Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18
Environmental Persistence of High-Risk KPC-Producing ST463 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Intensive Care Units in East China
Authors Shi W, Zhang P, Feng H, Ge T, Chen Y
, Jiang Y, Shen P, Ni L, Yu C, Qu T
Received 26 May 2025
Accepted for publication 2 October 2025
Published 21 October 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 5379—5390
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S531973
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 5
Editor who approved publication: Dr Hemant Joshi
Weixiao Shi,1,* Piaopiao Zhang,1,* Haiting Feng,2,* Tianxiang Ge,2 Yunbo Chen,1 Yan Jiang,3 Ping Shen,1 Lingmei Ni,2 Chengbo Yu,1 Tingting Qu1,2
1State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Infection Control Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Tingting Qu, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Chengbo Yu, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the distribution and characteristics of high-risk, difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) sequence type (ST) 463 in intensive care units (ICUs) in East China.
Patients and Methods: This 11-month study investigated Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) in patients and environments across four ICUs in a large teaching hospital in East China. It involved whole-genome sequencing, antibiotic susceptibility testing, and biofilm-forming ability testing of all the isolates. Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic relationships were assessed using multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST). Bacterial virulence was evaluated using Galleria mellonella infection model.
Results: A total of 54 CRPA were isolated from the environment and inpatients in ICUs and classified into 25 STs, with ST463 identified as the predominant ST (13/54, 24.07%). All 13 ST463 PA isolates belonged to DTR-PA, including 4 from patients and 9 from environments primarily from wastewater dumping pools. All ST463-DTR-PA isolates carried blaKPC-2 and exhibited exoU+/exoS+ virulence genotype. There were 3 KPC-ST463-DTR-PA additionally carried blaAFM-1, resulting in resistance to last-resort antibiotics. ST463-DTR-PA had higher biofilm-forming ability and mortality in infected larvae than non-ST463-DTR-PA. Both clinical and environmental strains showed high virulence. CgMLST results revealed that several ST463-DTR-PA isolated from different ICUs were genetically related.
Conclusion: KPC-ST463-DTR-PA can widely colonize in ICU environment. Contamination and incomplete disinfection in humid environments may provide evolutionary opportunities for ST463-DTR-PA. Hence, it’s worth our vigilance about the growing prevalence of ST463-DTR-PA in East China’s ICUs. Meanwhile, it is important to strengthen the management of the ICU environment, especially water reservoirs, and even to promote the management of patients without water.
Keywords: difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ST463, virulence, resistance, ICU, transmission
Introduction
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is an opportunistic pathogen that can colonize a wide range of environments, including the human respiratory, digestive, and urinary tracts as well as hospital water systems. It is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections such as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections. These infections pose a significant threat to immunocompromised patients in intensive care units (ICUs), particularly those who require mechanical ventilation or invasive procedures.1–4 Carbapenems are frequently used as the last line of defence against infections caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) in ICU patients. However, the global incidence and mortality associated with carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) continue to increase.5 A Consequently, ICUs are becoming focal points for the colonization and infection of CRPA, significantly increasing its clinical burden.
CRPA exhibits complex resistance mechanisms, including downregulation or loss of the OprD porin, hyperproduction of AmpC β-lactamase, overexpression of efflux systems such as MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN, and production of carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes, particularly metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), such as IMP, VIM, and GIM enzymes.5–8 Previously, there have been multiple outbreaks of CRPA in ICUs reported outside of China.9 Moreover, the formation of dense and persistent biofilms reduces the efficacy of antibiotics and disinfectants, facilitating long-term colonization of hospital wastewater and medical equipment, thereby contributing to hospital-acquired infections (HAIs).10
Globally, high-risk CRPA clones, particularly sequence types (ST) 111, 235, 175, 155, and 298, are frequently observed in regions such as America and Europe.11,12 In contrast, the ST463 clone has emerged as the predominant strain in China, characterized by high antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity.13 ST463 CRPA, which often carries blaKPC, displays a difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) profile and is not susceptible to drugs such as piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin.14 Recent epidemiological studies have indicated that approximately 40% of the CRPA isolates in East China are related to the KPC-producing ST463 clone.15 Alarmingly, infections caused by KPC-producing ST463 PA are associated with prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality.16
However, the prevalence and characteristics of ST463 DTR-PA in ICU environments remain poorly understood. To investigate the distribution, genetic relationship, and characteristics of CRPA, especially ST463 strains isolated from environment, infected and colonized patients in ICU, we collected the CRPA strains from four different ICUs of a large tertiary teaching hospital in East China from September 2020 to July 2021 for further study.
