Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18

Influence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study in China

Authors Shi C, Shen X, Liu J, Huang L, Ni H, Tang P, Feng Y, Wu M, Zhang J

Received 7 August 2024

Accepted for publication 23 April 2025

Published 8 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2415—2425

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S490491

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor Mora-Montes



Cuilin Shi,* Xinghua Shen,* Jing Liu,* Lijun Huang,* Huanglei Ni, Peijun Tang, Yanjun Feng, Meiying Wu, Jianping Zhang

The Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou, Suzhou, 215000, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Meiying Wu, The Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou, 10 Guangqian Road, Xiangcheng District, Suzhou, 215000, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86-512-87806067, Email [email protected] Jianping Zhang, The Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou, 10 Guangqian Road, Xiangcheng District, Suzhou, 215000, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Purpose: To explore the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the clinical outcomes of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and the factors that may affect outcomes. In addition, the treatment regimens of active pulmonary TB patients with or without T2DM were described.
Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, real-world study conducted in the Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou (China), an urban hospital. This study divided 340 inpatients with active TB who received standard anti-tuberculosis treatment into the T2DM and control groups, with 61 patients in the T2DM group and 279 patients in the control group. The outcomes were the time to negative Mycobacterium tuberculosis sputum conversion and the rate of negative sputum conversion for tuberculosis bacteria at 2 months.
Results: The percentage of patients who received the isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE) regimen was numerically lower in the T2DM vs control group (73.8% vs 79.6%), while the use of the isoniazid, rifapentine, ethambutol, and levofloxacin (HRftELfx) regimen was numerically higher (14.8% vs 9.7%). The median time to negative sputum conversion was longer in the T2DM group (median, 60.00 vs 52.00 days, P< 0.001). The rates of negative sputum conversion at 2 months were 85.2% vs 92.8% in the T2DM and control groups (P=0.055). The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the male sex (adjusted HR=0.759, 95% CI: 0.585– 0.984, P=0.037) and T2DM (adjusted HR=0.721, 95% CI: 0.528– 0.986, P=0.040) were independently associated with the time to negative sputum Mycobacterium tuberculosis conversion.
Conclusion: Patients with TB and T2DM had a longer time to negative sputum Mycobacterium tuberculosis conversion. In addition, being male significantly increased the risk of prolonged time to negative sputum Mycobacterium tuberculosis conversion.

Keywords: tuberculosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anti-tuberculosis drugs, treatment regimens, prognosis

Introduction

Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) refers to the clinical syndrome associated with the infection of the respiratory system caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis).1,2 The World Health Organization estimated that, in 2022, 10.6 million people developed TB, and 1.3 million died from the disease globally.2 In 2021, China reported approximately 590,000 new cases of TB, with a mortality rate of 2.1 per 100,000. China has the world’s third-largest number of TB cases.3 M. tuberculosis is spread through the air from one person to another when bacteria are aerosolized from a person with pulmonary TB.2 TB is a global public health issue that poses a serious threat to public health.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition with a worldwide prevalence of 6.1%;4 the prevalence in China is among the highest worldwide, at 12.4%.5 T2DM is associated with low-grade systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction,6,7 increasing the risk of opportunistic infections.8 T2DM is closely related to the incidence of pulmonary TB.9,10 Patients with T2DM have a 2-3-time increased risk of developing TB than non-T2DM patients.11 Globally, the incidence of diabetes-associated TB is increasing, with nearly 17% of TB cases in China being attributed to T2DM.12 The prevalence of T2DM in China has continuously increased in the last decades due to the aging population, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.13 Hence, it is expected that the burden of TB will follow the T2DM burden, posing a double-threat to public health, especially in countries with high prevalences of both diseases.

