Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18
Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants Isolated from Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens
Authors An C
, Zou S, Chen S, Chen R, Wu B, Lin Y, Luo C, Yang B
Received 28 July 2025
Accepted for publication 4 November 2025
Published 13 November 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 5927—5937
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S556503
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Hazrat Bilal
Chao An,1– 3 Shenghua Zou,4 Shanjian Chen,1– 3 Ruan Chen,5 Baijian Wu,5 Yulan Lin,1– 3 Chenshuo Luo,1– 3 Bin Yang1– 3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People’s Republic of China; 2Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, The First Clinical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People’s Republic of China; 3Fujian Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital of Fujian Province, Fuzhou, 350008, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Bin Yang, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Chenshuo Luo, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Purpose: Epidemiological data on small colony variants (SCVs) of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in China are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of S. aureus SCVs in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) pneumonia.
Methods: From October 2024 to September 2025, S. aureus SCVs were collected from lower respiratory tract specimens at two tertiary hospitals in Fuzhou and identified using MALDI-TOF MS. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using a VITEK® 2 Compact System. Genetic diversity and virulence were analyzed using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing, and toxin gene profiling. Biofilm formation was assessed using a microtiter plate assay, and patient characteristics were analyzed using the Hospital Information System.
Results: Thirty-eight S. aureus SCVs (2.1%) were isolated from 1,832 lower respiratory tract specimens collected from patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia. Compared to normal phenotype strains, SCVs exhibited smaller colonies and reduced hemolysis. Among resistant strains, 20 were methicillin-resistant S. aureus SCVs (MRSA-SCVs), with ST1-t128 (25.0%) being the most prevalent. ST764-t1084 MRSA-SCVs were resistant to penicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline. Eighteen strains were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus SCVs (MSSA-SCVs), predominantly ST72-t3735 (16.7%). Virulence analysis showed adhesion-related gene carriage rates of 47.4– 100.0% and immune evasion gene carriage rates of 52.6– 73.7%. In addition, most S. aureus SCVs showed strong biofilm production.
Conclusion: This study identified a 2.1% prevalence of S. aureus SCVs (often undetected) in P. aeruginosa pneumonia patients. More than half of patients were methicillin-resistant (MRSA), with strong biofilm-forming capacity and a potential association with prolonged hospitalization. Vigilance is warranted against potential outbreaks of the predominant MRSA-SCV clone ST1-t128, as well as the severe drug resistance observed in ST764-t1084 MRSA-SCVs.
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, small colony variants, MLST, antibiotic susceptibility, biofilm
Introduction
Small colony variants (SCVs) are a subpopulation of nutrient-deficient bacteria that exhibit a unique phenotype as an adaptive response to environmental stress. They are characterized by small colony size, slow growth, reduced metabolic activity, and intracellular parasitism.1 The first SCV was reported in Salmonella typhi in 1910 and, since then, SCVs have been identified in various bacterial species, including Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, and Escherichia coli.2 Among these, S. aureus is a major pathogen responsible for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and hemorrhagic necrotizing pneumonia, and it can lead to severe conditions such as sepsis and septic shock.3
The formation of SCVs is primarily attributed to specific nutritional auxotrophies affecting the respiratory chain, including deficiencies in thymidine, menadione, or heme.4 These metabolic impairments lead to obstructed oxidative phosphorylation in the electron transport chain, resulting in significantly reduced bacterial replication and metabolic rates that ultimately manifest as the SCV phenotype. Unlike wild-type S. aureus, small colony variants of S. aureus demonstrate enhanced resistance to antibiotics such as aminoglycosides and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Both methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) can develop SCVs. Notably, MRSA-SCVs are particularly challenging to treat, warranting heightened clinical vigilance among physicians and clinical microbiologists.5 Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy may facilitate SCV development.6 Prolonged use of sulfonamides such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is associated with thymidine-auxotrophic SCVs, as this antibiotic combination inhibits the synthesis of tetrahydrofolate, an essential cofactor for thymidylate synthase.7 Similarly, aminoglycoside usage correlates with the emergence of menadione- or heme-auxotrophic SCVs, although the precise underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Furthermore, SCVs exhibit attenuated virulence and an enhanced biofilm-forming capacity. By downregulating host chemokines, including CCL5 and CXCL8, SCVs impair the rapid recruitment of neutrophils and other immune cells to infection sites, thereby facilitating persistent host colonization.8 Consequently, SCVs are frequently implicated in chronic and recurrent infections, such as periprosthetic joint infections, pulmonary cystic fibrosis-related infections, and refractory wound infections.8–10
The rapid and accurate identification of SCVs is crucial for effective clinical treatment. However, owing to their slow growth, SCVs are frequently overlooked by clinical microbiologists in routine practice. Although certain chromogenic media can facilitate convenient screening of S. aureus SCVs, most clinical laboratories in China and other countries do not routinely test for these variants.11,12 Furthermore, clinically isolated S. aureus SCVs often exhibit phenotypic instability and tend to revert to the wild-type phenotype.