We have previously reported the clinical characteristics and genomic features of KPC-producing ST463 P. aeruginosa isolates collected from ICU patients in the same hospital setting.17 In contrast, the present study emphasizes the environmental persistence and potential transmission routes of these high-risk clones within the ICU environment. This work provides novel insights into the ecology of ST463 in non-clinical reservoirs, which were not addressed in our previous study.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Sampling
The study was conducted over 11 months, from September 2020 to July 2021, in four intensive care units (ICUs) located in three different buildings of a large tertiary teaching hospital in China, with a total of 91 ICU beds. Each ICU was equipped with wash basins in the patient rooms and common areas, and patient wastewater was handled in dedicated sewage rooms. Disinfection was performed three times daily using 500 mg/L chlorinated disinfectant.
Weekly screening for intestinal carriage of Carbapenem-resistant Organism (CRO), including CRPA, was performed in all ICU patients. Clinical specimens, such as tracheal aspirations, sputum, and urine, were collected routinely, whereas additional samples (eg, blood, wound pus, and drainage fluid) were obtained when infection was suspected. Patients with both infection symptoms and positive CRPA cultures were classified as having CRPA-related infection.
Monthly environmental sampling in each ICU included ventilator condensate, stethoscopes, beddings, wash basin surfaces, wastewater dumping pools, medical workers’ overalls, and air. Samples were cultured on cetrimide agar plates containing 2 μg/mL imipenem at 37°C and assessed for growth after 24 h. Condensate samples were filtered through 0.45 μm membranes to capture bacteria, and isolates were identified using the VITEK 2 system (BioMerieux, France).
Whole Genome Sequencing and Analysis
We used the Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) to sequence all CRPA isolates and the RAST server to provide annotations. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted using MLST 2.0, through the online services of the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org). Antibiotic resistance and virulence factor genes were separately identified using CGE servers (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk) and the Virulence Factor Database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/).
Phylogenetic Analysis by Core-Genome Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (cgMLST) and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms
The phylogenetic tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6.3 (http://itol.embl.de/). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of ST463 was performed using Snippy to obtain additional genomic information.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
The broth dilution method was used to determine the sensitivity of the strains to 12 antipseudomonal agents (imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, aztreonam, and polymyxin), and the results were analyzed according to the guidelines formulated by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2024). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as a control.
Virulence Studies
We randomly selected the participants to conduct the experiment. G. mellonella larvae (10 in each group) were infected with bacteria resuspended in Phosphate Buffered saline (PBS) to reach 102 CFU, and 10μL of bacteria liquid was injected into the second right proleg. The infected larvae were incubated in 90-mm plastic culture dishes at 37°C and observed every 12 h for 36 h. PA14 and P. aeruginosa ATCC9027 were used as hypervirulent and hypovirulent reference strains, respectively.
Biofilm-Forming Ability Test
The bacterial solution was diluted after overnight culture in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth to an OD600 of 1.0 and then 200μL of each 100-fold diluted sample was transferred to a 96-well plate. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the floating bacteria were removed and the wells were washed with PBS. The biofilm was then dyed with crystal violet for 30 min, washed again with PBS, and subsequently dissolved in 200μL of 95% ethanol. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader. The cut-off optical density (ODc) was calculated based on the absorbance of the negative control wells (containing only LB broth) and was defined as the mean OD of these wells plus three times their standard deviation (SD). Strains were then classified based on their own absorbance (OD) as follows: non-adherent (OD ≤ ODc), weakly adherent (ODc < OD ≤ 2×ODc), moderately adherent (2×ODc < OD ≤ 4×ODc), or strongly adherent (OD > 4×ODc), according to the method described by Stepanović et al.18 All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Statistical Analysis
The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the proportional differences. SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS, Inc.) was used for data analysis. Survival curves were calculated using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Isolation of CRPA from Patients and Environments in ICU
During the 11 months monitoring period, 54 CRPA isolates were collected and equally divided into patient samples (n=27) and environmental sources (n=27) in the ICU (Table 1). No CRPA was screened from the stool specimens. Two CRPA strains were isolated from the sputum samples of two patients, but these were classified as colonization due to the absence of clinical symptoms, normal inflammatory markers, and unremarkable lung imaging. The remaining 25 CRPA strains were isolated from various clinical samples including sputum (13/25, 52%), blood (4/25, 16.00%), urine (3/25, 12.00%), bile (2/25, 8.00%), wound secretions (1/25, 4%), ascites (1/25, 4%), and pleural fluid (1/25, 4%).
