Back to Journals » Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma » Volume 13
Heat Shock Protein 47 as a Novel Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarker for Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Authors Wang ZG, Peng Y, Wei WY, Liu P, Zhao R, Liu MF
Received 4 December 2025
Accepted for publication 6 March 2026
Published 17 April 2026 Volume 2026:13 586560
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S586560
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Dr David Gerber
Zi-Ge Wang,1,2,* Yan Peng,1,2,* Wen-Yan Wei,1,2 Peng Liu,1,2 Rui Zhao,1,2 Mei-Fang Liu1,2
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Rui Zhao, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86079188693136, Fax +86079188692272, Email [email protected] Mei-Fang Liu, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86079188699430, Fax +86079188692272, Email [email protected]
Purpose: Thrombosis is a severe complication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), significantly contributing to poor prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that elevated heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) is closely associated with hypercoagulable states, indicating its potential role as a key mediator in thrombotic processes. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive and diagnostic value of plasma HSP47 levels for thrombosis in HCC patients.
Methods: We collected plasma samples from 169 patients with HCC, 114 with liver cirrhosis (LC), and 91 healthy controls (HC). Plasma HSP47 levels were compared across these groups and relevant subgroups. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for thrombosis in HCC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the diagnostic performance of HSP47 and D-dimer.
Results: Plasma HSP47 levels were significantly higher in the HCC group compared to both the LC and HC groups (P < 0.001). This elevation was more pronounced in patients with hypercoagulability (D-dimer > 0.5 mg/L) or active thrombosis. Multivariate analysis confirmed HSP47 as an independent risk factor for thrombosis. The ROC curve for HSP47 yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.780– 0.939), with a sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 82.4%, outperforming D-dimer (AUC = 0.740, 95% CI: 0.640– 0.840; P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Our findings identified HSP47 as an independent risk factor for thrombosis in HCC patients and demonstrated its strong potential as a diagnostic biomarker. This study provided a new theoretical foundation for the early diagnosis of HCC-associated thrombosis, offering a promising target for clinical translation. It should be noted that this was a single-center retrospective study, and further prospective multicenter validation is warranted to enhance the generalizability of the findings.
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis, heat shock protein 47, thrombophilia, thrombosis
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide.1 Its progression and patient survival are influenced by a multitude of factors, ranging from molecular and genetic alterations,2–5 to critical changes in the tumor immune microenvironment.6 Beyond these intrinsic tumor biological drivers, clinical complications are pivotal determinants of outcomes.7,8 Notably, patients with HCC face a substantially increased risk of thromboembolism (TE), particularly portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which occurs in 20–40% of cases.9,10 The presence of PVT is a well-established marker of poor prognosis, significantly shortening overall survival11,12. Cancer is a well-established risk factor for thrombosis, approximately 20% of all VTE are observed in patients with cancer, which confers a 9-fold higher risk of developing VTE.7,13 Cancer-associated thrombosis involves a complex, multifactorial pathophysiological process, including cancer-related risk factors (such as hypercoagulability stemming from the procoagulant properties of cancer cells, cancer stage and site), patient-related risk factors (including gender and age), and other contributing factors (such as inflammation, chemotherapy, prolonged immobilization, and infection).14–17
Most HCC cases arise in the context of liver cirrhosis (LC),18 which itself induces profound hemostatic alterations characterized by platelet activation, reduced synthesis of coagulation factors and anticoagulant proteins, and altered fibrinolytic activity.19–21 These disturbances collectively shift the hemostatic balance toward a hypercoagulable state, elevating the risk of PVT and potentially accelerating HCC progression.12,22 Early identification of prethrombotic states and timely prophylactic anticoagulation are therefore critical for improving clinical outcomes in these patients.
Current biomarkers for thrombosis, such as D-dimer, lack specificity in cancer patients due to frequent elevations in non-thrombotic conditions including inflammation, infection, and advanced age.23 Thrombin generation assays (TGA), while informative, suffer from a lack of standardization, limiting their routine clinical use.24 Thus, there is an urgent need for novel, specific biomarkers to predict thrombosis in high-risk populations like HCC.
Heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), encoded by the SerpinH1 gene, is a chaperone protein belonging to the serpin superfamily but lacks serine protease inhibitory activity.25 As an endoplasmic reticulum-resident chaperone specific for collagen, HSP47 is essential for collagen biosynthesis and assembly.26 It has been implicated in a range of pathological processes, most notably various fibrotic diseases and cancers, such as pulmonary/liver fibrosis, HCC, lung cancer and breast cancer, underscoring its role in fibrogenesis and tumor progression.27–30In addition to these associations, emerging evidence highlights a direct role for HSP47 in promoting thrombus formation. HSP47 is specifically exposed on the surface of activated platelets, where it enhances glycoprotein VI (GPVI) binding to collagen, promoting platelet aggregation and coagulation, thereby promoting thrombus formation.31,32 Evidence suggests that downregulation of HSP47 confers thromboprotective effects across diverse models, including long-term immobilized hibernating brown bears, mice, and spinal cord injury patients.33 Furthermore, recent studies indicate that HSP47 inhibitors reduce cerebral vascular damage in ischemic stroke models.34 This implies a dual role for HSP47 in both cancers and thrombosis. However, the relationship between HSP47 and thrombosis in HCC remains unexplored. More importantly, it is unknown whether HSP47 contributes to thrombosis via a unique, collagen-mediated pathway that is distinct from the coagulation cascades monitored by conventional biomarkers (eg, D-dimer). Therefore, to address these gaps, we investigated plasma HSP47 levels in HCC patients and evaluated its potential as a novel biomarker for predicting thrombotic events.
Methods
Patient Selection
This study enrolled 169 patients with HCC, 114 with LC, and 91 healthy controls (HC) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January and March 2025. HCC diagnosis followed the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2024 Edition).35 LC diagnosis was confirmed by clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histopathological data. TE diagnosis was performed using imaging. On ultrasonography, TE was identified as intraluminal material that was isoechoic or hypoechoic to soft tissue, causing partial or complete occlusion. On computed tomography, it was characterized by a filling defect that partially or totally occluded the vessel lumen.36 The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee (Approval No.: IIT2025 Clinical Ethics Review No. 224), with a waiver of informed consent, as it retrospectively analyzed only residual, anonymized serum samples from prior routine care, posing no additional risk to patients. All procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Exclusion criteria included: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, mixed HCC, extrahepatic malignancies, immune-related diseases, severe cardiopulmonary or renal dysfunction, systemic infections, recent anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, surgery within 30 days, blood product transfusion within 14 days, age < 18 years, pregnancy, or lactation. The HC group comprised 91 age- and sex-matched individuals without acute/chronic diseases or relevant medication use.
Data Collection
Clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from the hospital information system. Hematological parameters (WBC, RBC, HGB, PLT) were measured using a BC-6800PLUS automated hematology analyzer (Mindray, China). Coagulation parameters (PT, PT-INR, APTT, FIB, TT, D-dimer, FDP, PC, PS, AT-III) were analyzed using an ACL TOP 750 LAS automated coagulation analyzer (Werfen, Spain). Tumor characteristics (number, size, location, vascular invasion, metastasis) and CNLC stage were recorded for HCC patients.
Measurement of Plasma HSP47 Concentration
Plasma HSP47 levels were measured using a commercial Human Heat Shock Protein 47 (HSP47) ELISA Kit (Cat. No. RX105334H, Ruixin Biotechnology, Quanzhou, China). According to the manufacturer’s specifications, the kit has a detection limit of 0.1 pg/mL, with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of < 10% and < 15%, respectively, and shows no cross-reactivity with structural analogues.
