Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 21

Harnessing Nanocarriers to Improve Psychiatric Treatment: Progress, Limitations, and Future Directions

Authors Ge X, Zhao L, Xing X, Hao Y, Zhang Z, Sun G

Received 31 January 2026

Accepted for publication 15 April 2026

Published 25 April 2026 Volume 2026:21 600278

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S600278

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Dong Wang



Xiaoyan Ge,1 Lei Zhao,1 Xiaoyan Xing,1 Yanyun Hao,2,3 Zhiyue Zhang,4– 7 Guoping Sun1

1Department of Pharmacy, Qingdao Mental Health Center, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China; 2State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 3Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4State Key Laboratory of Discovery and Utilization of Functional Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China; 5Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China; 6Shandong Key Laboratory of Targeted Drug Delivery and Advanced Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China; 7NMPA Center for Innovation and Research in Regulatory Science, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Zhiyue Zhang, Email [email protected] Guoping Sun, Email [email protected]

Abstract: To address clinical bottlenecks of traditional antipsychotic drugs, including delayed onset of action, significant peripheral side effects, and poor patient compliance, nanodelivery systems offer a feasible approach through their unique physicochemical properties to improve drug solubility, optimize in vivo transport, and enhance blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration efficiency. This review focuses on the application potential and translational value of nanodelivery systems in psychiatric disorders. We systematically summarize recent advances in the construction strategies of mainstream nanocarriers, including lipid‑based, polymer‑based, inorganic nanomaterials, Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), and Extracellular Vesicles (EVs), as well as commonly used nanoparticle preparation and characterization techniques. We briefly discuss key challenges facing nanoformulations, such as long‑term safety, large‑scale production, and batch‑to‑batch consistency, and highlight future directions driven by artificial intelligence and precision medicine. This review aims to provide insights for the rational design of nanodelivery systems for psychiatric disorders and to advance the development of precision psychiatry. Various nanoparticle structures, including spherical, cubic and other shapes, are shown converging towards a central nanoparticle. This central nanoparticle is depicted moving towards and crossing a barrier, representing the blood-brain barrier. After crossing, the nanoparticles are shown reaching the brain, indicated by a brain illustration. The process suggests targeting the brain for drug delivery, with arrows indicating the direction of movement from the nanoparticles to the brain. The diagram emphasizes the role of nanoparticles in crossing the blood-brain barrier to deliver drugs effectively to the brain.Diagram of drug delivery using nanoparticles crossing the blood-brain barrier to target the brain.

Keywords: antipsychotics, psychiatric disorders, BBB, nanoformulations, drug delivery, lipid-based nanoparticles, polymer-based nanoparticles, inorganic nanomaterials, MOFs, EVs

Introduce

Introduction to Psychiatric Disorders

Schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder and other psychiatric conditions are major contributors to the global disease burden and account for a substantial proportion of global years lived with disability.1 Psychiatric disorders stem from the complex interaction of psychological stress sources, social environment and physiological foundations (such as genetic susceptibility and abnormal brain structure).2,3 Notably, functional dysregulation in neural circuits involving the limbic system, prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus is closely linked to the pathophysiology of psychiatric conditions. The brain relies on neurotransmitters—specifically serotonin, dopamine, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)—to facilitate interneuronal communication through physiological signaling cascades. Dysregulation in the synthesis, release, or reuptake of these neurotransmitters can severely compromise critical biological processes, including sleep-wake rhythmicity, and mood modulation, which in turn promotes the initiation and progression of psychiatric conditions.4 Presently, the most extensively studied neurotransmitters in psychiatric research include monoamines, such as dopamine and the aforementioned serotonin, amino acid neurotransmitters like glutamate, and other mediators including acetylcholine, melatonin, and histamine. Targeted neurotransmitter imbalance is the core treatment strategy of a variety of psychiatric disorders, which can be enhanced by nanocarrier-mediated drug delivery. Significantly, the regulation of serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine receptors is a common pharmacological method for alleviating the symptoms of schizophrenia, and nanocarriers may improve the specificity and effectiveness of such receptor-targeting drugs. For example, first-generation antipsychotic drugs (eg, haloperidol and chlorpromazine) mainly exert a high-affinity antagonistic effect on dopamine D2 receptors and effectively control positive symptoms, accompanied by a higher incidence of extrapyramidal side effects.5 Second-generation antipsychotics are characterized by rapid dissociation from the dopamine D2 receptor and high-affinity antagonism of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. These properties are associated with a lower risk of extrapyramidal side effects and may help improve negative and cognitive symptoms.6 Upregulating the levels of monoamine neurotransmitters and enhancing their function is the core mechanism of antidepressants.7 We have summarized representative psychiatric disorders, their relevant brain regions, and key neurotransmitters in Table 1. It should be noted that ongoing research encompasses a broader range of conditions and mechanisms beyond those listed. In addition to explaining issues with neurotransmitters, research shows strong immunity-psychiatric disorders correlation. Upon differentiation into the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, microglia release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), a process closely linked to the onset of neuronal dysfunction and psychiatric disorders.8,9 Despite the complexity of the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, most existing studies focus on cerebral areas that control perception, behavior, emotions, and other facets of life because psychiatric disorders are closely linked to changes in specific brain regions’ function and structure.10 Further intensive research on the brain will continue to be beneficial for drug treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Table 1 Common Psychiatric Disorders and Their Associated Brain Regions and Neurotransmitters

Long-Standing Challenges and Current Limitations of Drug Treatment for Psychiatric Disorders

Pharmacotherapies remain a fundamental and indispensable component of clinical treatment for psychiatric disorders.33 The WHO’s list of essential medicines for psychiatric disorders serves as a valuable reference for countries when formulating their own national essential medicines lists.34 Psychiatric disorders are similar to chronic diseases and require long-term medication to prevent reoccurring symptoms. In addition, symptoms can be managed by medication injections during severe psychiatric disorder episodes. While pharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders has advanced considerably in clinical practice, current treatments still face a dual dilemma: persistent hurdles such as central nervous system (CNS) physiological barriers, first-pass metabolism, and mucociliary clearance, together with inherent limitations including rapid systemic elimination, adverse reactions, and delayed onset. These issues collectively reduce patient compliance and limit optimal therapeutic efficacy.35

Physiological Barriers

BBB

The BBB, consisting of tightly connected cerebral endothelial cells, astrocytes, pericytes, and the basement membrane, serves as a critical physiological barrier for pharmaceutical delivery in psychiatric disorder therapies.36 It selectively mediates nutrient translocation, inhibits pathogen infiltration, and serves a pivotal role in sustaining brain homeostasis by tightly governing the exchange of substances between the bloodstream and the cerebral parenchyma. The intact BBB enables the permeation of lipophilic small molecules with molecular weights under 500 Da, while excluding roughly 98% of small-molecule compounds and all large-molecule drugs.37,38 Although they can cross the BBB, several antipsychotic agents—including amisulpride, paliperidone, risperidone (RSP), aripiprazole, and olanzapine—have been identified as substrates of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump, which actively extrudes them from the brain parenchyma.39 These physiological barriers constitute long-standing challenges in psychiatric drug delivery, and insufficient drug accumulation in the brain remains a major obstacle to achieving therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, augmenting cerebral drug concentrations is fundamental to effectively treating psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier (BCSFB)

BCSFB consists of choroid plexus epithelial cells and the tight junctions between them. This barrier maintains CNS homeostasis by selectively regulating the exchange of substances between the blood and the cerebrospinal fluid, while also further intercepting drugs (eg, via mechanisms such as P-gp efflux pumps) from entering the cerebrospinal fluid.40,41 Drug therapy still faces challenges in penetrating target cells within the brain. Notably, brain parenchymal penetration represents an often-overlooked yet critical barrier for CNS drug entry.42 A major limitation of current therapies is the lack of delivery systems capable of crossing multiple central barriers simultaneously. Even when drugs successfully penetrate the BBB, they are frequently impeded by the BCSFB, resulting in uneven distribution in target regions and suboptimal therapeutic efficacy.

Metabolism and Multiple Efflux Protein Barriers

Metabolic barriers and drug clearance mediated by efflux proteins constitute two persistent obstacles. Systemically, the hepatic first‑pass effect markedly reduces the bioavailability of oral drugs.43 Within the CNS, drugs crossing the BBB are further degraded by cerebral cytochrome P450 enzymes, while P-gp and other multidrug efflux pumps actively expel them from the brain parenchyma.44 Together, these mechanisms hinder the maintenance of effective drug concentrations at target sites.

Inherent Deficiencies and Limitations of Administration Routes

Different administration routes present long-standing practical challenges and inherent technological limitations, as detailed below:

Oral Administration

Oral drug delivery continues to be the predominant administration route in clinical psychiatric practice, attributed to its convenience, favorable patient adherence, and non-intrusive characteristics. Nevertheless, in the context of therapeutics engineered for CNS targeting, oral administration often gives rise to hurdles linked to suboptimal pharmacokinetic behaviors and insufficient brain bioavailability.45 A key underlying reason lies in the physicochemical features of most antipsychotic agents are generally highly lipophilic and exhibit low aqueous solubility, which characteristic results in restricted dissolution within the gastrointestinal lumen and compromised absorption efficiency across the intestinal epithelial barrier. Many antipsychotics undergo Phase I drug metabolism in the intestinal mucosa and liver, where they are metabolized by Cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as CYP2D6, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4, which results in lower active concentrations before they reach systemic circulation.46,47 Notably, the hepatic first-pass impact significantly affects the metabolism of clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic that is therapeutically recommended for refractory schizophrenia, resulting in an oral bioavailability of less than 27%.48 These pharmacokinetic hurdles also represent common challenges across the field, which directly impair therapeutic efficacy and increase interindividual pharmacokinetic variability.

Nose-to-Brain Delivery

To bypass gastrointestinal degradation and hepatic metabolism, intranasal delivery has gained attention as a promising non-invasive strategy for direct nose-to-brain transport. This route exploits the unique anatomical and physiological connections between the nasal cavity and the CNS, particularly via the olfactory epithelium and trigeminal nerve pathways, enabling rapid and targeted drug delivery while avoiding systemic metabolic clearance.49 Nevertheless, formulation challenges remain, including limited dosing volume, rapid mucociliary clearance, and the risk of nasal mucosal irritation, all of which necessitate careful optimization of drug formulation and delivery devices.50 Overcoming these limitations requires a new formula to enhance mucosal adhesion/tolerance and a special delivery system that can penetrate deep and reliable nasal deposition.

Transdermal Drug Delivery

As a long-term adjunctive therapeutic route, transdermal drug delivery aims to address poor oral compliance and the pain associated with injections. However, a persistent key obstacle is the strong barrier function of the stratum corneum, which impedes drug absorption and diffusion.51 The quetiapine transdermal patch reported by Agrawal et al achieved a cumulative release rate of 82.98% over 20 hours, with bioavailability superior to conventional formulations.52 However, this formulation lacks a brain-targeting design, indicating that there is still significant room for optimization in the brain-targeting capabilities of current transdermal formulations.

Intravenous/Intramuscular Administration

Intravenous and intramuscular administration are widely used as emergency treatments to rapidly control symptoms during acute episodes of severe psychiatric disorders.53 However, intravenous administration shows poor brain targeting because it cannot cross the multiple physiological barriers of the CNS. Conventional injectable formulations act quickly but have a short duration of action and require frequent dosing, leading to low patient compliance. Although novel formulations such as RSP in situ microspheres have achieved initial technical progress toward rapid onset and long-acting effects via biphasic release, these clinically available preparations still need further optimization.54 Thus, injectable formulations that combine rapid onset with sustained release remain scarce in clinical practice, making it difficult to meet the integrated clinical demand for both acute symptom control and long-term maintenance therapy in severe psychiatric disorders.

Adverse Reactions and Compliance

Antipsychotic medications are often linked to dose-related and individual-specific adverse effects, which can markedly undermine patients’ treatment adherence and overall clinical outcomes. The metabolic disruptions, such as significant weight gain connected with olanzapine and chlorpromazine, carry long-term health risks. Additionally, hyperprolactinemia usually occurs with drugs such as RSP and paliperidone, while drugs such as aripiprazole and chlorpromazine are more likely to cause sedation. QT interval prolongation is a serious heart risk that can be caused by certain antipsychotic drugs, including zilaxidone and esicilopran. Extrapyramidal symptoms, meanwhile, remain a defining feature of typical antipsychotics, most notably haloperidol.55 Epidemiological data show that drug adherence to psychiatric patients is a common problem, affecting 50% to 75% of individuals. Intolerance to side effects is the main reason, accounting for about 71.4% of the termination of treatment.56 What’s more, many psychiatric medications have a delayed therapeutic effect that is a factor further worsens adherence issues. For example, conventional antidepressants often require several weeks to exert their full therapeutic effect, and the rate of inadequate response to first-line treatment is nearly 30%.57,58 Beyond that, some antipsychotic drugs require frequent injections, which can cause physical discomfort and psychological distress, further reducing patient adherence.

We summarize the aforementioned remaining challenges and current limitations associated with pharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders in Table 2. Given these multiple clinical bottlenecks, there is an urgent need to develop novel delivery strategies to break through the existing therapeutic paradigm. Therefore, the construction of rationally designed and targeted nano-drug delivery systems provides a promising strategy to overcome these obstacles.