|
Table 1 Distribution of 54 CRPA Strains from Patient and Environment in ICUs |
In the ICU environment, CRPA was predominantly isolated from ventilator condensates (12/27, 44.44%), followed by wastewater dumping pools (8/27, 29.62%), wash basins (4/27, 14.81%), medical workers’ clothing (1/27, 3.70%), patient bedding (1/27, 3.70%), and air (1/27, 3.70%).
Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of CRPA Isolates
Overall, 42.59% (23/54) of the CRPA strains were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, with 69.57% (16/23) of these displaying high-level resistance (MICs ≥ 64 µg/mL) (Supplemental Table A). When comparing by sequence type, all 13 ST463 CRPA strains were categorized as DTR-PA, a significantly higher proportion than the 34.15% (14/41) observed among non-ST463 isolates (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1A). In contrast, no significant differences in resistance rates were observed between environmental- and patient-derived strains for most antimicrobials, except for aztreonam, for which patient-derived strains showed higher resistance (p < 0.05) (Figure 1B). The detailed susceptibility profile for each individual strain is presented in Figure 2, which shows that most isolates remained highly susceptible to polymyxin B, with the exception of one high-level resistant strain from ventilator condensate (MIC ≥ 64 µg/mL).
MLST, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Virulence Factors of CRPA Isolates
The MLST, antibiotic resistance genes, and virulence factors of all the CRPA strains are summarized in Figure 2. MLST analysis of the 54 CRPA isolates identified 25 STs, with ST463 being the most common (13/54, 24.07%), followed by ST231 (5/54, 9.26%), ST244 (4/54, 7.41%), ST235 (2/54, 3.70%), ST275 (2/54, 3.70%), and other dispersed STs (51.85%). Nine ST463 isolates were environmental, predominantly from wastewater dumping pools in ICU sewage rooms (8/9), with one strain isolated from a medical worker’s clothing. Four ST463 clinical isolates were recovered from sputum and urine samples of infected patients.
All 13 ST463 CRPA strains carried multiple antimicrobial resistance genes, including carbapenem resistance gene (blaKPC-2), aminoglycoside resistance gene (aph(3′)-IIb), cephalosporin resistance gene (blaOXA-486), and fluoroquinolone resistance gene (crpP). Notably, these strains also harbored both exoU+/exoS+ virulence genes, a combination not found in other STs. Twelve CRPA strains carried MBLs genes: blaAFM-1 (7/54, 12.96%), blaVIM-2 (4/54, 7.41%) and blaIMP-1 (1/54, 1.85%). The blaAFM-1 was present in ST463 (3/7), ST275 (2/7), and ST712 (2/7), whereas blaVIM-2 was detected in ST 244 (3/4) and ST155 (1/4), and blaIMP-1 was detected in ST606. Three ST463 strains co-harbored blaAFM-1 and blaKPC-2, isolated from different ICUs’ wastewater dumping pools (two strains) and urine sample (one strain), showing extensive antimicrobial resistance.
All CRPA strains carried disinfectant resistance genes (triA, triC, and opmH) against triclosan and the detergent sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS), whereas 11 strains harbored qacEΔ1, conferring resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds. None of the isolates carried sugE or qacF.
Distribution of CRPA Strains in Different ICUs
Figure 3 illustrates the temporal distributions of the 54 CRPA strains across four distinct ICUs (ICU1, ICU2, ICU3, and ICU4) located in three separate buildings. These four ICUs are located in three separate buildings within the hospital, with their spatial arrangement detailed in Figure 3A. During various periods, ST463 strains were consistently detected in the wastewater pools of sewage rooms in each ICU. In addition, one ST463 strain (PA-F6) was isolated from the clothing of a healthcare worker in ICU1. In addition to the dominant strain ST463-CRPA, other CRPA strains of different STs were also found to colonize different wash basins near patient beds in ICU4.