Owing to the phenotypic instability of SCVs, researchers often employ stable site-directed mutant strains (hemB or menD mutants) to simulate SCV phenotypes.13 Consequently, studies on clinically derived SCVs remain limited. Existing evidence has established a significant association between S. aureus SCV formation and P. aeruginosa coinfection.14 However, epidemiological data on S. aureus SCVs in China are notably scarce. To address this knowledge gap, our study aimed to investigate the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and genetic characteristics of S. aureus SCVs isolated from lower respiratory tract specimens of patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection and Identification of S. aureus SCVs
From October 2024 to September 2025, 1,832 lower respiratory tract specimens (including sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) were collected from patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia at two major tertiary hospitals in Fuzhou, Fujian Province. All specimens suspected of harboring S. aureus SCVs were processed by isolating single colonies through quadrant streaking, followed by confirmatory identification using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonik, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Confirmed S. aureus isolates were cultured on blood agar plates for 24–48 hours. Colonies exhibiting characteristic SCV phenotypes, including approximately 10% reduction in size compared to normal morphology, grayish-white coloration, and diminished hemolytic activity, were identified as S. aureus SCVs.15 All verified S. aureus SCVs were subsequently lyophilized and preserved at −80°C for future research purposes.
DNA Extraction of S. aureus SCVs
DNA was extracted from S. aureus SCVs using previously described methods.16 Briefly, preserved SCVs were streaked onto blood agar plates and incubated overnight at 35°C. Subsequently, the bacterial colonies were suspended in 300 μL sterile distilled water, heated at 95°C for 10 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min to remove cellular debris. The supernatant was stored at 4°C and used as the DNA template for amplification. DNA concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
Molecular Typing of S. aureus SCVs
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis was performed as described previously.17 Seven S. aureus housekeeping genes (arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL) of S. aureus were amplified and sequenced. The sequencing data were compared with existing S. aureus sequences in the MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/) to determine the allelic profiles and sequence types (STs). Spa typing was performed based on polymorphisms in the X-region of the staphylococcal protein A (spa) gene.18 The X-region of each isolate was amplified by PCR, and the PCR products were subjected to Sanger sequencing. The obtained spa sequences were compared with the database (https://spa.ridom.de/) to determine the spa types of S. aureus SCVs.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of S. aureus SCVs
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Vitek® 2 Compact system (bioMérieux, France). The results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.19 The study evaluated susceptibility to 13 antibiotics: penicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, rifampin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, linezolid, vancomycin, tetracycline, and tigecycline. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was used as a quality control strain. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains were confirmed based on phenotypic resistance patterns and detection of the mecA gene.
PCR Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes
The detection of 15 virulence genes (sea, icaA, icaC, icaD, clfA, clfB, hla, hlg, pvl, fnbA, cna, sarA, sdrD, and sdrE, ebpS) and the resistance gene mecA in S. aureus SCVs was performed by PCR according to the methods described by a previous study.20,21 The PCR amplification protocol consisted of: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 53°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were visualized using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequently sent to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) for sequencing. The sequencing results were analyzed using SnapGene 7.1.2 software.
