Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 17

Azelaic Acid: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications

Authors Feng X ORCID logo, Shang J, Gu Z, Gong J, Chen Y, Liu Y ORCID logo

Received 2 July 2024

Accepted for publication 27 September 2024

Published 22 October 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2359—2371

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S485237

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg



Xiaoyue Feng,1,* Jianli Shang,1,* Zhengping Gu,1 Junhua Gong,1 Yong Chen,1,2 Youting Liu1,2

1R&D Department, Beijing UPROVEN Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, Daxing, People’s Republic of China; 2Beijing UPROVEN Institute of Dermatology, Beijing, Daxing, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Youting Liu, R&D Department, Beijing UPROVEN Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Yard 5, Tianhua Avenue, Beijing, Daxing, 102699, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 18510256963, Email [email protected]

Abstract: AZA is a non-phenolic, saturated dicarboxylic acid with nine carbon atoms, naturally produced by the yeast Malassezia. It has diverse physiological activities, including antibacterial, anti-keratinizing, antimelanogenic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. AZA is widely used in dermatology and is FDA-approved for treating papulopustular rosacea. It also shows significant efficacy in acne vulgaris and melasma. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and clinical applications of AZA, aiming to provide theoretical support for its clinical and cosmetic use and to facilitate further research.

Keywords: azelaic acid, mechanism, rosacea, acne, melasma, safety

Introduction

Azelaic acid (AZA), also known as azalea acid, is a beautiful mistake. Upon investigation, it was found that it has little to do with azaleas, as the similarity in their English names led to its early translation as azalea acid. AZA is widely present in nature, found in grains such as rye, wheat, and barley.1 In the human body, it exists in small amounts in the urine of healthy individuals as a physiological component, synthesized from fatty acids via ω-oxidation.2 Additionally, on the human skin surface, Pityrosporum ovale synthesizes and secretes AZA.3

The discovery of AZA in dermatology dates back to the 1970s, significant depigmentation was found in the lesions of pityriasis versicolor by a dermatologist in Rome. Further research revealed that the yeast Malassezia furfur, a normal skin commensal, could degrade unsaturated fatty acids into C8-C12 dicarboxylic acids, including AZA, which inhibit melanocytes.4 AZA was first applied in combination with surgical treatment for malignant melanoma patients in 1980, achieving good results.5 Subsequently, extensive research on AZA revealed its remarkable efficacy not only in inhibiting melanogenesis but also in exhibiting multiple physiological activities such as antibacterial, anti-keratinization, antimelanogenic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. It is extensively used in the treatment of various conditions, including rosacea, acne vulgaris, and melasma. In recent years, its popularity in cosmetics has been steadily increasing, indicating a broad application prospect.

Therefore, we systematically review the various mechanisms of action and clinical applications of AZA to provide theoretical support for its use in clinical and cosmetic fields and to lay the foundation for further research.

Molecular Characteristics

AZA is a straight-chain saturated dicarboxylic acid with the molecular formula C9H16O4 and a molecular weight of 188.22. Due to its two carboxyl groups, it dissociates as a weak acid in aqueous solutions, with two pKa values, pKa1 at 4.5 and pKa2 at 5.3. The absorption of AZA strongly depends on the pH value and degree of dissociation in the topical formulation. Unlike other substances, increased dissociation enhances the absorption rate of AZA in the skin.6 This is likely because higher dissociation improves the solubility of AZA in the formulation, thereby increasing the total skin permeation.

Mechanism of Action of AZA

We systematically elucidated and refined the potential mechanisms underlying AZA’s effects on antibacterial activity, keratinization inhibition, melanogenesis suppression, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses through a comprehensive analysis of AZA’s structure and properties, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Mechanism of Action of AZA. This figure illustrates the mechanisms of action of AZA using different line colors: pink for the antibacterial mechanism, yellow for the anti-keratinization mechanism, blue for the antimelanogenic mechanism, and green for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. AZA, Azelaic acid.

Bacteriostatic

AZA exhibits bacteriostatic activity against bacteria such as Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as demonstrated by in vitro studies. Its bacteriostatic efficacy is concentration and pH-dependent, with more pronounced effects at low pH and high concentrations.7,8 Unlike antibiotics, AZA does not induce bacterial resistance. It effectively targets antibiotic-resistant strains of Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus aureus, closely related to its mechanism of action.9–11 AZA can non-specifically traverse the bacterial cell membrane via ion transporters, subsequently lowering intracellular pH and disrupting membrane pH homeostasis. To maintain this balance, bacteria increase energy consumption, ultimately leading to decreased vitality or even death.2 Additionally, AZA inhibits bacterial thioredoxin reductase activity, thereby suppressing protein and DNA synthesis.12 This broad-spectrum antibacterial mechanism makes AZA less prone to inducing bacterial resistance.