Table 2 Examples of Long-Standing Challenges and Current Limitations in Pharmacotherapy for Psychiatric Disorders

Advantages of Nano Delivery System

Overcoming the BBB is still a major hurdle to neurological and psychiatric disorders. Contemporary advances in nanotechnology offer a viable approach for efficiently delivering therapeutic molecules to the brain through engineering nanoparticles (NPs).42 The success of these NPs depends largely on two core design characteristics: their size and surface chemical properties. Studies show that the penetration of NPs into the BBB in the diameter range of 50–100 nm is optimally balanced, because the permeability usually decreases with the increase of size.59–61 Receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) represents a promising strategy for brain targeting. It enables efficient BBB penetration via endogenous receptors such as the transferrin receptor (TfR), with high specificity and clinical translational potential.62 In addition to RMT, other endogenous pathways offer alternative routes for BBB crossing. Carrier-mediated transport (CMT) relies on nutrient transporters including GLUT1 to facilitate brain uptake.63 Cell-mediated delivery (eg, using macrophages) shows unique advantages for psychiatric disorders due to its excellent biocompatibility and intrinsic BBB-penetrating ability.64 In nanodelivery research for psychiatric disorders, RMT is widely applied, whereas CMT and cell-mediated strategies remain at the exploratory stage. Nevertheless, studies have demonstrated that mannose-modified NPs can achieve brain accumulation by targeting GLUT1.65 Macrophage-based delivery systems have also shown significant anti-inflammatory and antidepressant effects in inflammation-related depression models.66

Table 3 shows representative nanodelivery systems based on endogenous transport pathways, including RMT, CMT and cell‑mediated delivery. Notably, these pathways are not the only routes for crossing the BBB. Adsorptive-mediated transcytosis, the nose-to-brain pathway, and other approaches also enable effective brain delivery.67

Table 3 Representative Nanodelivery Systems for Psychiatric Disorders Based on Endogenous Transport Pathways (Including RMT, CMT and Cell‑mediated Delivery)

Nanocarriers offer value that goes far beyond their now well-established targeting abilities. Reformulation of drugs with poor physicochemical properties is one of their key benefits. For example, encapsulating hydrophobic antipsychotics within polymeric micelles with low critical micelle concentrations stabilizes the drugs in the gastrointestinal tract, a strategy that notably boosts oral bioavailability.74 What’s more, NPs open up innovative administration routes that get around traditional barriers. Intranasal nanoparticle formulations leverage olfactory and trigeminal neural pathways to bypass systemic metabolism, achieving direct drug delivery to CNS. Lithium-loaded nanohydrogel has successfully put this idea into practice, providing a fast and non-invasive way to target the brain.75 Nasal nanocomposite hydrogels encapsulating antipsychotic drugs have shown prolonged brain retention and sustained therapeutic effects in treating schizophrenia.76 Long-acting injectable formulations, including paliperidone palmitate and emerging RSP-based copolymer depots, can maintain stable plasma drug concentrations over extended intervals, improving patient adherence and treatment consistency.77,78 RSP can be delivered minimally invasively and sustainedly via sophisticated delivery systems as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) -based microneedle patches, which promote self-administration while reducing the frequency of doses.79

By integrating physicochemical tuning, receptor-mediated transport, and controlled release kinetics, these systems address core pharmacokinetic challenges, enhancing brain targeting while limiting off-target effects. While promising, challenges including nanocarrier biocompatibility, immunogenicity, large-scale manufacturing, and precise targeting specificity remain critical areas for future research to fully realize their clinical potential in psychiatric disorder management.

Common Carrier Materials for Nanoparticle Delivery Systems

Advantages of Nanocarrier-Mediated Delivery

Nanocarriers critically orchestrate the pharmacokinetic fate and brain-targeting precision of therapeutics, with their physicochemical composition fundamentally determining biodistribution and cellular interactions. Lipid NPs facilitate intestinal lymphatic transport, enabling labile drugs to bypass enzymatic degradation and hepatic first-pass metabolism—key barriers that frequently compromise oral bioavailability.80 In clinical practice, lipid NPs effectively enhance BBB permeability through lipid-mediated membrane fusion, showing good potential as a brain-targeted drug delivery system.81

At the same time, polymer nanocarriers have the advantage of highly modular design. By introducing stimulation response connection units such as pH-sensitive amide bonds and redox unstable disulfide bonds, such carriers can achieve time-time controllable payload release in the acidic or reducing microenvironment unique to pathological brain areas.82,83 In addition, its surface charge can be dynamically reversed with the protonation state, further promoting the engulf process of cells.84

Inorganic NPs now go beyond standard drug delivery for psychiatric disorders. Iron-based magnetic NPs can serve to achieve MRI-guided precise drug delivery and upregulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. This receptor enhancement promotes the homing of endogenous stem cells to sites of neural injury, providing additional therapeutic support.85 Black phosphorus (BP) nanosheets achieve another form of synergy by combining photothermal-mediated BBB modulation with reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. This combination is capable of both neuroprotective effects and reversibly enhancing BBB permeability, which is a dual mechanism that is hard to achieve with traditional carriers.86,87

Collectively, through rational design, nanocarriers achieve robust physicochemical stability and stimuli-responsive release behavior. These properties work together to avoid premature clearance, minimize off-target toxicity, and facilitate cellular uptake.88,89

Preparation Methods of Nanocarriers

The preparation method of a nanodelivery system directly affects its physicochemical properties, which in turn determine its in vivo behavior and therapeutic efficacy.90 Based on the type of carrier, the commonly used preparation methods and their advantages and limitations are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4 Preparation Methods, Advantages, and Disadvantages of Common Nanocarriers

Evaluation Methods for Nanocarriers

Evaluating the critical quality attributes of nanocarriers requires a thorough characterization approach to ensure their suitability for delivering therapeutic agents against psychiatric disorders. Generally, the evaluation should be performed from three aspects: physicochemical properties, drug-loading performance, as well as biological function and safety.99

Physicochemical characterization serves as the essential foundation for quality control of NPs. When particle size and distribution are measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS), the polydispersity index (PDI) should be less than 0.3 to indicate uniform particle size.100 In addition, an absolute zeta potential value higher than 30 mV reflects good colloidal stability, which is beneficial for long-term stability.101 Characterization of nanoparticle morphology and structure relies on transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM).102 X‑ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier‑transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) are usually employed for determining crystalline structure and chemical composition.103

Drug loading characterization includes the evaluation of drug loading content, encapsulation efficiency, and in vitro drug release behavior. Drug loading content and encapsulation efficiency are routinely determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which reflects the drug-carrying capacity of NPs. In vitro release profiles are investigated under simulated physiological and pathological microenvironments (eg, acidic pH, high glutathione concentration) to evaluate the sustained-release property and stimuli-responsive drug release ability of the delivery system.

For biological function and safety assessment in the context of brain targeting for psychiatric disorders, cellular uptake, BBB penetration (using the Transwell model), and pharmacokinetic parameters (eg, in vivo biodistribution and brain accumulation) should be examined. In addition, cytotoxicity, hemolysis rate, and relevant animal models must also be evaluated to ensure in vivo safety.104

This paper systematically reviews strategies for delivering antipsychotic drugs using various nanocarrier platforms, including lipids (Figure 1A), polymers (Figure 1B), inorganic nanomaterials (Figure 1C), MOFs (Figure 1D), and EVs (Figure 1E). Our analysis aims to provide a conceptual foundation for the rational design of nanocarriers that overcome the multifaceted challenges of delivering drugs for psychiatric disorders.

Diagram of nanoparticle-based drug delivery for psychiatric disorders, showing types and administration routes.

Figure 1 Nanoformulations for delivering drugs for psychiatric disorders ((A) Lipid NPs; (B) Polymer NPs; (C) Inorganic Nanomaterials; (D) MOFs; (E) EVs) and their administration routes ((a) nasal; (b) oral; (c) parenteral; (d) dermal) for antipsychotic delivery. Figure created with Biorender.

Nanomaterials for Antipsychotic Treatment

Based on the basic characteristics of nanocarriers explained in Chapter 2, this section further elaborates on the practical applications of various nanomaterials in the delivery of psychotropic drugs, highlighting their unique value and potential in solving the bottleneck of drug treatment for psychiatric disorders.

Lipid-Based NPs

According to their differences in preparation materials and structures, lipid NPs can be roughly classified into two generations. First-generation lipid NPs, termed as liposomes with a bilayer structure, has a lengthy research history.105 Liposomes are double-layered hollow vesicles made of cholesterol and phospholipids, and their internal hydrophilic core and lipid bilayer can load hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs, respectively.106 Multiple strategies are available for loading drugs into liposomes, including electrostatically adsorbed on liposomal surfaces, directly encapsulated in the lipid bilayer or its hydrophilic core through physical action.107,108 Liposomes have several benefits, including high biocompatibility and lipophilicity, which makes them easier for cells to absorb. The effectiveness of distribution is also significantly increased by targeted and multifunctional liposomes made by surface modification.109 Lipid nanoemulsions (LNEs), nanostructured lipid nanocarriers (NLCs), lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) and solid lipid NPs (SLNs), and are the several types of lipid NPs that belong to the second generation. They have more stable physical characteristics, greater industrial production opportunities, and a stronger drug-carrying ability for hydrophobic medicines than liposomes.110

Lipid-based NPs have been demonstrated to be beneficial for delivering antipsychotic medications (Table 5). Their use has been documented in numerous studies to deliver insoluble antipsychotic drugs like olanzapine,111 lurasidone,112 selegiline,113 and sertraline,114 resulting in a significant increase in their solubility and bioavailability. Notably, stimuli-responsive liposomes, such as electrically active ferrocene liposomes loaded with carbamazepine that can rapidly react to and release drugs in situ during epileptic discharges, provide inspiration for on-demand drug therapy against antipsychotic diseases.115

Table 5 Example of Lipid NPs for Delivering Antipsychotic Drugs

Previous research has shown that lipid-based NPs can enter the brain through small, highly lipophilic properties without modification or ligand binding.124–126 The experimental results of Maqsood et al also demonstrated that, in contrast to levosulpiride (LEVO) suspension, LEVO-loaded nano lipid carriers (LEVO NLCs) more effectively crossed the BBB and have advantages in neuroprotection and nerve regeneration, indicating that NLCs can be effectively used for delivering therapeutic agents in the brain.127 Similarly, lipid NPs administered intranasally can deliver siRNA to the brain, potently relieving depressive-like behaviors caused by LPS.128

When combined with other readily available materials, the new lipid NPs can increase the effectiveness of poorly soluble drugs. To increase the solubility and absorption of ziprasidone, for instance, Meola et al created the nano-crystalline silicon lipid hybrid (SLH) particles with an average diameter of 280 nm.129 The drug loading of SLH was 17 times greater than that of normal SLH microparticles, leading to a significant improvement in the solubility, dissolution, and intestinal absorption of ziprasidone. By combining neutrophils with liposomes, Zhou et al130 designed a distinctive pharmaceutical delivery approach that exploits the characteristic infiltration of neutrophils into core brain regions during neuroinflammatory responses. To serve as a targeting ligand, they conjugated the N-Acetyl Pro-Gly-Pro (PGP) peptide, which binds effectively to CXCR2 receptors on neutrophil surfaces, onto oxytocin-loaded liposomes (PGP-OTL). This PGP-OTL formulation can “hitchhike” on neutrophils via a novel cell-mediated liposome technique, boosting medication transport to the brain. Thanks to their excellent biocompatibility and lipophilic properties, lipid NPs are particularly valuable for treating mental health illnesses.

Polymer-Based NPs

Polymeric NPs improve antipsychotic solubility, prolong systemic exposure, and enable sustained release, thus reducing off-target effects and strengthening drug delivery and therapeutic outcomes.131 In particular, polymersomes formed from amphiphilic block copolymers share a structure similar to liposomes but can be tailored with superior customization through polymer chemistry. They enable on-demand regulation of drug encapsulation properties and membrane permeability, which is crucial for delivering antipsychotic drugs across the BBB while minimizing systemic exposure. Their excellent adaptability enables the co-encapsulation and sustained release of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic antipsychotic drugs, effectively addressing formulation challenges such as poor water solubility and chemical instability.132,133

Polymer micelles self-assembled into core-shell nanostructures. The hydrophobic core effectively isolate lipophilic antipsychotic drugs through hydrophobic interactions or covalent bonds, while the hydrophilic corona prolongs drug’s systemic circulation time and reduces premature clearance. This architecture optimizes the pharmacokinetic profile and bioavailability of poorly soluble antipsychotic compounds, facilitating improved drug accumulation at target sites within the CNS.82,134 Dendrimers, characterized by their highly branched three-dimensional architecture, offer multivalent surface functionality enabling efficient drug conjugation and targeted cellular interactions. Cationic dendrimers (eg, polyamidoamine, PAMAM) exhibit strong affinity for cell membranes, promoting endocytosis to facilitate intracellular delivery of nucleic acids. These properties make dendrimers ideal candidate carriers for gene-regulatory therapies targeting psychiatric disorders.135

Polymer materials are generally divided into natural materials and synthetic materials according to their origin. Natural polymers including chitosan and hyaluronic acid (HA) are widely used in neuropsychiatric drug delivery systems due to their excellent biocompatibility and multifunctionality.136 HA offers additional mechanistic benefits due to their inherent biocompatibility and receptor-mediated targeting capabilities.137 HA-modified NPs can accurately deliver therapeutic drugs to the traumatic brain injury area, thus reducing the off-target effect and improving the therapeutic effect.138 Consequently, HA may provide inspiration for research on how to deliver antipsychotic drugs to the brain. Moreover, the sensitivity of HA to the enzymatic degradation of HA enzymes in the brain microenvironment makes it possible to stimulate the release of reactive drugs. For example, Ge et al created a multifunctional nanocarrier (AC-RM@HA-MS-KA) that ketamine (KA)-loaded mesoporous silica coupled with HA to act as pore gatekeepers, and coated with red blood cell membranes to evade the immune system. Bifunctional peptides (Ang-2 and Con-G) are applied to the surface to enhance BBB penetration and regional accumulation in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, which are crucial areas of mental pathology (Figure 2a). Once localized, endogenous hyaluronidase degrades the HA shell, triggering controlled KA release directly at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor sites (Figure 2b). This targeted controlled-release system, which exhibits effective BBB crossing and precise brain-directed targeting (Figure 2c and d), greatly reduces the risk of ketamine addiction while maximizing its antidepressant efficacy, illustrating the therapeutic advantages of polymer-based nanocarriers in antipsychotic treatment.139

Diagram of AC-RM@HA-MS-KA nanoparticle structure, KA release, brain imaging and radiant efficiency graph.