Detection of Biofilm Formation
Crystal violet staining measured biofilm formation.16 Briefly, fresh S. aureus SCVs were inoculated into LB broth, cultured at 37°C, and shaken (220 rpm) for 18 h. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to a McFarland standard of 0.5, and diluted at a ratio of 1:100 in fresh LB broth. Aliquots (200 μL) of the diluted culture were dispensed into eight wells of a 96-well microtiter plate and incubated statically at 37°C for 48 h. Sterile LB broth served as the negative control. After incubation, the plates were washed thrice with phosphate-buffered saline PBS (pH 7.0) and air-dried at room temperature. The biofilms were then fixed with methanol for 20 min, after which the methanol was discarded. The fixed biofilms were stained with 1% crystal violet solution for 15 min, followed by washing with PBS until the solution became colorless. After drying, the bound crystal violet was solubilized in 200μL of absolute ethanol and the solution was transferred to a new microtiter plate. Optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm. Mean OD values were calculated for all tested strains and negative controls. The optical density cutoff (ODc) was defined as 3 standard deviations (SDs) above the mean optical density (OD) of the negative control. Classification: non-biofilm producers: OD ≤ ODc; weak-biofilm producers: ODc < OD ≤ 2ODc; moderate-biofilm producers: 2ODc < OD ≤ 4ODc; strong-biofilm producers: OD > 4ODc.
Clinical Data Collection
Clinical data of hospitalized and outpatient patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia were collected from the Hospital Information System (HIS), including patient age, sex, department, treatment course, and underlying diseases. The data were organized using Microsoft Excel.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Categorical variables were analyzed using either the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, while continuous variables were evaluated using either the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05.
Results
Prevalence of S. aureus SCV Isolates
Thirty-eight S. aureus SCVs were isolated from 1,832 sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens collected from patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia, yielding a detection rate of 2.1%. After 24 h of incubation on blood agar plates, S. aureus SCVs formed pinpoint-sized round white colonies. As shown in Figure 1, when cultured on blood agar plates at 37°C for 24 h, S. aureus SCVs demonstrated distinct morphological differences from normal S. aureus ATCC 29213.
Molecular Characteristics of S. aureus SCV Isolates
MLST typing of 38 S. aureus SCVs revealed 15 distinct sequence types (STs) (Figure 2). ST1 (15.8%, 6/38) and ST398 (15.8%, 6/38) were the predominant clones, followed by ST965 (13.2%, 5/38), ST72 (10.5%, 4/38), ST764 (10.5%, 4/38), and ST7 (7.9%, 3/38). The remaining nine ST types collectively accounted for 26.3% of isolates. Among the methicillin-resistant S. aureus SCVs (MRSA-SCVs), ST1 (25.0%, 5/20) and ST965 (25.0%, 5/20) were the most prevalent, followed by ST764 (20.0%, 4/20).
|
Figure 2 Distribution of sequence types (STs) of all isolates of S. aureus SCVs, MRSA-SCVs and MSSA-SCV isolates. |
Spa typing revealed 23 distinct types, predominantly t128 (13.2%, 5/38). Notably, 25.0% (5/20) of MRSA-SCVs carried the t128 spa type (Table 1). The most prevalent S. aureus SCV in lower respiratory tract samples was ST1-t128 (13.2%, 5/38), followed by ST965-t062 (7.9%, 3/38), ST72-t3735 (7.9%, 3/38) and ST764-t1084 (7.9%, 3/38). Genotypic distribution analysis showed that ST1-t128 was the dominant MRSA-SCVs genotype, whereas ST72-t3735 was predominant among methicillin-susceptible S. aureus SCV (MSSA-SCVs) isolates. These findings suggest a potential association between specific molecular types of S. aureus SCV and methicillin resistance.