The assay was performed strictly according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, standards and samples were loaded in duplicate into a 96-well microplate. Subsequently, 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. The plate was then washed five times with wash buffer. Next, 100 μL of prepared chromogenic reagent (a mixture of reagent A and reagent B) was added to each well. After gentle mixing, the plate was incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes in the dark. Finally, 50 μL of stop solution was added to each well. Optical density was measured at 450 nm within 15 minutes using a microplate reader (RT-6100, Rayto, China).
Statistical Analyses
In this retrospective study, sample size was based on available cases. To quantify the strength of the findings, post-hoc power was analyzed using G*Power 3.1 software based on HSP47 levels for five comparisons: TE (yes/no) and hypercoagulability (D-dimer > 0.5 mg/L; yes/no) within the HCC and LC groups, along with the comparison of CNLC stages (advanced vs. early) within the HCC group. The estimated power was 99%, 85%, 94%, 92% and 83%, respectively (two-tailed α = 0.05), underscoring the robustness of the findings.
Analyses were performed using R software (v4.2.1). Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact, chi-square, or continuity-corrected chi-square tests. Continuous variables were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance; normally distributed data (mean ± SD) were analyzed using t-tests or ANOVA, while non-normal data (median, IQR) were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Logistic regression identified thrombosis risk factors. ROC curve analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of HSP47 and D-dimer. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient Characteristics
The study included 169 HCC, 114 LC, and 91 HC participants. No significant differences were observed in age, sex, or BMI among groups (all P > 0.05). However, significant differences were found in alcohol consumption, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and multiple laboratory parameters (WBC, RBC, HGB, PLT, PT, PT-INR, APTT, FIB, TT, D-dimer, FDP, PC, PS, AT-III; all P < 0.05). Compared to HC, both LC and HCC groups showed lower WBC, RBC, HGB, PLT, FIB, PC, PS, and AT-III (all P < 0.01), and higher PT, PT-INR, APTT, TT, D-dimer, and FDP (all P < 0.01). No significant difference in D-dimer or FDP was observed between HCC and LC groups (D-dimer, P = 0.395; FDP, P = 0.513) (Table 1).
|
Table 1 General Data Analysis of the HCC, LC and HC Groups |
Plasma HSP47 levels were significantly elevated in the HCC group compared to both LC and HC groups (all P < 0.001; Figure 1A and B). The LC group also showed higher HSP47 levels than HC (P < 0.001; Figure 1C).
Consistent with a role in tumor progression,30 plasma HSP47 levels were significantly elevated in patients with larger tumors and in those with vascular invasion (all P < 0.01). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in relation to lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis (all P > 0.05). Plasma HSP47 levels increased significantly with advancing CNLC stage, (P for trend = 0.016) and were higher in advanced- versus early-stage disease (P = 0.004), indicating a clear association with disease progression (Table 2).
|
Table 2 Comparison of Plasma HSP47 Levels Among Different CNLC Stages in Patients with HCC |
Comparison of Plasma HSP47 Levels Between Groups with High and Normal D-Dimer Levels in Patients with HCC and LC
Elevated D-dimer levels are associated with hyperfibrinolysis, which indicates a hypercoagulable state and increases the risk of thrombosis.23 Using a cutoff level of D-dimer (0.5 mg/L),37 we stratified HCC and LC patients into hypercoagulable and normal subgroups. In the HCC group, elevated D-dimer levels were significantly associated with WBC, RBC, HGB, PT, PT-INR, TT, FDP, PC, AT-III, and HSP47 (all P < 0.05). In the LC group, elevated D-dimer was associated with RBC, HGB, PT, PT-INR, FIB, TT, FDP, PC, AT-III, and HSP47 (all P < 0.05) (Table 3).
|
Table 3 Comparison of Laboratory Parameters Between Groups with High and Normal D-Dimer Levels in Patients with HCC and LC |
In both HCC and LC groups, patients with elevated D-dimer exhibited significantly higher plasma HSP47 levels than those with normal D-dimer (all P < 0.01; Figure 2A–D). These results indicated that HSP47 elevation was associated with hypercoagulability across different etiologies.