Previous studies demonstrated that T2DM has a significant influence on the treatment outcomes of TB, resulting in a delayed time to negative sputum culture conversion, increased risk of treatment failure, TB relapse, and death.14–18 A meta-analysis showed that, compared with non-T2DM patients, patients with pulmonary TB and T2DM had a lower rate of negative sputum culture conversion at 2 months and higher rates of treatment failure and death,17 but that meta-analysis included only one study from mainland China. The available studies based on the Chinese population mainly focused on the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with pulmonary TB complicated by T2DM.19–22 A study demonstrated that T2DM was an independent risk factor for tuberculosis.23 A study in China indicated that T2DM had an adverse effect on the treatment outcomes of drug-sensitive pulmonary TB and suggested that all patients in the intensive phase applied the standard treatment regimen, which included the combination of isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z), and ethambutol (E) (HRZE);22 however, the patients in that study were treated between 2008 and 2010. Adjustment may be necessary based on tolerance; Z and R can lead to liver toxicity and may be replaced with Lfx and Rft. Therefore, the isoniazid (H), rifapentine (Rft), ethambutol (E), and levofloxacin (Lfx) (HRftELfx) regimen is also an option. Since patients with T2DM exhibit individual differences in response to anti-TB drugs, it is necessary to personalize treatment regimens by considering the individualized factors of patients in the clinical practice. However, the influence of T2DM on the treatment outcomes of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosed by sputum culture and other factors (such as other clinical parameters affected by the disease) that influence the treatment outcomes still lack evidence.

Hence, this study explored the influence of T2DM on the clinical outcomes of pulmonary TB and the factors that may affect clinical outcomes. In addition, the treatment regimens of active pulmonary TB patients with or without T2DM were described.

Methods

Study Design and Patients

This retrospective, single-center, real-world study included inpatients diagnosed with active pulmonary TB according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Pulmonary TB (WS288-2017)24,25 and received anti-TB treatment between April 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020, at the Tuberculosis Department of the Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou. This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou (approval #K-2023-001-002). The requirement for individual informed consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study. The investigators were committed to maintaining strict confidentiality of all patient data.

The inclusion criteria were 1) ≥35 years of age, male or female, 2) diagnosed with active pulmonary TB according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Pulmonary TB (WS288-2017),24,25 3) microscopy positive for sputum smear or culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and 4) inpatients with a documented anti-tuberculosis treatment history. The exclusion criteria were 1) known or suspected infection with rifampicin mono-resistant M. tuberculosis (RMR-TB), multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (MDR-TB), and extensively drug-resistant M. tuberculosis (XDR-TB), 2) concomitant non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease, 3) type 1 diabetes mellitus, 4) severe cardiac, hepatic, or end-stage renal disorders, history of neoplasm malignant, or any other terminal conditions, or 5) incomplete data or lost to follow-up. Patients with HIV were not explicitly excluded, but at the study hospital, patients with HIV, irrespective of the TB status, are treated in the Infectious Diseases Department, not the Tuberculosis Department.

MDR-TB was defined as M. tuberculosis resistant to at least two first-line anti-TB drugs, including isoniazid and rifampicin. XDR-TB was defined as M. tuberculosis resistant to first-line anti-TB drugs isoniazid and rifampicin and additionally resistant to at least one fluoroquinolone antibiotic and at least one other group A anti-TB drug (levofloxacin/moxifloxacin, bedaquiline, linezolid).

Data Collection and Outcome

All data in this study were collected from the patient’s medical records, and the baseline serum biomarkers were extracted from the results on the first day after admission. Patients with T2DM were defined as19 the population meeting the Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of T2DM in China,13,19 or those treated with antidiabetic agents. Based on the status of baseline T2DM, the patients were divided into the T2DM and control groups.