|
Table 1 Molecular Characteristics of S. aureus SCV Isolates |
Antibiotic Susceptibility of S. aureus SCV Isolates
The VITEK® 2 Compact results revealed that 86.8% of the isolated S. aureus SCVs were resistant to at least one antibiotic. However, all S. aureus SCVs remained susceptible to linezolid, vancomycin, and tigecycline. The isolated S. aureus SCVs showed high resistance rates to the β-lactam antibiotics, penicillin (81.6%) and oxacillin (52.6%). Lower resistance rates were observed for other antibiotics, including gentamicin (26.3%), tetracycline (34.2%), rifampin (2.6%), ciprofloxacin (36.8%), levofloxacin (36.8%), and moxifloxacin (36.8%). Methicillin resistance was observed in 52.6% (20/38) of S. aureus SCVs, with the remaining (18/38) being MSSA-SCVs. Compared to MSSA-SCV strains, MRSA-SCV strains demonstrated significantly higher resistance rates to clindamycin, erythromycin,ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and oxacillin (P<0.05) (Table 2). Additionally, it should be noted that all ST764-t1084 MRSA-SCVs were resistant to penicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline. ST764 S. aureus SCVs showed high resistance to multiple antibiotics, whereas ST72 and ST9 remained susceptible to all tested antibiotics (Figure 3).
|
Table 2 Susceptibility of S. aureus SCVs to Antimicrobials |
Detection of Virulence and Resistance Genes
The distribution of virulence genes among the isolated S. aureus SCVs is summarized in Table 3 and Figure 3, demonstrating that most S. aureus SCVs co-harbored multiple virulence determinants. The analysis revealed universal positivity (100%) for icaD, hla, hlg, and fnbA, whereas other virulence genes, including icaA, icaC, clfB, cna and pvl, showed positivity rates exceeding 70%. In contrast, the enterotoxin gene sea and immune evasion-associated gene sdrE exhibited lower positivity rates of 36.8% and 52.6%, respectively. Notably, MRSA-SCVs displayed significantly higher positivity rates for cna, sea, and pvl than their MSSA-SCV counterparts (P<0.05), with no other statistically significant differences observed. Furthermore, strain typing analysis revealed distinct genotype-specific patterns: pvl was predominantly associated with the ST1, ST5, and ST764 lineages, whereas sarA and sdrD genes were primarily detected in the ST6, ST25, and ST672 strains.
|
Table 3 Carrying Rates of Virulence Genes in S. aureus SCV Isolates |
Biofilm Formation Capacity of S. aureus SCV Isolates
All S. aureus SCVs obtained in this study exhibited biofilm production, as observed by crystal violet staining. Among these, 25 isolates (65.8%) exhibited strong biofilm-forming capacity, 10 isolates (26.3%) showed moderate biofilm formation, and the remaining isolates (7.9%) displayed weak biofilm formation (Table 4). No significant difference in biofilm-forming capacity was observed between MRSA-SCVs and MSSA-SCVs.
|
Table 4 Biofilm Formation of S. aureus SCV Isolates |
Clinical Characteristics
Clinical data from P. aeruginosa pneumonia were extracted using the HIS. S. aureus SCV carriers showed significant differences in epidemiological and clinical features compared with non-carriers (Table 5). Patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia coinfected with S. aureus SCVs experienced significantly longer hospital stays and antimicrobial therapy duration than those without SCVs (P = 0.010 and 0.002, respectively). S. aureus SCV carriers also required fluoroquinolone or vancomycin treatment more frequently (P = 0.022). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex (P = 0.156), age (P = 0.071), PCT level (P = 0.673), or prevalence of underlying conditions, such as diabetes (P = 0.082) and hypertension (P = 0.100).
|
Table 5 Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Study Patients |
Discussion
In this study, we isolated 38 S. aureus SCVs from 1,832 lower respiratory tract specimens obtained from patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia, yielding a detection rate of 2.1%. Similarly, Min10 screened three S. aureus SCVs from 278 S. aureus isolates obtained from wound specimens, with a detection rate of 1.1%. Zheng22 identified three stable S. aureus SCVs from 41 rifampin-resistant S. aureus isolates, with a detection rate of 7.3%. The higher detection rate among rifampin-resistant S. aureus may be attributed to mutations in the rpoB gene, which reduce the transcription of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation-related genes, forcing the bacteria to rely on fermentation pathways and thereby adopting SCV characteristics. Cervantes-García23 detected four S. aureus SCVs from 47 pus samples of diabetic foot ulcer patients infected with S. aureus, with a detection rate of 8.5%. Further investigation revealed that all four patients carrying S. aureus SCVs had received multiple antibiotic treatments, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, for one month or longer. We propose that the variation in detection rates of S. aureus SCVs across different studies may be linked to its survival environment. When S. aureus is exposed to adverse conditions, such as prolonged antibiotic exposure, the small-colony variant phenotype may provide a survival advantage for it. Additionally, we investigated the carriage rate of S. aureus SCVs in patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia in Southeast China, which distinguishes our study from previous research in terms of population and geographic location. The carriage rate of S. aureus SCVs may vary across different populations and regions.
