Back to Journals » International Journal of Women's Health » Volume 16

High Fat Mass Index is Associated with Endometrial Hyperplasia in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Study

Authors Kuai D, Li M, He L, Li X, He Y, Liu S, Wei J ORCID logo, Ji X, Wang Y, Tian W, Zhang H ORCID logo

Received 18 September 2024

Accepted for publication 21 November 2024

Published 30 November 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 2065—2075

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S491443

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Vinay Kumar



Dan Kuai,1,2 Mengying Li,1,2 Ling He,1,2 Xiaoyan Li,1,2 Ying He,1,2 Shiqi Liu,1,2 Jiayu Wei,1,2 Xia Ji,3 Yingmei Wang,1,2 Wenyan Tian,1,2 Huiying Zhang1,2

1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, People’s Republic of China; 2Tianjin Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Health and Eugenics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, People’s Republic of China; 3Baogang Hospital of Aerospace Medicine of Inner Mongolia, Baotou, 014000, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yingmei Wang, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Health and Eugenics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Huiying Zhang, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, He Ping District, Tianjin, 300052, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-022-60362255, Email [email protected]

Aim: To assess body composition, glucolipid metabolism, and uric acid levels in PCOS (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome) patients to determine their relationship with the risk of endometrial hyperplasia (EH).
Methods: A total of 232 patients were included and divided into groups according to whether they had PCOS and endometrial pathology (Group A: non-PCOS and normal endometrium; Group B: PCOS and normal endometrium; Group C: non-PCOS and EH; Group D: PCOS and EH). Body composition differences between groups and correlations between body composition, glucolipid metabolism, and uric acid levels were analyzed.
Results: In Group D, the patient’s PSM (Percent Skeletal Muscle) of Trunk, PBF (Percent Body Fat) of Arm, free mass index, FMI (Fat Mass Index), and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index were significantly higher than in Groups A, B, and C. Waist-hip rate, PBF, PBF of Trunk, PSM of Leg, skeletal muscle mass index and visceral fat level were significantly higher than in Groups A and B. FMI was an independent risk factor for EH in PCOS patients, the AUC for FMI prediction of endometrial hyperplasia in PCOS patients was 0.82. FMI had significant positive correlations with fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance), total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein, and uric acid levels. FMI was correlated with HOMA-IR and uric acid at 0.602 and 0.649 respectively in PCOS patients.
Conclusion: Increased FMI and altered glucolipid metabolism as key factors associated with a higher risk of EH in patients with PCOS. Monitoring body composition and metabolic health in PCOS patients could help identify those at greater risk of EH, guiding preventive interventions.

Keywords: polycystic ovary syndrome, endometrial hyperplasia, body composition, glycolipid metabolism, metabolic syndrome

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common reproductive endocrine and chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent ovulatory dysfunction, clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovarian changes.1 PCOS can be as common as 6% to 10% of women of childbearing age.2 PCOS is a serious threat to young women’s reproductive health, with 70–80% of PCOS patients experiencing varying degrees of infertility.3

As a result of chronic anovulation, the endometrium of PCOS patients is stimulated by long-term estrogen without progesterone antagonism, which can lead to abnormal endometrial hyperplasia (EH) that can result in EH and even endometrial cancer (EC). About 30% of women with PCOS have EH. The incidence of EC is 3 to 10 times higher than in the normal population.4,5 Previous studies showed that the incidence of PCOS gradually increased with increasing degree of EH.6 EH seriously threatens the health of young women, where atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) is a precursor to EC and is more likely to progress to cancer. The endometrium of EH patients lacks periodic morphological changes and dysregulation of molecular events, resulting in decreased endometrial receptivity, decreased implantation rate, decreased live birth rate, increased abortion rate, and other clinical signs of significantly reduced fertility.

