Back to Journals » Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy » Volume 16
Genetic Evidence Linking Immune Cell Subsets to Psoriatic Arthritis Susceptibility: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Authors Wang H
, Ma M
, Wang C, Zhen Y, Li S
Received 17 December 2025
Accepted for publication 8 April 2026
Published 16 April 2026 Volume 2026:16 589733
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S589733
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Mio Nakamura
Huiwei Wang,1,* Mingxuan Ma,1,* Chenfeng Wang,2,* Yu Zhen,1 Shanshan Li1
1Department of Dermatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Shanshan Li, Department of Dermatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) involves intricate immune-mediated pathways that extend beyond the well-characterized IL-23/IL-17 axis. Given that many patients show inadequate responses to current therapies, identifying novel immune drivers is essential. To clarify how specific immune cell populations influence PsA susceptibility, we performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study.
Methods: We used genetic instruments for immune traits from a GWAS of 3,757 European individuals and PsA summary data from the IEU database (5,065 cases and 21,286 controls). Applying inverse variance weighting as our principal method.
Results: At a nominal significance level (P < 0.05), we detected 14 immune phenotypes linked to heightened risk and 12 associated with reduced risk. Among the risk-associated phenotypes, activated B cells—particularly those expressing CD25 and BAFF-R on IgD+CD24+ subsets—emerged as prominent markers, a finding that shifts focus toward humoral involvement alongside the conventional emphasis on T cells alone. We also identified pathogenic contributions from specific T cell subsets, notably CCR7+naïve CD4+T cells and CD127+CD45RA+CD4+T cells. Conversely, certain natural killer T cell phenotypes appeared protective, hinting at a regulatory role for these populations. Reverse MR indicated that PsA liability itself may drive changes in 23 immune phenotypes, including depletion of circulating plasmacytoid dendritic cells and alterations in myeloid compartments—patterns likely reflecting cellular migration into inflamed synovial tissue. Importantly, none of these associations survived false discovery rate correction, indicating that these findings are exploratory.
Conclusion: Our findings map the genetic underpinnings of immune dysregulation in PsA and provide a hypothesis-generating resource for therapeutic strategies targeting B cell stimulation. The preliminary nature and uncertainty of these associations necessitates further investigation and validation in independent, larger cohorts alongside current cytokine-directed approaches.
Keywords: immunocyte phenotype, psoriatic arthritis, Mendelian randomization, genome-wide association studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms
Introduction
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory arthropathy that manifests as seronegative spondyloarthritis in patients with psoriasis.1 Its clinical presentation encompasses psoriatic rash, joint swelling, pain, stiffness, and impaired joint mobility, accompanied, in certain cases, by spondylitis and sacroiliac arthritis,2 which contributes to a substantial burden on both families and healthcare systems. One of the factors making it challenging to identify and treat psoriatic arthritis in its early stages is its unclear etiology.3 Consequently, there is a pressing need to identify novel risk factors for PsA to facilitate the development of preventative and therapeutic strategies, thereby alleviating the future burden on the healthcare system.
Within the realm of immunology, leukocytes, which comprise lymphocytes and diverse phagocytic cells, are instrumental in orchestrating immune responses. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that immune cells significantly influence multiple processes in bone physiology, including bone regeneration, osteoclastogenesis, osteoblast activity, bone density modulation, and other pertinent functions associated with skeletal homeostasis.4,5 Alterations in immune cells have been linked to the risk, severity, and progression of PsA. For instance, one study identified monocytes, dendritic cells, memory T regulatory cells, and T-helper 17 cells as being associated with increased disease activity and longer PsA duration.6 Evidence also suggests that disrupted homeostasis of innate lymphoid cells may confer a potential risk of PsA.7 Therefore, using MR analysis, we examined the complicated causative link as well as the reverse causal association between 731 immune cell types and immunocyte phenotypes in PsA.8 The insights generated by this study may inform future research into PsA mechanisms and the development of clinical diagnostics and therapies.
