Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 20
Demand Analysis of Mobile Health Applications for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Across Different E-Health Literacy Levels
Authors Gao Y, Pu LJ, Yan Y, Duan DF
, Liu M, Yan LJ, Li L, Ma DY, Chen Y
Received 20 November 2025
Accepted for publication 25 March 2026
Published 20 April 2026 Volume 2026:20 582991
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S582991
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
Yan Gao,1,2 Li-Jia Pu,2,3 Yu Yan,2,3 Di-Fei Duan,2,3 Min Liu,2,3 Lin-Jia Yan,4 Ling Li,3 Deng-Yan Ma,2,3 Yi Chen2,3
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China; 2West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China; 4The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Correspondence: Yi Chen, Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Deng-Yan Ma, Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Purpose: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires innovative strategies to support long-term self-management. This study is novel in applying the Kano model to examine preferences for mobile health (mHealth) apps among Chinese patients with CKD and to compare these preferences across different levels of e-health literacy.
Patients and Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted among 484 patients with CKD in China. Face-to-face questionnaires were used to assess self-management needs and user interface (UI) preferences for CKD-related mHealth apps. App attributes were classified using the Kano model, and their priorities were further evaluated using Better-Worse coefficients and ranking analysis.
Results: Low e-health literacy users prioritized foundational features: must-be attributes included disease knowledge, while one-dimensional attributes were symptom and medication management. High e-literacy users emphasized medical insurance information (must-be) and disease management (one-dimensional). Both groups valued an intuitive UI, in addition to considering privacy protection as must-be attributes, low e-health literacy users required simplified navigation, whereas high e-health literacy users preferred efficient data entry.
Conclusion: Preferences for CKD mHealth apps varied by e-health literacy level. Patients with lower e-health literacy may benefit more from basic health education and simplified interfaces, whereas those with higher e-health literacy expect more advanced and efficient functionalities. These findings highlight the value of the Kano model in identifying differentiated user needs and can inform the development of tailored mHealth apps to support equitable CKD self-management.
Keywords: chronic kidney disease, e-health literacy, mHealth apps, Kano model
Introduction
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant global health issue, affecting many and placing heavy burdens on healthcare systems.1 In China, factors like an aging population, lifestyle changes, and increasing diabetes and hypertension rates have driven CKD prevalence among adults to 8.2% over the past decade.2 CKD progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) necessitates costly dialysis treatments, underscoring the urgency for effective management through continuous monitoring, medication adherence, lifestyle changes, and regular healthcare interactions.3 However, traditional care models often fail to support patient self-management, resulting to poorer outcomes and higher costs.
Self-management significantly benefits individuals with chronic illnesses by empowering them to actively participate in their care, thereby improving outcomes and quality of life.4 For CKD patients, developing a personalized management plan requires close collaboration with healthcare professionals. While traditional in-person consultations offer limited scalability, digital health technologies like mobile health applications (mHealth apps) provide new possibilities for enhancing healthcare delivery.5 mHealth apps have become valuable tools for managing chronic diseases like CKD, providing medication reminders, symptom tracking, dietary guidance, educational resources, and direct communication with healthcare teams.6 For this study, “mobile health applications” refer specifically to smartphone-native apps that deliver health-related content, enable self-monitoring, and support provider–patient communication. To avoid confounding user preference assessment due to differing interfaces and capabilities, this definition excludes responsive websites, tablet-optimized apps, and web platforms accessed via mobile browsers.6
Central to the success of digital tools is e-health literacy, the ability to seek, understand, and apply online health information.7 E-health literacy directly influences how patients interact with mHealth apps, particularly among middle-aged and older populations who may face challenges due to limited technological exposure, cognitive decline, or physical impairments.8 Critically, patients with low e-health literacy often struggle to navigate complex interfaces or interpret health data, whereas those with higher literacy may demand advanced functionalities.9 This relationship between e-health literacy and interface design preferences has direct implications for UI decisions: low-literacy users require simplified navigation with visual cues and reduced cognitive load, while high-literacy users can accommodate more complex data entry and information architecture.10 Tailoring app features and user interfaces (UI) to these divergent needs is essential to ensure accessibility and usability across literacy levels.10 For instance, simplified navigation or visual aids may be indispensable for low-literacy users but less critical for others.11 In China, high smartphone penetration and widespread use of super‑apps such as WeChat, together with national policies prioritizing “Internet+ healthcare” and digital chronic‑disease management, make literacy‑sensitive design directly actionable.12 However, e‑health literacy varies by age, education, and urban–rural residence.13 Thus, assessing self-management needs and UI requirements based on e-health literacy levels ensures that apps address disparities in technological access and capability, bridging the digital divide.14