One study evaluated the effects of AZA on the skin microbiota of individuals with acne vulgaris. Over a 28-day period of daily application of 15% AZA gel by 55 acne patients, microbial diversity at acne sites improved, with slight reductions in bacterial and staphylococcal populations, and a significant increase in lactobacilli. Long-term use brought the levels of Propionibacterium and Staphylococcus closer to those found in normal skin.13 Another study, using a Propionibacterium acnes model, assessed the antibacterial effects of AZA micro-nanocrystals in vitro and explored their anti-acne efficacy in vivo. The findings demonstrated that AZA micro-nanocrystals inhibit Propionibacterium acnes and have a superior therapeutic effect on acne compared to standard AZA formulations.14

Antikeratin

AZA is a mild anti-keratinizing agent that exhibits reversible inhibitory effects on the proliferation of keratinocytes, with its action being dose- and time-dependent.15 Studies indicate that the inhibitory effect of AZA is primarily achieved by inducing mitochondrial swelling and rough endoplasmic reticulum dilation in keratinocytes, thereby affecting keratinocyte differentiation, particularly terminal differentiation12,16,17 Keratohyalin granules and filaggrin are key markers of terminal differentiation in keratinocytes, with mature filaggrin aiding in the aggregation of keratin filaments to form tonofilament bundles, serving as the primary structural scaffold in keratinocytes.18 Studies have demonstrated that AZA can delay the synthesis of filaggrin, reducing the size and quantity of keratohyalin granules and tonofilament bundles.17 Additionally, AZA reversibly inhibits the synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins in keratinocytes, affecting their proliferation.12,17

A study demonstrated that 8–12 weeks of twice-daily application of 20% AZA cream to acne-affected skin led to significant reduction or normalization of intra- and interfollicular hyperkeratosis. Additionally, there was a notable decrease in both the number and size of keratohyalin granules in follicular and epidermal keratinocytes.19 Another study evaluated the effects of 20% AZA cream, 0.05% retinoic acid (RA) cream, and a placebo cream on acne, focusing on anti-keratinization indicators. With 30 subjects randomly allocated into three equally sized groups, participants received either twice-daily application of 20% AZA cream, once-daily application of RA cream, or a placebo cream. Results showed that both AZA and RA significantly reduced the number of comedones compared to the placebo group, and the reduction in follicular hyperkeratinization induced by AZA was similar to that induced by RA.20

Antimelanogenic

AZA selectively targets hyperactive and malignant melanocytes without affecting normal cells. This may be related to the increased permeability of the membrane of abnormal melanocytes to AZA.21 In vitro studies have shown that AZA can penetrate the cell membrane, disrupt mitochondrial respiration, induce rough endoplasmic reticulum expansion, and inhibit DNA synthesis, thereby suppressing the proliferation and differentiation of melanocytes.15,22 Additionally, AZA competitively inhibits tyrosinase activity, a key enzyme in melanin production that promotes the conversion of tyrosine to dopa and dopaquinone, effectively inhibiting melanogenesis.23 These multifaceted mechanisms contribute to AZA’s efficacy in treating abnormal pigmentation disorders, while its selective action enhances safety. Numerous studies have reported the clinical application of AZA in treating conditions such as melasma, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.24,25

Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity

AZA is a competitive inhibitor of various redox enzymes in vitro, including the aforementioned tyrosinase and thioredoxin reductase involved in DNA synthesis.23 Additionally, AZA exhibits significant anti-inflammatory activity. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of AZA are interconnected and mutually influential.

Neutrophils are a significant source of ROS in the early stages of the inflammatory process.26 Studies have shown that AZA can dose-dependently inhibit the release of ROS from neutrophils, such as hydroxyl radicals (OH·) and superoxide anions (O2-). Further research indicates that this inhibition may be related to the suppression of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate oxidase (NOXs) activity on the surface membrane of neutrophils.27 It is well-known that ROS are crucial mediators of inflammatory responses, activating a series of inflammatory signaling pathways and triggering inflammation. Several articles have reported that AZA can interfere with the NF-κB/MAPK inflammatory signaling pathway. AZA inhibits MAPK p38 phosphorylation and impairs the translocation of NF-κB to the nucleus.12 Additionally, AZA can modulate the inflammatory response by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), inhibiting the transactivation of NF-κB, and reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.28 Studies have shown that AZA can inhibit the mRNA expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα induced by UVB.29 Furthermore, AZA can inhibit lipid peroxidation of arachidonic acid, potentially reducing the production of its peroxidation products, such as prostaglandin E2, thromboxane, and leukotrienes, which play significant roles in the development of inflammation.30,31

Additionally, AZA can inhibit the expression of toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), a key molecule in recognizing various pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, and playing a significant role in many diseases.32 In rosacea, TLR2 expression increases, stimulating keratinocytes to produce more serine proteases, such as KLK5.33 The upregulation of KLK5 leads to the aberrant accumulation of active LL37, which can promote inflammation through various pathways and induce the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8. Additionally, LL37 bind to TLR2 on keratinocytes, creating a positive feedback loop that amplifies and sustains inflammation. LL37 also activates the NF-κB signaling pathway.34 Studies have shown that AZA not only inhibits TLR2 but also effectively suppresses KLK5 and LL-37, providing a theoretical basis for its use in rosacea treatment.35 AZA was approved by the FDA for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR) in 2002. Additionally, the overactivity of TLR2 also plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of acne. Propionibacterium acnes can stimulate TLR2 activity, inducing skin inflammation.36,37 Similar to its mechanism in treating rosacea, the inhibition of TLR2 activity by AZA helps explain its efficacy in the treatment of acne vulgaris.38

Clinical Applications of AZA

AZA, as a natural dicarboxylic acid, exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial effects, mild anti-keratinizing actions, selectively targets hyperactive melanocytes and excellent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These characteristics confer soothing, whitening, and spot-fading benefits. Therefore, AZA is frequently used clinically for skin beautification and the treatment of skin diseases.

