Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 17
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans in a 12-Year-Old Child: A Rare Case
Authors Sutedja EK
, Sutedja E
, Ruchiatan K, Faldian Y
, Yogya Y, Hidayah RMN
, Anandita R
, Azhar Y
, Yantisetiasti A, Hernowo BS, Rivanzah Y
Received 10 July 2024
Accepted for publication 13 August 2024
Published 27 August 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 1921—1930
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S480616
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha
Eva Krishna Sutedja,1 Endang Sutedja,1 Kartika Ruchiatan,1 Yogi Faldian,1 Yuri Yogya,1 Risa Miliawati Nurul Hidayah,1 Rafithia Anandita,1 Yohana Azhar,2 Anglita Yantisetiasti,3 Bethy Suryawathy Hernowo,3 Yovan Rivanzah1
1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran - Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia; 2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran – Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia; 3Department of Pathological Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran – Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
Correspondence: Eva Krishna Sutedja, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran - Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Jl. Pasteur 38, Bandung, West Java, 40161, Indonesia, Tel +628122014300 ext. 3449, Fax +62222032426, Email [email protected]
Abstract: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft tissue tumor involving the dermis and subcutaneous fat that rarely occurs in children, manifested as a slowly growing firm plaque on the trunk. A 12-year-old girl patient presented with dark patch on the nasal root after finishing 25 sessions of radiotherapy. Initially, patient came to Oncology Surgery Clinic at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung with the chief complaint of a large exophytic mass located in the nasal area, which was neither itchy nor painful. A large, firm, painless mass with no sign of localized heat or redness was found on physical examination. There were no palpable cervical or axillary lymph nodes. Wide local excision and frontal flap procedure were performed by Oncology Surgery Department leaving a pedicle with 2× 1.5× 1 cm on size was observed. Upon histopathological examination, tumor mass was found in the subepithelium and consisted of oval to spindle-shaped cells that were hyperplastic, compacted, diffuse, forming fasciculus, whorled, and cartwheel. Cell nuclei were pleomorphic (oval to wavy), hyperchromatic, with clear nucleolus, and occasion mitotic figures. Hyalinisation was seen between the tumor masses. On immunohistochemical stains, there were diffuse positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and vimentin. Based on the histological and immunohistochemical findings, the diagnosis of stage II DFSP was made. Until now, there is no established algorithm for treatment of DFSP. Wide local excision and radiotherapy for 25 sessions was performed on this patient, resulting in complete tumor mass removal. After three months of observation, the second surgery was done to remove a pedicle; however, there is no recurrence of tumor growth. Despite its rarity, DFSP should be considered as a differential diagnosis to avoid underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis.
Keywords: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, radiotherapy, wide local excision
Introduction
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft tissue tumor that involves the dermis, subcutaneous fat, and in rare cases, muscle and fascia.1,2 It accounts for 1–6% of all soft tissue sarcomas and 18% of all cutaneous soft tissue sarcomas. DFSP in children, although rare, is reported in some countries, including congenital presentations.2 According to Ramos and Hernanz in 2012,3 only 6% of these tumors present in children, while according Loeb et al in 2008,4 the prevalence of DFSP before 20 years of age is 1.0 per million. It typically presents as a slowly growing,5 firm plaque on the trunk of young adults.2,3,5
The cause is not clearly understood yet, however, some studies have implicated a chromosomal translocation that results in a fusion protein COL1A1-PDGFB that promotes tumor growth through the overproduction of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF).1,6 Diagnosis is made through skin biopsy. It is considered an intermediate-grade malignancy with a low likelihood of metastasis but a high local recurrence rate.2,5 Molecular detection of the gene rearrangement or fusion transcripts is helpful for the diagnosis of patients with atypical morphology and for screening candidates for targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.5
The standard treatment is complete surgical excision, including wide local excision (WLE) with tumor-free margins, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and amputation.5 Given its propensity for a subclinical extension, the optimal treatment modality is MMS, a surgical technique that allows complete margin assessment and tissue preservation. The goal of the therapy for DFSP is to reach a wide and clear resection margin of 2–3 cm to reduce the local recurrence rate.7,8 Unresectable DFSPs are treated with radiation therapy and/or targeted therapy. The chemotherapeutic agent imatinib mesylate is currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for adults with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic DFSP.1,2,9,10
The overall prognosis is good with a 10-year survival rate of 99.1%. However, there is still a possibility of complication with metastasis being the main one. Other complications including post-surgical scarring and cosmetic defect.2 Hereby, we present a rare case of DFSP in children with clinical manifestation of tumor mass located in nasal root, which is an uncommon predilection of DFSP.