Insulin resistance, resulting in multiple defects in the regulation of carbohydrate, fat, and purine metabolism, is considered an important pathophysiological feature in developing PCOS.7 Body Mass Index (BMI) is a classic measure of obesity but does not distinguish between body fat and muscle mass. Previous study8 has shown that PCOS patients with normal weight and central obesity have a higher risk of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia than those with non-central obesity. This suggests that the distribution of muscle and fat may also influence metabolic dysfunction in PCOS. Metabolic disorders are also one of the independent risk factors for the development of endometrial hyperplasia. Therefore, it is unclear whether the changes in the distribution of human body components in PCOS patients affect the endometrium by affecting the metabolism of PCOS patients.

This study analyzed body composition, glycolipid metabolism, and uric acid levels in normal controls, PCOS patients with normal endometrial, non-PCOS patients with EH, and PCOS patients with EH. We hope to be able to assess the risk of endometrial hyperplasia in patients with PCOS and to contribute to the protection of fertility in young women with PCOS.

Material and Method

Study Design and Patients

This is a retrospective study that had approval from the ethics committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. We collected patients from June 1, 2021, to March 1,2024.

Inclusion Criteria

(1) Patients’ pathological diagnoses were EH without atypia, AH, secretory or proliferative phases of the endometrium, (2) Patients undergoing body composition analysis in our hospital, (3) Patients who have had fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, blood lipids and uric acid tested in our hospital, (4) Patients without malignant tumors, (5) Patients without other system comorbidities.

Exclusion Criteria

(1) Patients were being treated with hormone therapy, (2) Patients’ clinical and pathological data were missing.

Calculation of the Sample Size

This is a retrospective case-control study, the main outcome of this study was to determine the relationship between polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial hyperplasia. For this aim, we used the following formula to calculate the minimal sample size for this type of study:

(ie the minimal sample size should be 74. P0 is the probability of endometrial hyperplasia in premenopausal women, which is 10%, P1 is the probability of endometrial hyperplasia in the PCOS population, which is about 30%,9,10 and P is the average of P0 and P1. The statistical significance level was 5% (α = 0.05) using a two-sided test β = 0.1).

Relevant Definitions and Standards

Diagnostic Criteria for PCOS

(1) Rare ovulation or anovulation (often accompanied by abnormal menstruation), (2) Clinical symptoms of hyperandrogenism and/or hyperandrogenism, (3) Polycystic ovarian changes on ultrasound: ≥12 follicles with a diameter of 2–9mm in one or both ovaries and/or ovarian volume ≥10mL.11 Any two of the above three factors were met, and other diseases causing hyperandrogenism were excluded.

Parameters’ Calculation method

BMI (Body Mass Index, kg/m2) = Weight (kg)/Height2 (m).

FFMI (Free Mass Index, kg/m2) = Free Mass (kg)/Height2 (m).

FMI (Fat Mass Index, kg/m2) = Fat Mass (kg)/Height2 (m).

SMI (Skeletal Muscle Mass Index, kg/m2) = Skeletal Muscle Mass (kg)/Height2 (m).

ASMI (Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Index, kg/m2) = Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (kg)/Height2 (m).

SVR = SMI/ Visceral Fat Area (Visceral Fat Level*10, cm2).

HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance) = [fasting insulin (μIU/mL) × fasting blood glucose (mmol/L)]/22.5.

Data Collection

General Clinical Data

The data included age, menstrual cycle history, and measurements from vaginal or abdominal color Doppler ultrasounds (such as uterine size, endometrial thickness, bilateral ovarian size, and the number of 2–9 mm follicles).

Anthropometric Characteristics

The height, waist circumference, and hip circumference of both PCOS patients and controls were measured in centimeters. The body composition of all subjects was analyzed using the In Body 270 body composition analyzer. The following parameters were obtained: body weight, BMI, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, PBF, VFL, and PSM. The percentage of muscle or fat mass in each site is referred to as the proportion of muscle or fat in that site relative to body weight.

