal period. Child Fam Soc Work. 2023;28(4):1203–1213. doi:10.1111/cfs.13042
88. Özşahin Z. The effects of adverse childhood experiences on pregnancy-related anxiety and acceptance of motherhood role. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20(3):1217. doi:10.4314/ahs.v20i3.25
89. Ohara M, Okada T, Aleksic B, et al. Social support helps protect against perinatal bonding failure and depression among mothers: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08768-3
90. La Rosa VL, Alparone D, Commodari E. Psychological and social factors influencing mother–child bonding in the first year after birth: a model for promoting infant and maternal well-being. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1588433. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1588433
91. Siebach KF, Park S, Mansoor M, et al. The association of spousal relationship quality and social support with maternal-infant bonding: moderating roles of maternal age and paternal occupation. Infancy. 2025;30(1):e12647. doi:10.1111/infa.12647
92. de Souza DS, de L Machado W, Guimarães LDA, et al. Mother-infant bonding: the role of postpartum depression, violence, and bonding established with one’s own mother during childhood. Infant Ment Health J. 2024;45(5):529–540. doi:10.1002/imhj.22126
93. Rizk S. Factors associated with maternal-infant attachment one month postnatally. J High Inst Public Heal. 2012;42(2):103–118. doi:10.21608/jhiph.2012.20127
© 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