Figure 2 (a) Diagrammatic representation of the composition and structure of the AC-RM@HA-MS-KA nanoparticle. (b) The mechanism of KA release. (c) Ex vivo brain images of depressed mice along with the corresponding average radiant efficiency values (t-test, *p< 0.05, n=6). (d) DiR-labeled (free/nanosystem-based) confocal fluorescence imaging of frozen brain sections from depressed mice (blue: cell nuclei; red: NPs; scale bar=100 μm). Solid blue arrows indicate directional processes. Reprinted with permission from.139 Copyright 2023 Wiley.

Chitosan has polycationic characteristics because it is rich in amino groups, and can effectively combine with negatively charged biomolecules (eg, nucleic acids, proteins). These amino groups also provide sites for chemical modification, further expanding their application versatility as biological functional materials.140,141 In the field of psychotropic drug delivery, chitosan is mainly used to prepare hydrogel, and usually uses cross-linking agents such as formaldehyde to achieve a stable structure, so as to build a delivery system with biocompatibility and release control functions.142 Chitosan-based hydrogels prolong drug retention time within the nasal cavity, enabling sustained release and reducing administration frequency, thus markedly boosting intracerebral drug delivery efficiency. At the same time, this characteristic helps to reduce nasal irritation and improve patient compliance. By co-spraying oxidized starch NPs (SNP-CHO) with carboxymethyl chitosan, Majcher et al developed a biodegradable nanocomposite hydrogel that enhances nasal mucosa adherence and enables sustained release of antipsychotic peptide (PAOPA). Experiments have confirmed that the preparation can penetrate deep into the nasal cavity and form hydrogel in situ, achieve continuous drug release, enhance intracerebral delivery, and effectively control the symptoms of schizophrenia for up to three days.143 Additionally, hydrophilic chitosan hydrogel can realize the delivery of hydrophobic drugs through reasonable design. Taking the research of Andrew Lofts’ team as an example, they oxidized and hydrophobically modified about 20 nanometers of ultra-small starch NPs. Oxidation introduced cross-linkable aldehyde groups, while hydrophobic modification was achieved via conjugation with octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA), yielding amphiphilic SNP-OSA-CHO NPs. Olanzapine was then encapsulated into the hydrophobic core of SNP-OSA-CHO, followed by mixing with chitosan oligosaccharide lactate (COL). Through Schiff base-mediated crosslinking, this mixture formed an in-situ hydrogel (SNP-OSA-CHO/COL) (Figure 3a). The hydrogel slowly releases SNP-OSA NPs via cleavage of Schiff-base bonds in the nasal cavity, thereby significantly prolonging olanzapine’s antipsychotic effect and overcoming the rapid inactivation of conventional nasal delivery (Figure 3b and c). 144 Chitosan can also be developed into oral formulations. As demonstrated by He et al,145 TNF-α siRNA and gallic acid–mediated graphene quantum dots were first encapsulated into bovine serum albumin (BSA) via the desolvation method, forming siRNA-GBSA NPs. Subsequently, multiple layers of chitosan and tannic acid (CHI/TA) were assembled on the NP surface through electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembly—this coating protects the NPs from gastrointestinal degradation, yielding siRNA-GBSA (CHI/TA) n (Figure 3d). This nanosystem not only effectively treated colitis and regulates gut microbiota-brain interactions but also significantly alleviated depressive behaviors in mice, supported by forced swimming test (Figure 3e) and tail suspension test (Figure 3f).

Infographic on chitosan-based nanosystems for psychiatric disorders, drug release and behavioral tests in mice.

Figure 3 Schematic diagram of chitosan-based nanosystems for ameliorating psychiatric disorders: (a) Schematic of design and drug release mechanism for olanzapine-loaded SNP-OSA-CHO/COL in situ gelling nanoparticle network hydrogel. Solid black arrows indicate directional processes. (b and c) One-hour cumulative locomotion scores in mice receiving amphetamine 0.5–4 h after intranasal administration of either free olanzapine ((b) blue) or OLZ@OSA-NNH ((c) red) at olanzapine doses ranging from 1–4 mg/kg. One-way RM ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0005; ns, not significant, n=6. Reprinted with permission from.144 Copyright 2024 Elsevier. (d) Synthetic scheme of siRNA-GBSA (CHI/TA) n NPs. Blue arrows denote material assembly. (e) Forced swimming test: (i) Schematic diagram; (ii) immobility time; (iii) latency to first immobility; (f) Tail suspension test: (i) Schematic diagram; (ii) immobility time; (iii) latency to first immobility. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n=10. Reprinted with permission from.145 Copyright 2023 AAAS.

Beyond chitosan, sodium alginate also exhibits considerable potential in drug delivery owing to its favorable biocompatibility and functional tunability.146 Addressing the key challenges in depression treatment, namely the difficulty of drugs penetrating the BBB and the imbalance of ROS in the brain, Xu et al constructed a ROS-responsive brain-targeted polysaccharide nanogel delivery system (BT-ROS-GA-PA-ANs DDS) based on alginate nanogels (Figure 4). 69 Taking natural sodium alginate as the scaffold, this system loads two natural active ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine, GA and PA. The nanogels were modified with transferrin to achieve BBB targeting, and further formulated into a thermosensitive hydrogel containing collagen to prolong nasal retention. Meanwhile, disulfide bonds were introduced to achieve ROS-responsive controlled drug release in the brain. This design reduces nasal drug loss and improves the antidepressant efficacy. Liu et al utilized other natural polysaccharides such as dextran (DEX) to develop ROS-responsive DEX derivatives modified with hexarginine (R6).147 These derivatives can load olanzapine and contribute to the treatment of depression through antioxidant effects.

Diagram of brain-targeted, ROS-responsive polysaccharide nanogels delivery process in three steps.

Figure 4 Design and antidepressant mechanism of brain-targeted, ROS-responsive polysaccharide nanogels. Red circled numbers (①, ②, ③) indicate the sequential steps of the nanogel delivery process, including sustained release, receptor binding, and ROS release. Solid black arrows show the directional processes; dashed arrows denote the sequential activation of intracellular signaling pathways; green and red lines represent hydrogen and ionic bonds, respectively. Reprinted with permission from.69 Copyright 2025 Elsevier.

Chemical techniques like reversible addition breakage chain transfer148 and reversible deactivation radical polymerization149 allow for flexible structural modification of produced polymers, which can be utilized to create polymer-drug conjugates, multiblock copolymers, and other materials. This enhances drug loading and provides a wide development platform for the creation of polymer nanocarriers by enabling the screening of corresponding structures from a large chemical library and using their charge, amphiphilicity, responsiveness, and other properties to achieve controlled drug release and improve drug safety.150,151

Currently, widely studied or commercially available polymers are frequently employed to deliver psychotropic drugs due to their established safety profiles (Table 6).

Table 6 Example of Polymer NPs Used for Delivering Psychotropic Drugs

Biodegradable polymer NPs represent a promising nanoplatform for antipsychotic drug delivery due to their ability to enhance drug solubility, membrane permeability, and bioavailability, while simultaneously reducing systemic toxicity. Notably, polymers synthesized through amino acid polymerization—which resemble natural proteins in structure and functio—exhibit excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low immunogenicity.155 Lugasi et al successfully encapsulated RSP within protein-mimetic polymer NPs, designated prot1/RSP and prot2/RSP. To enhance the formulation’s in vivo stability, they prepared RSP-loaded protein NPs via PEGylation following RSP-mediated self-assembly. Compared with free RSP, prot.1/RSP and prot.2/RSP exhibited better solubility, stability, and brain-targeting ability, suggesting their potential as efficient nanocarriers for CNS drug delivery.156 Polydopamine (PDA) is a typical synthetic biopolymer that has a straightforward preparation method and excellent biosafety and ROS scavenging abilities, which can reduce inflammation in the inflammatory microenvironment.167 To alleviate depression, Jiang et al created an inflammation-targeting microglial-biomimetic system (PDA-Mem@M) to eliminate ROS and upregulate BDNF expression.168 PDA-Mem@M, engineered with a BV2 cell membrane shell derived from microglia and a Mem-loaded PDA core, exhibits the multi-capabilities of penetrating the BBB to target microglia, alleviating the inflammatory environment via PDA-mediated ROS elimination, and enabling pH-responsive Mem release. Experimental results show that this nanosystem has excellent brain targeting ability and ROS scavenging capacity, and exhibits a good therapeutic effect in mice with chronic restraint stress-induced depression (Figure 5).

Schematic of PDA-Mem@M synthesis and its effects on neuroinflammation and neuroplasticity in depression.

Figure 5 Schematic diagram showing the synthesis process of PDA-Mem@M and its regulatory effect on neuroinflammation and neuroplasticity in depression. Solid blue arrows indicate directional processes; curved arrows denote administration, state transition, and microglial polarization; upward/downward arrows indicate increased/decreased levels. Reprinted with permission from.168 Copyright 2025 Wiley.

The solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs can be significantly enhanced by nanoscale co-precipitates formed through drug nucleation facilitated by polymers. PVMMA copolymer finds broad application as a drug carrier for its bioadhesive property and ability to react with various functional groups to build multifunctional delivery systems.169 Chen et al prepared composite NPs (PA NPs) of aripiprazole and PVMMA using an environmentally friendly fluid method. Compared to free aripiprazole, PA NPs treatment significantly lowered serum inflammatory marker levels and attenuated microglial activation in LPS-induced mouse brains. According to mouse behavior tests, PA NPs significantly alleviated the depressive-like behavior induced by LPS.153

Polymer-based delivery systems offer numerous advantages, including precise targeting and controlled drug release triggered by internal or external stimuli.92 Building on these observations, polymers emerge as exceptionally promising drug delivery vehicles, facilitating the creation of customized NPs for efficient antipsychotic administration.

Inorganic Nanomaterials

Nanoenzyme-Based NPs

Nanozymes are synthetic catalysts that mimic the biocatalytic activity of natural enzymes. These materials excel in biocatalytic applications because they offer greater stability, better scalability, and lower costs than natural enzymes.170,171 In fields like tumor therapy and diagnosis,172 as well as regenerative medicine,173 nanozymes have gained growing traction—they combine the catalytic specificity of natural enzymes with the multifunctional properties of nanomaterials. These functional features, together with their compact size and antioxidant capacity, further suggest strong potential for addressing psychiatric disorders. Singh et al reported on a cerium vanadate (CeVO4) nanoenzymes with high superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. These nanoenzymes can functionally replace SOD1 and SOD2 in nerve cells, help regulate the level of intracellular superoxide, restore levels of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, and protect neurons from oxidative damage.174 Therefore, CeVO4 nanozymes are expected to compensate for the defects in neuronal SOD function in psychiatric disorders, reverse abnormal mitochondrial energy metabolism and inhibit neuronal apoptosis. It is a potential new nanotherapeutic that intervenes in psychiatric disorders. The CeO2@BSA nanocluster synthesized with BSA as the template, with its ultra-small structure of about 2 nanometers, has high-efficiency BBB penetration, rapid in vivo metabolic clearance and excellent active oxygen removal ability. It verified the antidepressant-like effect of the nanocluster in a chronic restraint stress-induced depression model, which provided a reference for the development of nanoenzyme-based neuropsychiatric disease treatment.175 For inorganic materials used in antidepressant treatment, some work through nanoenzyme activity, while others improve the therapeutic effect through carrier function. Shi et al developed an N-acetylcysteine (NAC)-sealed gold nanocage for loading TLQP21. In an oxidative stress environment, TLQP21 is released upon consumption of NAC. This system effectively attenuates oxidative stress in the mouse brain and ameliorates major depressive disorder. In this study, the gold nanocage did not use its inherent nanoenzyme potential, but realized the ROS response release of TLQP21 as a drug carrier, thus providing practical support for the wide application of inorganic materials in this field.176

BP Nanosheets

BP nanosheets is a two-dimensional material with a large specific surface area, which have garnered significant attention owing to their biodegradability into non-toxic phosphorus oxides and favorable optical properties. These characteristics make BP nanosheets suitable for biomedical applications, especially photodynamic therapy and photothermal treatment.177,178 BP nanosheets can enhance the permeability of the BBB through near-infrared (NIR)-irradiated photothermal mediation. This characteristic gives them a potential application in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.179 Wang et al used BP nanotaphets coated with fluoxetine (BP–Flu) to study its potential to treat depression. They further developed a BP-based photothermal combined chemotherapy drug co-medication platform, providing a synergistic strategy to enhance the efficacy of antidepressant (Figure 6a). Fluorescence imaging confirms that BP nanosheets boost the BBB via the photothermal response. Importantly, in the behavioral test, BP-Flu combined with 808 nm laser irradiation can produce faster antidepressant response and lower toxicity than fluoxetine alone.180

Two-part schematic of BP NPs for depression treatment and brain-targeted nanotherapy.

Figure 6 (a) Schematic diagram of BP NPs for synergistic photothermal/chemotherapy treatment of depression. Solid black arrows indicate directional processes. Reprinted with permission from.180 Copyright 2020 Wiley. (b) Brain-Targeted based on BP-RVG29@HYP for nanotherapy. Red arrows show the upregulation of 5-HT, BDNF, and CREB; blue arrows indicate the directional processes; the dashed arrow denotes the indirect neuroprotective effect. Reprinted with permission from.181 Copyright 2024 Wiley.