Among the S. aureus SCVs isolated, ST1-t128 (13.2%, 5/38) were the predominant clones. The ST1 lineage, originally prevalent in North America (the United States and Canada) before spreading to Europe and other regions, had not been previously reported as circulating in China.24,25 Fujian Province’s status as a southeastern coastal region with extensive exchanges with North America may explain ST1 emergence in this area. Notably, ST1 represents one of the major community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) clones.25 Unlike multidrug-resistant hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains such as ST5 and ST239, ST1 typically exhibits a narrower resistance profile. Our study confirmed this pattern, with ST1 S. aureus SCVs showing resistance only to penicillin and oxacillin, while remaining susceptible to the other tested antibiotics.
Globally, the ST5 lineage is one of the most widely disseminated HA-MRSA lineages. ST764 is a single-locus variant of the ST5 HA-MRSA lineage, exhibiting characteristics of community-associated MRSA, and was first identified in Japan in 2006.26 The ST764 clone has become increasingly prevalent in China, Japan, and other Asian regions, which may be associated with its strong biofilm formation and cell adhesion capabilities.27 Our study found that ST764-t1084 is resistant to all tested antibiotics, including penicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline. These results highlight the necessity for increased surveillance of ST764-t1084 S. aureus SCVs in the clinical setting.
PVL, encoded by the lukF-PV and lukS-PV genes, forms pores in target cell membranes leading to membrane damage and subsequent leukocyte necrosis.28 The ST1 strain of S. aureus frequently carries PVL and represents a highly virulent form of CA-MRSA. PVL-mediated destruction of white blood cells and cytokine storms by ST1 S. aureus are key factors in necrotizing pneumonia.29 In our study, 71.1% of S. aureus SCVs carried PVL genes, with 100% carriage among ST1 isolates. Previous research has shown that PVL-positive MRSA strains can evade host immunity and induce keratinocyte apoptosis, thereby promoting local inflammatory spread.30 However, some studies found no correlation between PVL production levels and clinical infection severity, indicating the need for further investigation into PVL’s role in disease progression.31 The intercellular adhesion gene cluster (icaADBC) collectively encodes enzymes for the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) synthesis essential for biofilm formation, while icaR encodes a repressor protein regulating icaADBC expression.32 In this study, the positivity rates of icaA, icaC, and icaD genes in S. aureus SCVs all reached 90.0% or higher. However, in normal-phenotype S. aureus infections, the positivity rates of icaA and icaD genes were only 77.6%.33 This suggests that, compared to normal-phenotype S. aureus, the high expression of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster icaADBC may contribute to the strong biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus SCVs. The cna gene encodes a collagen-binding protein that mediates bacterial adhesion. Among our SCVs, the cna positivity rate was 71.1%, with a significantly higher prevalence in MRSA-SCVs than in MSSA-SCVs (P = 0.011). The hemolysins encoded by hla and hlg genes can penetrate eukaryotic membranes and lyse target cells. In our SCVs, both hla and hlg genes showed 100.0% positivity rates, that is, markedly higher than the 83.5% and 69.5% rates observed in normal-phenotype S. aureus.20 Additionally, the immune evasion-related gene sdrD demonstrated a positivity rate of 73.7%, exceeding the 63.5% rate reported for normal-phenotype strains in previous studies.20 The elevated expression of these virulence factors in S. aureus SCVs likely plays a crucial role in their pathogenic processes, including adhesion, invasion, and host immune evasion.
Finally, S. aureus SCVs displayed enhanced biofilm-forming capabilities. Our data showed that 92.1% of S. aureus SCVs exhibited moderate to strong biofilm production, with 65.8% of isolates demonstrating particularly robust biofilm formation. This pronounced biofilm-forming capacity may contribute to chronic and persistent infections associated with SCVs. Through analysis of clinical data from the Hospital Information System, we observed that P. aeruginosa pneumonia patients co-infected with S. aureus SCVs experienced significantly prolonged hospitalization and required extended courses of antimicrobial therapy. These findings suggest that S. aureus SCVs may play a critical role in sustaining persistent pulmonary infections in P. aeruginosa pneumonia patients.
