Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18

First Report of Scedosporium aurantiacum Endocarditis in an Immunocompetent Chinese Male and Literature Review

Authors Liu C ORCID logo, Qin X, Zhang P, Wang L, Deng Y

Received 30 September 2025

Accepted for publication 12 December 2025

Published 30 December 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 6801—6810

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S565462

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor Mora-Montes



Chen Liu, Xiaohua Qin, Pei Zhang, Liping Wang, Yunfeng Deng

Department of Katharine Hsu International Research Center of Human Infectious Diseases, Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Liping Wang; Yunfeng Deng, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Background: Scedosporium aurantiacum is a rare opportunistic pathogen distributed worldwide. S. aurantiacum can cause invasive infections in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals following exposure to contaminated environments. The risk associated with wastewater exposure is an important public health concern. Owing to its multi-drug resistance, the treatment of S. aurantiacum infection is very challenging.
Case Presentation: We report a case of a 44-year-old Chinese male with disseminated infection and endocarditis caused by S. aurantiacum after falling into a nearly dry wastewater pool. S. aurantiacum isolated from blood cultures was identified using nanopore sequencing technology of internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing indicated that voriconazole was the most active agent with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.5 μg/mL. Despite receiving appropriate antifungal therapy, the patient died 12 days after fungal isolation because of uncontrolled infection and systemic organ failure.
Conclusion: This is the first reported clinical case of S. aurantiacum endocarditis in China. This case highlights that even in immunocompetent patients, S. aurantiacum infection should be considered. For clinicians, understanding a detailed history of the contaminated environments that the patient has been exposed to is crucial for early diagnosis. Nanopore sequencing offers a new option for identifying S. aurantiacum. Drug susceptibility testing is essential for determining the most appropriate antimycotic agent.

Keywords: Scedosporium aurantiacum, immunocompetent patient, disseminated infection, infective endocarditis, nanopore sequencing technology, multi-drug resistance

Introduction

Scedosporium species are saprophytic filamentous fungi broadly distributed in soil, sewage, and sludge that can cause asymptomatic colonization or localized or disseminated infection in immunocompromised patients, especially following aspiration of contaminated water or traumatic inoculation.1 Scedosporium aurantiacum, one of the main species responsible for scedosporiosis, is a rare and life-threatening opportunistic pathogen that has intrinsic resistance to multiple antifungals, presenting significant challenges to the processes of diagnosis and treatment.2 S. aurantiacum had a high incidence in respiratory specimens of cystic fibrosis patients in Australia, and a relatively low incidence in Europe.3 The clinical isolates of S. aurantiacum from China were described for the first time in 2022,4 but so far there has been no clinical case report of S. aurantiacum endocarditis in China. Herein, we report the fatal case of a previously healthy Chinese patient with disseminated infection and endocarditis, which was found to be caused by S. aurantiacum using fungal culture, MALDI-TOF MS, and nanopore sequencing technology. We also provide a literature review on S. aurantiacum infections.

Case Presentation

A 44-year-old previously healthy Chinese male presented to our hospital with progressive back pain and limited functional activity of the left lower limb for one month. He reported no history of immunosuppressive medication, corticosteroid, or intravenous drug addiction. On admission, he was conscious, and his vital signs and physical examination findings were unremarkable, except for a lumbosacral examination, which revealed tenderness in the interspinous and bilateral paravertebral muscles, accompanied by radiating pain in his left lower limb. The complete blood cell count showed a white blood cell count (WBC) of 13.36×109/L with neutrophils 80.1%, hemoglobin (Hb) 94 g/L, and platelets (PLT) 870×109/L. Elevated inflammatory marker levels included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) 277.77 mg/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 88 mm/h, interleukin-6 (IL-6) 53.1 pg/mL and procalcitonin (PCT) 204.27 ng/mL. HIV-1/-2 antibody test results were negative.

Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging revealed inflammation of the L4/5 disc and ruled out the possibility of an intraspinal tumor. He immediately underwent an aggressive surgical debridement and etiological investigation, but no pathogenic bacteria, including Brucella and mycobacteria, were identified. Subsequently, histopathological of the L4/5 nucleus pulposus revealed granulomatous inflammation. His serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan antigen assay (BG assay) and serum aspergillus galactomannan antigen assay (GM assay) came back negative. Piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin were empirically administered. However, the symptoms did not improve. Even worse, his body temperature increased to 40 °C, accompanied by new symptoms of chest tightness and dyspnea. Therefore, the indicators of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) were investigated. The results showed that the values significantly increased, reaching 40.52 pg/mL and 2379 pg/mL, respectively. Then, echocardiography was performed and revealed new-onset vegetation measuring 13×12 mm over the native mitral valve, with severe mitral regurgitation (Figure 1A). Based on the unusual finding, a detailed interview was conducted once more with the patient. We learned that he had a history of falling into a nearly dry wastewater pool after exposure to hydrogen sulfide gas while working at a sewage treatment plant three months ago. Accordingly, serum BG assay was re-examined and found to be positive with 126.59 pg/mL (normal <70 pg/mL), whereas GM assay remains negative. Therefore, fungal endocarditis was clinically suspected.

Figure 1 (A) Echocardiography showing a large vegetation over the native mitral valve (white arrow). S. aurantiacum cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar after 3 days at 35 °C: (B) front view and (C) reverse view. (D) Phenotypic characterization of S. aurantiacum colonies on Sabouraud dextrose agar after 5 days at 35 °C. (E) Lactophenol cotton blue stain (×1000) of S. aurantiacum showing septate hyphae with obovoid and thick-walled conidia.

According to the diagnostic protocol for infective endocarditis (IE), two sets of aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures (from veins of the left lower extremity and the right upper extremity, respectively) were collected, and four days apart two other sets (from the right femoral vein and the left femoral artery, respectively) were collected. As expected, branching hyphae were found in all aerobic blood culture smears. At 35 °C, the colonies appeared mold-like and greyish-white on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) after 3 days of incubation (Figure 1B), and a brown orange center with a distinctive light-yellow pigment appeared on the reverse side of the SDA plate (Figure 1C). Moreover, a concentric growth pattern and white margins of the colonies were observed after 5 days of incubation (Figure 1D). Lactophenol cotton blue staining of the mold revealed septate hyphae with branching at acute angles and lateral cylindrical or slightly flask-shaped conidiogenous cells bearing obovoid and thick-walled conidia singly or in small groups (Figure 1E), morphologically consistent with Scedosporium species.5 By using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonics GmbH Microflex LT/SH, USA), the fungus was identified as Scedosporium aurantiacum with 2.012 points (Figure 2). Nanopore sequencing targeting the fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region was conducted using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform. The fungal sequences showed 100% sequence identity with those of S. aurantiacum (accession number: KP132662), and the sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession number: PX279226) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PX279226.1/). In addition, the lumbar drainage fluid was subjected to prolonged incubation and the fungi grew, but only a single colony. The patient was diagnosed with disseminated S. aurantiacum infection and endocarditis, meeting two major criteria and one minor criterion of the 2023 European Society of Cardiology modified diagnostic criteria for IE.6

Figure 2 MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the isolate.

In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by a broth microdilution assay according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.7 The minimum inhibitory concentrations were as follows: voriconazole, 0.5 μg/mL; itraconazole, 1 μg/mL; posaconazole, 2 μg/mL; isavuconazole, 4 μg/mL; caspofungin, 8 μg/mL; anidulafungin, >8 μg/mL; amphotericin B, >16 μg/mL; micafungin, >16 μg/mL; fluconazole, 32 μg/mL and 5-flucytosine, >64 μg/mL.

Owing to his poor clinical status, which manifested as septic shock, multiple organ failure, and a low PLT count of 27×109/L, he was considered unsuitable for surgical management. Intravenous voriconazole (400 mg on day 1 and 200 mg daily thereafter) combined with amphotericin B (Lipid Complex) (200 mg once daily) and other supportive treatments were initiated; however, his condition continued to deteriorate, and he died 12 days after the fungus was isolated. The patient’s family refused autopsy.

Discussion

Although IE due to Scedosporium species is quite rare, it is the most common pathogen in fungal IE caused by non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi.8 The pathology of Scedosporium species varies widely, ranging from respiratory colonization in cystic fibrosis patients and localized subcutaneous tissue infections to life-threatening disseminated infections.3 Because clinical symptoms, histopathology, and imaging features of scedosporiosis are easily confused with other mycoses, such as aspergillosis and fusariosis, the diagnosis of scedosporiosis is difficult, resulting in delayed optimal treatment and increased mortality.