Recent progress in computational analytic methods has introduced new approaches for examining relationships between distinct disease phenotypes.9,10 These techniques offer valuable opportunities to clarify the mechanistic basis of PsA and to uncover candidate targets for therapeutic intervention. Although randomised controlled trials are commonly recognised as the most effective method for determining causal associations in epidemiological studies, their practical execution is often constrained by ethical considerations and substantial financial outlays.11 Studies based on observation face inherent challenges from unmeasured confounders and bidirectional causality, which undermine confident causal conclusions.12 Mendelian randomization (MR) addresses these challenges through the use of genetic variants as instrumental proxies, enabling more reliable causal estimation.13–15 Jia et al (2025) previously conducted a bidirectional MR study on 731 immune phenotypes in PsA,8 and they concluded that there was no reverse causal relationship8—this finding may have overlooked the immunorenewal phenomenon that has been confirmed in clinical PsA. Our study expands and deepens this previous work in two fundamental aspects: Firstly, by providing a more detailed description of the reverse causal path, our research results are coordinated with the clinical evidence of systemic immune changes (such as the alterations of Th17 and regulatory T cells).16–18 Secondly, by isolating the unified biological characteristics of dysregulation of B cell co-stimulatory markers—especially CD25 on multiple memory B cell subpopulations. In contrast to prior work, we pay particular attention to the biological plausibility of B-cell co-stimulatory signals and offer a more circumspect interpretation of the reverse MR findings in the context of disease-driven immune remodeling. Our objective was to pinpoint immune markers that might serve as targets for early detection or therapeutic development.
Method
Study Design
We employed bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to investigate the causal relationship between 731 immunocyte phenotypes and PsA. First, the direct effects of each immunocyte phenotype on the occurrence of PsA were estimated using MR analyses (Figure 1). Three main hypotheses were tested: (1) The IVs displayed a strong correlation with immunocyte phenotypes, (2) the IVs remained unaffected by confounding factors related to the association between immunocyte phenotypes and PsA, and (3) the IVs had no effect on immunocyte phenotypes through pathways other than immunocyte phenotypes. Subsequently, we performed reverse MR analyses treating PsA as the exposure and immune cell phenotypes as outcomes, thereby testing whether disease liability influences immune composition. All analyses adhered to the STROBE-MR reporting guidelines. Effect estimates are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) for PsA per unit change in immunocyte phenotypes.
Data Source
Exposure data for 731 immune cell phenotypes were obtained from a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS; GWAS Catalog accession IDs: GCST90001391–GCST90002121) conducted in 3,757 individuals of European ancestry, enabling the construction of a standardized, high-resolution atlas of the human immune system. For the outcome analysis, we selected the PsA dataset from the IEU OpenGWAS database (ID: IEU-B-5116, https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets), comprising 5,065 cases and 21,286 controls—all of European ancestry—yielding a total sample size of N = 26,351.19 This dataset was prioritized following systematic evaluation of key methodological criteria, including sample size, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density, and ancestral homogeneity, to maximize statistical power and mitigate potential confounding due to population stratification.
Genetic Data Processing
We employed the R package TwoSampleMR (version 0.5.6 in R 4.3.0) to identify valid genetic instruments from exposure summary statistics. To ensure independence among selected variants and minimize confounding from linkage disequilibrium, we applied a clumping procedure using an r2 threshold of 0.001 within a 10 Mb window, referencing the 1000 Genomes European ancestry panel.20 Given the limited sample size of the immune cell GWAS, we adopted a relaxed genome-wide significance threshold (P < 5×10–5) for instrument selection, consistent with recent MR studies examining immune traits. However, we acknowledge that this relaxed threshold introduces a methodological trade-off: while it increases the number of available instruments and improves statistical power, it may also admit variants with weaker exposure associations, elevating the potential for false-positive findings. To mitigate this risk, we applied stringent post-selection quality control, including F-statistic filtering and Steiger directionality testing, and interpret all findings in the context of this limitation. To exclude weak instruments susceptible to bias, we calculated F-statistics using the formula F = β2/SE2, retaining only variants with F > 10.21 This conventional threshold was selected because F-statistics below 10 are empirically associated with meaningful weak instrument bias in MR settings. Across all retained instruments, F-statistics ranged from 29.85 to 5062, indicating that the majority of selected variants satisfied instrument strength requirements. Following instrument selection, we harmonized exposure and outcome datasets by aligning effect alleles to a common reference strand.22 Ambiguous palindromic SNPs lacking clear strand orientation were removed, while those with unambiguous allele configurations were appropriately oriented to ensure directional consistency.