Excessive ROS can cause oxidative stress, resulting in cell damage and functional imbalances associated with psychiatric disorders.182,183 BP nanosheets possess ROS-scavenging ability due to their unique molecular structure and can serve as drug carriers.184 Therefore, they are expected to exert antidepressant effects by reducing oxidative stress. Tan et al developed a low-toxicity BP nanoplatform for efficient delivery of the natural antidepressant medication hypericin (HYP) to the brain. Specifically, they developed a nano-platform, BP-RVG29@HYP (BRH), by loading the natural antidepressant HYP onto BP functionalized with the neural cell-targeting peptide RVG29. BRH specifically targets acetylcholine receptors and crosses the BBB via endocytosis by cerebral capillary endothelial cells. Upon 808 nm NIR irradiation, BRH significantly downregulates Claudin-5, a tight junction protein involved in maintaining BBB integrity, thereby enhancing BBB permeability. Once in the brain, BRH exerts dual antidepressant effects by scavenging ROS through BP nanosheets and modulating neurotransmitter function, including 5-HT, via HYP release (Figure 6b). 181

Graphene Oxide (GO)

GO, an oxidized graphene-derived product, exhibits enhanced hydrophilicity and provides outstanding loading capability for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs.185,186 Torabi Fard et al developed a targeted delivery system for venlafaxine by loading it onto GO modified with a polyester dendrimer and adorned with 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid.187 Additionally, GO has been reported to exhibit intrinsic neuroprotective properties, which may contribute to the prevention or attenuation of depression.188,189 Yu et al developed a PEG-modified GO nanocarrier (GO-PEG-BO) functionalized with borneol (BO) and loaded with ginsenoside Rg1 (GRg1). BO serves as a targeting and permeation enhancer, temporarily and reversibly opening the BBB and inhibiting efflux mechanisms, thereby facilitating efficient GRg1 delivery to the brain without causing significant neural damage. GRg1/GO-PEG-BO exhibits uniform particle size (179.21 ± 1.95 nm), good dispersibility (PDI 0.272 ± 0.028), and enables sustained and complete release of GRg1. Upon intravenous administration, the nanocarrier successfully crossed the BBB with the assistance of BO and delivered GRg1 to the brain (Figure 7). Notably, GO itself can improve depression-related neuroplasticity abnormalities by upregulating the expression of neurotrophic factors such as NGF and BDNF. This property remains stable after PEG and borneol modification, synergizing with the antidepressant effects of GRg1 to further enhance therapeutic efficacy.190

Diagram of GO-PEG-BO fabrication and BBB translocation showing chemical processes, brain targeting and cellular interactions.

Figure 7 Schematic diagram of the fabrication and BBB translocation of GO-PEG-BO. Solid black arrows indicate directional processes; red upward/downward arrows indicate increased/decreased levels. Reprinted with permission from.190 Copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide NPs (SPIONs)

SPIONs are composed of magnetic iron cores (such Fe3O4 or Fe2O3) and are typically coated with biocompatible materials. They exhibit strong paramagnetism, nanoscale dimensions, and functionalizability, making them ideal candidates for biomedical applications. SPIONs have been extensively used as contrast agents in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to their excellent magnetic properties. SPION-based nanocarriers have been explored to deliver drugs across the BBB, improve brain accumulation, reduce peripheral side effects, and support real-time visualization of drug distribution via MRI.191 Notably, the magnetic response properties of SPIONs can also synergize with neurostimulation technologies to exert therapeutic effects, providing an innovative treatment strategy for psychiatric disorders. Afshari et al directly injected SPIONs into the lateral ventricles of the brain followed by continuous application of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for 14 days in a valproic acid-induced ASD rat model.192 This combined therapy successfully reversed ASD-related behavioral abnormalities (such as increased anxiety and repetitive behaviors) while simultaneously reducing levels of relevant factors like BDNF, MAP2, and SYN, which offers a novel therapeutic strategy for ASD treatment. SPIONs can be chemically modified to enable nanoscale strategies for controlled release and targeted drug delivery. Fang et al engineered chitosan-functionalized Fe3O4 NPs (Fe3O4@CS) through an in-situ serotonin synthesis strategy (Figure 8a). These nanozymes can catalyze the conversion of tryptophan into 5-hydroxytryptophan, effectively compensating for the impaired activity of tryptophan hydroxylase and promote the release of presynaptic neurotransmitters in the brain. This approach offers a more targeted and efficient means of restoring serotonin levels, thereby offering a hopeful therapeutic solution for treating depression.193 Through amidation condensation, Wang et al conjugated amino-modified Fe3O4 to the outer membrane of engineered bacteria, taking advantage of its magnetothermal conversion trait to regulate GABA release. After oral administration, the poly(norepinephrine) layer enhanced the mucosal adhesion of genetically engineered Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN). The Fe3O4 layer converted magnetic stimulation into local heat, which triggered temperature-dependent GABA release from the genetically engineered EcN (Figure 8b). 194 The gut-brain axis can be regulated effectively and controlled by this nano-assisted engineered bacterial system, and it has the potential to be used in therapy to relieve anxiety. Those approaches offer improved spatial targeting, deeper penetration, and enhanced focusing accuracy, suggesting that SPION-based neuromodulation may evolve into a robust approach for the precise management of psychiatric disorders.

A schematic of TPH-like nanozyme restoring serotonin and EcN-GadABC@Fe-NE modulating anxiety via Gut-Brain Axis.

Figure 8 (a) The schematic representation of how a tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH)-like nanozyme can restore serotonin synthesis in neurons to treat depression. Solid black arrows indicate directional processes; red curved arrow denotes the catalytic reaction of tryptophan to 5-HTP; red upward arrow indicates increased serotonin levels. Reprinted with permission from.193 Copyright 2025 ACS. (b) Schematic illustration of the mechanism by which EcN-GadABC@Fe-NE modulates anxiety-like behaviors through the Gut-Brain Axis. Solid black arrows indicate directional processes; red upward arrows indicate increased levels; curved arrows denote signaling pathways. Reprinted with permission from.194 Copyright 2025 BMC.

Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Materials: MOFs

MOFs constitute a family of crystalline materials that are coordinated by metal ions or clusters and organic linkers, possessing well-defined porous structures with tunable characteristics.195 The delivery scope of deliverable therapeutic substances can be significantly expanded by efficiently loading traditional small-molecule drugs and special therapeutic agents, such as carbon monoxide.196,197 They also show special utility in the management of neuropsychiatric disorders. Many obstacles have long hampered the clinical treatment of conditions like depression and schizophrenia, such as the difficulty of crossing the BBB, inadequate drug targeting, intricate pathogenic pathways, and the potential for drug addiction. Particularly in the fields of multi-target synergistic therapy and precision drug delivery, MOFs provide creative answers to these constraints.

To develop a MOFs-based drug delivery system for psychiatric disorder treatment, Hu et al utilized carbonized frameworks (CFs) derived from MIL-100 (Fe). The resulting platform (CFs@DP) serves as an intranasal delivery system and features dual response to NIR light and magnetic signals (Figure 9a–c). 198 The porous structure and iron-based composition of MIL-100 (Fe) give it a dual-functional basis. On one hand, the porous framework provides ample space for drug loading, enabling the efficient encapsulation of domperidone (DP) with a drug loading efficiency of approximately 12.5–14.3%. On the other hand, the iron-based component not only confers excellent paramagnetism to the material (saturation magnetization reaching 84.42 emu g−1) but also serves as a cerebral iron supplement, participating in dopamine receptor (DR) synthesis and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity regulation, which aligns with the crucial role of cerebral iron metabolic balance in mental function. During the treatment phase (Figure 9d), DP released by CFs@DP acts dually on synaptic membranes: it binds to presynaptic D2 receptors to boost dopamine storage, recycling and release, and to promote dopamine-D1R binding, thereby activating the AC/cAMP/CREB pathway and increasing BDNF expression to produce antidepressant-like effects. After drug withdrawal (Figure 9e), the CFs@DP induces upregulation of the CaMKII/CREB/BDNF axis, modulating synaptic plasticity and further elevating BDNF levels. This approach eases depressive/cognitive symptoms safely without addiction risk.

Diagram of CFs@DP in drug delivery and neural therapy, showing synthesis, delivery and therapeutic mechanisms.

Figure 9 Schematic diagram of CFs@DP application in magnetic targeted drug delivery and neural therapy. (a) Synthesis of CFs@DP. Blue arrows indicate the addition of raw materials (FeCl3, BTC, PVP, and domperidone), and red arrows represent the key fabrication processes of CFs. (b) Snuff bottle-derived magnetic targeted intranasal delivery platform for CFs@DP. (c) Mechanisms of toxicity attenuation and controlled drug release. (d) Therapeutic mechanism during drug administration. (e) Therapeutic mechanism after drug withdrawal. Solid colored arrows indicate directional processes; curved arrows denote signaling pathways; red upward and green downward arrows indicate increased/decreased levels. Reprinted with permission from.198 Copyright 2024 Wiley.

In addition, the light-responsive UZPM system, carried by ZIF-8, is delivered into live macrophages via functional liposome fusion and is further surface-modified to form the CAR-M-UZPM delivery platform. Leveraging CTLA-4 to target central M1-type microglia, it releases melatonin under NIR light stimulation, regulates microglial polarization balance, and inhibits neuroinflammation, thus providing an efficient central immune regulation strategy for inflammation-related depression.66 These two MOFs-based delivery systems, proceeding from the two pathways of neurotransmitter regulation and central anti-inflammation respectively, overcome the core bottlenecks of difficult drug delivery and poor targeting in neuropsychiatric disease treatment, fully demonstrating the unique advantages and broad application prospects of MOFs in this field.

EVs

EVs are nanoscale, phospholipid bilayer-enclosed particles that mediate intercellular communication in vivo. They are derived from various cell types, including exosomes and microvesicles.199,200 Owing to their endogenous origin, EVs exhibit high biocompatibility and stability in circulation, making them resistant to rapid degradation by the immune system.201

EVs also exhibit intrinsic targeting capabilities and the ability to cross the BBB, as demonstrated in recent studies.202 In specific therapeutic trials, EVs have demonstrated a favorable safety profile in humans and possess several key characteristics of an ideal drug delivery carrier.203 It is worth noting that clinical translation of EV-based therapies largely depends on advancements in isolation technologies and the development of improved strategies to control their biodistribution in vivo. Therefore, delivery efficiency can be enhanced by engineering with targeting properties. Yu et al204 developed RVG-modified EVs loading the circular RNA circDYM (RVG–circDYM EVs), leveraging the natural ability of EVs to protect endogenous bioactive molecules and cross the BBB. RVG specifically targets acetylcholine receptor, enabling efficient EV-mediated delivery of circDYM to the brain. Mechanistically, circDYM binds to the transcription factor TAF1 to downregulate its downstream target genes, thereby suppressing CNS inflammation and effectively alleviating depressive-like behaviors. This work is effective in treating severe depression and has potential for clinical application. Wang et al, created PBGE (Figure 10a), a Prussian blue (PB) nanodrug system encapsulated in macrophage exosomes and loaded with geniposide (GEN).205 Benefiting from the excellent biocompatibility and low immunogenicity of exosomes, as well as the specific interaction between exosomal LFA-1 and ICAM-1 on cerebral vascular endothelial cells, this system significantly enhances BBB penetration efficiency and improves targeting to inflammatory brain sites. In addition to enhancing the bioavailability of GEN as a carrier, PB also eliminates ROS accumulated in the brain. The interaction between GEN and PB activates the Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway, enhancing the body’s resistance to oxidative stress. This significantly improves depressive-like behaviors by further inhibiting microglial activation, lowering inflammatory markers like IL-1β and IL-6, and restoring synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis. Another innovative study constructed a bifunctional engineered EVs system, CM-sEVs.206 By co-incubating Raw 264.7 cells with copper nanodots (Cu NDs) and isolating Cu ND-loaded C-sEVs via differential centrifugation, MANF mRNA was further loaded through electroporation to form CM-sEVs with both gene delivery and enzymatic activities (Figure 10b). Utilizing EVs’ ability to cross the BBB and target microglia, the system enables Cu NDs to scavenge intracellular ROS for maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis, and MANF mRNA to inhibit the NF-κB pathway after translation. Ultimately, it promotes microglial M2 polarization, downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokines, and significantly alleviates LPS-induced depressive-like behaviors. Moreover, for treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bionic EVs also demonstrate unique value. Qi et al207 loaded cannabidiol into macrophage-derived vesicles (CMNVs) and enhanced delivery efficiency by leveraging the inflammatory targeting and immune evasion properties of the macrophage membrane (Figure 10c).207 With ultrasound assistance, this system further enhances BBB permeability, targets inflammatory brain regions, and effectively alleviates PTSD symptoms. These studies, through the synergistic design of enzyme-mimetic nanomaterials and EVs, offer a novel targeted therapy for inflammation-related psychiatric disorders, further highlighting the clinical potential of EVs in this field.

Schematic synthesis of PBGE, CM-sEVs and CMNV nanodrugs in three stages with directional processes.

Figure 10 Schematic synthesis of (a) PBGE (Reprinted with permission from.205 Copyright 2025 Wiley); (b) CM-sEVs (Reprinted with permission from.206 Copyright 2025 Wiley); (c) CMNV nanodrugs (Reprinted with permission from.207 Solid blue arrows indicate directional processes. Copyright 2023 Elsevier).

Challenges in Clinical Translation

While nanoparticle delivery systems can improve the solubility, bioavailability, and targeting of antipsychotic drugs, they still face significant challenges in clinical translation. Two major bottlenecks stand out. First, our understanding of nano-bio interactions in complex pathological environments is limited, which affects how NPs distribute, metabolize, and work in vivo. Second, nanomedicines for psychiatric disorders encounter general barriers during clinical development, including incomplete safety evaluation, a lack of unified regulatory standards, and limited scalability for large-scale production.