Laboratory Measurements

Peripheral venous blood (5 mL) was collected on days 2 to 4 of the menstrual cycle from all subjects with regular menstruation and those with amenorrhoea for more than 1 month. The blood was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes after being allowed to stand at room temperature for approximately 40 minutes. The supernatant was collected for analysis. Fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, blood lipids (total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and uric acid (UA)) were measured by electrochemiluminescence.

Pathological Diagnoses

Two experienced gynaecologists from the Pathology Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital diagnosed the endometrial pathology. In case of disagreement, a third gynaecological pathologist is consulted to finalise the pathological diagnosis report to ensure consistency of pathological diagnosis. The most severe pathological diagnosis was considered to be the final diagnosis for the study. Patients were divided into normal endometrium, SH (simple EH), CH (complex EH), and AH based on the results of the pathological diagnoses. A pathological diagnosis of secretory and proliferative phases of the endometrium was defined as normal endometrium.

Statistical Methods

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 software for Windows (IBM Inc)., the R programming language and environment (v.4.1.1; http://www.r-project.org/), and GraphPad Prism 8.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc). One-way ANOVA tests were used for continuous variables and results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Scheffe’s test was used to compare multiple groups. Stepwise forward regression was performed using significant multivariate logistic regression variables. The Spearman correlation test was used for correlation analysis. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The study included 232 patients based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 118 patients were non-PCOS and normal endometrial (Group A), 34 patients were PCOS and normal endometrial (Group B), 38 patients were non-PCOS and EH (Group C), and 42 patients were PCOS and EH (Group D).

Demographic Baseline Characteristics in Four Groups

Baseline demographic characteristics in Groups A, B, C, and D are shown in Table 1. In Group D, the patient’s weight and BMI levels were significantly higher than in Groups A, B, and C. In Group C, the patient’s weight and BMI levels were markedly higher than in Group A (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic Baseline Characteristics in Four Groups

Differences in Body Composition Among the Four Groups

In Group D, the patient’s PSM of Trunk, PBF of Arm, FFMI, FMI, and ASMI were significantly higher than in Groups A, B, and C (Table 2 and Figure 1). In Group D, the patient’s WHR, PBF, PBF of Trunk, PSM of Leg, SMI and VFL were significantly higher than in Groups A and B (Table 2). In Group D, the patient’s PSM, PBF of Leg, and SVR were significantly higher than in Group A (Table 2).

Table 2 Differences in Body Composition Among the Four Groups

Figure 1 FMI levels in the Four Groups. Group (A) non-PCOS and normal endometrium; Group (B) PCOS and normal endometrium; Group (C) non-PCOS and EH; Group (D) PCOS and EH.

Abbreviation: FMI, Fat mass index.

In Group C, the patient’s WHR, PBF, PSM, PSM of Trunk, Fat mass of Trunk, PBF of Trunk, PBF of Arm, PSM of Leg, PBF of Leg, FFMI, FMI, ASMI, VFL, and SVR were significantly higher than in Group A (Table 2).

Multivariate Regression Analysis of EH Risk Factors in PCOS Patients

Stepwise forward regression was performed using the significant variables in Table 1 and Table 2 in the multivariate logistic regression equation. The results showed that FMI was an independent risk factor for EH in PCOS patients, with groups A and B as reference groups. Increased FMI was an independent risk factor for endometrial hyperplasia in PCOS patients, while increased age was a protective factor, using C as the reference group (Table 3). The AUC for FMI prediction of EH in PCOS patients was 0.82 (Figure 2).

Table 3 Multivariate Regression Analysis of EH Risk Factors in PCOS Patients

Figure 2 ROC curve of FMI for prediction of endometrial hyperplasia in patients with PCOS.

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the ROC curve; CI, Confidence Interval.

Correlation Between FMI and Glucose Metabolism in Patients with PCOS

Correlation analysis of FMI and glucose metabolic indices in PCOS patients showed significant positive correlations with fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR. The correlation coefficient between FMI and HOMA-IR was 0.602 (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Correlation between FMI and glucose metabolism in patients with PCOS. (A) Correlation between FMI and FBG level in patients with PCOS; (B) Correlation between FMI and FINS level in patients with PCOS; (C) Correlation between FMI and HOMA-IR in patients with PCOS.