Patient P6 had an ICU stay of 11 months (October 2020 to September 2021). CRPA strains were first identified in sputum following respiratory infection symptoms and later detected in the ventilator condensate, with strain migration observed corresponding to bed location changes (Figure 3B). Four CRPA strains isolated from patient P6 were classified as ST231. Patient P4 experienced long-term CRPA colonization in the ventilator condensate over a 5-month period; however, no CRPA was detected in respiratory samples, where only carbapenem-sensitive P. aeruginosa was isolated. Additionally, for patients P8, P9, and P10, CRPA strains were isolated from both their sputum and ventilator condensate. For each patient, the isolates from both sources shared an identical sequence type—ST1125, ST244, and ST2100, respectively.
Patient P17, who was admitted to the ICU for duodenal perforation with abdominal infection, had CRPA strains isolated from the blood (JYPA162), urine (JYPA192J), and bile (YPA187) samples. The blood and urine isolates (JYPA162 and JYPA192J) were identified as ST275, whereas the bile isolate (YPA187) identified as ST270 (Supplemental Table B).
Genetic Correlation Analysis of ST463 CRPA Strains
The genetic relatedness of the ST463 CRPA strains was assessed by phylogenetic analysis (Figure 4A) and pairwise SNP comparisons (Figure 4B). The SNP differences in ST463 CRPA strains isolated from the same wastewater dumping pool at 1-month interval were not significant, for example, PA-A3 and PA-A6 (ICU4, 41 SNPs), PA-B4, and PA-B5 (ICU2, 22 SNPs). PA-D3 isolated from different floors in ICU4 had an SNP difference of 31–33 SNPs compared to the PA-A3 and PA-A6 in the same ICU. Two ST463 strains (PA-H1 and PA-D3), isolated from wastewater dumping pools in different buildings six months apart, showed a close genetic relationship, differing by only eight SNPs.
|
Figure 4 Genome phylogenetic tree of ST463 isolates generated by panaroo and iTOL. (A) The colored stripes represent the sample source. (B) SNP matrix diagram of ST463 strains. |
In addition, the SNP differences between JYPA156 isolated from the urine sample of an infected patient and the environmental strains PA-H1 and PA-D3 ranged from 22 to 30 SNPs. The isolation time of the patient strains was between that of the two environmental strains, and all three strains were isolated from different ICUs at 6-month intervals. The SNP differences among the three KPC-ST463-CRPA strains (JYPA156, PA-A3, and PA-A6) carrying blaAFM-1 ranged from 41 to 59. These patient strains were isolated in ICU2, with a 5-month difference in isolation time compared to the other two environmental strains.
Virulence Assessment
The mortality rates of larvae infected with the two CRPA strains (JYPA121/ST1743 and JYPA526/ST1026) isolated from colonized patients were not significantly different from those of larvae infected with the low-virulence control strain ATCC9027 (p > 0.05). Additionally, when comparing CRPA strains from environmental samples with those from infected patients, both groups exhibited mortality rates similar to those of the high-virulence control strain PA14, with no significant differences (p > 0.05) (Figure 5A). Larval mortality caused by environmental CRPA strains was comparable to that caused by the strains isolated from infected patients (Figure 5B). However, larvae infected with ST463 strains showed significantly higher mortality rates than those infected with non-ST463 strains (p < 0.05) (Figure 5C).
Biofilm Forming Ability
The proportion of environmental CRPA strains exhibited strong biofilm-forming ability was significantly higher than that of patient-related CRPA strains (62.96% [17/27] vs 33.33% [9/27]; p < 0.05). Additionally, ST463 isolates exhibited a significantly higher biofilm-forming capacity than non-ST463 isolates (76.92% [10/13] vs 39.02% [16/41]; p < 0.05).
Discussion
The emergence of DTR-PA has also become a global concern because it poses a significant constraint on clinical therapeutic strategies.19 In China, the predominant DTR-PA clone is ST463, which commonly produces KPC and exhibits high virulence and mortality rates.20,21 A recent epidemiological study confirmed that ST463 is the most prevalent CRPA clone in China (20%), with 91% of ST463-CRPA strains carrying the blaKPC-2 gene, while the detection rate of MBLs in CRPA was only 7.02%.22 In our study, all ST463 strains isolated from ICU environments also harbored blaKPC-2 and were classified as DTR-PA, consistent with the clinical ST463 strains detected in the past.21,23,24 However, we observed a significantly higher MBL detection rate (22.22%) in ICU-derived CRPA strains, which was significantly higher than the proportion of MBLs in CRPA in China.22,25–27 Notably, our study identified ST463 strains co-harboring blaAFM-1 and blaKPC-2 not only in patient samples but also in ICU environments. These strains exhibited high-level resistance to all β-lactam antibiotics, including novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, indicating the emergence of a new “superbug” in ICU. We hypothesized that the widespread use of antibiotics, particularly carbapenems, in ICU settings and the strong colonization ability of CRPA may contribute to the acquisition of resistance genes and recombination events, facilitating adaptation to antibiotic pressure.