Major in vivo Microenvironmental Challenges for Nanoparticle Brain Delivery

The BBB stands out as a key obstacle for delivering drugs to the psychiatric disorders because it tightly controls which molecules and cells can enter the brain. For systemically given NPs to reach their target brain regions, they need to stay stable in the circulatory system and cross the BBB successfully. A major issue during systemic circulation is the clearance of these NPs by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), which is predominantly localized in the liver and spleen. Nanoparticle size is a critical determinant of their in vivo behavior: particles smaller than 6 nm are rapidly filtered by the kidneys, whereas those exceeding 200 nm are preferentially sequestered by the MPS. Particles in the 10–200 nm range, particularly 10–100 nm, represent an optimal window for prolonged circulation and effective lymph node access.208,209 Besides size, the surface properties of NPs also have a notable impact on how they interact with blood proteins and immune cells. When these particles enter the bloodstream, they bind to serum proteins to form a protein corona. This corona is able to mask the targeting ligands on the surface of NPs and accelerate immune system clearance, which in turn diminishes therapeutic efficacy.210,211 To tackle these problems, researchers have widely used surface modification methods like PEG grafting, also known as PEGylation, to create stealth coatings. These coatings reduce protein adsorption and help NPs stay in circulation longer.212,213 The recent innovative strategy aims to actively customize the composition of the protein crown, improve the targeting specificity by designing its components, and effectively transform the crown from biological barriers into functional advantages. For instance, researchers have demonstrated that chitosan NPs loaded with siRNA and encapsulated in BSA modified with cyclic RGD can enhance delivery efficiency.214 These “nanoparticle stealth” technologies provide valuable insights for optimizing nanoformulations used in psychiatric disorder treatment, as prolonging in vivo drug circulation time and achieving precise targeting are indispensable in this field.

Insufficient accumulation of therapeutic drugs in target brain regions or specific target cell types constitutes another major drawback. Protein coats tend to mask surface ligands on NPs, a process that reduces receptor-mediated recognition efficiency at the BBB and leads to non-specific distribution throughout the brain. Even NPs that successfully traverse the BBB often lack the ability to selectively localize to diseased subregions or specific cell populations within the CNS. To address this challenge, multi-tiered targeting strategies have emerged as a viable solution. For instance, Ge et al developed a dual-targeting cascade system where Ang-2 promotes BBB crossing, while Con-G enables targeting of lesion sites. Such cascade systems boost the site-specific accumulation of therapeutic agents, which in turn improves treatment outcomes for psychiatric disorders.139

Safe Manufacturing Considerations for Translating Nanoparticle Brain Delivery to Clinical Use

Multiple hurdles impede the clinical translation of nanomedicines, including non-standardized safety/toxicity assessment systems, ambiguous regulatory pathways, and poor reproducibility in large-scale manufacturing. Although optimally designed NPs theoretically offer controlled release and targeting capabilities, a comprehensive preclinical and clinical evaluation of parameters including cytotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and genotoxicity is required before they can enter clinical use—particularly for newly developed nanomaterials.215 Additionally, nanoparticle accumulation in the CNS poses a risk of neurotoxicity and long-term effects like aggravated anxiety, a risk that should not be ignored.216

From the perspectives of risk control and research efficiency, standardized in vitro evaluation has become a critical step in preclinical research for brain-targeted nanodelivery systems after basic physicochemical characterization. In current studies, microfluidic models, 2D Transwell co-culture models, and 3D organoid models are commonly used to mimic the BBB. Based on measurements such as trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and nanoparticle permeability coefficients, these models enable efficient assessment of BBB penetration, cellular uptake efficiency, and biosafety of the delivery vehicles.217

A well-established in vitro evaluation system not only enables rapid screening of optimal formulations and targeting strategies, but also provides in-depth insights into the intrinsic mechanisms of nanoparticle transport across biological barriers. It thereby offers reliable scientific support for subsequent in vivo experiments and enhances the reliability and reproducibility of research outcomes. Without such standardized assessment, in vivo behavior becomes unpredictable, leading to poor reproducibility, higher costs, and lower translation efficiency.218,219

To meet clinical application requirements, appropriate sterilization methods must be selected for nanomedicines based on the characteristics of the carrier material and formulation. Sterile filtration (0.22 µm) works under mild conditions and has little effect on particle size or drug loading, making it particularly suitable for heat-sensitive or structurally sensitive brain-targeting nanosystems. However, it is only applicable to NPs smaller than the pore size of the filter membrane and is prone to pore blockage, which affects efficiency and yield. Autoclaving is efficient and inexpensive, which suits stable systems like inorganic metal NPs. But the high heat and pressure can compromise the structural integrity of organic carriers (eg, polymers), leading to aggregation or degradation.220 Ionizing radiation (eg, γ‑rays) kills microorganisms thoroughly, yet high doses may degrade carriers and damage drugs—thus it is unsuitable for heat-sensitive materials.221 Non‑ionizing radiation (eg, ultraviolet) is easy to use but penetrates poorly, limiting it to surface sterilization.222 In short, the sterilization process must be carefully aligned with the carrier material, formulation, and targeting strategy to preserve uniform particle size, stable drug loading, and effective brain targeting.

Despite the excellent BBB penetration and lesion accumulation capabilities of brain-targeted nanomedicines in preclinical studies, their large-scale production and scalability remain serious challenges that limit clinical translation. Laboratory-scale batch preparation methods commonly used in nanomedicine development often lead to problems such as non-uniform particle size and surface properties when scaled up for industrial production. This results in poor batch-to-batch reproducibility and makes it difficult to meet GMP requirements for large-scale manufacturing. Complex nanostructures—such as those involving targeting ligand conjugation or surface stealth modifications—tend to suffer from poor uniformity, unstable surface characteristics, and impaired control over the protein corona during scale-up, ultimately reducing in vivo delivery efficiency.223 These issues hit brain‑targeted systems especially hard, often causing inconsistent ligand density and reduced BBB penetration that directly impair brain delivery performance.

Worldwide, no unified regulatory guidelines or evaluation standards specific to nanomedicines currently exist, leading to extended approval timelines.224 Standardized protocols for critical quality attributes—such as batch-to-batch consistency and long-term storage stability—are lacking, making it difficult to satisfy regulatory demands for quality control and stability.225 This constitutes a key external bottleneck limiting the clinical translation of brain-targeted nanomedicines.

Despite the growing number of basic and preclinical studies on nanomedicines, very few brain‑targeted formulations have actually entered clinical trials. More than 50 nanomedicines have been approved for clinical use, and over 100 are in clinical development, but brain‑targeted ones remain a small fraction. The clinical translation pathway for brain‑targeted nanomedicines is typically longer and more complex, with significantly extended development timelines and higher capital investment than traditional drugs.215 In particular, brain‑targeted nanodelivery systems for psychiatric disorders remain mostly at the preclinical stage, and their clinical translation lags substantially behind.

Strategies to promote the clinical translation of nanoformulations include microfluidics‑based controllable scale‑up,226 quality‑by‑design for full‑process control, mild post‑processing techniques, nano‑redevelopment of active molecules with proven safety (eg, curcumin,227 nitric oxide synthase modulators228), exploration of novel delivery targets and disease‑relevant models (eg, the gut-microbiota-immune-brain axis229), and the design of biodegradable, low‑immunogenicity nanocarriers. The synergistic implementation of these strategies can enhance scalability, batch‑to‑batch consistency, and translational feasibility.

Future Perspectives

In the future, precision and personalization will become central directions for nanodelivery systems in psychiatric disorders. Clinical diagnosis will gradually shift toward biomarker-driven precision subtyping, which may reduce the high misdiagnosis rate (up to 75%) in diseases such as schizoaffective disorder,230 providing a basis for targeted design and dosage optimization of nanocarriers. Artificial intelligence will play a key role in disease subtyping, target identification, and carrier optimization. Machine learning models based on EV proteomics can already effectively distinguish schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression, supporting the development of personalized nanomedicines.231 Meanwhile, stimuli-responsive smart nanocarriers will be deeply integrated with multimodal diagnostic platforms, enabling spatiotemporally controlled drug release in response to endogenous or exogenous signals, thereby enhancing targeting accuracy and reducing off-target effects. The synergistic integration of nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, and multimodal data will provide new opportunities for developing personalized therapeutic strategies tailored to individual pathophysiological profiles.

Conclusions

Nanodelivery systems, through their unique physicochemical properties, provide a feasible way to address clinical bottlenecks of traditional antipsychotic drugs, including delayed onset, pronounced peripheral side effects, and poor compliance, by improving drug solubility, optimizing in vivo transport, and enhancing brain delivery efficiency.

This review summarizes mainstream nanocarriers including lipid-based, polymer-based, and inorganic-based systems, each with distinct construction strategies and application advantages. Among them, lipid-based NPs and exosomes can efficiently cross the BBB due to their structural features, while targeted modification and flexible combination of various materials provide a feasible route to overcome delivery barriers. Notably, some nanomaterials possess both therapeutic and diagnostic functions. GO shows neuroprotective effects, SPIONs enable theranostic integration, and biomolecules inherent in natural carriers such as exosomes offer potential for early diagnosis and drug tracking. Alongside advances in these carrier platforms, nanotechnology has expanded beyond simple drug delivery. It broadens therapeutic dimensions for psychiatric disorders via multiple mechanisms, including regulating the brain–gut axis and attenuating neural damage by intervening in oxidative stress.

However, several critical limitations remain that hinder clinical translation: insufficient long-term biosafety data, suboptimal brain-targeting efficiency, and challenges in large-scale production and batch-to-batch consistency.

Future advances in understanding nano-bio interactions, optimizing brain-targeting strategies, and improving manufacturing and quality control are expected to overcome these barriers. Smart biodegradable carriers integrated with multifunctional therapies will represent a key direction for precision psychiatry.

Acknowledgments

Figure 1 and the Graphical Abstract were developed with the assistance of BioRender. Language refinement and proofreading of this manuscript were assisted by ChatGPT.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other financial support were received for the conduct of this review. No sponsors had any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.

References

1. GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–32. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3

2. Öngür D, Paulus MP. Embracing complexity in psychiatry—from reductionistic to systems approaches. Lancet Psychiatry. 2025;12(3):220–227. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00334-1

3. Gordon JA, Dzirasa K, Petzschner FH. The neuroscience of mental illness: building toward the future. Cell. 2024;187(21):5858–5870. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.028

4. Cheng Z, Su J, Zhang K, et al. Epigenetic mechanism of early life stress-induced depression: focus on the neurotransmitter systems. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:929732. doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.929732

5. Gebru WA, Asfaw GK, Berhe KT, et al. Predictors of extrapyramidal side effects among patients taking antipsychotic medication at Mekelle psychiatry units, Northern Ethiopia, 2023: unmatched case-control study. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25(1):837. doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07202-7

6. El-Tokhy FS, Abdel-Mottaleb MMA, El-Ghany EA, et al. Transdermal delivery of second-generation antipsychotics for management of schizophrenia; disease overview, conventional and nanobased drug delivery systems. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;61:102104. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102104

7. Hung LY. SSRIs and depression: role of gut–brain communication. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;22(8):530. doi:10.1038/s41575-025-01082-8

8. Song Y, Wang X, Ma W, et al. Graves’ disease as a driver of depression: a mechanistic insight. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1162445. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1162445

9. Wu H, Wu J, Jiang J, et al. Compound 7 regulates microglia polarization and attenuates radiation-induced myelopathy via the Nrf2 signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro studies. Mol Med. 2024;30(1):198. doi:10.1186/s10020-024-00951-3

10. Gerstner N, Fröhlich AS, Matosin N, et al. Contrasting genetic predisposition and diagnosis in psychiatric disorders: a multi-omic single-nucleus analysis of the human OFC. Sci Adv. 2025;11(10):eadq2290. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adq2290

11. Li Y, Zhang B, Pan X, et al. Dopamine-mediated major depressive disorder in the neural circuit of ventral tegmental area-nucleus accumbens-medial prefrontal cortex: from biological evidence to computational models. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:923039. doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.923039

12. Doolin K, Farrell C, Tozzi L, et al. Diurnal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis measures and inflammatory marker correlates in major depressive disorder. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2226. doi:10.3390/ijms18102226

13. Gabbay V, Bradley KA, Mao X, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex γ-aminobutyric acid deficits in youth with depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(8):e1216. doi:10.1038/tp.2017.187

14. Richardson E, Patterson R, Meltzer-Brody S, et al. Transformative therapies for depression: postpartum depression, major depressive disorder, and treatment-resistant depression. Annu Rev Med. 2025;76(1):81–93. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-050423-095712

15. Penninx BWJH, Pine DS, Holmes EA, et al. Anxiety disorders. Lancet. 2021;397(10277):914–927. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00359-7

16. Barchiesi R, Chanthongdee K, Petrella M, et al. An epigenetic mechanism for over-consolidation of fear memories. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(12):4893–4904. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01758-6

17. Liu W-Z, Huang S-H, Wang Y, et al. Medial prefrontal cortex input to basolateral amygdala controls acute stress-induced short-term anxiety-like behavior in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;48(5):734–744. doi:10.1038/s41386-022-01515-x

18. Zhang X, Wang S, Gong Q. Gray matter deficits of cortical-striatal-limbic circuit in social anxiety disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2022;65(S1):S399–S400. doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1012

19. Robison AJ, Thakkar KN, Diwadkar VA. Cognition and reward circuits in Schizophrenia: synergistic, not separate. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87(3):204–214. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.021

20. Howes OD, Bukala BR, Beck K. Schizophrenia: from neurochemistry to circuits, symptoms and treatments. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20(1):22–35. doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00904-0

21. McIntyre RS, Berk M, Brietzke E, et al. Bipolar disorders. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1841–1856. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31544-0

22. Kong L, Guo X, Shen Y, et al. Pushing the frontiers: optogenetics for illuminating the neural pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Int J Biol Sci. 2023;19:4539–4551. doi:10.7150/ijbs.84923

23. Zhang C-Y, Cai X, Guo L, et al. Genetic evidence for the “dopamine hypothesis of bipolar disorder”. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(2):532–535. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01808-z

24. Guglielmo R, Hasler G. The neuroprotective and neuroplastic potential of glutamatergic therapeutic drugs in bipolar disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;142:104906. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104906

25. Lu F, Cui Q, He Z, et al. Prefrontal-limbic-striatum dysconnectivity associated with negative emotional endophenotypes in bipolar disorder during depressive episodes. J Affect Disord. 2021;295:422–430. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.055

26. Stein DJ, Costa DLC, Lochner C, et al. Obsessive–compulsive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):52. doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0102-3