Rosacea

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition primarily affecting the central face, characterized by recurrent flushing and erythema. 15% AZA was approved by the FDA in 2002 for the topical treatment of PPR, and it has been in use for over 20 years. AZA was included in the standard management options for rosacea by the Rosacea guidelines of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee in 2019.39 AZA is rated as Grade A evidence for the treatment of PPR and is also recommended in the Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rosacea.40 There are an increasing number of clinical reports on the application of AZA in the treatment of PPR.

A large randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy of AZA foam with vehicle foam in patients with PPR. The study included 961 subjects, who were randomly assigned in equal proportions to either the AZA group or the vehicle group. The single treatment dose of AZA was 0.5g, administered twice daily for a total of 12 weeks. The results indicated that the 15% AZA group showed significant improvement in IGA scores compared to the vehicle foam group (32.0% vs 23.5%; P<0.001), with a significant reduction in the mean percentage of inflammatory lesion counts (61.6% vs 50.8%; P<0.001) and a notable improvement in erythema scores (61.5% vs 51.3%; P<0.001). Although the incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was higher in the AZA group than in the control group, the tolerance was good, and the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was low.41 Another study also supported that AZA gel was more effective than vehicle gel in reducing erythema and inflammation in PPR subjects, with good tolerability and no unexpected adverse events.42

Another randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of 15% AZA gel versus 0.75% metronidazole gel in treating PPR. In this study, a total of 251 subjects were randomly assigned to receive either AZA gel or metronidazole gel, with both treatments administered twice daily for 15 weeks. The results indicated that AZA demonstrated a significant therapeutic advantage in both investigator-assessed and patient-assessed efficacy.43 Another trial comparing the efficacy of 15% AZA gel with 1% metronidazole gel also supported this view. The study demonstrated that the AZA regimen acted more quickly and effectively.44

A clinical study was conducted in two phases, involving a total of 172 participants. In the initial phase, patients with moderate to severe PPR were treated with a combination of 15% AZA gel and 100mg oral doxycycline, administered twice daily for 12 weeks. In the second phase, subjects who showed good clinical outcomes in the first phase were randomly assigned to apply either 15% AZA gel or a vehicle gel for maintenance treatment, twice daily for 24 weeks. The results showed that at the end of the first phase, 81.4% of the subjects had a reduction in inflammatory lesions by 75% or more, and 64% of the patients achieved treatment success. During the maintenance phase, 15% AZA gel provided better maintenance effects.45

Additionally, we conducted a detailed review of several clinical reports on the application of AZA for rosacea over the past 10 years, as summarized in Table 1. Extensive clinical studies on AZA for the treatment of PPR have demonstrated its excellent efficacy and good tolerability, providing valuable treatment guidance for clinicians.46–50 However, additional clinical reports are needed to offer more options and further benefit patients.

Table 1 Clinical Applications of AZA in Dermatology

Acne Vulgaris

Acne is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that commonly affects the pilosebaceous units of the face, particularly during adolescence. Its clinical manifestations include comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts. AZA is an effective anti-acne medication with good therapeutic effects on both non-inflammatory and inflammatory acne, especially the latter, commonly used in concentrations of 15% and 20%.61 It is now recommended by most physicians as a second-line treatment option.62 Studies have shown that AZA can be used for maintenance therapy in acne, extending the period without relapse, with effectiveness comparable to adapalene.63,64 With sufficient evidence supporting its use and high safety, the European evidence-based guidelines also recommend AZA with medium strength for the treatment of acne.65 Currently, there are increasing cases of AZA being used to treat acne.

AZA can inhibit sebum secretion, although its exact mechanism remains unclear. This has a positive effect on the treatment of acne. One study evaluated the effects of a 30% AZA peel on sebum secretion and acne in patients with acne vulgaris. A total of thirty-five acne patients received facial applications of a 30% AZA solution (pH 2.4) for 10 minutes, biweekly, for six treatments. The measured outcomes were sebum secretion and improvement of acne.The results showed that after AZA treatment, sebum secretion was significantly reduced, and the total number and severity of acne lesions also significantly improved.52 Another study evaluated the effect of a 20% AZA solution on sebaceous gland activity in patients with acne vulgaris. Similar conclusions were reached, and the study found that sebaceous gland activity remained reduced 12 weeks after the final treatment, with scores lower than those recorded 2 weeks after the final treatment. This indicates that AZA peeling has a long-term inhibitory effect on sebaceous gland activity and improves acne treatment outcomes.66

AZA can improve post-inflammatory erythema (PIE) and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation(PIH).67 A study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 15% AZA gel in treating acne-induced PIE and PIH. A total of 72 patients with mild to moderate acne were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: the AZA group and the control group. The AZA group applied 15% AZA gel twice daily for 12 weeks, while the control group used a blank vehicle. Key indicators included the post-acne hyperpigmentation index, melanin content, hemoglobin levels, and adverse reactions. Results showed that, compared to the control group, the AZA group had significantly lower post-acne hyperpigmentation index, melanin content in the lesions, and hemoglobin levels, with fewer adverse reactions.25

AZA can improve patients’ Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). One study assessed the impact of a 20% AZA cream on quality of life and disease severity in adult female acne patients. A total of 251 participants with mild to moderate acne were included, and they applied the cream twice daily for 12 weeks. The median DLQI decreased from 9 at baseline to 5, with 90% of doctors and patients rating the treatment tolerance as very good or good.68 In two comparative studies, AZA has consistently shown significant improvement in patients’ DLQI. Although AZA treatment is less effective compared to treatments with 1% benzoyl peroxide/1% clindamycin and combined oral contraceptives, it still significantly improves acne therapy outcomes.69,70