Abbreviations FMI, Fat mass index; EH, Endometrial Hyperplasia; EC, Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma; FBG: fasting blood glucose; FINS: fasting insulin; HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance.

Correlation Between FMI and Lipid Metabolism/Uric Acid in Patients with PCOS

Correlation analysis of FMI and lipid metabolic indices/uric acid in PCOS patients showed significant positive correlations with TC, TG, LDL, TG/HDL, and uric acid. FMI has significant negative correlations with HDL. The correlation coefficient between FMI and uric acid was 0.649 (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Correlation between FMI and lipid metabolism/Uric Acid in patients with PCOS. (A) Correlation between FMI and TC level in patients with PCOS; (B) Correlation between FMI and TG level in patients with PCOS; (C) Correlation between FMI and LDL level in patients with PCOS; (D) Correlation between FMI and HDL level in patients with PCOS; (E) Correlation between FMI and TG/HDL level in patients with PCOS; (F) Correlation between FMI and Uric Acid level in patients with PCOS.

Abbreviations: FMI, Fat mass index; EH, Endometrial Hyperplasia; EC, Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma; TC, Total Cholesterol; TG, Triglyceride; LDL, Low density lipoprotein; HDL, High density lipoprotein.

Further group analysis of the PCOS population showed that FMI was more strongly associated with TG, TG/HDL, HDL, and uric acid levels in PCOS patients with hyperplastic endometrium compared to PCOS patients with normal endometrium (Figure 4).

Discussion

The prevalence of EH ranges from 1% to 48.8% in patients with PCOS.12 A meta-analysis study13 showed that the prevalence of PCOS was 17.23%, 10.26%, 9.13%, and 2.22% in people aged 21–30, 10–20, 31–40, and over 40 years respectively. PCOS mainly affects the reproductive function of women of childbearing age. A Korean study14 of nearly 70,000 patients found a 14.1% annual increase in the incidence of PCOS in recent years. Further analysis of PCOS in 1,806 patients with EH and 335,440 PCOS patients with normal endometrium showed that the combination of T2D (diabetes mellitus type 2, OR=1.17 [95% CI 1.00–1.38, P=0.050]), obesity (OR=1.34 [95% CI: 1.10–1.64, P=0.004]), HT (Hypertension, OR=1.49 [95% CI: 1.31–1.68, P<0.001]), HL (Hyperlipidemia, OR=2.17 [95% CI: 1.55–3.02, P<0.001]), and infertility (OR=1.24 [95% CI: 1.10–1.39, P<0.001]) increased the risk of EH in PCOS patients. In our study, the BMI level of EH patients was significantly higher than that of non-EH patients, regardless of whether PCOS was combined. The BMI level of EH patients with PCOS was significantly higher than that of EH patients without PCOS, which is consistent with previous research.