HSP47 Levels in Patients with Thrombosis
Patients were classified into four subgroups: HCC with TE, HCC without TE, LC with TE, and LC without TE. Median plasma HSP47 levels were significantly higher in patients with TE (HCC with TE: 904.7 [876.25–1016]; HCC without TE: 631.95 [299.6–816]; LC with TE: 596.03 [495.92–667.36]; LC without TE: 229.5 [108.53–630.76]).
In both HCC and LC groups, patients with TE exhibited significantly higher HSP47 levels than those without TE (P < 0.001; Figure 3A and B), with significant differences across all subgroups (P < 0.001; Figure 3C and D). These findings demonstrate a strong association between elevated HSP47 and thrombogenesis.
Risk Factors for Thrombosis in HCC
Univariate analysis identified LC, decreased RBC, prolonged PT-INR, decreased FIB, prolonged TT, increased D-dimer, increased FDP, decreased PC, decreased AT-III, and increased HSP47 as risk factors for TE (Table 4). Multicollinearity was absent (all VIF < 2.467). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that elevated plasma HSP47 was an independent risk factor for TE in HCC (Table 4).
|
Table 4 Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of TE Risk Factors in the HCC Patients |
Diagnostic Performance of HSP47 and D-Dimer
ROC analysis for diagnosing thrombosis in HCC yielded an AUC of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.780–0.939) for HSP47, with 81.5% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity (Table 5). The AUC for D-dimer was 0.740 (95% CI: 0.640–0.840), with 74.1% sensitivity and 65.5% specificity (Table 5). HSP47 demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic performance compared to D-dimer (P < 0.05; Figure 4).
|
Table 5 ROC Curve Parameters for HSP47 and D-Dimer |
Discussion
Patients with both LC and HCC are at high risk of TE, with PVT being the most prominent subtype.9,10,38,39 This study established HSP47 as a novel, independent biomarker for predicting and diagnosing thrombosis in HCC. PVT was the predominant TE subtype, occurring in 85.2% of HCC and 89.5% of LC patients with TE, aligning with its known role as a critical prognostic factor.11,12 Early PVT diagnosis is therefore essential for improving patient outcomes.
While D-dimer is a sensitive marker for venous thromboembolism,40 its low specificity in cancer and other conditions limits its diagnostic utility.41,42 Our results confirm that D-dimer, though a risk factor, is not an independent predictor of thrombosis in HCC, highlighting the need for better biomarkers.
HCC commonly arises in the setting of LC,18 In both conditions, the combined impact of the underlying liver pathology and its treatments (eg, transarterial chemoembolization, systemic therapy) compromises hepatic synthetic function.43 Given that the liver produces most coagulation and anticoagulation factors, this impairment exacerbates dysregulation of coagulation and fibrinolysis and promotes aberrant platelet activation.44,45 Since activated platelets express HSP47,33 which further potentiates thrombus formation, a vicious cycle may be established. In our study, compared to the HC group, patients with LC or HCC showed elevated levels of PT, D-dimer, and FDP, along with reduced activities of FIB, PC, PS, and AT-III. These abnormalities were more marked in patients who developed thrombosis, collectively indicating a systemic hypercoagulable state in HCC.46–49
HSP47 is a collagen-specific chaperone responsible for the correct folding and stabilization of procollagen in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is essential for maintaining the structural integrity of the extracellular matrix.50,51 In HCC, tumor cells and surrounding stromal cells highly express HSP47, leading to abnormal perivascular deposition of type I collagen, exacerbating fibrosis and inducing pathological vascular remodeling.52–54 This process not only promotes the growth, migration, and invasion of HCC but also results in thickening, stiffening, and increased vulnerability of the vessel wall.53 Following vascular endothelial injury, HSP47-mediated collagen becomes extensively exposed, serving as a key trigger for platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombosis.27,32 Under the stimulation of collagen, platelets undergo rapid aggregation and release a variety of procoagulant substances, which in turn activate the coagulation cascade and ultimately lead to thrombus formation.45 Notably, activated platelets also express HSP47 on their surface, which enhances the binding of GPVI to collagen, further promoting platelet aggregation and coagulation, thereby forming a positive feedback loop that exacerbates thrombus formation.33