In our study, all ST463 strains isolated from patients and environments in ICUs co-carried exoU and exoS virulence genes encoding the type III secretion system in P. aeruginosa to deliver virulence factors into host cells.23,28 While previous research has extensively reported on the virulence of ST463 strains,16,21 our findings emphasize that environmental isolates share a similar high-virulence phenotype. G. mellonella virulence assays demonstrated that environmental ST463 strains exhibited virulence levels comparable to those of clinical strains, underscoring the persistence of these virulence factors outside the human host. Additionally, ICU environmental CRPA isolates, predominantly of the ST463 lineage, displayed enhanced biofilm-forming ability compared to the clinical strains. Biofilm formation facilitates long-term colonization by promoting bacterial adhesion, protecting cells from adverse conditions, and providing nutrients in nutrient-limited environments, thereby contributing to the survival and persistence of these bacteria on surfaces.7
This study identified ventilator condensate as a key colonization site for CRPA, likely originating from the respiratory tract, owing to the direct connection between ventilator tubes and patient airways. Some patients with CRPA-positive ventilator condensate had carbapenem-sensitive P. aeruginosa detected in their sputum over extended periods, potentially reflecting the clonal diversity of P. aeruginosa. Contaminated condensates may contribute to the development of ventilator-associated or hospital-acquired pneumonia (VAP/HAP). Therefore, increased monitoring and more frequent handling of ventilator condensates are recommended for patients with respiratory P. aeruginosa colonization, to mitigate the spread of CRPA. Additionally, CRPA strains were isolated from ICU air in our study, suggesting a potential risk of aerosol dissemination and subsequent environmental contamination in ICU settings. This poses a threat to other patients by contaminating the wounds, skin, or catheters. Current ICU protocols that emphasize contact isolation may be insufficient in addressing aerosol dissemination. These findings underscore the need for single-room isolation of patients with antibiotic-resistant infections to mitigate broader ICU contamination and associated infection risks.
According to SNP analysis, representative clinically relevant P. aeruginosa was defined as bacteria with an SNP difference of less than 37.29,30 In our study, the striking genomic similarity (differing by only eight SNPs) between two ST463-CRPA strains (PA-H1 and PA-D3) isolated from wastewater dumping pools in different buildings six months apart provides compelling evidence for the long-term persistence and inter-unit dissemination of a single high-risk clone. The powerful biofilm-forming ability of these strains may serve as a protective mechanism against disinfectant treatments. This finding underscores that routine disinfection may be insufficient to eradicate such entrenched biofilm-forming clones and highlights that transient vectors, such as the movement of healthcare workers, medical equipment, and patients are likely contributing to the spread of this strain across different regions. Furthermore, the genomic plasticity observed among these closely related isolates, even within a short time frame, suggests a capacity for rapid adaptation to environmental changes. Contamination in humid environments, such as wastewater dumping pools and inadequate disinfection, may provide opportunities for clonal spread and evolution of ST463 strains in the ICU.
Therefore, we emphasize the rigorous and effective disinfection of ICU environments to reduce the colonization of the emerging high-risk clone ST463 PA. It is crucial to standardize the use of water reservoirs in different areas of the ICU, such as prohibiting operations other than handwashing in wash basins near a patient’s bed. Implementing waterless care for patients as much as possible, including removing wash basins from patient rooms, has proven effective in preventing outbreaks of VIM-producing CRPA in an ICU in another hospital setting.9 In practice, this strategy involves using pre-packaged, disposable bathing products for patient hygiene and strictly prohibiting the use of tap water for direct patient care, thereby eliminating a major environmental reservoir for P. aeruginosa. Additionally, wastewater dumping pools, which are primarily used for handling patient secretions, have emerged as significant reservoirs for ST463 colonization. Introducing disinfection systems for fecal and urinary waste disposal could help mitigate environmental contamination and further reduce the risk of ICU colonization.