In recent years, the use of AZA in acne treatment has increased significantly. We compiled clinical reports with a high number of studies from the past 5 years, as shown in Table 1. These studies have shown that AZA is effective and safe for the treatment of acne, providing an effective treatment option for acne patients.25,51–56

Melasma

Melasma is a chronic, acquired hyperpigmentation disorder of the facial skin, clinically manifested as light to dark brown patches with unclear boundaries, symmetrically distributed on the cheeks, forehead, and jaw. Hydroquinone (HQ) is the gold standard for melasma treatment; however, its repeated use can lead to permanent discoloration and ochronosis. Therefore, safer alternative topical treatments for melasma are needed. AZA is considered an effective and safer alternative to HQ, commonly used at concentrations of 15–25%.71

A study compared the therapeutic effects of 20% AZA and 4% HQ on melasma. It included 329 participants with epidermal or mixed epidermo-dermal type of melasma who were not pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one using 20% AZA cream and the other using 4% hydroquinone cream, applied twice daily along with broad-spectrum sunscreen, for 24 months. At the end of the treatment period, there were no significant differences between the groups in overall improvement scores (64.8% for AZA and 72.5% for HQ), the time course and magnitude of median lesion size reduction (71% for AZA and 78% for HQ), and improvement in pigment intensity (84.2% for AZA and 89.2% for HQ). AZA did not show severe adverse reactions such as allergic sensitization.72 Subsequently, several studies also compared the therapeutic effects of 20% AZA and 4% HQ on melasma, yielding similar results.73–75

Several studies have also investigated the combined effects of AZA. One study examined the therapeutic effects of 20% AZA combined with 5% HQ compared to 5% HQ alone in melasma, applied nightly for 16 weeks. The results showed significant efficacy in both treatments, with better outcomes observed with the combination, albeit with increased side effects.76 Another study observed the therapeutic effects of 20% AZA combined with 0.05% tretinoin cream, applied nightly for 12 weeks. The findings indicated some effectiveness in treating melasma, accompanied by notable adverse reactions.77 Additionally, research compared three AZA-containing cosmetics for reducing female melasma using objective skin measurement parameters. The results demonstrated significant melanin reduction with all three products, most pronounced within the first three months of use. A combination containing 20% AZA, 10% mandelic acid, 5% phytic acid, 5% 4-n-butylresorcinol, and 5% arbutin proved most effective.78 Lastly, a recent study evaluated the efficacy of locally applied 20% AZA and its combination with 755 nm picosecond laser in treating facial melasma. The findings showed significant improvement in melasma with 20% AZA alone or combined with picosecond laser treatment, without significant differences between the two approaches. Combination therapy exhibited better improvement in immune cells and dendritic cells.79

In addition, AZA is preferred in pregnancy with FDA category B. A study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AZA in treating melasma in pregnant women, involving 28 participants. They applied 15% AZA gel topically twice daily for four months. The results showed that 92.9% to 96.4% of cases experienced either disappearance or lightening of pigmented lesions. Compared to healthy skin, there was a reduction in size and contrast of the lesions, along with improvements in skin texture and quality of life. This suggests that topical application of 15% AZA gel twice daily is an effective and safe method for treating melasma in pregnant women.80

We further listed several clinical applications of AZA in the treatment of melasma over the past 5 years, as detailed in Table 1. Numerous studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of AZA in treating melasma.57–60 However, clinical practice requires further research to explore optimal treatment strategies. Only through simultaneous assessment of effectiveness and safety can we truly address patient concerns.

Other Skin Disorders

Psoriasis is an immune-related chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by scaly red patches. Research suggests that AZA can improve symptoms of psoriasis. In a single-blind randomized clinical trial, patients had lesions on their left and right sides randomly assigned to receive either 15% AZA gel or placebo treatment twice daily for one month. The results showed that compared to placebo, AZA treatment significantly improved symptoms, effectively reducing the pruritus, scaling, and hyperkeratosis of psoriasis plaques.81

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune condition marked by temporary, non-scarring hair loss. A study assessed the efficacy of 20% AZA cream in treating patients with alopecia areata. The control group used topical 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream, applied nightly for 12 weeks with monthly follow-ups. The results indicated that topical 20% AZA showed acceptable efficacy compared to 0.05% topical clobetasol propionate. This suggests that 20% AZA is an effective topical treatment for patients with alopecia areata. Another study comparing 20% AZA with 0.5% anthralin in treating alopecia areata also supported this conclusion.82

Folliculitis is a skin condition that often recurs, presenting with inflammatory papules and pustules in multiple body areas. Research indicates that applying 15% AZA foam twice daily to affected areas for 4 weeks resulted in a 78% reduction in overall folliculitis. This suggests that 15% AZA foam may be an effective treatment or adjunct therapy for folliculitis.83

Studies have also reported clinical applications of AZA in conditions such as melasma, female pattern hair loss, perioral dermatitis, and keratosis.84–87 AZA exhibits diverse mechanisms, and its therapeutic effects in various skin conditions warrant further exploration.

