Back to Journals » Open Access Rheumatology: Research and Reviews » Volume 18
Insights into TNXB-Related Classical-Like Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome: A Study of Polish Patients
Authors Junkiert-Czarnecka A
, Pilarska-Deltow M, Kacprzak MM, Łobodzińska A, Sobczyńska-Tomaszewska A, Linkowska K, Grzybowski T, Haus O
Received 16 November 2025
Accepted for publication 21 February 2026
Published 25 March 2026 Volume 2026:18 574513
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S574513
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Tamer Gheita
Anna Junkiert-Czarnecka,1 Maria Pilarska-Deltow,1 Magdalena M Kacprzak,2 Agnieszka Łobodzińska,2 Agnieszka Sobczyńska-Tomaszewska,2 Katarzyna Linkowska,3 Tomasz Grzybowski,3 Olga Haus1
1Department of Clinical Genetics, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland; 2MEDGEN Medical Centre, Warsaw, Poland; 3Department of Forensic Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
Correspondence: Anna Junkiert-Czarnecka, Department of Clinical Genetics, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland, Email [email protected]
Objective: Ehlers–Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a heterogeneous group of heritable connective tissue disorders with diverse clinical and genetic backgrounds. Classical-like EDS (clEDS, OMIM 606408) is an extremely rare autosomal recessive subtype caused by biallelic variants in TNXB. Fewer than 100 cases have been described worldwide. This study aimed to identify and characterise TNXB-related variants in two Polish patients with clinical features suggestive of clEDS.
Methods: Two male patients, aged 13 and 14 years, underwent comprehensive genetic testing, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a connective tissue gene panel, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), and Sanger sequencing. Family segregation analysis was performed to confirm compound heterozygosity.
Results: NGS and confirmatory analyses identified compound heterozygous TNXB variants: c.[7222C>T];[8780T>C], p.[Pro2408Ser];[Ile2927Thr] in Patient 1, and c.[5947_5948delinsTT];[8300C>T], p.[Glu1983Leu];[Thr2767Ile] in Patient 2. Both variants were located in non-homologous TNXB exons, minimising the risk of misinterpretation due to pseudogene sequences. The clinical presentations of both patients were consistent with the major diagnostic criteria for classical-like EDS.
Conclusion: This report presents the first genetically confirmed Polish patients with a classical-like form of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, expanding the known clinical and molecular spectrum of TNXB-related EDS. Our findings reinforce the notion that heterozygous TNXB variants, particularly frameshift alterations, may occasionally contribute to mild connective tissue manifestations in carriers, underscoring the complexity of genotype–phenotype correlations in this rare disorder.
Keywords: Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, TNXB, connective tissue disorders, genetic testing, next-generation sequencing, classical-like EDS
Introduction
Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous group of heritable, non-inflammatory connective tissue disorders. The 2017 International Classification of EDS recognises 13 subtypes caused by pathogenic variants in 19 genes. These genes encode structural proteins critical for connective tissue integrity, including various types of collagen, proteins involved in collagen metabolism, and molecules that help maintain connective tissue stability. Among EDS subtypes are the more common classical (cEDS), vascular EDS (vEDS), and the hypermobile (hEDS) and rare types, eg, classical-like EDS (clEDS) (OMIM 606408).1,2
Classical-like EDS is an extremely rare type of EDS, up to now, less than 100 patients have been described3–9 clEDS is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the TNXB gene (NM_019105.6). The major criteria of clEDS include hyperextensible, velvety skin without atrophic scarring; generalised joint hypermobility (GJH), which may or may not include recurrent dislocations; and a tendency for easy bruising or spontaneous ecchymoses. The minor criteria include: foot deformities, leg oedema, mild proximal and distal muscle weakness, axonal polyneuropathy, hand and foot muscle atrophy, acrogeric hands, mallet finger(s), clinodactyly, brachydactyly, vaginal/uterus/rectal prolapse. To meet the diagnostic criteria for clEDS, a patient must meet all three major criteria and have a family history compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance.1,2,10
The TNXB gene, mapped on chromosome 6 (6p21.33-p21.32), encodes the extracellular matrix protein (ECM) tenascin-X. The gene is located near the pseudogene TNXA, which shares over 97% sequence similarity with the 3′ end of TNXB (exons 32–44, excluding exon 35), making variant detection challenging. The high homology between these genes can lead to non-allelic homologous recombination, resulting in hybrid genes and complicating genetic analysis.6–8
Tenascin-X, a protein encoded by the TNXB gene, is a member of the tenascin family of extracellular matrix glycoproteins, which are crucial for tissue architecture and function. Tenascin-X is primarily expressed in connective tissues and is critical for ECM organisation and cellular interactions. Biochemically, tenascin-X is a large, modular protein with several domains, including fibronectin-type III repeats, which enable it to bind to various ECM components, such as collagen and elastin. These interactions help organise and stabilise the ECM, which is essential for the mechanical properties of connective tissues, including elasticity and tensile strength.5,6,11
One of the primary roles of tenascin-X in the ECM is to modulate collagen fibril assembly. It interacts with collagen types I and III, facilitating proper alignment and stability of collagen fibres.