BMI does not reflect the distribution of body fat and muscle, although it is a commonly used indicator of obesity. However, PCOS patients with a normal BMI have a significantly higher level of body fat than healthy women, and the fat is mainly distributed in the upper limbs and around the trunk.15 PCOS patients with normal BMI have a higher prevalence of dysglycaemia and dysglycaemia than healthy women of similar age and BMI.16 Metabolic changes may be responsible for the increase in body fat volume and distribution. Specifically, body fat distribution, particularly abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat, reflects these changes better than overall adiposity.17 In the development of PCOS, obesity and specific fat distribution patterns may play an important role. Previous studies analyzed the body composition of PCOS patients and normal healthy women and found that the percentage of body fat, the percentage of fat in both upper limbs, the percentage of fat in both lower limbs and the percentage of trunk fat were significantly higher in PCOS patients than in normal healthy women, while the percentage of muscle in both lower limbs and the percentage of trunk muscle were significantly lower than in normal healthy women, suggesting that changes in fat and muscle distribution are significantly altered in PCOS patients. This study is the first to further subdivide PCOS and non-PCOS patients according to the presence or absence of EH and to analyse their body composition. PCOS patients with EH had increased WHR, increased PBF, increased FFMI, increased FMI, increased VFL, increased PBF in the trunk and upper limbs, and decreased PSM in the trunk and lower limbs compared to PCOS patients with normal endometrium. Compared with non-PCOS women with normal endometrium, non-PCOS women with EH also showed similar changes in fat and muscle distribution. The distribution of fat and muscle in patients with EH was altered, with fat being deposited mainly in the upper extremities and trunk, manifesting as central obesity. Further multivariate regression analysis showed that FMI was an independent risk factor for EH in patients with PCOS compared with non-PCOS/PCOS patients with normal endometrium. Patients with PCOS developed EH at an earlier age compared with non-PCOS patients with EH, suggesting that PCOS accelerates the progression of endometrial lesions.

Increased FMI indicates increased body fat in PCOS. Adipose tissue, which has a hormonal function, uses aromatase to transform androgens produced by non-ovarian tissues into estrone. Increased adiposity increases the conversion of androstenedione to estrone.18 This is because estrone does not fluctuate periodically like the estrogens secreted by the follicles. As a result, the pituitary gland cannot stimulate the release of large amounts of LH and FSH, and the serum LH/FSH peak is difficult to form, leading to obstructed follicular development or ejection and oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea. Ovulation disorders result in prolonged exposure of the endometrium to the effects of estrogen without the antagonism of progesterone, with the resultant abnormal endometrial hyperplasia.19 The imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines accelerates the development of obesity-related diseases, which are not only closely associated with diabetes, inflammation and cardiovascular disease, but also play a crucial role in the development of malignant tumours.20 Adipokines may be directly involved in the development of EH/EC, but may also interact with oestrogen to indirectly promote its development. Changes in the levels of various adipokines can also cause insulin resistance, directly promote the proliferation of tumour cells and inhibit cell apoptosis through PI3K/Akt and Ras/MAPK signalling pathways, and participate in the pathogenesis of EC.21

Studies have shown that PCOS has a positive association with EH, T1D, and T2D in obese patients after adjustment for BMI.22,23 Duleba’s study24 has shown that both normal-weight and obese women with PCOS have elevated circulating insulin levels/serum glucose levels compared to healthy women of normal weight and obese women. Conway’s study25 indicated that normal-weight women with PCOS demonstrate hepatic insulin resistance only, whereas obese women demonstrate whole-body insulin resistance. This means that the occurrence of metabolic abnormalities in people with PCOS is not always dependent on their BMI. Hyperinsulinemia has been shown to play an important role in the pathophysiology of PCOS. Insulin resistance is associated with hyperinsulinemia. In this study, further analysis of PCOS patients showed that FMI levels were significantly correlated with glucose and lipid metabolism and uric acid levels. The correlation coefficient between FMI and HOMA-IR was 0.602, the correlation coefficient between FMI and HDL was −0.419, and the correlation coefficient between FMI and TG/HDL was 0.481. The correlation coefficient between FMI and uric acid was 0.649.

Hyperinsulinemia increases plasma levels of free androgens by reducing the production of sex hormone-binding globulin. Endometrial cell differentiation can be affected by high plasma levels of androgens and insulin.26 This further increases the concentration of bioavailable circulating androgens, which dysregulates the production of follicles and leads to a series of pathological events in patients with PCOS.27 Qi’s research28 has shown that compared to PCOS patients without PCOS and PCOS patients without IR, the implantation rate of PCOS patients with IR is relatively low, and endometrial biopsies from PCOS patients with IR show increased cortisol levels, decreased 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases expression, and defects in the endometrial insulin signaling pathway. In addition, by inhibiting Akt phosphorylation and glucose transporter type 4 translocation (through induction of phosphatase and tensin cognate deletion (PTEN) on chromosome 10), cortisol attenuates insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in endometrial epithelial cells. Endometrial sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 gene expression was significantly increased in patients with PCOS and endometrial cancer compared with controls and was positively associated with serum triglycerides in patients with PCOS and endometrial cancer.29 Metformin and sorafenib promote apoptosis through synergistic regulation of autophagy and reduce endometrial hyperplasia in patients with PCOS.30