In China and other countries, routine screening through specialized methods such as chromogenic media for S. aureus SCVs may be beneficial but substantially increase patient treatment costs. Extended culture duration may represent a cost-effective alternative for detecting S. aureus SCVs. In future studies, we will employ whole-genome sequencing to elucidate the formation mechanisms of S. aureus SCVs in patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia, which will contribute to improving the diagnosis and treatment of these patients, particularly those with refractory infections.
Conclusion
In Fujian, China, S. aureus SCVs were detected in 2.1% of lower respiratory tract specimens from P. aeruginosa pneumonia cases, representing missed coinfection in clinical practice. Among these S. aureus SCVs, the ST1-t128 type was predominant and most strains carried the PVL gene. The ST1 S. aureus SCVs showed susceptibility to all tested antibiotics except penicillin and oxacillin. All ST764-t1084 MRSA-SCVs exhibited pan-resistance to tetracycline, β-Lactam antibiotics (penicillin and oxacillin), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin), and macrolide-lincosamides (erythromycin/clindamycin), highlighting the critical need for clinical vigilance. Notably, the strong biofilm-forming ability of S. aureus SCVs may be associated with prolonged treatment duration and extended hospitalization.
There were some limitations in this study. (1) Although we detected previously overlooked S. aureus SCVs in patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia at two tertiary hospitals in Fujian Province, our findings are intended primarily as a reference for clinicians and microbiologists in other regions managing refractory P. aeruginosa pneumonia. (2) Future studies utilizing whole-genome sequencing and animal models to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the formation and persistent colonization of S. aureus SCVs in the lower respiratory tract of these patients will be crucial for alleviating disease burden.
Data Sharing Statement
Data will be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author (Bin Yang, Email: [email protected]).
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study exclusively involved bacterial isolates and did not include any human or animal subjects. It utilized only anonymized residual clinical samples from routine hospital laboratory tests and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University and Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital of Fujian Province. As this was a retrospective study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82172327), and the National Natural Youth Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82402686).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Zhou S, Rao Y, Li J, Huang Q, Rao X. Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants: formation, infection, and treatment. Microbiol Res. 2022;260:127040. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127040
2. Proctor RA, Von Eiff C, Kahl BC, et al. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(4):295–305. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1384
3. Jung N, Rieg S. Essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection. Infection. 2018;46(4):441–442. doi:10.1007/s15010-018-1130-8
4. Mapar M, Rydzak T, Hommes JW, Surewaard BGJ, Lewis IA. Diverse molecular mechanisms underpinning staphylococcus aureus small colony variants. Trends Microbiol. 2025;33(2):223–232. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2024.09.007
5. Liu S, Chen HB, Chen J, et al. Transcriptome and proteome of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants reveal changed metabolism and increased immune evasion. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(2):e01898–22. doi:10.1128/spectrum.01898-22
6. Chen J, Zhou H, Huang J, Zhang R, Rao X. Virulence alterations in staphylococcus aureus upon treatment with the sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. J Adv Res. 2021;31:165–175. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.01.008
7. Kriegeskorte A, Lorè NI, Bragonzi A, et al. Thymidine-dependent staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are induced by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) and have increased fitness during SXT challenge. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(12):7265–7272. doi:10.1128/aac.00742-15
8. Cai Y, Huang C, Chen X, et al. The role of Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants in intraosseous invasion and colonization in periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint Res. 2022;11(12):843–853. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.1112.BJR-2021-0590.R1
9. De Souza DC, Cogo LL, Dalla-Costa LM, et al. Emergence of thymidine-dependent staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants in cystic fibrosis patients in Southern Brazil. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(1):11.e00614–21. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00614-21
10. Min C, Wang H, Xia F, et al. Characteristics of staphylococcus aureus small colony variants isolated from wound specimen of a tertiary care hospital in China. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(1):e24121. doi:10.1002/jcla.24121