Concentration and Dosage Form

In clinical applications, the most commonly used concentrations of AZA are 15% and 20%. In certain cases, such as for acne treatment, higher concentrations of AZA, such as 30%, are also utilized. In contrast, the concentration of AZA used in cosmetic products is typically lower and often combined with other ingredients, although 15% and 20% AZA skincare products are also available on the market.24,52,88,89

The percutaneous absorption of AZA is relatively poor and is influenced by concentration and dosage form. While higher concentrations can enhance skin absorption, they also increase the risk of side effects. To improve the percutaneous absorption of AZA, researchers have proposed various dosage forms, including gels, foams, microemulsions, liposomes, ethosomes, and liquid crystal formulations. These dosage forms are designed to enhance the solubility and permeability of AZA in the skin while reducing the required dosage.90 Studies have shown that after the application of a single dose of topical AZA cream, approximately 3–5% of the drug is retained in the stratum corneum. However, when using a gel formulation, the percutaneous absorption rate can increase to 8%.91,92 These findings provide valuable insights into improving the percutaneous absorption of AZA.

Safety

AZA is classified as pregnancy category B for topical use and is suitable for individuals aged 12 and above. Local application of 15% or 20% AZA is well tolerated in humans, with main adverse effects being mild and transient sensations of stinging, burning, or itching. There are no significant systemic adverse reactions or photosensitivity reported.92,93 Overall, AZA appears to be highly tolerated with high patient satisfaction rates.

Conclusion

This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and research progress of AZA in various diseases. AZA acts through multiple mechanisms, including inhibiting neutrophil ROS release, interfering with inflammatory cytokine expression, reducing bacterial intracellular pH, damaging mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, and inhibiting DNA, protein, and tyrosinase synthesis. These actions contribute to its antibacterial, keratolytic, depigmenting, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects. AZA is FDA-approved for treating PPR, and research supports its use in melasma and as a second-line treatment for acne vulgaris. However, its application in conditions like psoriasis, alopecia areata, and folliculitis is less explored, indicating a need for further studies.

Abbreviations

AZA, azelaic acid; RA, retinoic acid; OH, hydroxyl radicals; O2-, superoxide anions; NOXs, Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate oxidase; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; TLR2, toll-like receptor 2; PPR, papulopustular rosacea; IGA, Investigator Global Assessment; PIE, post-inflammatory erythema; PIH, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation; HQ, Hydroquinone; ILC, inflammatory lesion count; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; IS, importance score; AZA-NC, AZA nanocrystals; PA, pyruvic acid; SA, salicylic acid; SA-AZA, combination of salicylic acid and azelaic acid; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; TXA, tranexamic acid; MASI, melasma area severity index.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Nazzaro-Porro M. Azelaic acid. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17(6):1033–1041. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(87)70294-1

2. Sauer N, Oślizło M, Brzostek M, et al. The multiple uses of azelaic acid in dermatology: mechanism of action, preparations, and potential therapeutic applications. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023;40(6):716–724. doi:10.5114/ada.2023.133955

3. Pandey A, Mishra RK, Tiwari AK, et al. Management of cosmetic embarrassment caused by Malassezia spp. with fruticose lichen Cladia using phylogenetic approach. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:169794. doi:10.1155/2013/169794

4. Nazzaro-Porro M, Passi S. Identification of tyrosinase inhibitors in cultures of Pityrosporum. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;71(3):205–208. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12547184

5. Nazzaro-Porro M, Passi S, Zina G, et al. Effect of azelaic acid on human malignant melanoma. Lancet. 1980;1(8178):1109–1111. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(80)91555-X

6. Li N, Wu X, Jia W, et al. Effect of ionization and vehicle on skin absorption and penetration of azelaic acid. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012;38(8):985–994. doi:10.3109/03639045.2011.635376

7. Bojar RA, Cunliffe WJ, Holland KT. Disruption of the transmembrane pH gradient--a possible mechanism for the antibacterial action of azelaic acid in Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;34(3):321–330. doi:10.1093/jac/34.3.321

8. Charnock C, Brudeli B, Klaveness J. Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of diesters of azelaic acid. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;21(5):589–596. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2003.12.006

9. Ozkan M, Durmaz G, Sabuncu I, et al. Clinical efficacy of topical clindamycin phosphate and azelaic acid on acne vulgaris and emergence of resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci. Turk J Med Sci. 2000;30(5):483–488.

10. Maple PA, Hamilton-Miller JM, Brumfitt W. Comparison of the in-vitro activities of the topical antimicrobials azelaic acid, nitrofurazone, silver sulphadiazine and mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;29(6):661–668. doi:10.1093/jac/29.6.661

11. Farmery M, Jones’ C, Eady E, et al. In vitro activity of azelaic acid, benzoyl peroxide and zinc acetate against antibiotic-resistant propionibacteria from acne patients. J DermatolTreat. 1994;5(2):63–65. doi:10.3109/09546639409084531

12. Sieber MA, Hegel JK. Azelaic acid: properties and mode of action. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;27(Suppl 1):9–17. doi:10.1159/000354888

13. Yu W, Shen H, Cai B, et al. 15% Azelaic acid gel modify the skin microbiota of acne vulgaris. J Dermatol Sci Cosmet Technol. 2024:100041. doi:10.1016/j.jdsct.2024.100041

14. Ji Y, Li H, Li J, et al. Hair follicle-targeted delivery of azelaic acid micro/nanocrystals promote the treatment of acne vulgaris. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:5173–5191. doi:10.2147/IJN.S459788

15. Detmar M, Mayer-da-Silva A, Stadler R, et al. Effects of azelaic acid on proliferation and ultrastructure of mouse keratinocytes in vitro. J Invest Dermatol. 1989;93(1):70–74. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12277353

16. Mayer-da-Silva A, Gollnick H, Detmar M, et al. Effects of azelaic acid on sebaceous gland, sebum excretion rate and keratinization pattern in human skin. An in vivo and in vitro study. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl. 1989;143:20–30.