The TG/HDL ratio is considered a predictive marker of IR and β cell dysfunction. Elevated levels of TG are an early manifestation of insulin resistance. High TG is often associated with intra-abdominal fat accumulation, increased lipoprotein lipase activity, and lipolysis to non-esterified fatty acids, which interfere with the binding of insulin to the appropriate receptors in the surrounding tissues, thus reducing the biological effect of insulin. Furthermore, elevated TGs lead to increased free fatty acids (FFA), and prolonged exposure to TG-induced FFA may reduce AMP-activated kinase protein activity and increase TG accumulation, leading to altered pancreatic α-cell insulin signaling and glucagon over-secretion.31,32 Insulin resistance promotes the synthesis of very low-density lipoprotein in the liver and inhibits the breakdown of TG by the lipoprotein enzyme, thereby increasing the amount of TG in the circulation. Low HDL-C exacerbates β cell dysfunction, and HDL protects beta cells from cytokine- or glucose-induced apoptosis through two components, including apoA1 (the major protein component of HDL) and S1P, exacerbating insulin resistance and thus glucose intolerance.33,34

We also found that FMI levels were significantly positively correlated with serum uric acid levels in PCOS patients, in addition to the close relationship between blood glucose and dyslipidemia. Studies35,36 have shown that for every 1mg/dL increase in serum UA, the risk of developing T2DM increases by approximately 6% to 17%. High levels of UA are associated with insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction, two defects that are central to the pathophysiology of T2DM.37,38 Serum UA levels have been reported to correlate positively with indicators of insulin resistance in healthy individuals with normal serum UA concentrations.39 In normal healthy people, other studies have shown that acute hyperinsulinemia inhibits renal uric acid excretion.40 Benzbromarone is a urinary excretion inhibitor of fatty acid-binding protein 4 that improves glucose tolerance in mice with type 2 diabetes.41 A retrospective cohort study41 showed that gout patients treated with benzbromarone had a reduced incidence of new-onset diabetes compared to those not treated with benzbromarone.

In conclusion, this study uniquely examined the interaction between metabolic dysfunction and endometrial health in patients with PCOS, confirmed FMI as a predictive marker and explored additional metabolic markers associated with EH risk in patients with PCOS. In patients with PCOS, attention should be paid to the quality and distribution of fat when assessing; some patients have a low BMI level, but increased abdominal fat is still detrimental to health. Some patients have a low body mass index, but increased abdominal fat is still detrimental to health. Pay attention to glucose, lipid and purine metabolism, prevent related complications and endometrial changes through early intervention, and improve reproductive function in PCOS patients. The results of this study will also help to develop targeted interventions, such as reminding PCOS patients with normal weight or normal BMI if their FMI level is elevated, to improve their diet structure or type, improve their lifestyle and increase moderate exercise to help reduce the risk of EH and protect fertility in young women.

Limitations

This is a retrospective single-center study. To reduce the selection bias, three gynecology experts and one statistics expert were invited to strictly define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The completeness of medical history and auxiliary examination data was determined one by one. For partial data or data missing in the medical records, the patients were followed up to complete the medical data as much as possible. As many participants as possible were included in the study to reduce bias. However, the selection bias cannot be completely controlled by these measures. In the future, multicenter hospitals (local hospitals, hospitals at all levels) should be included with more participants to reduce the selection bias as much as possible.

Data Sharing Statement

Data can be obtained by corresponding authors if necessary.