Among the 71 Australian clinical isolates of Scedosporium species associated with colonization and infection, Scedosporium apiospermum accounted for 59.2% and Scedosporium aurantiacum for 40.8%.9 However, among the 45 clinical isolates of Scedosporium infection in China, Scedosporium boydii was the most prevalent species at 48.9%, followed by S. apiospermum at 40%, S. aurantiacum at 8.9%, and Scedosporium dehoogii at 2.2%.4 This distribution is similar to that observed in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) in France and in patients with CF or immunocompromise in Northern Spain.10,11 Among the 28 cases of immunocompetent patients reported globally who were deeply infected with Scedosporium species, S. apiospermum was the most common species at 75%, followed by S. boydii at 17.9% and S. aurantiacum at 10.7%.12

Based on the initial laboratory investigations and epidemiological studies described above, S. apiospermum was the first pathogen to be identified in our patient. However, S. aurantiacum was identified based on macroscopic characteristics, including the production of a distinctive light-yellow pigment and growth at 45 °C, as well as microscopic features manifested as mostly obovoid conidia, and by MALDI-TOF MS and nanopore sequencing of ITS1. Additionally, the assimilation of d-ribose, but not sucrose, is the key characteristic for discriminating S. aurantiacum from S. apiospermum.13

Since S. aurantiacum was proposed as a new phylogenetic species in 2005,14 there has been an increase in S. aurantiacum cases involving local or invasive infections. Based on case reports available in PubMed, we identified and analyzed 15 cases of S. aurantiacum infection from 2005 to 2025, after including our case, as summarized in Table 1.15–26

Table 1 Summary of Reported Cases of Scedosporium aurantiacum Infection 2005–2025

Among the 15 patients, there were 7 males and 8 females. The age of these patients ranged from 4 to 82 years. There were 10 cases in Asia, two in America, two in Europe, and one in Australia. S. aurantiacum infection in these patients was associated with a diversity of risk factors and initial events, including trauma (5 cases, 33.3%), organ transplantation (4 cases, 26.7%), near-drowning experience (3 cases, 20%), diabetes (2 cases, 13.3%), malignant lymphoma (1 case, 6.7%), lung cancer (1 case, 6.7%), acute myeloid leukemia (1 case, 6.7%), chronic bronchiectasis (1 case, 6.7%), history of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection (1 case, 6.7%), neutropenia (1 case, 6.7%), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated systemic vasculitis (1 case, 6.7%). The interval from the initial event to onset among the 8 cases ranged from 0 days to 3 months. Fever was the most common systemic symptom (7 cases, 46.7%), followed by altered consciousness (5 cases, 33.3%) and respiratory distress (5 cases, 33.3%). The main sites of infection were the lungs (7 cases, 46.7%), brain (5 cases, 33.3%), blood and eye (each accounted for 3 cases, 20%). Other affected sites included the bones, subcutaneous tissues, and transplanted kidney (each accounted for 2 cases, 13.3%), and the native heart and transplanted heart (each accounted for 1 case, 6.67%). Five patients (33.3%) had a disseminated disease. Among them, three patients had a history of organ transplantation, 1 case involved trauma, and 1 case involved near-drowning.

There were eight immunocompromised patients (53.3%) and seven immunocompetent patients (46.7%). Generally, immunocompromised patients are thought to be predisposed to opportunistic Scedosporium infection; however, this review revealed a high incidence of S. aurantiacum infection in immunocompetent patients due to prior trauma (4 cases, 26.7%) and near-drowning (3 cases, 20%). This finding suggests the need to maintain a high index of clinical suspicion in patients with a history of exposure to contaminated environments, even if they are immunocompetent. In the current case, our patient was previously healthy. Despite extensive investigation, there was no evidence of immunosuppression and immunodeficiency in our patient. We presumed that the source of his disseminated infection and endocarditis was through traumatic inoculation in his lumbar after exposure to wastewater. The incidence of lung infections in immunocompromised patients (4 out of 8, 50%) was higher than that in immunocompetent patients (2 out of 7, 28.6%). Immunocompromised patients (3 out of 8, 37.5%) were also more likely to develop disseminated infection than immunocompetent patients (2 out of 7, 28.6%). To date, there have been no reported cases of subcutaneous soft tissue infection in immunocompetent patients.

Of note, only our patient’s native heart valves were affected, while the other patient was a heart transplant recipient who acquired S. aurantiacum through donor-derived transmission.18 Furthermore, S. aurantiacum endocarditis may have a poor prognosis. Previous studies have shown that in mouse models, the virulence of S. aurantiacum is stronger than that of other Scedosporium species and is comparable to that of Lomentospora prolificans, which has a high mortality rate of 81% in patients with endocarditis.27,28 In this review, the overall mortality of S. aurantiacum infection was 46.6% (7 out of 15), but the mortality in patients with disseminated infection can reach up to 80% (4 out of 5). Hence, the clinical outcomes of disseminated infections caused by S. aurantiacum are discouraging.