27. Ahmari SE, Spellman T, Douglass NL, et al. Repeated cortico-striatal stimulation generates persistent OCD-like behavior. Science. 2013;340(6137):1234–1239. doi:10.1126/science.1234733

28. Zhang H, Wang B, Li K, et al. Altered functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:522. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00522

29. Shalev A, Cho D, Marmar CR. Neurobiology and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2024;181(8):705–719. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20240536

30. Andrewes DG, Jenkins LM. The role of the amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotional regulation: implications for post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019;29(2):220–243. doi:10.1007/s11065-019-09398-4

31. Miao X-R, Chen Q-B, Wei K, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder: from diagnosis to prevention. Military Med Res. 2018;5(1):32. doi:10.1186/s40779-018-0179-0

32. Norred MA, Zuschlag ZD, Hamner MB. A neuroanatomic and pathophysiologic framework for novel pharmacological approaches to the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Drugs. 2024;84(2):149–164. doi:10.1007/s40265-023-01983-5

33. Cuijpers P, Noma H, Karyotaki E, et al. A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression. World Psychiatry. 2020;19(1):92–107. doi:10.1002/wps.20701

34. Todesco B, Ostuzzi G, Gastaldon C, et al. Essential medicines for mental disorders: comparison of 121 national lists with WHO recommendations. Arch Public Health. 2023;81(1):8. doi:10.1186/s13690-022-01014-x

35. Upadhyay R, Ghosh P, Desavathu M. Advancement in the nose-to-brain drug delivery of FDA-approved drugs for the better management of depression and psychiatric disorders. Int J Pharm. 2024;667(Pt B):124866. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124866

36. Zhang W, Mehta A, Tong Z, et al. Development of polymeric nanoparticles for blood–brain barrier transfer—strategies and challenges. Adv Sci. 2021;8(10):2003937. doi:10.1002/advs.202003937

37. Wu D, Chen Q, Chen X, et al. The blood–brain barrier: structure, regulation and drug delivery. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):217. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w

38. Riccardi C, Napolitano F, Montesarchio D, et al. Nanoparticle-guided brain drug delivery: expanding the therapeutic approach to neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(11):1897. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13111897

39. Pollak TA, Drndarski S, Stone JM, et al. The blood–brain barrier in psychosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(1):79–92. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30293-6

40. Rajput A, Pingale P, Dhapte-Pawar V. Nasal delivery of neurotherapeutics via nanocarriers: facets, aspects, and prospects. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:979682. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.979682

41. Madadi AK, Sohn M-J. Advances in intrathecal nanoparticle delivery: targeting the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier for enhanced CNS drug delivery. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17(8):1070. doi:10.3390/ph17081070

42. Nance E, Pun SH, Saigal R, et al. Drug delivery to the central nervous system. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7(4):314–331. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00394-w

43. Lai W-F. Design and applications of polymersomes for oral drug administration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(21):30423–30435. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c04658

44. Bayraktar A, Li X, Kim W, et al. Drug repositioning targeting glutaminase reveals drug candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):332. doi:10.1186/s12967-023-04192-6

45. Dening TJ, Rao S, Thomas N, et al. Oral nanomedicine approaches for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses. J Control Release. 2016;223:137–156. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.047

46. Thelen K, Dressman JB. Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism in the human gut wall. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;61(5):541–558. doi:10.1211/jpp.61.05.0002

47. Zemanova N, Anzenbacher P, Anzenbacherova E. The role of cytochromes P450 in the metabolism of selected antidepressants and anxiolytics under psychological stress. Biomed Pap. 2022;166(2):140–149. doi:10.5507/bp.2022.019

48. Patel HP, Gandhi PA, Chaudhari PS, et al. Clozapine loaded nanostructured lipid carriers engineered for brain targeting via nose-to-brain delivery: optimization and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;64:102533. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102533

49. Rai G, Gauba P, Dang S. Recent advances in nanotechnology for Intra-nasal drug delivery and clinical applications. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023;86:104726. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104726

50. Madden S, Carrazana E, Rabinowicz AL. Optimizing absorption for intranasal delivery of drugs targeting the central nervous system using alkylsaccharide permeation enhancers. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(8):2119. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15082119

51. Kim J, Jeong J, Jo JK, et al. Hollow microneedles as a flexible dosing control solution for transdermal drug delivery. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32:101754. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101754

52. Agrawal MB, Patel MM. Optimization and in vivo evaluation of quetiapine-loaded transdermal drug delivery system for the treatment of schizophrenia. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2020;46(11):1819–1831. doi:10.1080/03639045.2020.1821051

53. Patel MX, Sethi FN, Barnes TR, et al. Joint BAP NAPICU evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical management of acute disturbance: de-escalation and rapid tranquillisation. J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(6):601–640. doi:10.1177/0269881118776738

54. Toja-Camba FJ, Vidal-Millares M, Duran-Maseda MJ, et al. Evaluating the real-world pharmacokinetics of risperidone ISM® in routine clinical practice. Biomedicines. 2025;13(2):384. doi:10.3390/biomedicines13020384

55. Oliva V, Fico G, De Prisco M, et al. Bipolar disorders: an update on critical aspects. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025;48:101135. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101135

56. Moritz S, Hünsche A, Lincoln TM. Nonadherence to antipsychotics: the role of positive attitudes towards positive symptoms. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24(11):1745–1752. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.09.008

57. Zanos P, Thompson SM, Duman RS, et al. Convergent mechanisms underlying rapid antidepressant action. CNS Drugs. 2018;32(3):197–227. doi:10.1007/s40263-018-0492-x

58. Kulkarni SK, Dhir A. Current investigational drugs for major depression. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(6):767–788. doi:10.1517/13543780902880850

59. Pradhan D, Biswasroy P, Goyal A, et al. Recent advancement in nanotechnology-based drug delivery system against viral infections. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2021;22(1):47. doi:10.1208/s12249-020-01908-5

60. Meng Q, Meng H, Pan Y, et al. Influence of nanoparticle size on blood–brain barrier penetration and the accumulation of anti-seizure medicines in the brain. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10(2):271–281. doi:10.1039/D1TB02015C

61. Saraiva C, Praça C, Ferreira R, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated brain drug delivery: overcoming blood–brain barrier to treat neurodegenerative diseases. J Control Release. 2016;235:34–47. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.044

62. Nielsen SSE, Holst MR, Langthaler K, et al. Apicobasal transferrin receptor localization and trafficking in brain capillary endothelial cells. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2023;20(1):2. doi:10.1186/s12987-022-00404-1

63. Chen T, Dai Y, Hu C, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of the blood–brain barrier dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024;21(1):60. doi:10.1186/s12987-024-00557-1

64. Ou A, Wang Y, Zhang J, et al. Living cells and cell-derived vesicles: a trojan horse technique for brain delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(4):1257. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15041257

65. Zhang C, Yang L, Wang F, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of a synthetic brain-targeted H2S donor cross-linked nanomicelle in autism spectrum disorder rats through aerobic glycolysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;17(1):157–173. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c11663

66. Liu Y, Hu P, Zheng Z, et al. Photoresponsive vaccine-like CAR-M system with high-efficiency central immune regulation for inflammation-related depression. Adv Mater. 2022;34(11):2108525. doi:10.1002/adma.202108525

67. Terstappen GC, Meyer AH, Bell RD, et al. Strategies for delivering therapeutics across the blood–brain barrier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(5):362–383. doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00139-y

68. Ponduri TK, Guntupalli C, Jeganathan B, et al. Transferrin-conjugated chitosan nanoparticles for direct nose-to-brain delivery of Ziprasidone: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. Mol Pharm. 2025;22(11):6941–6955. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c00863

69. Xu D, Qiao T, Zhou Y-M, et al. A brain-targeted and ROS-responsive natural polysaccharide nanogel for enhancing antidepressant therapy. Chem Eng J. 2025;507:160719. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.160719

70. He X, Xie J, Zhang J, et al. Acid-responsive dual-targeted nanoparticles encapsulated aspirin rescue the immune activation and phenotype in autism spectrum disorder. Adv Sci. 2022;9(14):2104286. doi:10.1002/advs.202104286

71. Sakamoto K, Iwata S, Jin Z, et al. Cyclic peptides KS-133 and KS-487 multifunctionalized nanoparticles enable efficient brain targeting for treating Schizophrenia. JACS Au. 2024;4(8):2811–2817. doi:10.1021/jacsau.4c00311

72. Liu S, Chen L, Guo M, et al. Targeted delivery of engineered RVG-BDNF-exosomes: a novel neurobiological approach for ameliorating depression and regulating neurogenesis. Research. 2024;7:0402. doi:10.34133/research.0402

73. Abdel-Bar HM, Tulbah AS, Darwish HW, et al. Quetiapine albumin nanoparticles as an efficacious platform for brain deposition and potentially improved antipsychotic activity. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7):1785. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15071785

74. De R, Mahata MK, Kim K-T. Structure-based varieties of polymeric nanocarriers and influences of their physicochemical properties on drug delivery profiles. Adv Sci. 2022;9(10):2105373. doi:10.1002/advs.202105373

75. Lofts A, Abu-Hijleh F, Rigg N, et al. Nose-to-brain delivery of lithium via a sprayable in situ-forming hydrogel composed of chelating starch nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2025;378:831–846. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.12.063

76. Campea MA, Lofts A, Winterhelt E, et al. Starch nanoparticle/carboxymethyl chitosan nanoassemblies for intranasal delivery of antipsychotic drugs to the brain. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2025;8(20):10409–10424. doi:10.1021/acsanm.5c01088

77. Robin Emsley SK. Efficacy and safety profile of paliperidone palmitate injections in the management of patients with schizophrenia: an evidence-based review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:205–223. doi:10.2147/ndt.s139633

78. Steiner L, Bibi D, Merenlender Wagner A, et al. An evaluation of the subcutaneous depot release of TV-46000, A novel Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) formulation of risperidone, under extreme conditions in dogs, minipigs and humans. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(2):150. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17020150

79. Li L, Zhao L, Li M, et al. Schizophrenia treatment based on sustained release of risperidone from Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid implantable microarray patch. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(11):16616–16631. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c20010

80. Gangavarapu A, Tapia-Lopez LV, Sarkar B, et al. Lipid nanoparticles for enhancing oral bioavailability. Nanoscale. 2024;16(39):18319–18338. doi:10.1039/d4nr01487a

81. Xiang Y, Gu Q, Liu D. Brain endothelial cells in blood–brain barrier regulation and neurological therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(12):5843. doi:10.3390/ijms26125843

82. Cao Z, Zuo X, Liu X, et al. Recent progress in stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for targeted delivery of functional nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;330:103206. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103206

83. Gok O, Sharma A, Kambhampati SP, et al. Sustained and Step-wise drug release by a novel double responsive Dendrimer-N-Acetylcysteine conjugate. Biomacromolecules. 2025;26(7):4274–4285. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5c00283

84. Liu Y, Si L, Jiang Y, et al. Design of pH-responsive nanomaterials based on the tumor microenvironment. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:705–721. doi:10.2147/IJN.S504629

85. Huang X, Zhang F, Wang Y, et al. Design considerations of iron-based nanoclusters for noninvasive tracking of mesenchymal stem cell homing. ACS Nano. 2014;8(5):4403–4414. doi:10.1021/nn4062726

86. Chen W, Ouyang J, Yi X, et al. Black phosphorus nanosheets as a neuroprotective nanomedicine for neurodegenerative disorder therapy. Adv Mater. 2018;30(3):1703458. doi:10.1002/adma.201703458

87. Cheng G, Li Z, Liu Y, et al. “Swiss Army Knife” black phosphorus-based nanodelivery platform for synergistic antiparkinsonian therapy via remodeling the brain microenvironment. J Control Release. 2023;353:752–766. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.024

88. Wei X, Jiang Y, Chenwu F, et al. Synergistic ferroptosis–immunotherapy nanoplatforms: multidimensional engineering for tumor microenvironment remodeling and therapeutic optimization. Nano-Micro Lett. 2025;18(1):56. doi:10.1007/s40820-025-01862-6

89. Shetab Boushehri MA. Long circulating nanocarriers: achievements and shortcomings of biomimetic approaches. Int J Pharm. 2026;689:126488. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126488

90. Austria E, Bilek M, Varamini P, et al. Breaking biological barriers: engineering polymeric nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Nano Today. 2025;60:102552. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102552

91. Mehta M, Bui TA, Yang X, et al. Lipid-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery: an overview of the production techniques and difficulties encountered in their industrial development. ACS Mater Au. 2023;3(6):600–619. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00032

92. Beach MA, Nayanathara U, Gao Y, et al. Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Chem Rev. 2024;124(9):5505–5616. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00705

93. Sati A, Mali SN, Samdani N, et al. From past to present: gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in daily life─synthesis mechanisms, influencing factors, characterization, toxicity, and emerging applications in biomedicine, nanoelectronics, and materials science. ACS Omega. 2025;10(31):33999–34087. doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c03162

94. Moghaddari K, Schumacher L, Pöttgen R, et al. Optimizing superparamagnetic ferrite nanoparticles: microwave-assisted vs. thermal decomposition synthesis methods. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7(15):4563–4576. doi:10.1039/D5NA00244C

95. Liu D-M, Dong C. Recent advances in nano-carrier immobilized enzymes and their applications. Process Biochem. 2020;92:464–475. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2020.02.005

96. Stock N, Biswas S. Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites. Chem Rev. 2012;112(2):933–969. doi:10.1021/cr200304e

97. Heydarinasab H, Sadeghi FH, Mohammadloo HE, et al. Multi-metal/ligand MOFs: transformative materials for energy storage, photocatalysis, and sensor technologies. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;344:103592. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2025.103592

98. Ge X, Shan S, Lu H, Wang W, Gao C, Fu S. Strategies, challenges and application prospects for exosome engineering modifications in tumor targeted therapeutics. Int J Nanomed. 2026;21:572435. doi:10.2147/ijn.s572435