Case Illustration
A 12-year-old girl consulted to the Dermatology and Venereology Department due to the presence of dark patch on the nasal root after finishing 25 sessions of radiotherapy (Figure 1). The patient was initially presented to the Oncology Surgery Clinic at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung with the chief complaint of a large exophytic mass located in the nasal area, which was neither itchy nor painful (Figure 2A). The skin lesion first appeared 5 years ago as a small, irregularly shaped, pus-filled bump on nasal root that was painful. The lesion was thought to be a boil, therefore her teacher manipulated the lesion until it bled. Since then, the lesion has progressively increased in size. The patient denied any recent weight loss, fever, night sweats or chills. Previous medical history was insignificant. Family history of malignancy was positive.
|
Figure 1 Lesion when first consulted to Dermatology and Venereology Department (A). |
|
Figure 2 Lesion during the first visit to the Oncology Surgery Department (A), lesion during wide excision operation (B and C), and postoperative lesion (D). |
In August 2023, the patient underwent surgical excision combined with frontal flap performed by the Department of Surgery, Oncology Surgery Division at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung (Figure 2B–D). A mass measuring 4×1.5×0.5 cm was excised with diagnostic frozen section examination showing suspected malignant lesion (Figure 3). A pedicle was observed after the surgery. The safety margin could not be achieved because the lesion was too close to ocular structures. Therefore, adjunctive radiotherapies were performed for 25 times and afterwards the dark patch appeared on the nasal root. At follow-up 3 months after surgery, a pedicle structure was observed on the nasal root area. A second surgery was performed by Department of Surgery, Oncology Surgery Division, to excise the pedicle (Figure 4A and B).
|
Figure 3 Intraoperative lesion. |
|
Figure 4 Lesion before pedicle excision procedure (A) and lesion after pedicle excision procedure (B). |
On physical examination, a large, firm, painless mass was found with no sign of localized heat or redness. There were no palpable cervical or axillary lymph nodes. A pedicle in the size of 2×1.5×1 cm was observed. Upon histopathological examination, tumor mass was found in the subepithelium and consisted of oval to spindle-shaped cells that were hyperplastic, compacted, diffuse, forming fasciculus, whorled, and cartwheel. Cell nuclei were pleomorphic (oval to wavy), hyperchromatic, with clear nucleolus, and occasion mitotic figures. Hyalinisation was seen between the tumor masses (Figure 5A–D). On immunohistochemical stains, there were diffuse positivity for EMA (Figure 6A) and vimentin (Figure 6B). There was no positivity for cluster of differentiation (CD)34 (Figure 6C) and cytokeratins (CK) (Figure 6D). Based on the histological and immunohistochemical findings, the diagnosis of stage II DFSP was made.
|
Figure 6 Immunohistochemistry staining EMA strongly positive (A), vimentin positive in tumor cell (B), CD34 negative (C), and CK negative in tumor cell (D). |
The patient’s postoperative course after the pedicle excision was uneventful, and she was discharged on the second postoperative day (Figure 7A–C).