MR Analyses Between 731 Immunocyte Phenotypes and PsA
To investigate putative causal relationships, we conducted MR analyses using multiple complementary approaches: IVW analysis under both fixed-effects and random-effects frameworks, weighted median estimation, MR-Egger regression, and weighted mode analysis. The IVW method served as our primary analytical framework, with Cochran’s Q statistic used to evaluate heterogeneity across genetic instruments. Given the large number of independent tests (n = 731), we applied Benjamini-Hochberg correction to control the false discovery rate (FDR). Associations surviving FDR correction (FDR < 0.05) were considered robust findings. Associations achieving nominal significance (IVW P < 0.05) but not surviving FDR correction were classified as exploratory signals requiring independent replication and are discussed as such throughout this manuscript. When Cochran’s Q test indicated no significant heterogeneity (P > 0.05), we applied the fixed-effects IVW model. Conversely, when substantial heterogeneity was detected (Cochran’s Q test, P < 0.05), we employed the random-effects IVW framework. The weighted median, MR-Egger, and weighted mode approaches were implemented as sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of IVW findings. Effect estimates are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Where the primary IVW analysis yielded P < 0.05 but sensitivity methods were non-significant, we conservatively treated such associations as exploratory rather than confirmatory, given that consistent directional agreement across methods is required for stronger causal inference. These findings are explicitly flagged as requiring further validation. Scatter plots were generated to visualize MR results. This integrated analytical strategy enabled comprehensive assessment of potential causal pathways. Additionally, reverse MR analyses were performed to examine whether PsA liability causally influences immune cell profiles.
Sensitivity Analysis
To assess the reliability of our causal estimates, we implemented several sensitivity tests. Heterogeneity across instrumental variables was quantified using Cochran’s Q statistic, which evaluates consistency of SNP-specific causal effects. We examined potential violations of the exclusivity assumption by testing for horizontal pleiotropy through MR-Egger regression, wherein a non-zero intercept indicates that genetic variants influence the outcome through pathways independent of the exposure.23 To confirm the directionality of causal inference and ensure that observed associations reflect effects of immune phenotypes on PsA rather than reverse causation or confounding, we applied the Steiger filtering method, which compares the variance explained in exposure versus outcome by each instrumental variable.24 Instruments for which the variance explained in the outcome exceeded that in the exposure were excluded prior to final estimation, further guarding against spurious findings that could arise from the relaxed instrument selection threshold applied in this study.
Results
Exploratory Analysis of Immunocyte Phenotypes on PsA
The primary IVW analysis identified 26 immunophenotypes with a suggestive nominal association with PsA risk (P < 0.05, see Figure 2). Among these, 14 traits were nominally linked to heightened disease susceptibility (OR > 1), predominantly within B-cell and T-cell compartments. Potential phenotypes included: BAFF-R expression on IgD⁺CD24⁺ B cells; CCR7 on naïve CD4⁺ T cells; CD127 on CD45RA⁺ CD4⁺ T cells; BAFF-R on IgD−CD38⁺ B cells; IgD on IgD⁺CD38− unswitched memory B cells; IgD on IgD⁺CD24⁺ B cells; and CD25 expression across multiple B-cell subsets (CD24⁺CD27⁺, memory, IgD⁺CD24⁺, unswitched memory, and IgD−CD38− populations); CD39 on monocytes; along with total T-cell and lymphocyte counts. In contrast, 12 immune traits demonstrated inverse nominal associations with PsA risk (OR < 1, P < 0.05): side scatter area (SSC-A) parameters on CD4⁺ T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells; absolute cell counts of CD33dim HLA-DR⁺CD11b− populations; quantitative and proportional measures of CD8dim natural killer T cells; CD8 expression on terminally differentiated CD8⁺ T cells; CD8dim NKT cell frequency within the T-cell pool; CD3 on resting CD4⁺ regulatory T cells; CD28⁺CD45RA− and CD45RA⁺CD28− CD8⁺ T-cell proportions; and absolute counts of both CD45RA−CD28− and CD45RA⁺CD28− CD8⁺ T-cell subsets. When subjected to multiple testing correction via the false discovery rate approach, none of these associations achieved statistical significance (all FDR > 0.05), indicating that these findings represent preliminary, hypothesis-generating signals.