Voriconazole is recommended by the European Federation of Medical Mycology as a first-line antimycotic drug for the treatment of Scedosporium infections.29 Although voriconazole was used within the recommended dose in our patients, we did not monitor the serum voriconazole concentrations periodically during the course of intravenous therapy. However, this is an essential procedure for ensuring individualized medication, maximizing therapeutic efficacy and minimizing toxicity. In this case, we used voriconazole combined with amphotericin B (Lipid Complex) to combat S. aurantiacum infection. This combination therapy is a first-line alternative treatment for scedosporiosis. However, the optimal therapy remains unknown and data on treatment is anecdotal. Several case reports have added to the evidence that the combination therapy with voriconazole and terbinafine may be synergistic and effective for the treatment of scedosporiosis.30–32 So far, there have been no reports on the use of voriconazole in combination with terbinafine for the treatment of S. aurantiacum infection. Goldman et al reported a case of cutaneous S. apiospermum infection, and the patient partially recovered through the combination therapy of voriconazole plus micafungin and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).33 In this review, only one patient recovered through skin puncture of a subcutaneous abscess, but without using antifungal drugs.19 Among the remaining 14 patients who received antifungal treatment, 11 patients were administered voriconazole (11 out of 14, 78.6%), and most of them (7 out of 11, 63.6%) had improved outcomes, while all 3 patients who did not use voriconazole died.

Among the 7 improved cases, the treatment duration ranged from 12 to 215 days. Nine patients (9 out of 15, 60%) underwent in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of S. aurantiacum. The results showed that voriconazole was the most active agent with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range from 0.25 to 1 μg/mL, followed by a MIC range of 0.5->16 μg/mL for posaconazole, 0.5->16 μg/mL for itraconazole, 2->16 μg/mL for amphotericin, 2->16 μg/mL for terbinafine, 2->16 μg/mL for isavuconazole, 4->8 μg/mL for micafungin and 4->16 μg/mL for caspofungin.

Because of the variability in virulence and antifungal susceptibility patterns among different species, accurate identification of Scedosporium species at the species level is very important for clinical practice.2,34 Although little is known about the pathogenesis and virulence of Scedosporium species, recent studies have shown that the biofilms serves as a protective role, and the ability to form biofilms enhances virulence in Scedosporium species.35,36 The biofilms formed by S. aurantiacum were more robust and had a greater biomass than those formed by S. apiospermum, and the clinical S. aurantiacum isolate was also more virulent in a larvae Galleria mellonella infection model.35 By comparing the clinical presentation of S. aurantiacum and S. apiospermum in immunocompetent patients, we found that apart from fever and local pain, which were the most common clinical presentation for both, dyspnea and altered consciousness occurred more common in patients infected with S. aurantiacum compared to those infected with S. apiospermum, while haemoptysis and lethargy occurred more common in patients infected with S. apiospermum compared to those infected with S. aurantiacum.12 In immunocompetent individuals, patients infected with S. aurantiacum may have a poorer clinical prognosis than those infected with S. apiospermum, with the mortality rates being 28.6% and 23.8%, respectively.

Currently, culture remains the main method for detecting pathogens in clinical samples. Although it is difficult to distinguish these species in terms of morphology, molecular biological methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for use on tissue specimens and sequencing of ITS1, ITS2, β-tubulin, and calmodulin for use in cultures, are widely used for the identification of Scedosporium species with extremely high sensitivity and precision.37 Clinically, MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable tool that can rapidly and accurately identify Scedosporium species.38 Nanopore sequencing technology, as an important auxiliary diagnostic method for difficult-to-cultivate pathogens and uncommon pathogens, has the advantages of short turnaround time, high sequencing length, precise results, and applicability to various clinical samples.39

Conclusion

Herein, we report the first case of S. aurantiacum endocarditis in China. This case highlights that, even in immunocompetent patients, fungal origin should be suspected, especially in those with a history of exposure to a contaminated environment. Adequately obtaining the exposure history of contaminated environments is an important aspect of clinical practice, which could assist clinicians to avoid delayed diagnosis. Nanopore sequencing offers a new option for identifying S. aurantiacum. It is crucial for clinical laboratories to identify Scedosporium spp. to the species level and perform drug susceptibility testing to determine the most appropriate antimycotic agent. Accurate diagnosis and rational treatment are associated with low mortality rate.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University (No. GWLCZXEC-SOP-K-2025-157) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Institutional approval was not required for publication of the case details as it does not involve sensitive patient information. Written informed consent to have the case details and any accompanying potentially identifiable images or data published has been obtained from the patient’s family.