|
Figure 7 Post procedure lesion day 11 (A), day 18 (B), and day 23 (C). |
Discussion
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a rare tumor affecting the dermis, subcutaneous fat, and occasionally muscle and fascia.1,2 Typically, it presents as a slow growing, firm plaque on the trunk of young adults.2,9 Incidence of this tumor is approximately 4.2 per 1 million in the United States.1,2 DFSP occurs most often in middle-aged adults, although it has been reported in all age groups, including congenital presentations.2,5 Fibrosarcomatous (FS) change is observed on histopathology in 3 to 20% of patients with DFSP.7 FS is more often encountered in patient with large sized tumors which is more malignant.1 Furthermore, tumors with this feature have approximately double the chance of distant metastatic spread as well as a lower overall survival.7
The cause of DFSP is not clearly understood yet, however, some studies have implicated translocation of chromosomes 17 and 22 [t(17:22)(q22:q13)] is seen in over 90% of DFSP. The translocation then results in a fusion protein COL1A1-PDGFB that promotes tumor growth through the overproduction of PDGF, continuous autocrine activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRb), cellular proliferation, and tumor formation.1,2,6
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans initially manifests as an asymptomatic plaque, initially skin-colored in early stage and later transitioning to red-brown induration, eventually giving rise to multiple elevated violaceous to red-brown nodules in protuberant stage.2,5 Progressing slowly, these nodules can grow to several centimeters in diameter.2 DFSP is predominantly found on the trunk (50%), followed by the extremities (35%), and head and neck (15%). DFSP exhibits a characteristic predilection for the shoulder and pelvic regions. Although typically extending into subcutaneous fat, it rarely involves fascia, muscle, or bone unless it persists or recurs over time. If left untreated, the tumors can locally invade more deeply into the fascia, muscle, periosteum, bone, and occasionally metastasize to other organs in advanced stages.11
The clinical presentation of DFSP in childhood is similar to that in adults and varies with the stage of growth. In the early stages, lesions typically appear as single papules or plaques, with deep-seated nodules being less common.12 One of the most consistent features of this tumor is induration.3 The lesion usually moves freely over deep tissue structures until the late stages of the disease, when it begins to invade the underlying structures.13 The overlying skin can appear erythematous, brownish, violaceous, or flesh-colored. A bluish tinge may be the initial manifestation of the tumor, potentially leading to an incorrect initial diagnosis of a vascular lesion.14 Generally, these lesions are asymptomatic and measure between 1 and 5 cm at the time of diagnosis. They tend to grow progressively.15
There are various histologic variants of DFSP have been identified, including atrophic and FS.16 The atrophic variant presents as a violaceous plaque, resembling morphea or scar. In its early stages, the tumor may resemble a keloid or dermatofibroma, leading to frequent misdiagnoses. With increased size, some may ulcerate and become painful. DFSP displays relentless growth with asymmetrical, root-like projections, not discernible in clinical examinations, leading to common local recurrences after excision. Distant metastasis is infrequent, occurring in only 1% to 4% of cases, usually following multiple local recurrences, with the lung being the primary site of metastasis via hematogenous spread. Regional lymph node involvement is rare. The FS variant of DFSP possesses a higher risk of local recurrence (14 to 52%) and distant metastases (8 to 29%). It is considered an intermediate-grade malignancy with a low likelihood of metastasis, but a high local recurrence rate.2
Diagnosis is made through skin biopsy, preferably an incisional or excisional biopsy. A thorough history and physical exam, including lymph node examination, should be done. Some supporting examinations, such as chest X-ray and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are sometimes performed to evaluate for any metastatic disease and to define tumor extension before surgery.17–20 DFSP typically exhibits poor circumscription, commonly affecting both the dermis and subcutaneous tissues, with rare cases limited solely to the dermis. Positioned as an intermediate tumor between a benign dermatofibroma and a fibrosarcoma, DFSP carries the potential for distant metastasis and aggressive local invasion. While the overlying epidermis lacks atypical histological features, the skin may present a macroscopic appearance that is greyish or lightly pigmented.2