Robustness Assessment of Forward Analysis
Sensitivity testing confirmed the stability of these nominally significant findings. For each of the 26 identified immune traits, Cochran’s Q-test revealed no substantial instrument heterogeneity (all P > 0.05), and MR-Egger intercept analyses detected no evidence of directional pleiotropy (all intercept P > 0.05), indicating that the IVW estimates were not meaningfully biased by detectable pleiotropic variants. Weighted median and MR-Egger point estimates were directionally consistent with the primary IVW results for the majority of associations, further supporting their internal robustness within this exploratory framework. Full sensitivity statistics are provided in Supplementary Files 1 and 2.
Bidirectional Relationship: PsA Effects on Immune Profiles
To examine whether disease liability potentially influences immune composition, we performed reverse MR analyses treating PsA as the exposure (Figure 3). Genetic predisposition to PsA showed preliminary positive nominal associations (OR > 1, P < 0.05) with five immune traits: CD45 expression on lymphocytes, total T cells, and HLA-DR⁺ CD4⁺ T cells; IgD⁺CD38dim B-cell frequency among B cells; and IgD⁺CD38dim B-cell proportion within total lymphocytes. Conversely, PsA demonstrated inverse nominal associations (OR < 1, P < 0.05) with 18 immunophenotypes. These included reduced HLA-DR expression on myeloid dendritic cells, CD33dim HLA-DR⁺CD11b− populations, CD14⁺CD16⁺ monocytes, and HLA-DR⁺ CD4⁺ T cells. Additional traits showing negative associations comprised specific T-cell markers (CD8 on CD28⁺CD45RA⁺ CD8⁺ T cells, CD3 on CD28− CD8⁺ T cells, CD4⁺CD8⁺ double-positive T-cell counts) and B-cell characteristics (CD25 on IgD⁺CD38dim B cells). Consistent with forward analyses, these associations remained nominally significant but did not survive FDR correction, indicating they represent preliminary signals requiring independent validation.
Reverse Sensitivity Analyses
Robustness checks for the 23 reverse associations supported the validity of selected genetic instruments. Cochran’s Q-test indicated no significant heterogeneity across instruments (all P > 0.05), and MR-Egger intercept analyses found no systematic directional pleiotropy (all P > 0.05). Weighted median estimates were directionally concordant with IVW results for the majority of reverse associations, reinforcing the consistency of these preliminary signals. Detailed sensitivity statistics are presented in Supplementary Files 3 and 4.
Discussion
Our analysis applies a two-directional, two-sample Mendelian randomization approach to explore how immune cell characteristics nominally influence PsA susceptibility, and conversely, how disease predisposition potentially reshapes immune profiles across 731 distinct cellular features (Figure 4). Despite therapeutic advances centered on blocking the IL-23/IL-17 pathway, many patients continue to experience inadequate treatment response, pointing toward the putative involvement of immune mechanisms beyond this axis.1,25 We uncovered preliminary putative evidence linking 14 immune traits to heightened PsA risk and 12 traits to reduced risk. These findings nominally shift attention from the predominant focus on T lymphocytes by suggesting that B-cell activation may play a previously underappreciated exploratory pathogenic role, while also aligning with the contribution of specific T-cell populations and demonstrating that PsA liability is nominally associated with altered myeloid cell function.