To develop effective mHealth apps for CKD patients, understanding their needs, preferences, and expectations regarding app features and functionalities is crucial. Utilizing the Kano model, introduced by Professor Noriaki Kano in the 1980s (Figure 1), offers a methodological framework to evaluate and priorities these aspects.15 This model categorizes customer preferences into must-be attributes (M), one-dimensional attributes (O), attractive attributes (A), indifferent attributes (I), and reverse attributes (R), providing a systematic approach to enhance user satisfaction and engagement.16 Must-be attributes are the basic requirements that users expect. If these needs are unmet, users will be dissatisfied but fulfilling them does not significantly enhance satisfaction. One-dimensional attributes are directly related to user satisfaction, the better they are executed, the higher the satisfaction. Attractive attributes are features that users do not explicitly expect but can significantly increase satisfaction when present. Indifferent attributes do not significantly affect satisfaction, whether present or absent. Users typically do not care about these features, which can vary based on individual preferences. Reverse attributes are features that can lead to dissatisfaction if present.16 Unlike alternative frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model, which focuses broadly on perceived usefulness and ease of use,17 the Kano model specifically prioritizes features based on their capacity to drive satisfaction or dissatisfaction.18 A recent study using the Kano model to assess telenursing for chronically ill elderly highlighted its effectiveness in identifying key user needs and improving service quality.19
Nevertheless, a specific research gap persists in CKD: few studies explicitly stratify Kano priorities by e-health literacy and translate them into actionable UI patterns and modular roadmaps within the Chinese healthcare context. By tailoring app features to the unique needs, cultural contexts, and healthcare system specifics of Chinese patients, developers can significantly boost user satisfaction and health outcomes.20 By addressing this gap, the present study utilizes the Kano model to identify and prioritize the self-management needs and UI requirements of an mHealth app tailored for Chinese CKD patients with varying e-health literacy levels. The findings may inform future app design and feature prioritization in the Chinese healthcare context.
Materials and Methods
To enhance the study design and article quality, this research utilized the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Checklist to ensure rigorous reporting of observational studies.21
Design and Participants
This study adopted a multicentre cross-sectional survey design, conducted from April to September 2023 at five hospitals located in the provinces of Sichuan, Shandong, Guangdong, and Shaanxi, China, with participants selected via convenience sampling. Participants were included in the study if they: 1) were diagnosed with CKD according to the “Guidelines for early screening, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of chronic kidney disease (2022 edition)”;22 2) voluntarily participated and provided informed consent. Participants who were unable to complete the questionnaire due to communication difficulties or other reasons were excluded. Exclusions were made for those unable to complete the questionnaire due to communication difficulties or other reasons. Although convenience sampling may limit external validity, participants were recruited from multiple provinces and detailed demographic characteristics were reported to enhance the assessment of transferability.21 In this multicenter convenience sample, all eligible and consenting participants were consecutively recruited during the prespecified study period.
Sample Size
Based on the criteria proposed by Hulland et al for the Kano model,23 the sample size should be at least ten times the number of survey items and exceed 200 participants. For this study, with 32 variables and allowing for a potential 5% rate of invalid questionnaires, the minimum required sample size was 336.
Measurements
Sociodemographic Data
Sociodemographic data was collected using a self-designed form. This form gathered information on participants’ age, gender, marital status, education level, CKD stage. Wording of items and response options was standardized, and skip-logic was minimized to reduce missing data.
Data Survey Questionnaire for a Mobile Healthcare App Based on the Kano Model for Self-Management of CKD in the Middle-Aged and Elderly
The Kano questionnaire was developed in a literature-informed and theory-guided manner.24,25 Candidate attributes were derived from prior literature on CKD self-management and CKD-related mobile health applications,26 which consistently highlight disease education, symptom management, medication adherence, dietary support, exercise-related self-care, and continuity of care as important domains. User interface attributes were additionally informed by age-friendly mobile design guidance for older adults,27,28 particularly recommendations on readability, simplified navigation, reduced data-entry burden, clear labelling, adequate button size, and privacy protection. After review by the research team, overlapping or overly technical items were removed, and the remaining attributes were grouped into two domains: self-management content needs (7 items) and user interface requirements (9 items). In accordance with the Kano methodology,24 each attribute was then converted into paired functional and dysfunctional questions using the standard five response options.
An expert panel comprising renal dietitians, nephrology physicians, and specialist nurses reviewed the initial Kano questionnaire and reached consensus on item wording and overall structure. Subsequently, six independent experts (three nephrology professors, one renal dietitian, one nursing scholar, and one information technology scholar) evaluated the content validity of the questionnaire. The I-CVI ranged from 0.79 to 1.00, and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.92, indicating good content validity.29 Pretesting and cognitive debriefing interviews with inpatients were also performed to improve item clarity and comprehensibility before the final version was established. In the forward questionnaire, the Cronbach’s alpha for the self-management needs section was 0.891, while it was 0.923 for the user interface needs section. In the reverse questionnaire, the alphas were 0.960 for self-management needs and 0.963 for user interface needs. These findings indicate that both the forward and reverse questionnaires exhibit high levels of reliability and internal consistency. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett’s test of sphericity were used to examine the structural validity of the questionnaire data. The KMO values for the functional and dysfunctional questionnaires were 0.938 and 0.959, respectively, both above the recommended threshold of 0.70.30 Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant for both questionnaires (p < 0.001), indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis. All questions were framed specifically for native smartphone applications, with explicit references to touch-based interactions and mobile-specific interface elements to ensure participants responded with a consistent understanding of the platform being evaluated.