This interaction is fundamental to the structural integrity of tissues and organs such as the skin, joints, and blood vessels. Additionally, tenascin-X influences elastin fibres, which provide elasticity to tissues, allowing them to return to their original shape after stretching. This function is crucial in tissues such as the skin and blood vessels, which must withstand mechanical stress.7,12,13
Tenascin-X also contributes to ECM remodelling by interacting with proteoglycans and regulating the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). This regulation facilitates ECM remodelling during processes such as tissue repair and wound healing, where the ECM must remain both adaptable and structurally stable to support proper tissue function and integrity.12,13
The diagnosis of classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (clEDS) is based on clinical evaluation in combination with molecular testing. This includes DNA sequencing techniques such as Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), Sanger sequencing, and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), which are used to identify homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the TNXB gene.
Materials and Methods
The study included two patients (two males, aged 13–14 years) with a clinically established diagnosis of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome with suspicion of its classical-like type. The study was approved by the local Bioethics Committee of Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University. Institutional approval covered both the conduct of the study and the publication of the case details. Written informed consent for genetic testing and for publication of clinical data was obtained from the patients’ parents. The patients underwent Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) using a targeted connective tissue gene panel, followed by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) analysis. NGS findings were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Upon identification of TNXB mutations, family segregation analysis was performed to determine whether the variants were located in cis or in trans. The clinical characteristics of the patients and their pedigrees are presented below.
Patient 1
The 13-year-old boy fulfilled the clEDS major criteria: hyperextensible skin with no atrophic scarring, generalised joint hypermobility with no dislocations, and easy bruising. Additionally, the patient presented with one minor criterion: brachydactyly. Other symptoms included a gothic palate, kyphosis, valgus foot, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple food intolerances, tachycardia, microalbuminuria, MCAS (mast cell activation syndrome) (diagnosis not confirmed), and non-EDS-related asthma.
The patient is the only live-born child of non-consanguineous parents. The mother had a history of four previous pregnancy losses, all occurring in the early weeks of gestation due to unknown causes. He was born at term via cesarean section (due to a foetal bradycardia) with a birth weight of 2890g and length of 53cm. No abnormalities in psychomotor development were observed; the child began walking around 12–13 months. The patient underwent rehabilitation at the age of 7 due to foot valgus.
The patient’s parents were carriers of heterozygous TNXB variants; the mother had c.8780T>C, and the father had c.7222C>T. Parents did not present any symptoms of clEDS. The mother was diagnosed with hypothyroidism. The patient’s pedigree is presented in Figure 1.
Patient 2
The 14-year-old boy met all three major criteria for clEDS: hyperextensible skin without atrophic scarring, generalised joint hypermobility (without dislocations), and easy bruising. Additional EDS symptoms included a gothic palate, scoliosis, flat feet, and muscle hypotonia. Other clinical data included: ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
The patient was born to a non-consanguineous marriage as the first child from the first pregnancy. He was delivered preterm at 35 weeks of gestation, with a birth weight of 2390 g and a length of 48 cm. No abnormalities in psychomotor development were observed. He began walking at approximately 14 months of age. Rehabilitation was initiated from the first weeks of life due to muscle hypotonia.
The patient’s mother was diagnosed with hypothyroidism and exhibited mild joint hypermobility. The father did not present any symptoms of clEDS. The patient’s pedigree is presented in Figure 2.
Methods
Whole genomic DNA was extracted from nucleated cells using silica gel column methods according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen) and Prepito TM for sequencing (NGS and Sanger), as well as for the MLPA assay.
A targeted next-generation sequencing was performed using a targeted multigene custom panel including genes ADAMTS2, AEBP1, ATP7A, B3GALT6, B4GALT7, BGN, C1R, C1S, CHST14, COL12A1, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL2A1, COL3A1, COL5A1, COL5A2, CRTAP, DSE, FBN1, FKBP14, FLNA, P3H1, PLOD1, PRDM5, SLC39A13, SMAD3, TGFB2, TGFB3, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, TNXB, ZNF469. The sequencing library preparation was performed using SureSelectXT Custom (Agilent). The sample was sequenced with Illumina technology on a MiSeq sequencer with 2 × 75 bp reads. Demultiplexing of the sequencing reads was performed with Illumina’s bcl2fastq2 v2.19.0. Adapters were trimmed with Skewer version 0.2.9.14 BWA-MEM aligned the reads to the GRCh37/hg19 reference sequence.15 Read duplicates were removed using Picard 2.18.2 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Variant call was performed with GATK v 4.0.3.0 HaplotypeCaller16,17 and FreeBayes (v1.2.0-2-g29c4002).18 Variants have been annotated with databases (i) VEP97:19 annotations Sift, Polyphen2, (ii) dbNSFPv4.0:20 annotations MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, DANN, FATHMM, (iii) ESP6500, (iv) GnomAD, (v) dbSNP, (vi) ClinVar and (vii) 1000 Genomes.