|
Figure 4 Schematic diagram of the conclusion. Abbreviations: IgD, immunoglobulin D; PsA, psoriatic arthritis. |
Among our most striking observations is the suggestive association between activated B-cell populations and PsA liability. In particular, heightened BAFF receptor density on IgD⁺CD24⁺ B cells emerged as a notable candidate risk determinant. Although PsA is traditionally classified within the spondyloarthritis spectrum—disorders characterized primarily by innate and T-cell inflammation26—our data align with a growing body of evidence implicating humoral immunity in disease chronicity. The putative significance of BAFF-R suggests that survival signals required to maintain potential auto-reactive B-cell clones could be critical upstream drivers. This offers a hypothetical rationale for the formation of ectopic lymphoid structures observed in the psoriatic synovium, which serve as local germinal centers for antibody production.27–30 Importantly, although our results are similar to those of Jia et al (2025) on T cells,8 our work diverges and adds value in two fundamental ways. First, whereas Jia et al reported a lack of reverse causal effects, our bidirectional analysis identifies nominal evidence of PsA-driven immune remodeling—specifically the depletion of circulating pDCs and alterations in myeloid compartments—which better aligns with observed clinical phenomena of cellular recruitment to inflamed joints. Second, while prior work provided a broad-spectrum overview, we provide a deep-dive into the B-cell co-stimulatory axis (notably CD25 and BAFF-R signals). By framing these findings as a hypothesis-generating map rather than a definitive list, we offer a more nuanced interpretation of how genetic liability to B-cell activation might precede clinical diagnosis, a conceptual layer that was not the primary focus of the Jia et al study. Furthermore, recent molecular profiling has identified specific PsA endotypes characterized by a “B-cell rich” synovial signature, suggesting that B-cell depletion or BAFF blockade, strategies which have yielded equivocal results in unstratified trials, may warrant re-evaluation in these specific patient subgroups.30,31
Our findings nominally highlight the potential pathogenic contribution of specific adaptive immune cell populations to PsA susceptibility. Suggestive evidence linked increased CCR7 expression on naïve CD4⁺ T cells and elevated CD127 on CD45RA⁺ CD4⁺ T cells with heightened disease risk. These genetic signals results align with transcriptomic observations by Ezeonyeji et al, who showed that phenotypically naïve T cells from psoriatic patients exhibit functional abnormalities, secreting disproportionate amounts of IFNγ and IL-22 that in turn stimulate keratinocyte production of the chemokine CXCL9.32,33 Recent single-cell sequencing has further confirmed the clonal expansion of specific pro-inflammatory T-cell subsets in the PsA joint.34 However, it is vital to distinguish these genetically proxied liabilities from transient cellular dynamics observed in functional studies. Furthermore, the nominal link between increased T-cell subsets and PsA consistent with the efficacy of existing T-cell-modulating therapies. For instance, Alefacept, which targets CD2 and reduces T-cell counts, has been shown to significantly improve joint symptoms and reduce synovial T-cell infiltration.35 Similarly, Fludarabine treatment in PsA patients induces moderate synovial lymphopenia which correlates with clinical response, further cementing the pathogenic role of T-cell burden.36,37 However, our identification of novel markers like CD127 (IL-7R) suggests that more refined targeting of IL-7 signaling pathways could offer superior specificity compared to broad lymphocyte depletion.
Conversely, we observed that 12 phenotypes, including SSC-A on plasmacytoid dendritic cells and absolute counts of CD33dimHLA-DR+CD11b− cells, were nominally linked to a reduced likelihood of PsA. Rather than implying that these cells are inherently “protective,” this negative correlation likely reflects the “drainage” or “tissue homing” hypothesis. As separate clinical studies have firmly established that circulating pDCs are reduced in the peripheral blood of PsA patients because they are actively recruited to the inflamed joint via chemotactic gradients, such as those mediated by CXCR3 and its ligands (CXCL10/CXCL9).38–40 Indeed, pDCs are significantly enriched in PsA synovial fluid compared to osteoarthritis or healthy controls.41–44 Our MR findings provide a complementary genetic proxy for this migration capacity, though they do not directly measure cellular flux. Therefore, the genetically predicted “lower” levels in blood may serve as a preliminary proxy for heightened capacity to migrate into tissue, mirroring the active consumption of these cells in the joint microenvironment.
However, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the exposure GWAS relied on a relatively modest sample size (n = 3,757), which limited statistical power and necessitated the use of a relaxed P-value threshold for instrument selection. Although all instrumental variables (IVs) maintained F-statistics > 10, a degree of potential weak instrument bias cannot be entirely ruled out, which may influence the precision of our causal estimates. Second, due to the high-dimensional nature of the 731 immunophenotypes analyzed, the associations did not retain statistical significance after FDR correction. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and suggestive nominal associations requiring stringent validation in larger, independent cohorts. Third, the use of summary-level data inherently precludes the exploration of non-linear associations or stratified analyses (eg., by disease severity or medication history), which might mask endotype-specific immune drivers. Fourth, the genetic instruments employed in this study reflect constitutive, genetically determined expression levels rather than transient or context-dependent immune activation states; accordingly, caution is warranted when interpreting these findings as direct evidence of disease-relevant cellular dynamics, particularly during acute disease flares. Additionally, while we identify specific surface markers (eg., CD25, BAFF-R), the precise downstream effector functions of these subsets in the joint microenvironment remain to be fully characterized via functional assays. Importantly, the immune phenotypes identified here represent genetically proxied liability to altered surface marker expression or cell proportions, and should not be equated with functionally activated or pathologically expanded populations in the joint microenvironment. Any therapeutic inference drawn from these associations remains speculative and requires corroboration from functional and clinical studies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our MR-based genetic atlas of immune cell phenotypes in PsA provides exploratory evidence for the involvement of the B-cell axis alongside traditional T-cell pathways. By identifying nominally associated B-cell traits (CD25⁺, BAFF-R⁺) as candidate contributors to disease risk, we have extended the presumed pathogenic situation beyond the T-cell/cytokine axis. It is important to emphasize that while these findings provide a genetically informed map of immune traits, all reported associations were nominal (P < 0.05) and did not survive FDR correction. Consequently, the identified pathways, including targeting B-cell co-stimulation and restoring regulatory cell populations, represent hypothesis-generating avenues rather than confirmed therapeutic strategies. Rigorous validation in larger cohorts and functional assays is necessitated to transition these preliminary signals into established clinical targets.
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used AI-based language tools (e.g., large language models) solely for the purposes of language polishing and improving the readability of the manuscript. These tools were not used for data generation, analysis, interpretation, or the creation of original scientific content. Following the use of these tools, all authors reviewed and edited the content as necessary and take full responsibility for the originality, validity, and integrity of the published work. The use of these tools is not considered authorship.
Abbreviations
PsA, Psoriatic arthritis; RCT, Randomized controlled trials; MR, Mendelian randomization; IV, Instrumental variables; IVW, Inverse-variance weighted; IFNγ, Interferon-gamma.
Data Sharing Statement
The information detailed in the document is included in the text. For a high-level overview of the IEU data, you can access it through https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ieu-b-5116/.
Ethics Statement
This study was based exclusively on publicly available, de-identified data from open-access databases and did not involve direct interaction with human subjects or access to identifiable personal information. An ethics review application was submitted to the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University, which determined that this study is exempt from formal ethical approval (Exemption No. 2026-MS-005). This exemption is in accordance with Item 1 of Article 32 of the Measures for Ethical Review of Life Science and Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (February 18, 2023, China), which stipulates that research using lawfully obtained public data does not require ethics review. Therefore, informed consent was not applicable.
Acknowledgment
We thank the GWAS databases for offering summary data for the MR analysis.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Specifically, Huiwei Wang, Mingxuan Ma and Chenfeng Wang were responsible for the conception and experimental design, performed data analysis, and contributed to the drafting and composition of the manuscript. Shanshan Li and Yu Zhen conceptualized the study, developed and oversaw the research methodology, supervised the execution of the work, and provided critical revisions to ensure the intellectual integrity of the manuscript. Huiwei Wang, Mingxuan Ma and Chenfeng Wang share first authorship.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 82573969).