17. Nguyen QH, Bui TP. Azelaic acid: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and its therapeutic role in hyperpigmentary disorders and acne. Int J Dermatol. 1995;34(2):75–84. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1995.tb03583.x

18. Manabe M, Sanchez M, Sun TT, et al. Interaction of filaggrin with keratin filaments during advanced stages of normal human epidermal differentiation and in ichthyosis vulgaris. Differentiation. 1991;48(1):43–50. doi:10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00241.x

19. Gollnick H. Azelaic acid-pharmacology, toxicology and mechanisms of action on keratinization in vitro and in vivo. J Dermatological Treat. 1993;4(sup1):S3–S7. doi:10.3109/09546639309082151

20. Barbareschi M, Hendricks IE, Angius AG, et al. The anticomedonic activity of azelaic acid investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy on horny layer biopsy. J Dermatological Treat. 1991;2:55–57. doi:10.3109/09546639109086775

21. Robins EJ, Breathnach AS, Bennett D, et al. Ultrastructural observations on the effect of azelaic acid on normal human melanocytes and a human melanoma cell line in tissue culture. Br J Dermatol. 1985;113(6):687–697. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb02404.x

22. Leibl H, Stingl G, Pehamberger H, et al. Inhibition of DNA synthesis of melanoma cells by azelaic acid. J Invest Dermatol. 1985;85(5):417–422. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12277084

23. Breathnach A. Pharmacological properties of azelaic acid: a rationale for clinical use. Clin Drug Investig. 1995;10:27–33. doi:10.2165/00044011-199500102-00005

24. Mazurek K, Pierzchała E. Comparison of efficacy of products containing azelaic acid in melasma treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(3):269–282. doi:10.1111/jocd.12217

25. Shucheng H, Zhou X, Du D, et al. Effects of 15% azelaic acid gel in the management of post-inflammatory erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in acne vulgaris. Dermatol Ther. 2024;14(5):1293–1314.

26. Panday A, Sahoo MK, Osorio D, et al. NADPH oxidases: an overview from structure to innate immunity-associated pathologies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12(1):5–23. doi:10.1038/cmi.2014.89

27. Akamatsu H, Komura J, Asada Y, et al. Inhibitory effect of azelaic acid on neutrophil functions: a possible cause for its efficacy in treating pathogenetically unrelated diseases. Arch Dermatol Res. 1991;283(3):162–166. doi:10.1007/BF00372056

28. Briganti S, Flori E, Mastrofrancesco A, et al. Azelaic acid reduced senescence-like phenotype in photo-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts: possible implication of PPARγ. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22(1):41–47. doi:10.1111/exd.12066

29. Mastrofrancesco A, Ottaviani M, Aspite N, et al. Azelaic acid modulates the inflammatory response in normal human keratinocytes through PPARgamma activation. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19(9):813–820. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01107.x

30. Passi S, Picardo M, De Luca C, et al. Scavenging activity of azelaic acid on hydroxyl radicals “in vitro”. Free Radic Res Commun. 1991;11(6):329–338. doi:10.3109/10715769109088931

31. Mateu A, Ramudo L, Manso MA, et al. Cross-talk between TLR4 and PPARγ pathways in the arachidonic acid-induced inflammatory response in pancreatic acini. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;69:132–141. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2015.10.022

32. Oliveira-Nascimento L, Massari P, Wetzler LM. The role of TLR2 in infection and immunity. Front Immunol. 2012;3:79. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00079

33. Yamasaki K, Kanada K, Macleod DT, et al. TLR2 expression is increased in rosacea and stimulates enhanced serine protease production by keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(3):688–697. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.351

34. Chen C, Wang P, Zhang L, et al. Exploring the pathogenesis and mechanism-targeted treatments of rosacea: previous understanding and updates. Biomedicines. 2023;11(8):2153.

35. Coda AB, Hata T, Miller J, et al. Cathelicidin, kallikrein 5, and serine protease activity is inhibited during treatment of rosacea with azelaic acid 15% gel. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(4):570–577. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.019

36. Gollnick H, Cunliffe W, Berson D, et al. Management of acne: a report from a global alliance to improve outcomes in acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(1 Suppl):S1–37. doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.618

37. Thiboutot D, Gollnick H, Bettoli V, et al. New insights into the management of acne: an update from the global alliance to improve outcomes in acne group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(5 Suppl):S1–50. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.01.019

38. Rocha MAD, Guadanhim LRS, Sanudo A, et al. Modulation of toll like receptor-2 on sebaceous gland by the treatment of adult female acne. Dermatoendocrinol. 2017;9(1):e1361570. doi:10.1080/19381980.2017.1361570

39. Thiboutot D, Anderson R, Cook-Bolden F, et al. Standard management options for rosacea: the 2019 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(6):1501–1510. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.077

40. Chinese Society of Dermatology Rosacea Research Center, Committee. CMDADBRP. Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rosace (2021 edition). Chin J Dermatology. 2021;54(4):279–288.

41. Solomon JA, Tyring S, Staedtler G, et al. Investigator-reported efficacy of azelaic acid foam 15% in patients with papulopustular rosacea: secondary efficacy outcomes from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Cutis. 2016;98(3):187–194.