Following the methodology of the Kano model, our survey includes both a forward question (functional form) and a reverse question (dysfunctional form) for each feature assessed. For example, the inquiry CKD Diet Management: This feature allows you to learn about dietary considerations and provides recommendations for CKD patients. How do you feel about this feature? Is paired with the reverse question, “Absence of CKD Diet Management: How do you feel if you cannot access information on dietary considerations and recommendations for CKD patients?”. This dual-question approach facilitates a comprehensive evaluation of user preferences. Participants can choose from the following response options for each question: “dislike”, “can tolerate”, “doesn’t matter”, “deserves it”, and “likes it”. This approach ensured a thorough assessment of user attitudes toward each feature.
eHealth Literacy Scale
The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) developed by Norman et al consists of 8 items,31 which are divided into three categories: application ability to online health information and services (Items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), evaluation ability (Items 6 and 7), and decision-making ability (Item 8). Each item is answered using a Likert five-point scale: “Strongly disagree”, “Disagree”, “Unsure”, “Agree”, and “Strongly agree”, with corresponding scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The total score for each respondent is the sum of the scores from all items. The eHEALS was dichotomized into low and high groups using a cut-off value of 29.5. Participants with scores ≤29.5 were classified as having low e-health literacy, while those with scores >29.5 were classified as having high e-health literacy. The Chinese version of eHEALS demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.962.32
Evaluation Strategy
Attribute Partitioning
By analysing the positive and negative questions of the participants, a 5×5 combination of answers can be obtained, with each entry corresponding to six Kano attributes (O, M, A, I, R, Q) (Table 1). The attribute category is determined by the Better-Worse coefficient.33 According to the formula,19:
,
we calculate Better and worse values. Among them, the Better value is closer to 1, indicating that the demand has greater impact on the satisfaction of the survey subjects; The Worse value is closer to −1, which means that if a service is not provided, the user’s satisfaction will decline. With the Better value as the ordinate and the Worse value as the abscissa, the matrix diagram is drawn with the mean value of both as the origin. The first quadrant is the one-dimensional qualities, the second quadrant is the attractive qualities, the third quadrant is the indifference qualities, and the fourth quadrant is the must-be qualities.
|
Table 1 Comparison Table of Kano Model Positioning |
Priority Ordering
According to the Kano model, the priority of product development requirements is: M>O>A>I. The average satisfaction coefficient (ASC) is used to compare prioritising within the same attribute.34 The formula is as follows:
. ASC was used only for within-class ranking to avoid overinterpretation across classes.
Statistical Analysis
The data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software. Descriptive statistics, such as frequency and percentage, were utilized to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants. According to the Kano model, Better-Worse values were calculated to clarify the demand attributes of self-managed mobile health care for middle-aged and elderly people, and the priority ranking of product development needs was determined according to the attribute division and ASC values. As a sensitivity analysis, this study estimated the hospital-level intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the eHealth literacy score using an intercept-only mixed-effects model with hospital as a random effect.
Ethics Approval
All participants participated voluntarily in this study, completing questionnaires anonymously without any connection between their identity and their answers. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their involvement in the study. This study has been approved by the West China Hospital Sichuan University Ethics Committee (Approval No.: 2021[1721]). All procedures in this study were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions or equivalent ethical standards.
Results
Sociodemographic Characteristics and eHealth Literacy Level of the Participants
In this study, 523 questionnaires were initially collected. After removing 25 that were completed in under 5 minutes and 14 with identical answers, 484 valid responses were obtained, resulting in a 92.54% response rate. Among these, 57.2% of participants were male, and 58.9% were aged between 45 to 59 years. A majority (75.4%) of participants were in CKD stage 5. Only a small fraction were not familiar with smartphones (1.2% very unfamiliar, 3.3% unfamiliar). Regarding mHealth app usage for self-management, 46.6% were willing and 23.1% very willing. Notably, 71.49% had low e-health literacy (Table 2). The hospital-level ICC for the eHealth literacy score was very low (ICC = 0.001), indicating minimal between-hospital clustering. A sensitivity analysis using a one-way random-effects ANOVA yielded a similarly low estimate (ICC = 0.003).
|
Table 2 Distribution of Participants’ Sociodemographic Characteristics (N=484) |
Evaluation of the Attributes of Self-Management Needs Using Kano Model
Low e-Health Literacy Group
The Supplementary Table 1 indicated that diet management, with a Better coefficient of 65.6%, significantly enhanced satisfaction among CKD patients with low e-health literacy when included. Conversely, symptom management showed the lowest Worse score, implying a 68.0% drop in patient satisfaction if omitted. From the Better-Worse matrix analysis, symptom and medication management were categorized as one-dimensional attributes. Diet management, exercise guidance, and medical insurance information provision were identified as attractive attributes. Psychosocial support was seen as an indifferent attribute, while introducing CKD-related knowledge was considered a must-be attribute (Figure 2).