Disclosure
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Veale DJ, Fearon U. The pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2273–11. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30830-4
2. Stober C. Pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis. Best Pract Res. 2021;35(2):101694. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2021.101694
3. Gottlieb AB, Merola JF. Axial psoriatic arthritis: an update for dermatologists. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(1):92–101. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.089
4. Komatsu N, Takayanagi H. Mechanisms of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis - immune cell-fibroblast-bone interactions. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(7):415–429. doi:10.1038/s41584-022-00793-5
5. Fischer V, Haffner-Luntzer M. Interaction between bone and immune cells: implications for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022;123:14–21. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.05.014
6. Skougaard M, Ditlev SB, Stisen ZR, Coates LC, Ellegaard K, Kristensen LE. Four emerging immune cellular blood phenotypes associated with disease duration and activity established in Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2022;24(1):262. doi:10.1186/s13075-022-02956-x
7. Soare A, Weber S, Maul L, et al. Cutting Edge: homeostasis of Innate Lymphoid Cells Is Imbalanced in Psoriatic Arthritis. J Immunol. 2018;200(4):1249–1254. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700596
8. Jia Y, Bao H, Hou J, et al. Complex causal association between immune cells and psoriatic arthritis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Medicine. 2025;104(36):e44192. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000044192
9. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Lian X, et al. Therapeutic target database update 2022: facilitating drug discovery with enriched comparative data of targeted agents. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D1398–d1407. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab953
10. Wang C, Hu Y, Liang F. Text Mining and Drug Discovery Analysis: a Comprehensive Approach to Investigate Diabetes-Induced Osteoporosis. Int J Med Sci. 2024;21(3):464–473. doi:10.7150/ijms.90829
11. Hutchinson N, Moyer H, Zarin DA, Kimmelman J. The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice. eLife. 2022;11. doi:10.7554/eLife.79491.
12. Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2021;375:n2233. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2233
13. Sheehan NA, Didelez V, Burton PR, Tobin MD. Mendelian randomisation and causal inference in observational epidemiology. PLoS Med. 2008;5(8):e177. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050177
14. Karlsson T, Hadizadeh F, Rask-Andersen M, Johansson Å, Ek WE. Body Mass Index and the Risk of Rheumatic Disease: linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023. doi:10.1002/art.42613
15. Verduijn M, Siegerink B, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(5):1394–1398. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq098
16. Graßhoff H, Comdühr S, Nording H, et al. Transition From Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis is Characterized by Distinct Alterations in Peripheral Blood Tc17, Th17, and CD4(+) Effector Memory Cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026;78(2):332–343. doi:10.1002/art.43396
17. Hum RM, Christofi M, Smith SL, et al. Synovial immunopathology in psoriatic arthritis: cellular and molecular insights. Lancet Rheumatol. 2025;7(11):e808–e822. doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(25)00231-0
18. Nielsen MR, Skougaard M, Drachmann C, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing highlights the influence of innate and adaptive immune response mechanisms in psoriatic arthritis. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1490051. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1490051
19. Soomro M, Stadler M, Dand N, et al. Comparative Genetic Analysis of Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis for the Discovery of Genetic Risk Factors and Risk Prediction Modeling. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(9):1535–1543. doi:10.1002/art.42154
20. Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. doi:10.1038/nature15393
21. Bowden J, Del Greco MF, Minelli C, et al. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(3):728–742. doi:10.1093/ije/dyy258
22. Burgess S, Dudbridge F, Thompson SG. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods. Stat Med. 2016;35(11):1880–1906. doi:10.1002/sim.6835
23. Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nature Genet. 2018;50(5):693–698. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7
24. Hemani G, Tilling K, Davey Smith G. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genetics. 2017;13(11):e1007081. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081