In addition, HCC involves tumor-specific prothrombotic mechanisms.15 A persistent inflammatory response is observed throughout HCC progression,55 fostering a chronic inflammatory milieu that promotes vascular endothelial injury, aberrant platelet activation, and enhanced neutrophil recruitment—all contributing to thrombus formation.56 In this setting, HSP47 on the surface of activated platelets potentiates platelet-collagen interaction, hastening thrombus development.31,32 Furthermore, tumor-derived small extracellular vesicles (EV) in HCC contribute to platelet hyperactivation, establishing a positive feedback loop that amplifies platelet aggregation and thereby increases thrombosis risk.57,58 Emerging evidence shows that these EVs carry HSP47 on their surface, which may indirectly stimulate thrombosis via interactions with the matrix—consistent with the known role of platelet-bound HSP47 in enhancing GPVI signaling.53 Within the tumor microenvironment, extensive neutrophil infiltration triggers the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which in turn enhance local coagulation activity and facilitate thrombosis.59,60 HSP47 has been shown to directly facilitate NETosis, thereby exacerbating thrombus propagation.33 In HCC-associated thrombosis, HSP47 drives fibrosis, molds a pro-thrombotic matrix, and directly engages platelet activation cascades, thereby systematically coupling HCC progression with thrombotic mechanisms and establishing HSP47 as a key pro-thrombotic hub specific to the tumor microenvironment, distinct from conventional coagulation indicators.
We observed that plasma HSP47 levels were significantly elevated in the HCC cohort relative to the LC and HC groups. Moreover, HSP47 levels increased with advancing tumor stage and correlated with aggressive tumor features, supporting a link to disease progression. Notably, levels were even higher in HCC patients with hypercoagulability (D-dimer > 0.5 mg/L) or active thrombosis, indicating that thrombotic complications are associated with a notable additional rise in HSP47. While univariate analysis indicated HSP47 as a risk factor for thrombosis, multivariate analysis confirmed that it remained an independent predictor of thrombotic risk in HCC. The diagnostic utility of HSP47 was underscored by ROC curve analysis, which revealed a sensitivity of 81.5% and a specificity of 82.4%. These results strongly suggested that plasma HSP47 serves as a robust and independent diagnostic biomarker for thrombosis in the context of HCC.
However, several limitations of this study should be considered when interpreting the results. First, as a single-center study, our findings require validation in multi-center, geographically diverse populations to enhance their generalizability, additionally, the retrospective nature of the study limited the sample size to available cases (though post-hoc power for primary outcomes was >80%), highlighting the need for prospective validation with pre-planned enrollment. Second, the measurement of plasma HSP47 was conducted at a single time point; therefore, dynamic changes in its expression throughout disease progression or in response to therapy remain unexplored. Third, although we have strict inclusion standards, we cannot avoid the fact that HCC patients who are likely to have a group of patients have been treated with anti-tumor therapy (such as interventional therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy), which cannot completely rule out the potential impact of these treatments on HSP47 levels. Fourth, our analysis of thrombus types was constrained by the natural distribution within our cohort. While PVT was predominant, the very limited number of non-PVT cases precluded a meaningful statistical comparison of HSP47 levels across different thrombus types, which represents an important clinical dimension for future investigation. Consequently, future studies with larger, prospective cohorts and serial biomarker assessments are warranted to definitively establish the clinical utility of HSP47 for the early diagnosis of thrombosis in HCC.
Conclusion
This study identified HSP47 as an independent risk factor and a superior diagnostic biomarker for thrombosis in HCC patients. Its strong predictive performance underscores its potential clinical utility for early risk stratification and timely intervention, paving the way for improved management of HCC-associated thrombosis. Moreover, HSP47 elevated in advanced HCC and further increased with thrombosis, may mechanistically connect tumor progression to thrombogenesis. This conceptual advance beyond conventional coagulation models requires direct testing. Consequently, future prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate its prognostic utility and delineate its pathogenic role, paving the way for clinical translation.