The routine follow-up methods during the study period were Ziehl-Neelsen staining to detect acid-fast bacilli in sputum smears and liquid culture for culturing M. tuberculosis. Patients’ sputum smears for acid-fast bacilli and sputum M. tuberculosis culture were collected before treatment. Sputum smears for acid-fast bacilli were examined every 2 weeks after anti-TB treatment, and sputum M. tuberculosis culture was examined monthly; some patients provide their samples at the Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou, China, while others do so at designated local hospitals. The results of sputum sample tests were recorded in the electronic medical system. The time to negative sputum culture conversion was defined as the interval between the start of anti-TB treatment and the first time that M. tuberculosis could not be detected in two consecutive sputum samples recorded in days. The rate of negative sputum culture conversion at 2 months was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved negative conversion of M. tuberculosis in sputum samples within the first two months of anti-TB treatment. The standard of sputum conversion was defined as negative for acid-fast bacilli in sputum smear test for 2 consecutive months without recurrence or negative for M. tuberculosis in sputum culture.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and R (Version 4.2.3). The continuous variables were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables were described using means ± standard deviations, and those not normally distributed were described using medians (Q1, Q3). The categorical variables were described using frequency and percentage for a descriptive statistical summary. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the factors associated with the time to negative sputum culture conversion in patients with active pulmonary TB. All factors that may affect the clinical outcome of pulmonary TB were tested using univariable analyses for the time to sputum conversion, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI, ≥18.5 or <18.5 kg/m2), T2DM, hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90mmHg), pulmonary bacterial infection, pulmonary fungal infection (including pulmonary aspergillosis and pulmonary candidiasis), prior TB treatment (yes or no), smoking status (non-smoking or smoking: Non-smoking individuals are defined as patients who have never smoked or those who have smoked in the past but have quit for more than six months. Smoking individuals are defined as patients who continue to smoke at the time of hospitalization, excluding those who have previously smoked but have successfully quit), alcohol use status (non-alcohol use or alcohol use: Individuals who use alcohol are defined as patients who continue to consume alcohol at the time of hospitalization, with a weekly alcohol intake exceeding 140 grams of pure alcohol. Individuals who do not use alcohol are defined as patients who have never consumed alcohol or those who have consumed alcohol in the past but have abstained for more than six months), hemoglobin (>115 or ≤115 g/L), neutrophils (≤6.30 or >6.30 ×109/L), and albumin (≥35 or <35 g/L). All indicators that were significant in the univariable analyses were included in the multivariable analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the Patients

This study identified 880 potentially eligible patients, but 540 were excluded, leaving 340 patients with pulmonary TB: 61 patients (17.9%) had concurrent T2DM (T2DM group), and 279 patients (82.1%) did not have T2DM (control group) (Figure 1). Compared with the non-T2DM group, the patients in the T2DM group were older (median, 54.00 vs 46.00 years, P=0.011) and showed higher frequencies of males (85.2% vs 59.5%, P<0.001), hypertension (34.4% vs 10.8%, P<0.001), pulmonary fungal infection (4.9% vs 0.4%, P=0.019), smoking (34.4% vs 16.1%, P<0.001), alcohol use (27.9% vs 14.0%, P=0.001), and high neutrophils (neutrophils >6.30×109/L, 29.5% vs 9.3%, P<0.001). Demographic data and other baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the Patients

Figure 1 Patient flowchart.

Abbreviations: TB, tuberculosis; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens

In the T2DM group, 45 patients (73.8%) received the HRZE regimen, nine (14.8%) received the HRft ELfx regimen, and four (6.6%) received the rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z), ethambutol (E), and levofloxacin (Lfx)/moxifloxacin (Mfx) [RZELfx (Mfx)] regimen. In the control group, 222 patients (79.6%) received the HRZE regimen, 27 (9.7%) received the HRft ELfx regimen, and 18 (6.5%) received the RZELfx (Mfx) regimen (Table 2). There were no significant differences in TB treatment regimens between the T2DM group and the control group.

Table 2 Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens

Time to Negative Sputum Conversion

The median time to negative sputum conversion for all patients was 53.00 days (CI: 50.80–55.20). According to the Kaplan–Meier curves, before 60 days, patients with T2DM, patients with age <65 years, female patients, patients with high albumin (≥35 g/L) and patients with low neutrophils (≤6.30×109/L) were more likely to get negative sputum conversion than patients without T2DM, patients with age ≥65 years, male patients, patients with low albumin (<35 g/L) and patients with high neutrophils (>6.30×109/L), respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Continued.

Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier curves for the rate of negative sputum conversion after anti tuberculosis treatment in different subgroups. (A) Age; (B) Sex; (C) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); (D) Prior TB treatment; (E) Albumin; (F) Body mass index (BMI); (G) Neutrophils.