Histopathological stand point of DFSP is uniform spindle cell fascicles exhibiting a storiform pattern, along with several variants and robust, widespread CD34 immunoreactivity. Nonetheless, its spindle cell morphology and CD34 immunostaining pattern exhibit similarities with other both benign and malignant lesions, requiring careful differentiation. On an ultrastructural level, DFSP is characterized by stellate or spindle cells featuring long, slender, ramified cell processes connected by primitive junctions reminiscent of dermal dendrocytes.5,21 However, areas of FS change may show reduction or loss of CD34 expression immunohistochemically.22
There is no standard staging system of DFSP available up to today.23 Hao et al5 then proposed a modified staging system of DFSP based on European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline, the progression of DFSPs’ tumorigenesis and clinical presentation, as shown in Table 1. This staging system is useful for treatment.5
|
Table 1 Staging System of DFSP |
The standard treatment is complete surgical excision, including wide local excision (WLE) with tumor-free margins, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and rarely amputation.5 Given its propensity for a subclinical extension, the optimal treatment modality is MMS, a surgical technique that allows complete margin assessment and tissue preservation. The goal of the therapy for DFSP is to reach a wide and clear resection margin of 2–3 cm to reduce the local recurrence rate.7,8 Wide undermining following surgical excision of DFSP is discouraged due to the risk of tumor seeding and difficulties in interpreting subsequent reexcisions.24
Multiple studies have shown that MMS significantly reduces the risk of recurrence of DFSP, compared with WLE.25,26 Notably, DFSP treated with WLE has a recurrence rate of around 7.3%, in contrast to the 1% recurrence rate seen with MMS.26 Collaborative care, especially for infiltrative DFSP, enhances treatment outcomes. NCCN guidelines recommend lateral margins of 2–4 cm for WLE and excision of investing fascia for infiltrating tumors.5 The choice of surgical procedure depends on tumor depth, location, and patient factors.5,27
Adjuvant radiation therapy is effective in controlling tumor growth and reducing recurrence, with high disease-free survival rates reported in studies.28–32 The recommended radiation dose ranges from 60 Gy for indeterminate or microscopic positive margins to up to 70 Gy for macroscopic positive margins or primary gross tumors. The radiation field should extend 3–5 cm beyond surgical margins or the primary tumor boundary, with an individual dose administered at 2 Gy daily, 5 times weekly.23,25,26,33–36
The molecular identification of gene rearrangements or fusion transcripts proves advantageous not only for diagnosing cases lacking typical morphology but also for screening patients eligible for imatinib mesylate (IM) use.5,37 The chemotherapeutic agent imatinib mesylate is currently FDA-approved for adults with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic DFPS.1,2,9,10 Imatinib mesylate inhibits the constitutively activated PDGF receptor β in DFSP, demonstrating growth-inhibitory effects in studies.5 IM may also modulate immune responses, exerting direct antitumor effects on the PDGFR pathway and indirect effects via T-cell-mediated immune modulation. Effective in localized and metastatic DFSP cases, IM showed similar responses with daily doses of 400 mg or 800 mg.38 Preoperative IM therapy resulted in median tumor volume shrinkages (20%–31.5%), making unresectable tumors resectable.39–42 However, approximately 10% of DFSPs do not respond to IM, and some develop rapid secondary resistance. Surgical excision during the “shrinkage window” is crucial.5 Resistance mechanisms are unclear, but low PDGFR phosphorylation in resistant tumors may be a factor. In cases of IM resistance, alternatives like sunitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib can be considered, showing effectiveness in resistant DFSP patients.43,44
The overall prognosis is good with a 10-year survival rate of 99.1%. Given the infrequent occurrence of metastasis, the predominant concern lies in the morbidity resulting from local recurrence. Individuals aged over 50 meet an increased risk of local recurrence. On average, patients diagnosed with metastatic disease survive approximately two years. Risk factors associated with elevated mortality rates include a high mitotic index, heightened cellularity, belonging to the black race, male gender, and having the tumor located on the head, neck, or limb. However, there is still a possibility of complication with metastasize being the main one.2 Other complications center around post-surgical scarring and cosmesis.2
Conclusion
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is an uncommon soft tissue tumor involving the dermis and subcutaneous fat that rarely occurs in children, usually manifested as a slowly growing firm plaque on the trunk. However, in this case, the tumor mass was located in nasal root which is an uncommon predilection for DFSP. Until now, there is no established algorithm for treatment of DSFP. Nonetheless, the standard treatment includes complete surgical excision, such as WLE with tumor-free margins, MMS, and amputation. As a clinician, we must consider the diagnosis of DFSP because it tends to be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed.