42. Thiboutot D, Thieroff-Ekerdt R, Graupe K. Efficacy and safety of azelaic acid (15%) gel as a new treatment for papulopustular rosacea: results from two vehicle-controlled, randomized Phase III studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(6):836–845. doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.308

43. Elewski BE, Fleischer AB, Pariser DM, et al. A comparison of 15% azelaic acid gel and 0.75% metronidazole gel in the topical treatment of papulopustular rosacea: results of a randomized trial. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(11):1444–1450. doi:10.1001/archderm.139.11.1444

44. Del Rosso JQ, Bruce S, Jarratt M, et al. Efficacy of topical azelaic acid (AzA) gel 15% plus oral doxycycline 40 mg versus metronidazole gel 1% plus oral doxycycline 40 mg in mild-to-moderate papulopustular rosacea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9(6):607–613.

45. Thiboutot DM, Fleischer AB, Del Rosso JQ, et al. A multicenter study of topical azelaic acid 15% gel in combination with oral doxycycline as initial therapy and azelaic acid 15% gel as maintenance monotherapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8(7):639–648.

46. Dall’Oglio F, Tedeschi A, Lacarrubba F, et al. A novel azelaic acid formulation for the topical treatment of inflammatory rosacea: a multicentre, prospective clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:28–31. doi:10.1111/jocd.14098

47. Draelos ZD, Elewski BE, Harper JC, et al. A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of azelaic acid foam 15% in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea. Cutis. 2015;96(1):54–61.

48. Tyring S, Solomon JA, Staedtler G, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of azelaic acid foam 15% for patients with papulopustular rosacea: secondary efficacy results from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Cutis. 2016;98(4):269–275.

49. Williamson T, Cameron J, McLeod K, et al. Concerns and treatment satisfaction in patients being treated with azelaic acid foam for rosacea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(4):381–386.

50. Dall’Oglio F, Puviani M, Milani M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a cream containing modified glutathione (GSH-C4), beta-glycyrrhetic, and azelaic acids in mild-to-moderate rosacea: a pilot, assessor-blinded, VISIA and ANTERA 3-D analysis, two-center study (The “Rosazel” Trial). J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(4):1197–1203. doi:10.1111/jocd.13707

51. Tomić I, Miočić S, Pepić I, et al. Efficacy and safety of azelaic acid nanocrystal-loaded in situ hydrogel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(4):567. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13040567

52. Szymańska A, Budzisz E, Erkiert-Polguj A. Efficacy of 30% azelaic acid peel in the nonpharmacological treatment of facial acne. J DermatolTreat. 2021;32(3):291–296. doi:10.1080/09546634.2019.1657222

53. Chilicka K, Rogowska AM, Szyguła R, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of azelaic and pyruvic acid peels in the treatment of female adult acne: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12612. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69530-w

54. Chilicka K, Rogowska AM, Szyguła R, et al. Examining quality of life after treatment with azelaic and pyruvic acid peels in women with acne vulgaris. Clin Cosmet Invest Dermatol. 2020;13:469–477. doi:10.2147/CCID.S262691

55. Abdel Hay R, Hegazy R, Abdel Hady M, et al. Clinical and dermoscopic evaluation of combined (salicylic acid 20% and azelaic acid 20%) versus trichloroacetic acid 25% chemical peel in acne: an RCT. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019;30(6):572–577. doi:10.1080/09546634.2018.1484876

56. Sobhan M, Talebi-Ghane E, Poostiyan E. A comparative study of 20% azelaic acid cream versus 5% tranexamic acid solution for the treatment of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in patients with acne vulgaris: a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci. 2023;28:18. doi:10.4103/jrms.jrms_443_22

57. Akl EM. Liposomal azelaic acid 20% cream vs hydroquinone 4% cream as adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in melasma: a comparative study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;33:2008–2013. doi:10.1080/09546634.2021.1905765

58. Malik F, Hanif MM, Mustafa G. Combination of oral tranexamic acid with topical 3% tranexamic acid versus oral tranexamic acid with topical 20% azelaic acid in the treatment of melasma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(6):502–504. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.502

59. Rohullah A, Raihanullah Z. Clinical comparison of azelaic acid 20% versus hydroquinone 4% in the treatment of melasma. SRMS J Med Sci. 2023;8:52–54. doi:10.21761/jms.v8i01.11

60. Komal S, Mashhood AA, Farooq M, et al. A comparison of efficacy of intradermal tranexamic acid with topical 20% azelaic acid in the treatment of melasma. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71(2):494–497. doi:10.51253/pafmj.v71i2.4528

61. Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(5):945–973.e933. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037

62. Thiboutot DM, Dréno B, Abanmi A, et al. Practical management of acne for clinicians: an international consensus from the global alliance to improve outcomes in acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(2 Suppl 1):S1–S23.e21. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.078

63. Gollnick HP, Graupe K, Zaumseil RP. Comparison of combined azelaic acid cream plus oral minocycline with oral isotretinoin in severe acne. Eur J Dermatol. 2001;11(6):538–544.

64. Thielitz A, Lux A, Wiede A, et al. A randomized investigator-blind parallel-group study to assess efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 15% gel vs. Adapalene 0.1% gel in the treatment and maintenance treatment of female adult acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(4):789–796. doi:10.1111/jdv.12823

65. Nast A, Dréno B, Bettoli V, et al. European evidence-based (S3) guideline for the treatment of acne-update 2016-short version. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(8):1261–1268. doi:10.1111/jdv.13776

66. Szymańska A, Budzisz E, Erkiert-Polguj A. Long-term effect of azelaic acid peel on sebum production in acne. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(1):e15186.