Rates of Negative Sputum Conversion at 2 months After Anti-Tuberculosis Treatment

The rates of negative sputum conversion at 2 months were 85.2% vs 92.8% in the T2DM and control groups (P=0.055), 94.0% vs 82.2% for patients aged <65 and ≥65 years (P=0.001), 88.5% vs 96.7% for male and female patient (P=0.010), 92.3% vs 85.0% for patients without any prior TB treatment and patients having TB treatment before (P=0.131), 84.4% vs 93.1% for patients with albumin <35 and ≥35 g/L (P=0.024), 88.5% vs 92.0% for patients with BMI <18.5 and ≥18.5 kg/m2 (P=0.418) and 93.6% vs 77.3% for patients with neutrophils ≤6.30×109/L and >6.30×109/L (P=0.001) (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Subgroup analysis of the rate of negative sputum conversion at 2 months after anti-tuberculosis treatment.

Multivariable Analysis

The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that male sex (adjusted HR=0.759, 95% CI: 0.585–0.984, P=0.037) and T2DM (adjusted HR=0.721, 95% CI: 0.528–0.986, P=0.040) independently increased the risk of the time to negative sputum M. tuberculosis conversion, which could prolong the time to negative conversion (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariable and Multivariable Analyses of the Time to Sputum Conversion in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Discussion

This retrospective study explored the influence of T2DM on the clinical outcomes of pulmonary TB and the factors that may affect outcomes. Furthermore, the treatment regimens of active pulmonary TB patients with or without T2DM were described. The results suggest that patients with pulmonary TB and T2DM had a longer time to negative sputum M. tuberculosis culture conversion than those without T2DM. Male sex was also independently associated with a longer time to negative sputum M. tuberculosis culture conversion. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening monitoring and individualized treatment strategies in treating TB and adjusting the treatment regimens to improve clinical outcomes.

Previous studies showed that T2DM is associated with a poor prognosis of TB. Indeed, Wang et al21 showed that T2DM was associated with a poor TB prognosis and that the association of T2DM remained significant even after adjusting for age and sex. A longitudinal study showed that T2DM was an important predictor of death in patients with TB; the effect did not appear to be related to increased TB severity but to an impaired response to treatment.14 A systematic review of 33 early studies showed that T2DM increased the risk of relapse and death in patients with TB.17 A more recent meta-analysis of 65 studies from South Asia showed that patients with T2DM and TB were at higher risk of treatment failure and death than patients with TB alone.18 The present study showed that patients with T2DM and TB had a longer time to negative sputum M. tuberculosis culture conversion than those with TB alone. T2DM and TB interact at multiple levels. Suboptimal glycemic control is associated with a higher risk of TB and poorer response to anti-TB treatments. In addition, TB also causes hyperglycemia, complicating glycemic control. The anti-TB drugs can also interact with the hypoglycemic drugs, potentially leading to both poor glycemic control and suboptimal M. tuberculosis killing.15 On the other hand, T2DM does not appear to be associated with a higher M. tuberculosis resistance to treatments,26 suggesting that the worse prognosis is not due to resistance to antibiotics.

The four-drug regimen HRZE is commonly used in anti-tuberculosis treatment. A previous randomized controlled trial showed that patients treated with HRC (isoniazid, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin) had a longer time to negative M. tuberculosis negative conversion and a higher proportion of TB recurrence than those treated with HRZE.27 Moreover, due to the caution for patients with T2DM in the pyrazinamide (Z) monograph due to changes in pharmacokinetics,28 the proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus using Z is low, and thus, the difference in treatment regimens between the two groups may be related to the poorer prognosis. However, no differences in treatment regimens were observed between the two groups in this study. Furthermore, many studies have shown that long-term T2DM can alter various clinical manifestations of pulmonary TB, such as increasing the range of pulmonary TB lesions and the occurrence of pulmonary cavities and increasing the risk of treatment failure, death, recurrence, and drug resistance, affecting prognosis.17,18