Data Sharing Statement
All material and data supporting the conclusion of this commentary are included in the article.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge all the enrolled patients and healthy volunteers, and the Department of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, for providing experimental facilities and the technical guidance throughout this research.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This study was supported by the Higher Education Teaching Reform Research Project of Jiangxi Province, China (Grant No. JXJG-24-1-7) and the Key Teaching and Educational Reform Research Project of Nanchang University, China (Grant No. NCUJGLX-2024-155-18), and the National Natural Science Fund of China (Grant No. 82260085), the Science and Technology Project of the Health Commission of Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 202210436) were supported the data collection and statistical analysis of the study.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. New Engl J Med. 2019;380:1450–13. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1713263
2. Qi L, Tan Y, Zhou Y, et al. Proteogenomic identification and analysis of KIF5B as a prognostic signature for hepatocellular carcinoma. Current Gene Ther. 2025;25:532–545. doi:10.2174/0115665232308821240826075513
3. Ye W, Wang J, Zheng J, et al. Association between higher expression of vav1 in hepatocellular carcinoma and unfavourable clinicopathological features and prognosis. Protein Peptide Lett. 2024;31(9):706–713. doi:10.2174/0109298665330781240830042601
4. Gudivada IP, Amajala KC. Integrative bioinformatics analysis for targeting hub genes in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. Current Genom. 2025;26:48–80. doi:10.2174/0113892029308243240709073945
5. Liu C, Shi J, Lin B, et al. SHR6390 combined with cabozantinib inhibits tumor progression in the hepatocellular carcinoma mouse model. Current Gene Ther. 2024;24:453–464. doi:10.2174/1566523222666220825110147
6. Elwan N, Salem ML, Kobtan A, et al. High numbers of myeloid derived suppressor cells in peripheral blood and ascitic fluid of cirrhotic and HCC patients. Immunolog Investig. 2018;47:169–180. doi:10.1080/08820139.2017.1407787
7. Kim AS, Khorana AA, McCrae KR. Mechanisms and biomarkers of cancer-associated thrombosis. Transl Res. 2020;225:33–53. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2020.06.012
8. Hisada Y, Mackman N. Cancer-associated pathways and biomarkers of venous thrombosis. Blood. 2017;130:1499–1506. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-03-743211
9. Connolly GC, Chen R, Hyrien O, et al. Incidence, risk factors and consequences of portal vein and systemic thromboses in hepatocellular carcinoma. Thrombosis Res. 2008;122:299–306. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2007.10.009
10. Wang Y, Attar BM, Hinami K, et al. Characteristics and impacts of venous thromboembolism in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2018;49:275–282. doi:10.1007/s12029-017-9945-6
11. Senzolo M, Shalaby S, Grasso M, et al. Role of nonneoplastic PVT in the natural history of patients with cirrhosis and first diagnosis of HCC. Hepatology. 2024;79:355–367. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000538
12. Quirk M, Kim YH, Saab S, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3462–3471. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3462
13. Mulder FI, Horváth-Puhó E, van Es N, et al. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a population-based cohort study. Blood. 2021;137:1959–1969. doi:10.1182/blood.2020007338
14. Blann AD, Dunmore S. Arterial and venous thrombosis in cancer patients. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:394740. doi:10.4061/2011/394740
15. Fernandes CJ, Morinaga LTK, Alves JLJ, et al. Cancer-associated thrombosis: the when, how and why. Eur Resp Rev. 2019;28:151 doi:10.1183/16000617.0119-2018.
16. Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Versteeg HH, et al. Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood. 2013;122:1712–1723. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-04-460121
17. Ay C, Pabinger I, Cohen AT. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: burden, mechanisms, and management. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2017;117:219–230. doi:10.1160/TH16-08-0615
18. Toh MR, Wong EYT, Wong SH, et al. Global epidemiology and genetics of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2023;164:766–782. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.033
19. Zanetto A, Campello E, Spiezia L, et al. Cancer-associated thrombosis in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2018;10:450. doi:10.3390/cancers10110450
20. Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH, Diagnosis TA. Development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1582–1599.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.265
21. Lisman T, Caldwell SH, Intagliata NM. Haemostatic alterations and management of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2022;76:1291–1305. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.004
22. Khan AR, Wei X, Xu X. Portal vein tumor thrombosis and hepatocellular carcinoma - the changing tides. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:1089–1115. doi:10.2147/JHC.S318070
23. Franchini M, Focosi D, Pezzo MP, et al. How we manage a high D-dimer. Haematologica. 2024;109:1035–1045. doi:10.3324/haematol.2023.283966
24. Binder NB, Depasse F, Mueller J, et al. Clinical use of thrombin generation assays. J Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2021;19:2918–2929. doi:10.1111/jth.15538
25. Hirayoshi K, Kudo H, Takechi H, et al. HSP47: a tissue-specific, transformation-sensitive, collagen-binding heat shock protein of chicken embryo fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:4036–4044. doi:10.1128/mcb.11.8.4036-4044.1991
26. Ito S, Nagata K. Biology of Hsp47 (Serpin H1), a collagen-specific molecular chaperone. Seminars Cell Dev Biol. 2017;62:142–151. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.005
27. Abd El-Fattah EE, Zakaria AY. Targeting HSP47 and HSP70: promising therapeutic approaches in liver fibrosis management. J Transl Med. 2022;20:544. doi:10.1186/s12967-022-03759-z
28. Sakamoto N, Okuno D, Tokito T, et al. HSP47: a therapeutic target in pulmonary fibrosis. Biomedicines. 2023;11(9):2387. doi:10.3390/biomedicines11092387
29. Khan ES, Dainghaus T. HSP47 in human diseases: navigating pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14:e1755. doi:10.1002/ctm2.1755
30. Wu G, Ju X, Wang Y, et al. Up-regulation of SNHG6 activates SERPINH1 expression by competitive binding to miR-139-5p to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:1849–1867. doi:10.1080/15384101.2019.1629772
31. Kaiser WJ, Holbrook LM, Tucker KL, et al. A functional proteomic method for the enrichment of peripheral membrane proteins reveals the collagen binding protein Hsp47 is exposed on the surface of activated human platelets. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:2903–2914. doi:10.1021/pr900027j
32. Sasikumar P, AlOuda KS, Kaiser WJ, et al. The chaperone protein HSP47: a platelet collagen binding protein that contributes to thrombosis and hemostasis. J Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2018;16:946–959. doi:10.1111/jth.13998
33. Thienel M, Müller-Reif JB, Zhang Z, et al. Immobility-associated thromboprotection is conserved across mammalian species from bear to human. Science. 2023;380:178–187. doi:10.1126/science.abo5044
34. Wu S, Liang C, Xie X, et al. Hsp47 inhibitor Col003 attenuates collagen-induced platelet activation and cerebral ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:792263. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.792263
35. Department of Medical Administration National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (2024 edition). Chin J Clin Med. 2024;33:475–530 doi:10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2024.04.001.