Ethics Approval

This study adheres to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring the protection of patient privacy and confidentiality. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Committee for Medical Research Ethics at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (Ethical No. IRB2024-YX-222-01). The patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individuals for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital for providing facilities to carry out our research work.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the reported work from its conception, designing, execution, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; all authors participated in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; and gave their final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Developmental Program of China (Program Nos. 2022YFC2704400 and 2022YFC2704402), New sharp Tianjin Young Medical (TJSQNYXXR-D2-078), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171629), Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (23JCYBJC00720), Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYXZDXK-031A). The funding source played no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or drafting of the manuscript.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 194: polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2018;131(6):e157–e171. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002656

2. Belenkaia LV, Lazareva LM, Walker W, Lizneva DV, Suturina LV. Criteria, phenotypes and prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome. Minerva Ginecologica. 2019;71(3):211–223. doi:10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04404-6

3. Melo AS, Alberto Ferriani R, Andrea Navarro P. Treatment of infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: approach to clinical practice. Clinics. 2015;70(11):765–769. doi:10.6061/clinics/2015(11)09

4. Gallos ID, Ganesan R, Gupta JK. Prediction of regression and relapse of endometrial hyperplasia with conservative therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1165–1171. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828cb563

5. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):364–379. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004

6. Kuai D, Tang Q, Tian W, Zhang H. Rapid identification of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial endometrioid cancer in young women. Discov Oncol. 2023;14(1):121. doi:10.1007/s12672-023-00736-w

7. Gambineri A, Pelusi C, Vicennati V, Pagotto U, Pasquali R. Obesity and the polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26(7):883–896. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801994

8. Mu L, Zhao Y, Li R, Lai Y, Qiao J. Metabolic characteristics of normal weight central obesity phenotype polycystic ovary syndrome women: a large-scale national epidemiological survey. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(4):498–504. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.08.007

9. Göl K, Saraçoğlu F, Ekici A, Sahin I. Endometrial patterns and endocrinologic characteristics of asymptomatic menopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001;15(1):63–67. doi:10.1080/gye.15.1.63.67

10. Park JC, Lim SY, Jang TK, Bae JG, Kim JI, Rhee JH. Endometrial histology and predictable clinical factors for endometrial disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2011;38(1):42–46. doi:10.5653/cerm.2011.38.1.42

11. Geisthövel F. A comment on the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine consensus of the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(6):602–605. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62081-0

12. Wu Q, Gao J, Bai D, Yang Z, Liao Q. The prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome in Chinese women: a meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(1):74–87. doi:10.21037/apm-20-1893

13. Park B, Lee H, Park S, et al. Trend changes and factor analysis of endometrial hyperplasia in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome based on the Korean National Health Insurance Database. BMC Women's Health. 2022;22(1):439. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-02015-2

14. Kirchengast S, Huber J. Body composition characteristics and body fat distribution in lean women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1255–1260. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.6.1255

15. Wild RA, Rizzo M, Clifton S, Carmina E. Lipid levels in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1073–9.e1–11. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.027

16. Pacific, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Health Communications. 2000;2000:1

17. Modesitt SC, Hallowell PT, Slack-Davis JK, et al. Women at extreme risk for obesity-related carcinogenesis: baseline endometrial pathology and impact of bariatric surgery on weight, metabolic profiles and quality of life. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(2):238–245. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.015

18. Palomba S, Piltonen TT, Giudice LC. Endometrial function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive review. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(3):584–618. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaa051

19. Choe SS, Huh JY, Hwang IJ, Kim JI, Kim JB. Adipose Tissue Remodeling: its Role in Energy Metabolism and Metabolic Disorders. Front Endocrinol. 2016;7:30. doi:10.3389/fendo.2016.00030

20. Mu N, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Xue F. Insulin resistance: a significant risk factor of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):751–757. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.032

21. Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Risk of cancer following hospitalization for type 2 diabetes. Oncologist. 2010;15(6):548–555. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0300

22. Lai GY, Park Y, Hartge P, Hollenbeck AR, Freedman ND. The association between self-reported diabetes and cancer incidence in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):E497–502. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3335

23. Duleba AJ. Medical management of metabolic dysfunction in PCOS. Steroids. 2012;77(4):306–311. doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2011.11.014

24. Conway G, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, et al. The polycystic ovary syndrome: a position statement from the European Society of Endocrinology. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(4):P1–29. doi:10.1530/EJE-14-0253

25. McCartney CR, Marshall JC. CLINICAL PRACTICE. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(1):54–64. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1514916

26. Deswal R, Yadav A, Dang AS. Sex hormone binding globulin - an important biomarker for predicting PCOS risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018;64(1):12–24. doi:10.1080/19396368.2017.1410591

27. Qi J, Wang W, Zhu Q, et al. Local Cortisol Elevation Contributes to Endometrial Insulin Resistance in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(7):2457–2467. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02459

28. Shafiee MN, Mongan N, Seedhouse C, et al. Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP1) gene expression is similarly increased in polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(5):556–562. doi:10.1111/aogs.13106

29. Wang QQ, Guo XC, Li L, Gao ZH, Ji M. Treatment with metformin and sorafenib alleviates endometrial hyperplasia in polycystic ovary syndrome by promoting apoptosis via synergically regulating autophagy. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(2):1339–1348. doi:10.1002/jcp.29051

30. Lai M, Fang F, Ma Y, et al. Elevated Midtrimester Triglycerides as a Biomarker for Postpartum Hyperglycemia in Gestational Diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:3950652. doi:10.1155/2020/3950652

31. Manell H, Kristinsson H, Kullberg J, et al. Hyperglucagonemia in youth is associated with high plasma free fatty acids, visceral adiposity, and impaired glucose tolerance. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(7):880–891. doi:10.1111/pedi.12890

32. Di Bartolo BA, Cartland SP, Genner S, et al. HDL improves cholesterol and glucose homeostasis and reduces atherosclerosis in diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. J Diabetes Res. 2021;6(2021):6668506.

33. Sposito AC, de Lima-Junior JC, Moura FA, et al. Reciprocal Multifaceted Interaction Between HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) and Myocardial Infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(8):1550–1564. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312880

34. Xu YL, Xu KF, Bai JL, et al. Elevation of serum uric acid and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2016;2(2):81–91. doi:10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.09.003

35. Lv Q, Meng XF, He FF, et al. High serum uric acid and increased risk of type 2 diabetes: a systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56864. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056864

36. Zhu Y, Hu Y, Huang T, et al. High uric acid directly inhibits insulin signalling and induces insulin resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;447(4):707–714. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.080

37. Lu J, He Y, Cui L, et al. Hyperuricemia Predisposes to the Onset of Diabetes via Promoting Pancreatic β-Cell Death in Uricase-Deficient Male Mice. Diabetes. 2020;69(6):1149–1163. doi:10.2337/db19-0704

38. Facchini F, Chen YD, Hollenbeck CB, Reaven GM. Relationship between resistance to insulin-mediated glucose uptake, urinary uric acid clearance, and plasma uric acid concentration. JAMA. 1991;266(21):3008–3011. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470210076036

39. Quiñones Galvan A, Natali A, Baldi S, et al. Effect of insulin on uric acid excretion in humans. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(Pt 1):E1–5. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1995.268.1.E1

40. Cai HY, Wang T, Zhao JC, et al. Benzbromarone, an old uricosuric drug, inhibits human fatty acid binding protein 4 in vitro and lowers the blood glucose level in db/db mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34(11):1397–1402. doi:10.1038/aps.2013.97

41. Niu SW, Chang KT, Ta A, et al. Decreased incidence of diabetes in patients with gout using benzbromarone. Rheumatology. 2018;57(9):1574–1582. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/key138

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.