In the present study, male sex was also independently associated with a prolonged time to negative conversion. A retrospective study, combined with a meta-analysis, showed that males with TB had higher 9-month mortality rates and lower 2-month negative culture rates than females after adjustment for confounding factors.29 This association can be due to various factors, including higher frequencies of T2DM, smoking, and alcohol use than females30 but also higher sputum M. tuberculosis load and more severe lung lesions.31,32

Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier curves for the rate of negative sputum conversion after 2 months of anti-TB treatment in different subgroups of this study suggested that, before 60 days, albumin <35 g/L was associated with a reduced rate of negative sputum conversion, but albumin was not identified as being associated in the univariable Cox analysis, possibly because of the differences between the two statistical methods. Nevertheless, malnutrition is known to be associated with worse TB outcomes because of secondary immune dysfunction.33,34

This study has limitations. Firstly, it was a retrospective study, limiting the level of evidence that can be derived. The data were limited to those available in the patient charts. In addition, no data pertaining to T2DM, including glycemic control or medication, were collected. Therefore, it is difficult to analyze the influence of glycemic control status on the clinical outcomes of patients with T2DM. Even though longitudinal data were collected, the lack of long-term follow-up data made it impossible to assess the long-term outcomes, such as the maintenance of therapeutic effects and TB recurrence. Secondly, it was a single-center study with a small sample size. The results may be subject to a selection bias, affecting the accuracy of the conclusions. Therefore, future studies with larger sample sizes and multiple centers are warranted. The duration and severity of pulmonary TB and T2DM and the diversity of comorbidities may affect the treatment response, but the available data did not allow the analysis of these factors in detail.

Conclusion

This study suggests that patients with pulmonary TB and T2DM had a longer time to negative sputum M. tuberculosis conversion, and male sex was also associated with the prolonged time. Thus, enhanced monitoring and personalized treatment may be needed for pulmonary TB patients with comorbid T2DM and male TB patients in order to improve clinical outcomes for these patients.

Data Sharing Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

The study was funded by Project of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission (ZD2022041 to X.S.), Suzhou City Key Clinical Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Special Project (LCZX 202215 to J.Z., LCZX202216-to P.T.), Respiratory Infectious Diseases Clinical Medical Center of Suzhou, China (Szlcyxzx202108-to M.Y.), and Gusu Health Talents Project (GSWS2022086-to J.Z.), Science and Technology Development Plan of Suzhou Science and Technology Bureau (SKY2022060-to P.T.).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Furin J, Cox H, Pai M. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1642–1656. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30308-3

2. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva: Wold Health Organization; 2022.

3. Wang Q, Zhu J, Zhang L, Xie L. Regional and epidemiological characteristics of tuberculosis and treatment outcomes in West China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1254579.

4. Collaborators GBDD. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203–234. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6

5. Wang L, Peng W, Zhao Z, et al. Prevalence and treatment of diabetes in China, 2013–2018. JAMA. 2021;326(24):2498–2506. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.22208

6. Okdahl T, Wegeberg A-M, Pociot F, et al. Low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study from a Danish diabetes outpatient clinic. BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e062188. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062188

7. Berbudi A, Rahmadika N, Tjahjadi AI, Ruslami R. Type 2 diabetes and its impact on the immune system. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(5):442–449. doi:10.2174/1573399815666191024085838

8. Casqueiro J, Casqueiro J, Alves C. Infections in patients with diabetes mellitus: a review of pathogenesis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16 Suppl 1(Suppl1):S27–S36. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.94253

9. Delgado-Sanchez G, Garcia-Garcia L, Castellanos-Joya M, et al. Association of pulmonary tuberculosis and diabetes in Mexico: analysis of the national tuberculosis registry 2000–2012. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129312

10. Jeon CY, Murray MB, Williams B. Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of active tuberculosis: a systematic review of 13 observational studies. PLoS Med. 2008;5(7):e152. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050152

11. Kapur A, Harries AD. The double burden of diabetes and tuberculosis - public health implications. Diabet Res Clin Pract. 2013;101(1):10–19. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.001

12. Lonnroth K, Roglic G, Harries AD. Improving tuberculosis prevention and care through addressing the global diabetes epidemic: from evidence to policy and practice. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(9):730–739. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70109-3