Based on the attribute division and ASC coefficient detailed in Supplementary Table 1 and Figure 2, the priority ranking of self-management needs for CKD patients with low e-health literacy was as follows: CKD disease-related knowledge introduction was the highest priority, followed by symptom management, medication management, diet management, provide medical insurance information, exercise guidance and psychosocial support.
High e-Health Literacy Group
The data from Supplementary Table 2 shows that symptom management has a Better coefficient of 83.1%, indicating that including this feature could enhance satisfaction among CKD patients with high e-health literacy. Conversely, the introduction of CKD disease-related knowledge, with the lowest Worse score, suggests a potential 78.8% decrease in satisfaction if omitted. The Better-Worse matrix analysis identified symptom management, medication management, and CKD disease-related knowledge introduction as one-dimensional attributes (Figure 3). Diet management was an attractive attribute, psychosocial support and exercise guidance were indifferent attributes, and providing medical insurance information was a must-be attribute.
Based on the division of attributes and ASC coefficient outlined in Supplementary Table 2 and Figure 3, the prioritised ranking of self-management needs among CKD patients with high e-health literacy was as follows: provide medical insurance information ranked highest, followed by the CKD disease-related knowledge introduction, symptom management, medication management, diet management, psychosocial support and exercise guidance.
Evaluation of the Attributes of UI Needs Using Kano Model
Low e-Health Literacy Group
The survey results from Supplementary Table 3, utilising the Kano model for CKD patients with low e-health literacy, reveal key insights into mobile medical program UI preferences. The feature simplifying data entry process, with a Better coefficient of 54.2%, significantly boosted user satisfaction. In contrast, the absence of privacy protection, with a Worse coefficient of −60.6%, greatly reduced satisfaction. One-dimensional attributes identified include simplifying data entry process, simplify the function, number of buttons, beginner navigation and simplify in-app navigation. Buttons/ICONS are suitably sized and spaced, keep all button sizes and labels consistent, and use colour as a tool to classify different groups of options/ICONS were identified as indifferent attributes. Attractive attributes included appropriate text size, while privacy protection was deemed a must-be attribute, critical for user satisfaction (Figure 4).
According to the attribute partition and ASC coefficient Supplementary Table 3 and Figure 4, the priority order of UI requirements was as follows: privacy protection, followed by simplifying the data entry process, simplify the function and number of buttons, and simplify in-app navigation. Next came beginner navigation, text size appropriate, use colour as a tool to classify different groups of options/ICONS, keep all button sizes and labels consistent, and finally, buttons/ICONS are suitably sized and spaced.
High e-Health Literacy Group
The Kano model survey results for CKD patients with high e-health literacy in Supplementary Table 4 revealed that a simplified data entry process increases user satisfaction by 79.7%. Conversely, the absence of privacy protection reduces satisfaction by 58.3%. The simplifying the data entry process and in-app navigation were identified as one-dimensional attributes. Buttons/ICONS are suitably sized and spaced, simplify the function and number of buttons, beginner navigation, and keep all button sizes and labels consistent were identified as indifferent attributes. Attractive attributes include use colour to classify options/icons and appropriate text sizes. Privacy protection was also considered a must-be attribute (Figure 5).
According to the attribute partition and ASC coefficient in Supplementary Table 4 and Figure 5, the priority order of UI requirements was: privacy protection, followed by simplify data entry process and simplify in-app navigation, then text size appropriate, use colour as a tool to classify different groups of options/ICONS, simplify the function and number of buttons, keep all button sizes and labels consistent, buttons/ICONS are suitably sized and spaced, and finally, beginner navigation.
Discussion
The results of this study provide valuable insights into the self-management needs and user interface requirements for the mHealth app using the Kano model among CKD patients. The identification of must-be, one-dimensional, attractive, indifferent, and reverse allows developers to focus on essential features that meet patients’ expectations and improve overall satisfaction. The prioritization of self-management needs enables resource allocation and targeted interventions based on patients’ literacy levels. Moreover, understanding the UI requirements enhances app usability and accessibility for diverse user groups.
Must-Be Attributes
In this study, must-be attributes for CKD patients with low e-health literacy included the introduction of disease-related knowledge and privacy protection, while for those with high e-health literacy, must-be attributes were the provision of medical insurance information and privacy protection. These features significantly increased patient satisfaction. Previous research indicated that patients with limited e-health literacy crucially need to understand their condition to actively manage their health and communicate with healthcare providers.35 For the predominantly advanced-stage CKD population in this sample, understanding complex disease information is particularly critical given their intensive self-management demands, such as dialysis preparation and comorbidity management. For low e-health literacy patients, providing CKD-related disease knowledge emerged as a foundational requirement, aligning with evidence that basic health literacy was pivotal for engagement in self-care among underserved populations.36 In contrast, high-literacy users prioritized medical insurance information, reflecting their need to navigate complex healthcare systems,37 a concern that becomes especially salient for advanced-stage CKD patients facing substantial healthcare costs and insurance coverage decisions related to dialysis and transplantation.