Consent for Publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s family for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; have drafted, revised or critically reviewed the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province (No. 2021SFGC0504) and Medicine and Health Science Technology Development Program of Shandong Province (No. 202112050732).

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Cortez KJ, Roilides E, Quiroz-Telles F, et al. Infections caused by Scedosporium spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(1):157–197. doi:10.1128/CMR.00039-07

2. Lackner M, de Hoog GS, Verweij PE, et al. Species-specific antifungal susceptibility patterns of Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2635–2642. doi:10.1128/AAC.05910-11

3. Luplertlop N. Pseudallescheria/Scedosporium complex species: from saprobic to pathogenic fungus. J Mycol Med. 2018;28(2):249–256. doi:10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.02.015

4. Chen M, Zhu X, Cong Y, et al. Genotypic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of Scedosporium species from clinical settings in China. Mycoses. 2022;65(12):1159–1169. doi:10.1111/myc.13507

5. De Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gene J, et al. Atlas of Clinical Fungi. 3rd. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Reus; 2019.

6. Delgado V, Ajmone Marsan N, de Waha S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(39):3948–4042. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad193

7. J Hr. CLSI Standards M38 Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi. 3rd edn. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI;2017.

8. Meena DS, Kumar D, Agarwal M, et al. Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment outcome of fungal endocarditis: a systematic review of reported cases. Mycoses. 2022;65(3):294–302. doi:10.1111/myc.13398

9. Heath CH, Slavin MA, Sorrell TC, et al. Population-based surveillance for scedosporiosis in Australia: epidemiology, disease manifestations and emergence of Scedosporium aurantiacum infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(7):689–693. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02802.x

10. Zouhair R, Rougeron A, Razafimandimby B, Kobi A, Bouchara JP, Giraud S. Distribution of the different species of the Pseudallescheria boydii/Scedosporium apiospermum complex in French patients with cystic fibrosis. Med Mycol. 2013;51(6):603–613. doi:10.3109/13693786.2013.770606

11. Lackner M, Rezusta A, Villuendas MC, Palacian MP, Meis JF, Klaassen CH. Infection and colonisation due to Scedosporium in Northern Spain. An in vitro antifungal susceptibility and molecular epidemiology study of 60 isolates. Mycoses. 2011;54(Suppl 3):S12–S21. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02110.x

12. Yan P, Chen J, Wang H, Jia Q, Xie J, Mo G. A systemic infection involved in lung, brain and spine caused by Scedosporium apiospermum species complex after near-drowning: a case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):342. doi:10.1186/s12879-023-08279-9

13. Gilgado F, Cano J, Gené J, Sutton DA, Guarro J. Molecular and phenotypic data supporting distinct species statuses for Scedosporium apiospermum and Pseudallescheria boydii and the proposed new species Scedosporium dehoogii. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(2):766–771. doi:10.1128/JCM.01122-07

14. Gilgado F, Cano J, Gené J, Guarro J. Molecular phylogeny of the Pseudallescheria boydii species complex: proposal of two new species. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):4930–4942. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.10.4930-4942

15. Kooijman CM, Kampinga GA, de Hoog GS, Goudswaard WB, Reijnen MM. Successful treatment of Scedosporium aurantiacum osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient. Surg Infect. 2007;8(6):605–610. doi:10.1089/sur.2006.038

16. Tintelnot K, Wagner N, Seibold M, de Hoog GS, Horré R. Re-identification of clinical isolates of the Pseudallescheria boydii-complex involved in near-drowning. Mycoses. 2008;51(Suppl 3):S11–S16. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01579.x

17. Nakamura Y, Suzuki N, Nakajima Y, et al. Scedosporium aurantiacum brain abscess after near-drowning in a survivor of a tsunami in Japan. Respir Investig. 2013;51(4):207–211. doi:10.1016/j.resinv.2013.07.001

18. Kim SH, Ha YE, Youn JC, et al. Fatal scedosporiosis in multiple solid organ allografts transmitted from a nearly-drowned donor. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(3):833–840. doi:10.1111/ajt.13008

19. Kondo M, Goto H, Yamanaka K. Case of Scedosporium aurantiacum infection detected in a subcutaneous abscess. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2018;20:26–27. doi:10.1016/j.mmcr.2018.01.003