However, our study has certain limitations. First, it was a single-center study. Additionally, we did not perform phenotypic disinfectant susceptibility testing for the CRPA strains isolated from the ICU in our study. The presence of disinfectant resistance genes (eg, qacEΔ1) in our isolates suggests selection under environmental disinfectant pressure, and correlating these genotypes with phenotypic susceptibility to the specific biocides used in the hospital remains an important area for future investigation. Finally, the sampling frequency should be increased to adequately monitor the distribution and characteristics of the CRPA strains. In subsequent studies, we will systematically monitor and evaluate the distribution of CRPA strains in the ICU environments following the implementation of the aforementioned intervention measures.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study identified the high-risk clone ST463 CRPA as frequently present in both ICU patients and environmental samples, with evidence supporting clonal transmission within the ICU. Our results also showed that ST463 strains in ICU environments had strong biofilm-forming ability and seemed to be more suitable for living in a hospital damp environment for a long time. This indicates that contamination and incomplete disinfection of environmental water reservoirs may lead to clonal dissemination and evolution of ST463 strains in the ICU. In addition to traditional infection control measures, targeted measures should be strictly implemented, such as standardizing the use of wash basins and wastewater dumping pools in different areas, thorough disinfection, and even implementing waterless care for patients to prevent and control potential outbreaks of ST463 strain infections in the ICU.
Accession Numbers
The whole-genome sequences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were submitted to NCBI GenBank under the BioProject ID PRJNA1206678. The BioSample accession numbers ranged from SAMN46080943 to SAMN46080991, and the Genome accession numbers ranged from JBKILN000000000 to JBKINI000000000. Detailed information is provided in Supplemental Table C.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School in China (approval no. IIT20210120B). The need for individual informed consent was waived by the ethics committee because this study involved a retrospective analysis of clinical data and bacterial isolates, which posed no more than minimal risk to the subjects and did not adversely affect their rights and welfare. All patient data were fully anonymized before analysis to protect confidentiality. This study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LTGY23H010005) and Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province, China (2023KY103).
Disclosure
This paper has been uploaded to Research Square as a preprint: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3239716/v1. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Gales AC, Jones RN, Turnidge J, Rennie R, Ramphal R. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: occurrence rates, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and molecular typing in the global SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(Suppl 2):S146–55. doi:10.1086/320186
2. Markou P, Apidianakis Y. Pathogenesis of intestinal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cancer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;3:115. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00115
3. Rhodes NJ, Cruce CE, O’Donnell JN, Wunderink RG, Hauser AR. Resistance trends and treatment options in gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018;20(2):3. doi:10.1007/s11908-018-0609-x
4. Hu Y, Liu C, Wang Q, et al. Emergence and expansion of a carbapenem-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa clone are associated with plasmid-borne bla (KPC-2) and virulence-related genes. mSystems. 2021;6(3). doi:10.1128/mSystems.00154-21
5. Nordmann P, Poirel L. Epidemiology and diagnostics of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Suppl 7):S521–s8. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz824
6. Botelho J, Grosso F, Peixe L. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa - mechanisms, epidemiology and evolution. Drug Resist Updat. 2019;44:100640. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2019.07.002
7. Ma LZ, Wang D, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Wozniak DJ. Regulation of biofilm exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and degradation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2022;76:413–433. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-041320-111355
8. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Biondo C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the most critical pathogens. Pathogens. 2021;10(10):1310. doi:10.3390/pathogens10101310
9. Catho G, Martischang R, Boroli F, et al. Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing VIM carbapenemase in an intensive care unit and its termination by implementation of waterless patient care. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):301. doi:10.1186/s13054-021-03726-y
10. Thi MTT, Wibowo D, Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8671. doi:10.3390/ijms21228671
11. Stanton RA, Campbell D, McAllister GA, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals diversity of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected through CDC’s emerging infections program, United States, 2016–2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(9):e0049622. doi:10.1128/aac.00496-22
12. Wright LL, Turton JF, Livermore DM, Hopkins KL, Woodford N. Dominance of international ‘high-risk clones’ among metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(1):103–110. doi:10.1093/jac/dku339