99. Gou K, Xin W, Lv J, et al. A pH-responsive chiral mesoporous silica nanoparticles for delivery of doxorubicin in tumor-targeted therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2023;221:113027. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113027

100. Xu H, Hu D, Liu S, et al. Folic acid-modified ginger-derived exosome-like nanoparticles co-delivering sunitinib suppress renal cell carcinoma via PI3K-Akt pathway inhibition, P-gp downregulation, and macrophage reprogramming. Adv Sci. 2026;13(6):e12563. doi:10.1002/advs.202512563

101. Cai S, Yuan Z, Chen Y, et al. Transferrin and borneol-enhanced liposomes for targeted rapamycin delivery in TBI. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:4503–4518. doi:10.2147/IJN.S489165

102. Zhang B-C, Lai C-M, Luo B-Y, et al. Triterpenoids-templated self-assembly nanosystem for biomimetic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 based on the synergy of TLR-2 and ICB to enhance HCC immunotherapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14(7):3205–3217. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.033

103. Wang R, Wang Y, Chen J, et al. Photocatalytic TiO2/HAP nanocomposite for antimicrobial treatment, promineralization, and tooth whitening. RSC Adv. 2025;15(17):13453–13467. doi:10.1039/D5RA00792E

104. Hu X, Zhang X, Zhang G, et al. Cerium oxide-modified Pd nanosheets encapsulated by red blood cell membranes for high-efficiency RONS scavenging in depression treatment. Nanoscale. 2024;16(48):22312–22325. doi:10.1039/D4NR03410D

105. Fu L, Zhang Y, Farokhzad RA, et al. ‘Passive’ nanoparticles for organ-selective systemic delivery: design, mechanism and perspective. Chem Soc Rev. 2023;52(21):7579–7601. doi:10.1039/D2CS00998F

106. He Y, Zhang W, Xiao Q, et al. Liposomes and liposome-like nanoparticles: from anti-fungal infection to the COVID-19 pandemic treatment. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2022;17(6):817–837. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2022.11.002

107. Diedrichsen RG, Vetri V, Prévost S, et al. Carrier peptide interactions with liposome membranes induce reversible clustering by surface adsorption and shape deformation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;650:1821–1832. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.078

108. Zhang X, Liu W, Chu H, et al. Liposomes: a breakthrough in advanced drug delivery systems. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2026;353:103887. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2026.103887

109. Abbrederis N, Paloglou D, Astakhova KG. Smart lipid nanoparticles: the chemistry driving targeted therapeutics. Trends Chem. 2025;7(12):827–840. doi:10.1016/j.trechm.2025.09.011

110. Graván P, Aguilera-Garrido A, Marchal JA, et al. Lipid-core nanoparticles: classification, preparation methods, routes of administration and recent advances in cancer treatment. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;314:102871. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2023.102871

111. Jawahar N, Hingarh PK, Arun R, et al. Enhanced oral bioavailability of an antipsychotic drug through nanostructured lipid carriers. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:269–275. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.121

112. Song T, Wang W, Wu Y, et al. Functional liposomes improve the oral absorption of lurasidone hydrochloride by overcoming multiple absorption barriers and eliminating food effect. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:4883–4901. doi:10.2147/ijn.s512876

113. Patil A, Rajput A, Subbappa P, et al. Formulation, development and in vivo characterization of selegiline hydrochloride nanostructured lipid nanocarrier loaded microneedle array patch for depression. Int J Pharm. 2025;671:125257. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125257

114. Chauhan T, Rani V, Sahu B, et al. Negatively charged liposomes of sertraline hydrochloride: formulation, characterization and pharmacokinetic studies. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;58:101780. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101780

115. Sabet FS, Dabirmanesh B, Sabet HS, et al. The electro-responsive nanoliposome as an on-demand drug delivery platform for epilepsy treatment. Int J Pharm. 2024;664:124610. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124610

116. Akbar K, Rehman MU, Shah FA, et al. Paroxetine loaded nanostructured lipid carriers based in-situ gel for brain delivery via nasal route for enhanced anti-depressant effect: in vitro prospect and in vivo efficacy. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2024;25(8):248. doi:10.1208/s12249-024-02954-z

117. Jawad M, Shafique U, Din F, et al. Nose to brain delivery of escitalopram-loaded nano-structured lipid carriers thermosensitive gel: formulation, physiochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2024;97:105800. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105800

118. Noorulla KM, Yasir M, Muzaffar F, et al. Intranasal delivery of chitosan decorated nanostructured lipid carriers of Buspirone for brain targeting: formulation development, optimization and In-Vivo preclinical evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;67:102939. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102939

119. Rehman S, Nabi B, Javed A, et al. Unraveling enhanced brain delivery of paliperidone-loaded lipid nanoconstructs: pharmacokinetic, behavioral, biochemical, and histological aspects. Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1):1409–1422. doi:10.1080/10717544.2022.2069880

120. Ibrahim MM, Basalious EB, El-Nabarawi MA, et al. Nose to brain delivery of mirtazapine via lipid nanocapsules: preparation, statistical optimization, radiolabeling, in vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetic study. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024;14(9):2539–2557. doi:10.1007/s13346-024-01528-7

121. Rajeshwar Kamal Kant A, Juyal V, Dheeraj B, et al. Enhanced brain delivery via intranasal administration of carbamazepine loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: optimization, pharmacokinetic analysis, in-vitro, and in-vivo drug release study. Curr Drug Deliv. 2023;20(5):587–600. doi:10.2174/1567201819666220519120837

122. Yasir M, Chauhan I, Zafar A, et al. Buspirone loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for amplification of nose to brain efficacy: formulation development, optimization by Box-Behnken design, in-vitro characterization and in-vivo biological evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;61:102164. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102164

123. Tsai -C-C, Fan C-H, Lin C-W, et al. Focused ultrasound-triggered escitalopram delivery using microbubble-liposome complexes for rapid and sustained serotonin regulation in depression therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;190:118373. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118373

124. Kamburova K, Dimitrov IL, Hodzhaoglu F, et al. Investigation of the aggregation of Aβ Peptide (1–40) in the presence of κ-Carrageenan-Stabilised liposomes loaded with homotaurine. Molecules. 2024;29(15):3460. doi:10.3390/molecules29153460

125. Constantinou C, Meliou K, Skouras A, et al. Liposomes against Alzheimer’s disease: current research and future prospects. Biomedicines. 2024;12(7):1519. doi:10.3390/biomedicines12071519

126. Susa F, Arpicco S, Pirri CF, et al. An overview on the physiopathology of the blood–brain barrier and the lipid-based nanocarriers for central nervous system delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(7):849. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16070849

127. Maqsood S, Din FU, Khan SU, et al. Levosulpiride-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for brain delivery with antipsychotic and antidepressant effects. Life Sci. 2022;311:121198. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2022.121198

128. Ju M, Zhang Z, Gao F, et al. Intranasal delivery of circATF7IP siRNA via lipid nanoparticles alleviates LPS-induced depressive-like behaviors. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2024;13(30):2402219. doi:10.1002/adhm.202402219

129. Meola TR, Dening TJ, Prestidge CA. Nanocrystal-silica-lipid hybrid particles for the improved oral delivery of ziprasidone in vitro. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;129:145–153. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.05.028

130. Zhou L, Wu X, Qin S, et al. Cell-liposome delivery system based on neuroinflammation to target the amygdala for ameliorating depressive-like behaviors. Int J Pharm. 2023;637:122724. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122724

131. Ferreira MD, Duarte J, Veiga F, et al. Nanosystems for brain targeting of antipsychotic drugs: an update on the most promising nanocarriers for increased bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):678. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020678

132. Wong CK, Lai RY, Stenzel MH. Polymersomes with micellar patches. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;671:449–456. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.05.177

133. Wang X, Hu J, Liu S. Overcoming the dilemma of permeability and stability of polymersomes through traceless cross-linking. Acc Chem Res. 2022;55(23):3404–3416. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00442

134. Cai Y, Qi J, Lu Y, et al. The in vivo fate of polymeric micelles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;188:114463. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114463

135. Bharadwaj P, Roullin VG, Chain JL. Crossing the blood–brain barrier: advances in dendrimer-based nanocarriers for central nervous system delivery. Nanoscale. 2025;17(40):23202–23227. doi:10.1039/D5NR02548F

136. Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Sharma H, et al. Harnessing the power of biological macromolecules in hydrogels for controlled drug release in the central nervous system: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;254:127708. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127708

137. Elsori D, Pandey P, Obaidur Rab S, et al. How effective are key phytocompound carrying polysaccharide nanocarriers as anti-breast cancer therapy? A comprehensive review of the literature. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:8393–8413. doi:10.2147/IJN.S520580

138. Liu Z, Xing X, Zhu P, et al. Hyaluronic acid extracellularly inhibits ferroptosis via cell-surface receptors in acute traumatic brain injury. Nano Today. 2022;46:101625. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101625

139. Ge J, Tan R, Gao Q, et al. A multifunctional nanocarrier system for highly efficient and targeted delivery of ketamine to NMDAR sites for improved treatment of depression. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(21):2300154. doi:10.1002/adhm.202300154

140. Meng Q, Zhong S, Wang J, et al. Advances in chitosan-based microcapsules and their applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;300:120265. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120265

141. Iskandar A, Kim S-K, Wong TW. “Drug-Free” chitosan nanoparticles as therapeutic for cancer treatment. Polym Rev. 2024;64(3):818–871. doi:10.1080/15583724.2024.2323943

142. Huang H, Zhou Y, Li J, et al. Application of chitosan-based drug delivery systems in the treatment of bacterial diseases: a review. Drug Deliv. 2025;32(1):2514140. doi:10.1080/10717544.2025.2514140

143. Majcher MJ, Babar A, Lofts A, et al. In situ-gelling starch nanoparticle (SNP)/O-carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCh) nanoparticle network hydrogels for the intranasal delivery of an antipsychotic peptide. J Control Release. 2021;330:738–752. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.050

144. Lofts A, Campea MA, Winterhelt E, et al. In situ-gelling hydrophobized starch nanoparticle-based nanoparticle network hydrogels for the effective delivery of intranasal olanzapine to treat brain disorders. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;277:134385. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134385

145. He H, Qin Q, Xu F, et al. Oral polyphenol-armored nanomedicine for targeted modulation of gut microbiota–brain interactions in colitis. Sci Adv. 2023;9(21):eadf3887. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf3887

146. Wang W, Huang Y, Pan Y, et al. Sodium alginate modifications: a critical review of current strategies and emerging applications. Foods. 2025;14(22):3931. doi:10.3390/foods14223931

147. Liu L, Liu M, Xiu J, et al. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles delivered by a nasal-brain pathway alleviate depression-like behavior through extensively scavenging ROS. Acta Biomater. 2023;171:451–465. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.038

148. Smith AE, Xu X, McCormick CL. Stimuli-responsive amphiphilic (co)polymers via RAFT polymerization. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(1):45–93. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.11.005

149. Guerassimoff L, Ferrere M, Bossion A, et al. Stimuli-sensitive polymer prodrug nanocarriers by reversible-deactivation radical polymerization. Chem Soc Rev. 2024;53(12):6511–6567. doi:10.1039/D2CS01060G

150. Li H, Zha S, Li H, et al. Polymeric dendrimers as nanocarrier vectors for neurotheranostics. Small. 2022;18(45):2203629. doi:10.1002/smll.202203629

151. Zhang Q, Kuang G, Li W, et al. Stimuli-responsive gene delivery nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023;15(1):44. doi:10.1007/s40820-023-01018-4

152. Piazzini V, Landucci E, Urru M, et al. Enhanced dissolution, permeation and oral bioavailability of aripiprazole mixed micelles: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2020;583:119361. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119361

153. Chen L-F, Chen Y, Duan -Y-Y, et al. Preparation of aripiprazole-poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride) nanocomposites via supercritical antisolvent process for improved antidepression therapy. Regen Biomater. 2022;9:rbac080. doi:10.1093/rb/rbac080

154. Muthu MS, Sahu AK, Sonali, et al. Solubilized delivery of paliperidone palmitate by d-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate micelles for improved short-term psychotic management. Drug Deliv. 2016;23(1):230–237. doi:10.3109/10717544.2014.909907

155. Lugasi L, Grinberg I, Sabag R, et al. Proteinoid nanocapsules as drug delivery system for improving antipsychotic activity of risperidone. Molecules. 2020;25(17):4013. doi:10.3390/molecules25174013

156. Lugasi L, Grinberg I, Rudnick-Glick S, et al. Designed proteinoid polymers and nanoparticles encapsulating risperidone for enhanced antipsychotic activity. J Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18(1):149. doi:10.1186/s12951-020-00709-z

157. Tan T, Celebioglu A, Aboelkheir M, et al. Risperidone/cyclodextrin inclusion complex electrospun nanofibers for fast-disintegrating antipsychotic drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2024;97:105753. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105753

158. Bari NK, Fazil M, Hassan MQ, et al. Brain delivery of buspirone hydrochloride chitosan nanoparticles for the treatment of general anxiety disorder. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;81:49–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.041

159. Shah B, Khunt D, Misra M, et al. Application of Box-Behnken design for optimization and development of quetiapine fumarate loaded chitosan nanoparticles for brain delivery via intranasal route*. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;89:206–218. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.076

160. Piazza J, Hoare T, Molinaro L, et al. Haloperidol-loaded intranasally administered lectin functionalized poly(ethylene glycol)–block-poly(d,l)-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PEG–PLGA) nanoparticles for the treatment of schizophrenia. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(1):30–39. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.02.007

161. Katare YK, Daya RP, Sookram Gray C, et al. Brain targeting of a water insoluble antipsychotic drug haloperidol via the intranasal route using PAMAM dendrimer. Mol Pharm. 2015;12(9):3380–3388. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00402

162. Łukasiewicz S, Szczepanowicz K, Podgórna K, et al. Encapsulation of clozapine in polymeric nanocapsules and its biological effects. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;140:342–352. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.044