25. Scher JU, Ogdie A, Merola JF, Ritchlin C. Preventing psoriatic arthritis: focusing on patients with psoriasis at increased risk of transition. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(3):153–166. doi:10.1038/s41584-019-0175-0
26. Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):957–970. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505557
27. Cañete JD, Santiago B, Cantaert T, et al. Ectopic lymphoid neogenesis in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2007;66(6):720–726. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.062042
28. Castillo RL, Sidhu I, Dolgalev I, et al. Spatial transcriptomics stratifies psoriatic disease severity by emergent cellular ecosystems. Sci Immunol. 2023;8(84):eabq7991. doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abq7991
29. Eder L, Caucheteux SM, Afiuni-Zadeh S, et al. Imaging Mass Cytometry in Psoriatic Disease Reveals Immune Profile Heterogeneity in Skin and Synovial Tissue. J Invest Dermatol. 2025;145(6):1361–1370. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2024.08.039
30. Carter LM, Ehrenstein MR, Vital EM. Evolution and trajectory of B-cell targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases. Lancet Rheumatol. 2025;7(5):e355–e367. doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00338-2
31. Faliti CE, Van TTP, Anam FA, et al. Disease-associated B cells and immune endotypes shape adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in human SLE. Nat Immunol. 2025;26(1):131–145. doi:10.1038/s41590-024-02010-9
32. Ezeonyeji A, Baldwin H, Vukmanovic-Stejic M, Ehrenstein MR. CD4 T-Cell Dysregulation in Psoriatic Arthritis Reveals a Regulatory Role for IL-22. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1403. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01403
33. Wixler V, Zaytsev IZ, Leite Dantas R, et al. Small spleen peptides prevent development of psoriatic arthritis via restoration of peripheral tolerance. Mol Ther. 2022;30(2):745–762. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.08.030
34. Penkava F, Velasco-Herrera MDC, Young MD, et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals clonal expansions of pro-inflammatory synovial CD8 T cells expressing tissue-homing receptors in psoriatic arthritis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4767. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18513-6
35. Kraan MC, van Kuijk AW, Dinant HJ, et al. Alefacept treatment in psoriatic arthritis: reduction of the effector T cell population in peripheral blood and synovial tissue is associated with improvement of clinical signs of arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(10):2776–2784. doi:10.1002/art.10543
36. Kraan MC, Haringman JJ, Weedon H, et al. T cells, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, and granzyme B+ cytotoxic cells are associated with joint damage in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2004;63(5):483–488. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.009225
37. Takada K, Danning CL, Kuroiwa T, et al. Lymphocyte depletion with fludarabine in patients with psoriatic arthritis: clinical and immunological effects. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2003;62(11):1112–1115. doi:10.1136/ard.62.11.1112
38. Xu F, Cui YZ, Yang XY, et al. CXCL10 secreted by SPRY1-deficient epidermal keratinocytes fuels joint inflammation in psoriatic arthritis via CD14 signaling. J Clin Invest. 2025;135(15). doi:10.1172/jci186135
39. Smit MJ, Verdijk P, van der Raaij-Helmer EM, et al. CXCR3-mediated chemotaxis of human T cells is regulated by a Gi- and phospholipase C-dependent pathway and not via activation of MEK/p44/p42 MAPK nor Akt/PI-3 kinase. Blood. 2003;102(6):1959–1965. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-12-3945
40. Kurachi M, Kurachi J, Suenaga F, et al. Chemokine receptor CXCR3 facilitates CD8(+) T cell differentiation into short-lived effector cells leading to memory degeneration. J Exp Med. 2011;208(8):1605–1620. doi:10.1084/jem.20102101
41. Zhou Y, Xu F, Chen XY, et al. The epidermal immune microenvironment plays a dominant role in psoriasis development, as revealed by mass cytometry. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19(12):1400–1413. doi:10.1038/s41423-022-00940-8
42. Glitzner E, Korosec A, Brunner PM, et al. Specific roles for dendritic cell subsets during initiation and progression of psoriasis. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(10):1312–1327. doi:10.15252/emmm.201404114
43. Jongbloed SL, Lebre MC, Fraser AR, et al. Enumeration and phenotypical analysis of distinct dendritic cell subsets in psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2006;8(1):R15. doi:10.1186/ar1864
44. Lande R, Giacomini E, Serafini B, et al. Characterization and recruitment of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in synovial fluid and tissue of patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis. J Immunol. 2004;173(4):2815–2824. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2815
© 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