13. Ge C, Wei Z, Jiang Y, Shen P, Yu Y, Li L. Identification of KPC-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(5):1184–1186. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr060
14. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 guidance on the treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(2):187–212. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac268
15. Zhu Y, Chen J, Shen H, et al. Emergence of ceftazidime- and avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China. mSystems. 2021;6(6):e0078721. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00787-21
16. Hu H, Zhang Y, Zhang P, et al. Bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa sequence type 463, associated with high mortality rates in China: a retrospective cohort study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:756782. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.756782
17. Zhang P, Wu W, Wang N, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk sequence type 463 co-producing KPC-2 and AFM-1 Carbapenemases, China, 2020–2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(10):2136–2140. doi:10.3201/eid2910.230509
18. Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, et al. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. Apmis. 2007;115(8):891–899. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x
19. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–327. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3
20. Zhang P, Wang J, Shi W, et al. In vivo acquisition of bla(KPC-2) with low biological cost in bla(AFM-1)-harboring ST463 hypervirulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a patient with hematologic malignancy. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;31:189–195. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2022.09.004
21. Zhang B, Xu X, Song X, et al. Emerging and re-emerging KPC-producing hypervirulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST697 and ST463 between 2010 and 2021. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11(1):2735–2745. doi:10.1080/22221751.2022.2140609
22. Reyes J, Komarow L, Chen L, et al. Global epidemiology and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and associated carbapenemases (POP): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Microbe. 2023;4(3):e159–e70. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00329-9
23. Zhu Y, Kang Y, Zhang H, et al. Emergence of ST463 exoU-positive, imipenem-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in China. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(4):e0010523. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00105-23
24. Zhang X, Tang M, Xu Y, et al. Characteristics of rare ST463 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from blood. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2023;32:122–130. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2023.01.011
25. Dawadi P, Khadka C, Shyaula M, et al. Prevalence of metallo-β-lactamases as a correlate of multidrug resistance among clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Nepal. Sci Total Environ. 2022;850:157975. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157975
26. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(3):440–58, table of contents. doi:10.1128/CMR.00001-07
27. Wang J, Zhou JY, Qu TT, et al. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Chinese hospitals. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35(5):486–491. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.014
28. Vareechon C, Zmina SE, Karmakar M, Pearlman E, Rietsch A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa effector ExoS inhibits ROS production in human neutrophils. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(5):611–8.e5. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.001
29. Schürch AC, Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJL, Goering RV. Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene-based approaches. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(4):350–354. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.016
30. Blanc DS, Magalhães B, Koenig I, Senn L, Grandbastien B. Comparison of Whole Genome (wg-) and Core Genome (cg-) MLST (BioNumerics(TM)) Versus SNP Variant Calling for Epidemiological Investigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1729. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01729
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles
Epidemiological and Antimicrobial Resistant Patterns, and Molecular Mechanisms of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in ICU Patients
Lu F, Zhang L, Ji J, Xu Y, Wang B, Xia J
Infection and Drug Resistance 2023, 16:2813-2827
Published Date: 9 May 2023
The Resistance and Virulence Characteristics of Salmonella Enteritidis Strain Isolated from Patients with Food Poisoning Based on the Whole-Genome Sequencing and Quantitative Proteomic Analysis
Xu B, Hou Z, Liu L, Yan R, Zhang J, Wei J, Du M, Xuan Y, Fan L, Li Z
Infection and Drug Resistance 2023, 16:6567-6586
Published Date: 6 October 2023
Molecular Characterization and Risk Factors of Carbapenem-Resistant Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Chinese Tertiary Hospital
Zhu R, Li J, Lian S, Li Y, Cai M, Cao Y, Xu X
Infection and Drug Resistance 2025, 18:83-92
Published Date: 6 January 2025
Molecular Characteristics and Phenotypical Analysis of Carbapenem-Resistant K. Pneumoniae in the Lüliang Region, Shanxi Province
Wang H, Jia Z, Li X, Hao Y, Zhang J, Zhao X, Li H, Jin S
Infection and Drug Resistance 2025, 18:2911-2921
Published Date: 7 June 2025
Reversible Evolution of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Driven by blaKPC-71 and Aerobactin Loss in ST11-KL64 Hypervirulent Klebsiella Pneumoniae
Yang Z, Xu S, Xiao Z, Xu D, Tao Q
Infection and Drug Resistance 2025, 18:6407-6420
Published Date: 6 December 2025