Ethic Statement
The publications of images were included in the patient’s consent for publication of the case. Institutional approval has been obtained to publish the case details.
Consent Statement
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms from the parents of the patient as the patient is under the age of 18. The parents of the patient signed a consent form for the publication of the case details and images.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the staff of the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Surgery, and Department of Pathological Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Funding
There is no funding to report.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Neff R, Collins R, Backes F. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a rare and devastating tumor of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2019;28:9–11. doi:10.1016/j.gore.2019.01.006
2. Brooks J, Ramsey ML. Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Updated 2023 Apr 14. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513305/.
3. Loeb DM, Thornton K, Shokek O. Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Surgical Clinic North Am. 2008;88(3):615–627. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2008.03.008
4. Valdivielso-Ramos M, Hernanz JM. Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans in Childhood. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2012;103(10):863–873. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2011.12.005
5. Hao X, Billings SD, Wu F, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: update on the diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1752. doi:10.3390/jcm9061752
6. Greco A, Fusetti L, Villa R, et al. Transforming activity of the chimeric sequence formed by the fusion of collagen gene COL1A1 and the platelet derived growth factor b-chain gene in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Oncogene. 1998;17(10):1313–1319. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1202051
7. Liang CA, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Karia PS, Elenitsas R, Zhang PD, Schmults CD. A systematic review of outcome data for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with and without fibrosarcomatous change. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(4):781–786. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.018
8. Chen YT, Tu WT, Lee WR, Huang YC. The efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;Vol. 30(7):1107–1114. doi:10.1111/jdv.13601
9. Du K, Li J, Tang L, et al. Role of postoperative radiotherapy in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a propensity score-matched analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1). doi:10.1186/s13014-019-1226-z
10. Huis in ‘t Veld EA, van Coevorden F, Grünhagen DJ, et al. Outcome after surgical treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: is clinical follow-up always indicated? Cancer. 2019;125(5):735–741. doi:10.1002/cncr.31924
11. Wrotnowski UMD, Cooper PHMD, Shmookler BMMD. Fibrosarcomatous Change in Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988;12(4):287–293. doi:10.1097/00000478-198804000-00005
12. Iqbal CW, St. Peter S, Ishitani MB. Pediatric dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: multi-institutional outcomes. J Surg Res. 2011;170(1):69–72. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.01.042
13. Lemm D, Mügge LO, Mentzel T, Höffken K. Current treatment options in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135(5):653–665. doi:10.1007/s00432-009-0550-3
14. Jafarian F, McCuaig C, Kokta V, Laberge L, Ben Nejma B. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in childhood and adolescence: report of eight patients. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25(3):317–325. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00674.x
15. Gerlini G, Mariotti G, Urso C, Brandani P, Reali UM, Borgognoni L. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in childhood: two case reports and review of the literature. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008;25(6):559–566. doi:10.1080/08880010802235066
16. Trinidad CM, Wangsiricharoen S, Prieto VG, Aung PP. Rare Variants of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls. Dermatopathology. 2023;10(1):54–62. doi:10.3390/dermatopathology10010008
17. Penel N, Bedoui S, Robin Y-M, Decanter G. Dermatofibrosarcome: prise en charge Correspondance: mots clés Dermatofibrosarcome Imatinib Marges Microchirurgie de Mohs Transcrit de fusion Résumé. Bull Cancer. 2018.
18. Llombart B, Serra C, Requena C, et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cutaneous Sarcomas: dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans. Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas. 2018;109:868–877. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2018.05.006
19. Bhatt MD, Nambudiri VE. Cutaneous Sarcomas. In: Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders; 2019:87–101.
20. PDQ Pediatric Treatment Editorial Board. Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®): patient Version. PDQ Cancer Inf Summ. 2002.