13. Shi G, Zhu N, Qiu L, et al. Impact of the 2020 China diabetes society guideline on the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and eligibility for antidiabetic treatment in China. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:6639–6645. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S331948

14. Faurholt-Jepsen D, Range N, PrayGod G, et al. Diabetes is a strong predictor of mortality during tuberculosis treatment: a prospective cohort study among tuberculosis patients from Mwanza, Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(7):822–829. doi:10.1111/tmi.12120

15. Niazi AK, Kalra S. Diabetes and tuberculosis: a review of the role of optimal glycemic control. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11(1):28. doi:10.1186/2251-6581-11-28

16. van Crevel R, Critchley JA. The interaction of diabetes and tuberculosis: translating research to policy and practice. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021;6(1). doi:10.3390/tropicalmed6010008

17. Baker MA, Harries AD, Jeon CY, et al. The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9(81). doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-81

18. Gautam S, Shrestha N, Mahato S, et al. Diabetes among tuberculosis patients and its impact on tuberculosis treatment in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2113. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81057-2

19. Tong X, Wang D, Wang H, et al. Clinical features in pulmonary tuberculosis patients combined with diabetes mellitus in China: an observational study. Clin Respir J. 2021;15(9):1012–1018. doi:10.1111/crj.13405

20. Wu Q, Wang M, Zhang Y, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and their influencing factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a survey study from drug resistance surveillance in East China. Front Public Health. 2021;9:777000.

21. Wang CS, Yang CJ, Chen HC, et al. Impact of type 2 diabetes on manifestations and treatment outcome of pulmonary tuberculosis. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(2):203–210. doi:10.1017/S0950268808000782

22. Ma Y, Huang ML, Li T, et al. Role of diabetes mellitus on treatment effects in drug-susceptible initial pulmonary tuberculosis patients in China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2017;30(9):671–675. doi:10.3967/bes2017.089

23. Kuo MC, Lin SH, Lin CH, et al. Type 2 diabetes: an independent risk factor for tuberculosis: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78924. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078924

24. Ministry of Health People’s Republic of China. Guidelines for Implementing the National Tuberculosis Control Program in China. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Publishing House; 2008.

25. Ministry of Health People’s Republic of China. Diagnostic Criteria for Pulmonary Tuberculosis (WS 288–2008). Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House Press; 2008.

26. Wu J, You N, Zhu L, Lu L, Liu Q. Research progress of pulmonary tuberculosis with diabetesq. Chin Trop Med. 2022;22(08):712–717.

27. Kennedy N, Berger L, Curram J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a drug regimen that includes ciprofloxacin for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(5):827–833. doi:10.1093/clinids/22.5.827

28. Alfarisi O, Mave V, Gaikwad S, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tuberculosis treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(11). doi:10.1128/AAC.01383-18

29. Chidambaram V, Tun NL, Majella MG, et al. Male sex is associated with worse microbiological and clinical outcomes following tuberculosis treatment: a retrospective cohort study, a systematic review of the literature, and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(9):1580–1588. doi:10.1093/cid/ciab527

30. Neyrolles O, Quintana-Murci L. Sexual inequality in tuberculosis. PLoS Med. 2009;6(12):e1000199. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000199

31. Chu Y, Soodeen-Lalloo AK, Huang J, et al. Sex disparity in severity of lung lesions in newly identified tuberculosis is age-associated. Front Med. 2019;6:163. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00163

32. Tan W, Soodeen-Lalloo AK, Chu Y, et al. Sex influences the association between haemostasis and the extent of lung lesions in tuberculosis. Biol Sex Differ. 2018;9(1):44. doi:10.1186/s13293-018-0203-9

33. Gupta KB, Gupta R, Atreja A, Verma M, Vishvkarma S. Tuberculosis and nutrition. Lung India. 2009;26(1):9–16. doi:10.4103/0970-2113.45198

34. Sinha P, Ponnuraja C, Gupte N, et al. Impact of undernutrition on tuberculosis treatment outcomes in India: a multicenter, prospective, cohort analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(8):1483–1491. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac915

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.