Besides, CKD patients with both low and high e-health literacy identified privacy protection as a critical need. This consensus likely stems from the fact that in mHealth apps, privacy protection was essential to maintain the confidentiality of health information, which in turn builds trust, enhanced user engagement, ensured compliance with privacy laws, and reduced the risk of data breaches.38 These aspects were vital for fostering effective self-care and improving health outcomes in individuals managing chronic conditions.39
One-Dimensional Attributes
One-dimensional attributes directly affect user satisfaction in the Kano model.40 In this study, symptom and medication management were identified as such attributes for CKD patients with low e-health literacy, which is consistent with a study highlighting their reliance on structured guidance.41 For those with high e-health literacy, symptom management and the introduction of CKD disease-related knowledge were key, suggesting their preference for deeper engagement with clinical data.42 The prominence of symptom and medication management as one-dimensional attributes likely reflects the advanced disease stage of the sample, as patients with advanced-stage CKD typically experience significant symptom burdens including fatigue, pain, pruritus, and fluid overload, while managing complex medication regimens involving phosphate binders, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and antihypertensive medications.43 Effective symptom management not only enhances life participation but also improves health-related quality of life by reducing the burden of kidney disease.43 Additionally, medication management was critical for patients to maintain treatment adherence and prevent disease progression.44 Patients with limited e-health literacy may struggle to understand complex medication schedules, potential side effects, and the importance of adherence, highlighting the need for simplified and accessible medication information within mHealth apps.45
In terms of UI requirements for mHealth apps, key elements like simplifying data entry, in-app navigation, button functionality, and beginner navigation are critical for enhancing user satisfaction. This aligns with previous research on mHealth app usability.46 Specifically, beginner navigation aids are essential for users with limited experience or low e-health literacy, as clear instructions and guided tools help them navigate and effectively use the app.47 High e-literacy patients prioritized streamlined data entry, aligning with their preference for efficiency to follow-up clinical data.42 For advanced-stage CKD patients who frequently monitor symptoms, fluid intake, and laboratory values, efficient data entry becomes particularly important to reduce documentation burden while maintaining comprehensive health tracking.48 These features collectively improve ease of use, supporting better self-management and overall satisfaction for CKD patients.
Attractive Attributes
Attractive attributes in mHealth apps were features that exceed expectations and significantly enhance satisfaction. In this study, diet management and exercise guidance, along with providing medical insurance information, were identified as attractive attributes for CKD patients with low e-health literacy. For those with high e-health literacy, diet management stood out as an only attractive attribute. These findings mirror the efficacy of personalized lifestyle interventions in CKD care.49 Evidence from previous studies confirms the effectiveness of mHealth apps in managing diet and physical activity for CKD patients.50 Lifestyle modifications, including a healthy diet and physical activity, were recommended alongside pharmacological treatments to improve cardiometabolic health and preserve kidney function in CKD patients.51 For advanced-stage CKD patients, dietary management often involves complex restrictions on phosphorus, potassium, and fluid intake, making attractive attributes like diet management tools potentially valuable enhancements that could improve adherence and quality of life beyond basic care requirements.52
In this study, appropriate text size was identified as an attractive attribute for CKD patients, contrasting with previous research which classified it as a must-be attribute.53 This difference may be attributed to the younger age (range 18 to 54 years old) of participants in this study, who likely have milder visual impairments compared to older populations.54 Interestingly, using colour to classify options/icons was seen as attractive for patients with high e-health literacy. Colour coding could improve navigation and comprehension by providing visual cues that make it easier for users to identify different categories or importance levels of information.55
Indifferent Attributes
Indifferent attributes are those that do not significantly impact patient satisfaction. Psychosocial support was identified as an indifferent attribute for CKD patients, despite the potential stress, anxiety, and depression linked with CKD diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle changes.56 This indifference may stem from the variability in the quality and efficacy of psychosocial support within mHealth apps, as reported by Firth et al who found that effective psychosocial interventions are often limited in these applications.57 Patients may prefer in-person interactions, which they perceive as more effective and personal. The classification of psychosocial support as indifferent among predominantly advanced-stage patients is noteworthy, as this population faces substantial psychological burdens including mortality concerns, treatment decisional conflict, and lifestyle disruptions.58 This finding may reflect inadequate current mHealth psychosocial features rather than genuine lack of need, suggesting opportunities for innovation in this domain. Additionally, CKD patients with high e-health literacy may find exercise guidance indifferent, this may due to exercise recommendations maybe too generic or not tailored to individual needs, patients might feel that the guidance does not address their specific conditions or preferences.59 Also, patients with high e-health literacy might critically evaluate the information provided. If the guidance does not adequately explain the benefits of exercise or how it can improve their health outcomes, they may disregard it.60
In terms of UI requirements for CKD patients, suitably sized and spaced buttons/icons and consistent button sizes and labels were seen as indifferent attributes for both groups. While enhancing the app’s aesthetic appeal was beneficial, it was crucial to priorities functionality, especially for those with low e-health literacy who preferred practicality, ease of use, and clear information presentation over visual design.53 A user-centered mHealth app should be straightforward and easy to navigate to prevent user errors such as accidental presses on the wrong icons.61 This focus on usability and accessibility could significantly improve the effectiveness of the mHealth app.