163. Łukasiewicz S, Błasiak E, Szczepanowicz K, et al. The interaction of clozapine loaded nanocapsules with the hCMEC/D3 cells – in vitro model of blood brain barrier. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;159:200–210. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.07.053

164. Łukasiewicz S, Mikołajczyk A, Szczęch M, et al. Encapsulation of clozapine into polycaprolactone nanoparticles as a promising strategy of the novel nanoformulation of the active compound. J Nanopart Res. 2019;21(7):149. doi:10.1007/s11051-019-4587-1

165. Panda A, Meena J, Katara R, et al. Formulation and characterization of clozapine and risperidone co-entrapped spray-dried PLGA nanoparticles. Pharm Dev Technol. 2016;21(1):43–53. doi:10.3109/10837450.2014.965324

166. Tong G-F, Qin N, Sun L-W. Development and evaluation of Desvenlafaxine loaded PLGA-chitosan nanoparticles for brain delivery. Saudi Pharm J. 2017;25(6):844–851. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2016.12.003

167. Chen T, Zhuang B, Huang Y, et al. Inhaled curcumin mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles against radiation pneumonitis. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(5):2522–2532. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.10.027

168. Jiang C, Yang X, Huang Q, et al. Microglial-biomimetic memantine-loaded polydopamine nanomedicines for alleviating depression. Adv Mater. 2025;37(9):2417869. doi:10.1002/adma.202417869

169. Ren T, Zheng X, Bai R, et al. Bioadhesive poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride)-TPGS copolymer modified PLGA/lipid hybrid nanoparticles for improving intestinal absorption of cabazitaxel. Int J Pharm. 2022;611:121301. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121301

170. Fu Z, Fan K, He X, et al. Single-atom-based nanoenzyme in tissue repair. ACS Nano. 2024;18(20):12639–12671. doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c00308

171. Ai Y, Hu Z-N, Liang X, et al. Recent advances in nanozymes: from matters to bioapplications. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(14):2110432. doi:10.1002/adfm.202110432

172. Xiong R, Zhu X, Zhao J, et al. Nanozymes-mediated cascade reaction system for tumor-specific diagnosis and targeted therapy. Small Methods. 2024;8(10):2301676. doi:10.1002/smtd.202301676

173. Cai X, Yu M, Li B, et al. Cobalt ions-derived nanoenzyme array for endosseous neural network reconstruction and osseointegration. Bioact Mater. 2024;42:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.005

174. Singh N, NaveenKumar SK, Geethika M, et al. A cerium vanadate nanozyme with specific superoxide dismutase activity regulates mitochondrial function and ATP synthesis in neuronal cells. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60(6):3121–3130. doi:10.1002/anie.202011711

175. Fu S, Chen H, Yang W, et al. ROS-targeted depression therapy via BSA-incubated ceria nanoclusters. Nano Lett. 2022;22(11):4519–4527. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01334

176. Shi M, Li X, Fan Z, et al. N-Acetylcysteine-Capped TLQP21-containing au nanocages alleviate depression in mice. ACS Nano. 2025;19(42):37186–37205. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c11681

177. Zhou Q, Chen Q, Tong Y, et al. Light-induced ambient degradation of few-layer black phosphorus: mechanism and protection. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55(38):11437–11441. doi:10.1002/anie.201605168

178. Bigham A, Serrano-Ruiz M, Caporali M, et al. Black phosphorus-based nanoplatforms for cancer therapy: chemistry, design, biological and therapeutic behaviors. Chem Soc Rev. 2025;54(2):827–897. doi:10.1039/D4CS00007B

179. Xiong S, Li Z, Liu Y, et al. Brain-targeted delivery shuttled by black phosphorus nanostructure to treat Parkinson’s disease. Biomaterials. 2020;260:120339. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120339

180. Jin L, Hu P, Wang Y, et al. Fast-acting black-phosphorus-assisted depression therapy with low toxicity. Adv Mater. 2020;32(2):1906050. doi:10.1002/adma.201906050

181. Tan H, Cao K, Zhao Y, et al. Brain-targeted black phosphorus-based nanotherapeutic platform for enhanced hypericin delivery in depression. Small. 2024;20(31):2310608. doi:10.1002/smll.202310608

182. Bhatt S, Nagappa AN, Patil CR. Role of oxidative stress in depression. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(7):1270–1276. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.05.001

183. Czarny P, Wigner P, Galecki P, et al. The interplay between inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage, DNA repair and mitochondrial dysfunction in depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;80:309–321. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.036

184. Zhang J, Sun D, Guo Y, et al. Targeted delivery of black phosphorus nanosheets by ROS responsive complex hydrogel based on angiogenesis and antioxidant promotes myocardial infarction repair. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):433. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02685-0

185. Peng Y, Zhao Y, Yuan Y, et al. High-response humidity sensing with graphene oxide/lignosulfonate and laser-induced graphene for respiratory health. RSC Adv. 2025;15(15):11739–11748. doi:10.1039/D5RA01765C

186. Zhu X, Lei J, Jiang C, et al. Two-dimensional graphene nanomaterials for combined photothermal and chemotherapy-enhanced targeted therapy of breast cancer. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32:101668. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101668

187. Torabi Fard N, Tadayon F, Ahmad Panahi H, et al. The synthesis of functionalized graphene oxide by polyester dendrimer as a pH-sensitive nanocarrier for targeted delivery of venlafaxine hydrochloride: central composite design optimization. J Mol Liq. 2022;349:118149. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118149

188. Rauti R, Medelin M, Newman L, et al. Graphene oxide flakes tune excitatory neurotransmission in vivo by targeting hippocampal synapses. Nano Lett. 2019;19(5):2858–2870. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04903

189. Tortella L, Santini I, Lozano N, et al. Graphene oxide nanosheets hamper glutamate mediated excitotoxicity and protect neuronal survival in an in vitro stroke model. Chem Eur J. 2023;29(67):e202301762. doi:10.1002/chem.202301762

190. Yu S, Wang X, Lv L, et al. Borneol-modified PEGylated graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for brain-targeted delivery of ginsenoside Rg1 against depression. Int J Pharm. 2023;643:123284. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123284

191. Qiao R, Fu C, Forgham H, et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for brain imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;197:114822. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.114822

192. Afshari M, Gharibzadeh S, Pouretemad H, et al. Reversing valproic acid-induced autism-like behaviors through a combination of low-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):8082. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58871-5

193. Fang X, Wu Y, Dai Y, et al. In situ recovery of serotonin synthesis by a tryptophan hydroxylase-like nanozyme for the treatment of depression. J Am Chem Soc. 2025;147(11):9111–9121. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c10733

194. Wang X, Zhang Y, Chang Y, et al. Alternating magnetic field-responsive engineered probiotics for anxiety therapy via gut-brain axis modulation. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):463. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03551-3

195. Raza A, Wu W. Metal-organic frameworks in oral drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024;19(5):100951. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100951

196. Liu C, Tian C, Guo J, et al. Research progress of metal–organic frameworks as drug delivery systems. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(33):43156–43170. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c09536

197. Zhou Y, Yang T, Liang K, et al. Metal-organic frameworks for therapeutic gas delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;171:199–214. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.02.005

198. Hu J, Lian Z, Weng Z, et al. Intranasal delivery of near-infrared and magnetic dual-response nanospheres to rapidly produce antidepressant-like and cognitive enhancement effects. Adv Mater. 2024;36(31):2405547. doi:10.1002/adma.202405547

199. Lan M, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Solving the contamination conundrum derived from coisolation of extracellular vesicles and lipoproteins: approaches for isolation and characterization. Small Methods. 2025;9(11):e01606. doi:10.1002/smtd.202501606

200. Fang W, Wang G, Lin L, et al. Extracellular vesicles in skin health and diseases. Life Sci. 2025;378:123813. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123813

201. Xu G, Jin J, Fu Z, et al. Extracellular vesicle-based drug overview: research landscape, quality control and nonclinical evaluation strategies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025;10(1):255. doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02312-w

202. Huang Q, Wang S, Liu Z, Rao L, Cheng K, Mao X. Engineering exosomes for targeted neurodegenerative therapy: innovations in biogenesis, drug loading, and clinical translation. Theranostics. 2026;16(1):545–579. doi:10.7150/thno.117143

203. Najafi S, Majidpoor J, Mortezaee K. Extracellular vesicle–based drug delivery in cancer immunotherapy. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;13(11):2790–2806. doi:10.1007/s13346-023-01370-3

204. Yu X, Bai Y, Han B, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of circDYM alleviates CUS-induced depressive-like behaviours. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11(1):e12185. doi:10.1002/jev2.12185

205. Wang H, Xu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Exosome-functionalized self-carrier enzyme-like/drug with triple amplified anti-oxidative stress for synergistic depression therapy. Small. 2025;21(24):2411030. doi:10.1002/smll.202411030

206. Ge K, Bai Z, Wang J, et al. Engineering EVs-mediated mRNA delivery regulates microglia function and alleviates depressive-like behaviors. Adv Mater. 2025;37(9):2418872. doi:10.1002/adma.202418872

207. Li Q, Wang C, Hu J, et al. Cannabidiol–loaded biomimetic macrophage membrane vesicles against post–traumatic stress disorder assisted by ultrasound. Int J Pharm. 2023;637:122872. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122872

208. Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WCW. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14:1–16. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124

209. Xu M, Qi Y, Liu G, et al. Size-dependent in vivo transport of nanoparticles: implications for delivery, targeting, and clearance. ACS Nano. 2023;17(21):20825–20849. doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c05853

210. Hwang J-E, Jeon M, Yim H, et al. Collagenase-functionalized liposomes overcome stromal barriers in pancreatic cancer. ACS Nano. 2026;20(8):7184–7204. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c20618

211. Graván P, Peña-Martín J, de Andrés JL, et al. Exploring the impact of nanoparticle stealth coatings in cancer models: from PEGylation to cell membrane-coating nanotechnology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(2):2058–2074. doi:10.1021/acsami.3c13948

212. Harris JM, Chess RB. Effect of pegylation on pharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(3):214–221. doi:10.1038/nrd1033

213. Gref R, Lück M, Quellec P, et al. ‘Stealth’ Corona-core nanoparticles surface modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG): influences of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phagocytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2000;18(3):301–313. doi:10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00156-3

214. Wu Z, Yuan C, Xia Q, et al. Pre-coating cRGD-modified bovine serum albumin enhanced the anti-tumor angiogenesis of siVEGF-loaded chitosan-based nanoparticles by manipulating the protein Corona composition. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;267:131546. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131546

215. Wang G, Wang N, Xia X, et al. Clinical translation of nanomedicines for brain diseases: current challenges and future directions. J Control Release. 2026;389:114426. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114426

216. Singh S, Singh A, Chittu S, Sharma S. Precision nanomedicine for anxiety: challenges, opportunities, and future directions in targeted drug delivery. J Food Drug Anal. 2025;33(3):241–251. doi:10.38212/2224-6614.3556

217. Chaulagain B, Gothwal A, Lamptey RNL, et al. Experimental models of in vitro blood–brain barrier for CNS drug delivery: an evolutionary perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2710. doi:10.3390/ijms24032710

218. Aparicio-Blanco J, Martín-Sabroso C, Torres-Suárez AI. In vitro screening of nanomedicines through the blood brain barrier: a critical review. Biomaterials. 2016;103:229–255. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.051

219. Lynch MJ, Gobbo OL. Advances in non-animal testing approaches towards accelerated clinical translation of novel nanotheranostic therapeutics for central nervous system disorders. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(10):2632. doi:10.3390/nano11102632

220. Bernal-Chávez SA, Del Prado-Audelo ML, Caballero-Florán IH, et al. Insights into terminal sterilization processes of nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Molecules. 2021;26(7):2068. doi:10.3390/molecules26072068

221. Rachmawati P, Susanto S, Christian YE. Impact of sterilization method on the system performance of lipid-based novel drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2025;674:125486. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125486

222. Tapia-Guerrero YS, Del Prado-Audelo ML, Borbolla-Jiménez FV, et al. Effect of UV and gamma irradiation sterilization processes in the properties of different polymeric nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Materials. 2020;13(5):1090. doi:10.3390/ma13051090

223. Herdiana Y. Bridging the gap: the role of advanced formulation strategies in the clinical translation of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:13039–13053. doi:10.2147/IJN.S554821

224. Rodríguez-Gómez FD, Monferrer D, Penon O, Rivera-Gil P. Regulatory pathways and guidelines for nanotechnology-enabled health products: a comparative review of EU and US frameworks. Front Med. 2025;12:1544393. doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1544393

225. Đorđević S, Gonzalez MM, Conejos-Sánchez I, et al. Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12(3):500–525. doi:10.1007/s13346-021-01024-2

226. Wang J, Qiu S, Lu H, et al. Microfluidic-based synthesis of crystalline porous materials represented by metal-organic frameworks and covalent-organic frameworks. Chem Eng J. 2026;534:175029. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2026.175029

227. Lamanna-Rama N, Romero-Miguel D, Desco M, et al. An update on the exploratory use of curcumin in neuropsychiatric disorders. Antioxidants. 2022;11(2):353. doi:10.3390/antiox11020353

228. Zhu L-J, Li F, Zhu D-Y. nNOS and neurological, neuropsychiatric disorders: a 20-year story. Neurosci Bull. 2023;39(9):1439–1453. doi:10.1007/s12264-023-01060-7

229. Gao F, Wang C, Cao Z, et al. Nod2 deficiency exacerbates schizophrenia-related alterations in offspring of maternal immune activation in a sex-dependent manner. Brain Behav Immun. 2025;129:126–142. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2025.05.030

230. Ayano G, Demelash S, Yohannes Z, et al. Misdiagnosis, detection rate, and associated factors of severe psychiatric disorders in specialized psychiatry centers in Ethiopia. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021;20(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12991-021-00333-7

231. Xue T, Liu W, Wang L, et al. Extracellular vesicle biomarkers for complement dysfunction in schizophrenia. Brain. 2024;147(3):1075–1086. doi:10.1093/brain/awad341

Creative Commons License © 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.