36. Shukla A, Giri S. Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022;12:965–979. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2021.11.003
37. Righini M, Perrier A, De Moerloose P, et al. D-Dimer for venous thromboembolism diagnosis: 20 years later. J Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2008;6:1059–1071. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02981.x
38. Carballo-Folgoso L, Álvarez-Velasco R, Lorca R, et al. Evaluation of cardiovascular events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib in the clinical practice. The CARDIO-SOR study. Liver Int. 2021;41:2200–2211. doi:10.1111/liv.14941
39. Chen Y, Zhao J, Zhang Z, et al. Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of deep vein thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after laparoscopic hepatectomy: a retrospective study. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:783–794. doi:10.2147/JHC.S311970
40. Chang Y, Lu J, Chen C. Biomarkers in venous thrombosis: diagnostic potential and limitations. Biology. 2025;14(7):800. doi:10.3390/biology14070800
41. Tita-Nwa F, Bos A, Adjei A, et al. Correlates of D-dimer in older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010;22(1):20–23. doi:10.1007/BF03324810
42. Ay C, Dunkler D, Pirker R, et al. High D-dimer levels are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Haematologica. 2012;97:1158–1164. doi:10.3324/haematol.2011.054718
43. Sheta E, El-Kalla F, El-Gharib M, et al. Comparison of single-session transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation or radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized-controlled study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:1198–1203. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000000688
44. Singh AD, Mucha SR, Lindenmeyer CC. Cirrhotic coagulopathy: a rebalanced hemostasis. Cleveland Clin J Med. 2022;89:523–533. doi:10.3949/ccjm.89a.21018
45. Stella L, De Siati M, Talerico R, et al. Thrombotic risk and coagulation imbalance in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical implications and management. Cancers. 2025;17(21):3413. doi:10.3390/cancers17213413
46. McMurry HS, Jou J, Shatzel J. The hemostatic and thrombotic complications of liver disease. Eur J Haematol. 2021;107:383–392. doi:10.1111/ejh.13688
47. Dahlbäck B, Villoutreix BO. Regulation of blood coagulation by the protein C anticoagulant pathway: novel insights into structure-function relationships and molecular recognition. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1311–1320. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000168421.13467.82
48. Majumder R, Nguyen T. Protein S: function, regulation, and clinical perspectives. Current Opin Hematol. 2021;28:339–344. doi:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000663
49. Lu Z, Wang F, Liang M. SerpinC1/Antithrombin III in kidney-related diseases. Clin Sci. 2017;131:823–831. doi:10.1042/CS20160669
50. Widmer C, Gebauer JM, Brunstein E, et al. Molecular basis for the action of the collagen-specific chaperone Hsp47/SERPINH1 and its structure-specific client recognition. Proceed Nat Acad Sci United States Am. 2012;109:13243–13247. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208072109
51. Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A, et al. Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annual Rev Biochem. 2013;82(1):323–355. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060208-092442
52. Hou Y, Zhang Y, Zheng K, et al. Integrated analysis of tumor and adjacent non-tumor proteomic data reveals SERPINH1 as a recurrence biomarker and drug target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biolog Sci. 2024;20:5191–5207. doi:10.7150/ijbs.99734
53. Smadja DM, Chocron AF, Abreu MM. HSP47 at the crossroads of thrombosis and collagen dynamics: unlocking therapeutic horizons and debates. TH Open. 2025;9:a25994925. doi:10.1055/a-2599-4925
54. Xiao H, Yao Z, Li T, et al. SERPINH1 secretion by cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy through SENP3-mediated SP1/SQLE pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025;150:114259. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2025.114259
55. Maiorino L, Daßler-Plenker J, Sun L, et al. Innate immunity and cancer pathophysiology. Annual Rev Pathol. 2022;17:425–457. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-032221-115501
56. Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:265sr6. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337
57. Dudiki T, Veleeparambil M, Zhevlakova I, et al. Mechanism of tumor-platelet communications in cancer. Circul Res. 2023;132:1447–1461. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321861
58. Campello E, Zanetto A, Spiezia L, et al. Hypercoagulability detected by circulating microparticles in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Thrombosis Res. 2016;143:118–121. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.021
59. Xiong S, Dong L, Cheng L. Neutrophils in cancer carcinogenesis and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:173. doi:10.1186/s13045-021-01187-y
60. Segal BH, Giridharan T, Suzuki S, et al. Neutrophil interactions with T cells, platelets, endothelial cells, and of course tumor cells. Immunolog Rev. 2023;314:13–35. doi:10.1111/imr.13178
© 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