11. Watanabe Y, Oikawa N, Hariu M, Seki M. Evaluation of agar culture plates to efficiently identify small colony variants of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1743–1748. doi:10.2147/IDR.S207057
12. Kipp F, Kahl BC, Becker K, et al. Evaluation of two chromogenic agar media for recovery and identification of Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1956–1959. doi:10.1128/jcm.43.4.1956-1959.2005
13. Wong Fok Lung T, Monk IR, Acker KP, et al. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants impair host immunity by activating host cell glycolysis and inducing necroptosis. Nature Microbiology. 2019;5(1):141–153. doi:10.1038/s41564-019-0597-0
14. Hoffman LR, Déziel E, D’Argenio DA, et al. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(52):19890–19895. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606756104
15. Becker K. Detection, identification and diagnostic characterization of the staphylococcal small colony-variant (SCV) phenotype. Antibiotics. 2023;12(9):1446. doi:10.3390/antibiotics12091446
16. Luo C, Chen Y, Hu X, et al. Genetic and functional analysis of the pks gene in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(4):e00174–23. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00174-23
17. Enright MC, Day NPJ, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(3):1008–1015. doi:10.1128/JCM.38.3.1008-1015.2000
18. Koreen L, Ramaswamy SV, Graviss EA, Naidich S, Musser JM, Kreiswirth BN. spa typing method for discriminating among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: implications for use of a single marker to detect genetic micro- and macrovariation. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(2):792–799. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.2.792-799.2004
19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
20. Titouche Y, Akkou M, Campaña-Burguet A, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of staphylococcus aureus isolated from nasal samples of healthy dairy goats in Algeria. Pathogens. 2024;13(5):408. doi:10.3390/pathogens13050408
21. Gu J, Xiong M, Zhang J, Li Y. Prevalence and characterization of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates from human mastitis in Beijing, China. Int J Med Microbiol. 2024;315:151623. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2024.151623
22. Zheng X, Fang R, Wang C, et al. Resistance profiles and biological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:1527–1536. doi:10.2147/IDR.S301863
23. Cervantes-García E, García-Gonzalez R, Reyes-Torres A, Resendiz-Albor AA, Salazar-Schettino PM. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants in diabetic foot infections. Diabetic Foot & Ankle. 2015;6:26431. doi:10.3402/dfa.v6.26431
24. Golding GR, Levett PN, McDonald RR, et al. High rates of Staphylococcus aureus USA400 infection, Northern Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(4):722–725. doi:10.3201/eid1704.100482
25. David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(3):616–687. doi:10.1128/CMR.00081-09
26. Zaraket H, Otsuka T, Saito K, et al. Molecular characterization of methicillin‐resistant staphylococcus aureus in hospitals in Niigata, Japan: divergence and transmission. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51(2):171–176. doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03898.x
27. Xiao Y, Han W, Wang B, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and virulence characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST764-SCC mec II: an emerging hypervirulent clone ST764-t1084 in China. Emerging Microbes Infect. 2023;12(1):2165969. doi:10.1080/22221751.2023.2165969
28. Balakirski G, Hischebeth G, Altengarten J, et al. Recurrent mucocutaneous infections caused by PVL‐positive Staphylococcus aureus strains: a challenge in clinical practice. JDDG J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020;18(4):315–322. doi:10.1111/ddg.14058
29. Diep BA, Chan L, Tattevin P, et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes mediate Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin-induced lung inflammation and injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(12):5587–5592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912403107
30. Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–661. doi:10.1128/CMR.00134-14
31. McGuire E, Neill C, Collin SM, et al. Is panton–valentine leucocidin (PVL) toxin associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with community-acquired staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia? J Med Microbiol. 2023;72(4):001683. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001683
32. Fluckiger U, Ulrich M, Steinhuber A, et al. Biofilm formation, icaADBC transcription, and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by staphylococci in a device-related infection model. Infect Immun. 2005;73(3):1811–1819. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.3.1811-1819.2005
33. Omidi M, Firoozeh F, Saffari M, Sedaghat H, Zibaei M, Khaledi A. Ability of biofilm production and molecular analysis of spa and ica genes among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):19. doi:10.1186/s13104-020-4885-9
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