67. Bagatin E, Freitas THP. Adult female acne: a guide to clinical practice. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94(1):62–75.

68. Kainz JT, Berghammer G, Auer-Grumbach P, et al. Azelaic acid 20 % cream: effects on quality of life and disease severity in adult female acne patients. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016;14(12):1249–1259.

69. Rocha M, Sanudo A, Bagatin E. The effect on acne quality of life of topical azelaic acid 15% gel versus a combined oral contraceptive in adult female acne: a randomized trial. Dermatoendocrinol. 2017;9(1):e1361572. doi:10.1080/19381980.2017.1361572

70. Schaller M, Sebastian M, Ress C, et al. A multicentre, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of benzoyl peroxide 3%/clindamycin 1% with azelaic acid 20% in the topical treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(6):966–973. doi:10.1111/jdv.13541

71. Schmidt E. Azelaic acid is an effective and safer alternative to hydroquinone in treating mild to moderate melasma in women. School of Physician Assistant Studies; 2016.

72. Baliña LM, Graupe K. The treatment of melasma. 20% azelaic acid versus 4% hydroquinone cream. Int J Dermatol. 1991;30(12):893–895. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1991.tb04362.x

73. Farshi S. Comparative study of therapeutic effects of 20% azelaic acid and hydroquinone 4% cream in the treatment of melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2011;10(4):282–287. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00580.x

74. Martin M, Anbumalar M. Comparative study on the efficacy of topical 20% azelaic acid and 4% hydroquinone in epidermal melasma. Ann Roman Soc Cell Biol. 2020;24:776–784.

75. Maryam E, Jafar M, Ladan D. Therapeutic efficacy of a cream based azelaic acid 20% versus hydroquinone 4% in patients with melasma. Iran J Dermatol. 2013;16(63):13–16.

76. Tehrani S, Tehrani S, Esmaili AM, et al. Efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone 5% in the management of melasma. Iran J Dermatolog Treat. 2012;15(1):11–14.

77. Mahajan R, Kanwar AJ, Parsad D, et al. Glycolic acid peels/azelaic acid 20% cream combination and low potency triple combination lead to similar reduction in melasma severity in ethnic skin: results of a randomized controlled study. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(2):147–152. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.152510

78. Pekmezci E. A novel triple combination in treatment of melasma: significant outcome with far less actives. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(6):1700–1704. doi:10.1111/jocd.12904

79. Lai D, Cheng S, Zhou S, et al. 755-nm picosecond laser plus topical 20% azelaic acid compared to topical 20% azelaic acid alone for the treatment of melasma: a randomized, split-face and controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39(1):113. doi:10.1007/s10103-024-04052-9

80. Witkiewicz IM, Neering H. [Facial melanosis (melasma)]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1981;125(16):609–611.

81. Iraji F, Faghihi G, Siadat AH, et al. Efficacy of 15% azelaic acid in psoriasis vulgaris: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9(8):964–968.

82. Sasmaz S, Arican O. Comparison of azelaic acid and anthralin for the therapy of patchy alopecia areata: a pilot study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(6):403–406. doi:10.2165/00128071-200506060-00007

83. Draelos ZD. Examining 15% azelaic acid foam for the treatment of folliculitis: a pilot study. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020;13(4):36–38.

84. Hermanns JF, Petit L, Piérard-Franchimont C, et al. Assessment of topical hypopigmenting agents on solar lentigines of Asian women. Dermatology. 2002;204(4):281–286. doi:10.1159/000063359

85. Thanomkitti K, Pruksaeakanan C, Subchookul C, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical 5% azelaic acid solution versus 2% minoxidil solution in the treatment of female pattern hair loss. Siriraj Med J. 2023;75(12):887–893. doi:10.33192/smj.v75i12.266001

86. Jansen T. Azelaic acid as a new treatment for perioral dermatitis: results from an open study. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151(4):933–934. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06202.x

87. Yang G, Bordeaux J, Ou J-C. Prospective right/left comparison of azeleic acid and cetaphil for treatment of keratosis pilaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:AB167.

88. Bagatin E, Thouvenin MD, Bacquey A, et al. The usefulness of a dermocosmetic containing Myrtus communis extract and azelaic acid for maintenance phase of adult female acne: results from a randomized exploratory investigator-blinded comparative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37:26–30. doi:10.1111/jdv.18795

89. Choi YS, Suh HS, Yoon MY, et al. A study of the efficacy of cleansers for acne vulgaris. J Dermatological Treat. 2010;21:201–205. doi:10.3109/09546630903401454

90. Hung W-H, Chen P, Fang C-W, et al. Preparation and evaluation of azelaic acid topical microemulsion formulation: in vitro and in vivo study. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13030410

91. Akhavan A, Bershad SV. Topical acne drugs. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4:473–492. doi:10.2165/00128071-200304070-00004

92. Fitton A, Goa KL. Azelaic acid: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in acne and hyperpigmentary skin disorders. Drugs. 1991;41:780–798. doi:10.2165/00003495-199141050-00007

93. Searle T, Ali FR. The versatility of azelaic acid in dermatology. J Dermatol Treat. 2022;33(2):722–732. doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1800579

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.