20. Kim H, Ahn JY, Chung IY, et al. A case report of infectious scleritis with corneal ulcer caused by Scedosporium aurantiacum. Medicine. 2019;98(27):e16063. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000016063

21. Mizusawa M, Totten M, Zhang SX. A case of Scedosporium aurantiacum infection in the United States. Mycopathologia. 2021;186(1):127–130. doi:10.1007/s11046-020-00498-x

22. Amin S, Puri P, Chen SCA, Mahajan H, Neill L, Wong G. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and Scedosporium aurantiacum lung infection in a kidney transplant recipient. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(8):2232–2236. doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.05.002

23. Ghasemian R, Bandegani A, Kermani F, et al. Fatal pulmonary Scedosporium aurantiacum infection in a patient after near-drowning: a case report. Curr Med Mycol. 2021;7(4):38–42. doi:10.18502/cmm.7.4.8410

24. Carnovale S, Epelbaum C, Abrantes R, Córdoba S, Cabrera C, Caracciolo B. Scedosporium aurantiacum: first isolation in Argentina from a previously healthy patient after traumatic inoculation. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2022;54(4):318–321. doi:10.1016/j.ram.2022.02.002

25. Kitahara M, Sumi M, Kazumoto H, et al. Disseminated infection by Scedosporium/Lomentospora during induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia complicated by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Intern Med. 2024;63(10):1465–1471. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.2159-23

26. Kashiwada-Nakamura K, Noguchi H, Yaguchi T, et al. Subcutaneous hyalohyphomycosis caused by Scedosporium aurantiacum treated with posacanazole. Mycopathologia. 2024;189(1):9. doi:10.1007/s11046-023-00824-z

27. Wakabayashi Y, Okugawa S, Tatsuno K, et al. Scedosporium prolificans endocarditis: case report and literature review. Intern Med. 2016;55(1):79–82. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5592

28. Harun A, Serena C, Gilgado F, Chen SC, Meyer W. Scedosporium aurantiacum is as virulent as S. prolificans, and shows strain-specific virulence differences, in a mouse model. Med Mycol. 2010;48(Suppl 1):S45–S51. doi:10.3109/13693786.2010.517224

29. Hoenigl M, Salmanton-García J, Walsh TJ, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare mould infections: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology and the American Society for Microbiology. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(8):e246–e257. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30784-2

30. Jabr R, Hammoud K. Scedosporium apiospermum fungemia successfully treated with voriconazole and terbinafine. IDCases. 2020;22:e00928. doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e00928

31. Henao-Martínez AF, Castillo-Mancilla JR, Barron MA, Nichol AC. Combination antifungal therapy in the treatment of Scedosporium apiospermum central nervous system infections. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2013;2013:589490. doi:10.1155/2013/589490

32. Musk M, Chambers D, Chin W, Murray R, Gabbay E. Successful treatment of disseminated scedosporium infection in 2 lung transplant recipients: review of the literature and recommendations for management. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25(10):1268–1272. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2006.06.002

33. Goldman C, Akiyama MJ, Torres J, Louie E, Meehan SA. Scedosporium apiospermum infections and the role of combination antifungal therapy and GM-CSF: a case report and review of the literature. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2016;11:40–43. doi:10.1016/j.mmcr.2016.04.005

34. Gilgado F, Cano J, Gené J, Serena C, Guarro J. Different virulence of the species of the Pseudallescheria boydii complex. Med Mycol. 2009;47(4):371–374. doi:10.1080/13693780802256539

35. Rollin-Pinheiro R, de Meirelles JV, Vila TVM, et al. Biofilm formation by Pseudallescheria/Scedosporium species: a comparative study. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1568. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01568

36. Mello TP, Aor AC, Gonçalves DS, Seabra SH, Branquinha MH, Santos AL. Assessment of biofilm formation by Scedosporium apiospermum, S. aurantiacum, S. minutisporum and Lomentospora prolificans. Biofouling. 2016;32(7):737–749. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1192610

37. Morrissey CO. Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal infections due to non-Aspergillus moulds. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025;80(Suppl 1):i17–i39. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaf005

38. Sitterlé E, Giraud S, Leto J, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for fast and accurate identification of Pseudallescheria/Scedosporium species. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(9):929–935. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12574

39. Zhu X, Yan S, Yuan F, Wan S. The applications of nanopore sequencing technology in pathogenic microorganism detection. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020;2020:6675206. doi:10.1155/2020/6675206

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.