21. Dominguez-Malagon H, Valdez-Carrillo MDC, Cano-Valdez AM. Dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a comparative ultrastructural study. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2006;30(4):283–291. doi:10.1080/01913120600820468
22. Thway K, Noujaim J, Jones RL, Fisher C. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: pathology, genetics, and potential therapeutic strategies. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016;25:64–71. doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2016.09.013
23. Saiag P, Grob JJ, Lebbe C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(17):2604–2608.
24. Fiore M, Miceli R, Mussi C, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated at a single institution: a surgical disease with a high cure rate. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7669–7675. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.5122
25. Loghdey MS, Varma S, Rajpara SM, Al-Rawi H, Perks G, Perkins W. Mohs micrographic surgery for Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): a single-centre series of 76 patients treated by frozen-section Mohs micrographic surgery with a review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(10):1315–1321. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.021
26. Lowe GC, Onajin O, Baum CL, et al. A Comparison of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Wide Local Excision for Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans with Long-Term Follow-up: the Mayo Clinic Experience. Dermatologic Surg. 2017;43(1):98–106. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000910
27. Shah KK, Mchugh JB, Folpe AL, Patel RM. Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Distal Extremities and Acral Sites a Clinicopathologic Analysis of 27 Cases [Internet]. 2017.
28. Williams N, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Dagan R, Mendenhall WM. Radiotherapy for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;37(5):430–432. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e31827dee86
29. Ballo MT, Zagars GK, Pisters P, Pollack A. PII S0360-3016(97)00895-X • Clinical Investigation the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans. 1998.
30. Dagan R, Morris CG, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT, Mendenhall WM. Radiotherapy in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Oncol. 2005;28(6):537–539. doi:10.1097/01.coc.0000171278.69291.64
31. Castle KO, Guadagnolo BA, Tsai CJ, Feig BW, Zagars GK. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: long-term outcomes of 53 patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86(3):585–590. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.024
32. Agyeman MB, Vanderpuye VD, Yarney J, Agyeman MB, Vanderpuye VD, Yarney J. Abscopal Effect of Radiotherapy in Imatinib-resistant Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans. Cureus. 2019;11(1). doi:10.7759/cureus.3857
33. Paradisi A, Abeni D, Rusciani A, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34(8):728–736. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.06.002
34. Mullen JT. Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery. In: Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. Vol. 25. W.B. Saunders; 2016:827–839.
35. Malan M, Xuejingzi W, Quan SJ. The efficacy of mohs micrographic surgery over the traditional wide local excision surgery in the cure of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33.
36. Foshee JP, Trofymenko O, Zeitouni NC. Surgical and Functional Considerations of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Involving Facial Nerve Danger Zones. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2019;12:39–43.
37. Nakamura I, Kariya Y, Okada E, et al. A novel chromosomal translocation associated with COL1A2- PDGFB gene fusion in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: PDGF expression as a new diagnostic tool. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(12):1330–1337. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2389
38. Navarrete-Dechent C, Mori S, Barker CA, Dickson MA, Nehal KS. Imatinib Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: a Systematic Review. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(3):361–369. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4940
39. Kérob D, Porcher R, Vérola O, et al. Imatinib mesylate as a preoperative therapy in dermatofibrosarcoma: results of a multicenter Phase II study on 25 patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(12):3288–3295. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3401
40. Wang J, Yin Y, Shen C, et al. Preoperative imatinib treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single-center analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(9):e19275.
41. Rutkowski P, Klimczak A, Ługowska I, et al. Long-term results of treatment of advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) with imatinib mesylate – the impact of fibrosarcomatous transformation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(6):1134–1141. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2017.03.011
42. Ugure S, Mentzel T, Utikal J, et al. Neoadjuvant imatinib in advanced primary or locally recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a multicenter phase II DeCOG Trial with Long-Term Follow-Up. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(2):499–510. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1411
43. Kamar FG, Kairouz VF, Sabri AN. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) successfully treated with sorafenib: case report [Internet]. Clin Sarc Res. 2013;3(1). doi:10.1186/2045-3329-3-5
44. Miyagawa T, Kadono T, Kimura T, et al. Pazopanib induced a partial response in a patient with metastatic fibrosarcomatous dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans without genetic translocations resistant to mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine chemotherapy and gemcitabine–docetaxel chemotherapy. J Dermatol. 2017;44:e21–2. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.13717
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