Reverse Attributes
Reverse attributes referred to features or services that, if provided, could decrease patient satisfaction. In this study, no reverse attributes were identified for CKD patients with either low or high e-health literacy, indicating that all evaluated features generally contributed positively to patient satisfaction.
Implications
These findings support a tiered, hospital-embedded design strategy for CKD mHealth apps in China. Because privacy protection was a must-be attribute in both literacy groups, secure authentication, transparent consent, and hospital-governed data management should be treated as baseline requirements rather than optional features.62 For patients with lower e-health literacy, the first-release interface should prioritize disease education, symptom and medication management, simplified navigation, fewer buttons, beginner guidance, and appropriate text size.37 For patients with higher e-health literacy, the core package should combine medical insurance information with efficient data entry, streamlined navigation, and color-coded displays that speed interpretation without increasing cognitive burden.31 Given that most participants had advanced-stage CKD, symptom, medication, and diet modules should focus on high-burden issues such as fatigue, pruritus, fluid management, and renal dietary restrictions.46 In the Chinese context, implementation is likely to be more feasible if these functions are embedded within hospital-affiliated internet-hospital or CKD follow-up services, where they can be linked to outpatient review, laboratory follow-up, medication refill, and insurance navigation.63 At the same time, uneven e-health literacy among older Chinese adults, urban-rural disparities in internet-based healthcare use, and variable privacy compliance of internet-hospital apps suggest that deployment should include nurse-led onboarding, family support, and low-bandwidth workflows, rather than relying on a standalone app alone.64
Limitations
While the findings of this study provide valuable insights into the self-management needs of CKD patients with varying e-health literacy, it is crucial to recognize the limitations inherent in this study. Firstly, these results are based on a specific sample predominantly comprising advanced-stage CKD patients; therefore, generalizability to earlier stages should be interpreted with caution. Future research should aim to validate these findings across larger and more diverse populations, including patients across all CKD stages, to enhance the external validity and generalizability of the results. Second, the cross-sectional design prevents causal inferences about long-term app engagement. Longitudinal studies tracking how user preferences evolve with sustained app use and potential improvements in e-health literacy would provide valuable insights for adaptive design strategies, particularly for advanced CKD patients whose clinical status and self-management needs may change rapidly. Third, the absence of qualitative data restricts insight into why certain features were preferred, therefore, conducting qualitative studies to explore CKD patients’ lived experiences and perspectives could yield deeper insights into their self-management challenges and preferences.65 Fourth, the reliance on self-reported data introduces potential response bias, as participants may have provided socially desirable responses or may have had difficulty accurately assessing their own preferences for features, they have never experienced. Finally, the dichotomization of e-health literacy scores, while methodologically necessary for group comparisons, may obscure important variations within literacy groups and may misclassify participants near the threshold.66 Fifth, although the hospital-level ICC for the eHealth literacy score was very low, residual center-level effects cannot be entirely excluded. As this study used the Kano model primarily for descriptive classification and prioritization, clustering was not further modelled in the Kano-derived results. Therefore, the literacy-stratified findings should be interpreted with caution. Future multicenter studies with more sites and cluster-adjusted analyses are needed to confirm the robustness and generalizability of these findings.
Conclusion
The results of this study highlight the importance of addressing the self-management needs of CKD patients with varying levels of e-health literacy. The Kano model analysis revealed that for patients with low e-health literacy classified disease knowledge (must-be) and symptom management (one-dimensional) as critical, alongside simplified UI elements like privacy protection and guided navigation. While those with high e-health literacy prioritized medical insurance access (must-be) and disease management (one-dimensional), and preferred efficient interfaces and telehealth integration. By understanding the distinct categories of attributes identified through the Kano model, healthcare providers can develop user-centered interventions and strategies that promote effective self-management and improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.
Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
Chengdu Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Key Research and Development Project (2024-YF05-00223-SN).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–16. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30045-3
2. Wang L, Xu X, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: results from the sixth china chronic disease and risk factor surveillance. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(4):298–310. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6817
3. Chironda G, Bhengu BR. Motivators of adherence to integrated management among patients with chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2019;21(1):63–70. doi:10.1111/nhs.12556
4. Peng S, He J, Huang J, et al. Self-management interventions for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):142. doi:10.1186/s12882-019-1309-y
5. Fan K, Zhao Y. Mobile health technology: a novel tool in chronic disease management. Intelligent Med. 2022;2(1):41–47. doi:10.1016/j.imed.2021.06.003
6. Tsai YC, Hsiao PN, Kuo MC, et al. Mobile health, disease knowledge, and self-care behavior in chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study. J Pers Med. 2021;11(9):845. doi:10.3390/jpm11090845
7. van Kessel R, Wong BLH, Clemens T, Brand H. Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: more than simply the sum of its parts. Internet Interv. 2022;27:100500. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500
8. Jung SO, Son YH, Choi E. E-health literacy in older adults: an evolutionary concept analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01761-5
9. Refahi H, Klein M, Feigerlova E. e-health literacy skills in people with chronic diseases and what do the measurements tell us: a scoping review. Telemed J E Health. 2023;29(2):198–208. doi:10.1089/tmj.2022.0115
10. Srivastava A, Kapania S, Tuli A, Singh P. Actionable UI design guidelines for smartphone applications inclusive of low-literate users. Procee ACM Human Computer Interact. 2021;5(CSCW1):1–30. doi:10.1145/3449210
11. Islam MN, Khan NI, Inan TT, Sarker IH. Designing user interfaces for illiterate and semi-literate users: a systematic review and future research agenda. Sage Open. 2023;13(2):21582440231172741. doi:10.1177/21582440231172741
12. Tan X, Liu X, Shao H. Healthy China 2030: a vision for health care. Value in health regional issues. 2017;12:112–114.
13. Sun C, Meijer E, Chavannes NH, et al. eHealth literacy in the general population: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):211. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21389-0
14. Banbury A. Digital Futures: Ehealth, Health Literacy and Chronic Disease Self-Management Skills for Older People. CQUniversity; 2018.
15. Huang J-C. Application of Kano model and IPA on improvement of service quality of mobile healthcare. Int J Mobile Commun. 2018;16(2):227–246. doi:10.1504/IJMC.2018.089761
16. Materla T, Cudney EA, Antony J. The application of Kano model in the healthcare industry: a systematic literature review. Total Qual Manag Bus. 2019;30(5–6):660–681. doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1328980
17. Marangunić N, Granić A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Informat Soci. 2015;14:81–95. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
18. Rotar LJ, Kozar M. The use of the Kano model to enhance customer satisfaction. Organizacija. 2017;50(4):339. doi:10.1515/orga-2017-0025
19. Yuan Y, Tao C, Yu P, et al. Demand analysis of telenursing among empty-nest elderly individuals with chronic diseases based on the Kano model. Front Public Health. 2022;10:990295. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.990295
20. Obro LF, Heiselberg K, Krogh PG, et al. Combining mHealth and health-coaching for improving self-management in chronic care. A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(4):680–688. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.026
21. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013
22. EGoKCQCCi S. Guidelines for early screening, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of chronic kidney disease (2022 edition). Chinese J Nephrol. 2022;38(5):453–464.
23. Hulland J, Chow YH, Lam S. Use of causal models in marketing research: a review. Int J Res Marketing. 1996;13(2):181–197. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(96)00002-X
24. Lin FH, Tsai SB, Lee YC, et al. Empirical research on Kano’s model and customer satisfaction. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183888. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183888
25. Mokkink LB, Elsman EBM, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0. Quality Life Res. 2024;33(11):2929–2939. doi:10.1007/s11136-024-03761-6
26. Markossian TW, Boyda J, Taylor J, et al. A mobile app to support self-management of chronic kidney disease: development study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021;8(4):e29197. doi:10.2196/29197
27. Gomez-Hernandez M, Ferre X, Moral C, Villalba-Mora E. Design guidelines of mobile apps for older adults: systematic review and thematic analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2023;11:e43186. doi:10.2196/43186
28. Tajudeen FP, Bahar N, Tan MP, Peer Mustafa MB, Saedon NI, Jesudass J. Understanding user requirements for a senior-friendly mobile health application. Geriatrics. 2022;7(5). doi:10.3390/geriatrics7050110
29. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
30. Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Austral J Paramed. 2010;8:1–13.
31. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e27. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27
32. Zhu Y, Wang X, You X, et al. Cut-off value of the eHEALS score as a measure of eHealth skills among rural residents in Gansu, China. Digital Health. 2023;9:20552076231205269. doi:10.1177/20552076231205269
33. Lee J, Tak SH. Factors associated with eHealth literacy focusing on digital literacy components: a cross-sectional study of middle-aged adults in South Korea. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221102765. doi:10.1177/20552076221102765
34. Jang H-Y, Song H, Park YT. Determining the importance values of quality attributes using ASC. J Korean Soci Quality Manag. 2012;40(4):589–598. doi:10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.4.589
35. Schrauben SJ, Cavanaugh KL, Fagerlin A, et al. The relationship of disease-specific knowledge and health literacy with the uptake of self-care behaviors in CKD. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(1):48–57. doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2019.10.004
36. Chen N-J, Chang C-H, Huang C-M, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of interactive robot-assisted virtual health coaching for health literacy and disease knowledge of patients with chronic kidney disease: quasiexperimental study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e68072. doi:10.2196/68072
37. Kino S, Kawachi I. Can health literacy boost health services utilization in the context of expanded access to health insurance? Health Educ Behav. 2020;47(1):134–142. doi:10.1177/1090198119875998
38. Nurgalieva L, O’Callaghan D, Doherty G. Security and privacy of mHealth applications: a scoping review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:104247–104268. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999934
39. Zhou L, Parmanto B. User preferences for privacy protection methods in mobile health apps: a mixed-methods study. Int J Telerehabil. 2020;12(2):13–26. doi:10.5195/ijt.2020.6319
40. Malinka C, von Jan U, Albrecht UV. Prioritization of quality principles for health apps using the Kano model: survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(1):e26563. doi:10.2196/26563
41. Huang CL, Chiang CH, Yang SC, Wu F-Z. The associations among gender, age, ehealth literacy, beliefs about medicines and medication adherence among elementary and secondary school teachers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11):6926. doi:10.3390/ijerph19116926
42. Norgaard O, Furstrand D, Klokker L, et al. The e-health literacy framework: a conceptual framework for characterizing e-health users and their interaction with e-health systems. Knowledge Manage E-Learning. 2015;7(4):522.
43. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lockwood MB, Rhee CM, et al. Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(3):185–198. doi:10.1038/s41581-021-00518-z
44. Brummel A, Carlson AM. Comprehensive medication management and medication adherence for chronic conditions. J Managed Care Specialty Pharmacy. 2016;22(1):56–62. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.56
45. Jacobs RJ, Lou JQ, Ownby RL, Caballero J. A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy. Health Informat J. 2016;22(2):81–98. doi:10.1177/1460458214534092
46. Ansaar MZ, Hussain J, Bang J, Lee S, Shin KY, Woo KY. The mHealth applications usability evaluation review.
47. Emerson MR, Buckland S, Lawlor MA, et al. Addressing and evaluating health literacy in mHealth: a scoping review. Mhealth. 2022;8:33. doi:10.21037/mhealth-22-11
48. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Inrig J, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(5):884–930. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015
49. Lai S, Molfino A, Coppola B, et al. Effect of personalized dietary intervention on nutritional, metabolic and vascular indices in patients with chronic kidney disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(18).
50. Li WY, Chiu FC, Zeng JK, et al. Mobile health app with social media to support self-management for patients with chronic kidney disease: prospective randomized controlled study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e19452. doi:10.2196/19452
51. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Jafar TH, Nitsch D, Neuen BL, Perkovic V. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):786–802. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00519-5
52. Stevens PE, Ahmed SB, Carrero JJ, et al. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4):S117–S314.
53. Mao J, Xie L, Zhao Q, et al. Demand analysis of an intelligent medication administration system for older adults with chronic diseases based on the Kano model. Int J Nurs Sci. 2022;9(1):63–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.12.012
54. Fang S, Liang H, Liang Y. Typologies of dependency, household characteristics, and disparity in formal and informal care use: analysis of community-dwelling long-term care insurance claimants in an urban municipality of China. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):235. doi:10.1186/s12939-023-02048-5
55. Ma X, Liu Y, Zhang P, Qi R, Meng F. Understanding online health information seeking behavior of older adults: a social cognitive perspective. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1147789. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147789
56. Huang CW, Wee PH, Low LL, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for elevated anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021;69:27–40. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.12.003
57. Linardon J, Torous J, Firth J, Cuijpers P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2024;23(1):139–149. doi:10.1002/wps.21183
58. Palmer S, Vecchio M, Craig JC, et al. Prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Kidney Int. 2013;84(1):179–191. doi:10.1038/ki.2013.77
59. Clyne N, Anding-Rost K. Exercise training in chronic kidney disease-effects, expectations and adherence. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(Suppl 2):ii3–ii14. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfab012
60. Briones R. Harnessing the web: how e-health and e-health literacy impact young adults’ perceptions of online health information. Medicine 2.0. 2015;4(2):e5.
61. Molina-Recio G, Molina-Luque R, Jiménez-García AM, Ventura-Puertos PE, Hernández-Reyes A, Romero-Saldaña M. Proposal for the user-centered design approach for health apps based on successful experiences: integrative review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(4):e14376. doi:10.2196/14376
62. Jiang J, Zheng Z. Medical information protection in internet hospital apps in China: scale development and content analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2024;12(1):e55061. doi:10.2196/55061
63. Shen H, van der Kleij R, van der Boog PJ, Chavannes NH. Developing a tailored eHealth self-management intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease in China: intervention mapping approach. JMIR Format Res. 2024;8(1):e48605. doi:10.2196/48605
64. Zhang X, Yuan Y, Jiang J. Digital health literacy among older adults in China: a cross-sectional study on prevalence and influencing factors. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1661177. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1661177
65. James G, Nyman E, Fitz-Randolph M, et al. Characteristics, symptom severity, and experiences of patients reporting chronic kidney disease in the patientslikeme online health community: retrospective and qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e18548. doi:10.2196/18548
66. Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med. 2006;25(1):127–141. doi:10.1002/sim.2331
© 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