Sanger Sequencing
Single-nucleotide variants (SNV), small deletions/insertions and familial segregation were revealed by Sanger sequencing on a 3130/3130XL Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystem) using a BigDye Direct Cycle Sequencing Kit, specific primers and a BigDye XTerminator Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
MLPA
Copy number variations (CNVs) detected in NGS were confirmed by MLPA using a SALSA MLPA Kit P155-D2 (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The kit includes 15 probes for exons 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 23, 26, 31 and 35 of the TNXB gene. Electrophoresis was conducted on a 3130/3130XL Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystem), and the data were analysed with GeneMarker (SoftGenetics).
Results
Genetic testing for TNXB gene mutations was conducted in patients with clinically diagnosed clEDS and their families. The analyses revealed compound heterozygous variants in the TNXB gene among the tested patients. No structural variants were detected using MLPA.
Patient 1 was a compound heterozygote carrier. TNXB c.[7222C>T];[8780T>C], p.[Pro2408Ser][Ile2927Thr]. TNXB variant c.7222C>T was not recorded in the dbSNP and gnomAD databases; population frequency was not determined. Variant TNXB c.8780T>C was described in dbSNP with the number rs781570593 and was deposited in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.00003 (in the European non-Finnish population). Neither variant was deposited in the LOVD database, and neither has been described in clEDS patients. According to the sequence (NM_019105.6), variants were localised in exons 21 and 25, respectively. Both patients’ parents were carriers of single variants: the father carried TNXB c.7222C>T, and the mother carried TNXB c.8780T>C; neither parent presented any symptoms of clEDS. This result confirms the patient’s carrier status and determines the trans configuration of variants on both alleles. Electrophoregrams from Sanger sequencing are shown in Figure 3.
|
Figure 3 Sanger sequencing results of the patient and his parents. An arrow indicates the mutation site. |
Patient 2 harboured a compound heterozygous variant. TNXB c.[5947_5948delinsTT];[8300C>T], p.[p.Glu1983Leu];[p.Thr2767Ile]. The first change, c.5947_5948delinsTT, was not recorded in dbSNP or gnomAD. Population frequency was not evaluated. The mother and maternal grandfather were carriers of c.5947_5948delinsTT, a heterozygous variant, and exhibited mild joint hypermobility. Testing for a potential second mutation in the TNXB gene or pathogenic variants in any gene associated with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome or other connective tissue disorders revealed negative results. The patient’s paternal grandmother and aunt were not carriers of c.5947_5948delinsTT and did not present any symptoms of clEDS.
The second alteration, c.8300C>T, was set in dbSNP with the number rs201649053 and the gnomAD database with a population frequency of 0.0001 (in the European non-Finnish population). It was not placed in the LOVD registry. Segregation analysis revealed that the father was a carrier of the c.8300C>T variant with no symptoms of clEDS. Electrophoregrams from Sanger sequencing are shown in Figure 4.
|
Figure 4 Sanger sequencing results for the patient, his parents, and his grandfather. An arrow indicates the mutation site. |
Clinical characteristics and comparison among the patients are described in Table 1.
|
Table 1 Clinical Features of All Tested Patients |
Discussion
This study presents the first Polish patients clinically diagnosed with clEDS, whose diagnoses were subsequently confirmed by the identification of pathogenic TNXB gene variants. Analysis of the inheritance patterns provides additional insight into this condition’s clinical variability and genetic background. Diagnosis of clEDS is challenging due to the TNXA pseudogene, which shares high sequence similarity with TNXB. This homology increases the risk of diagnostic errors, particularly in Next-Generation sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and MLPA. However, in our study, the identified TNXB variants were located in non-homologous exons, which minimised the risk of misdiagnosis.5,7
The identified variants expand the mutational spectrum associated with clEDS. All patients carried TNXB mutations previously unreported in clEDS, including missense and frameshift variants. Individuals described in earlier studies originated from various populations and did not exhibit recurrent, population-specific variants. Similarly, Polish patients — despite the small cohort — show no evidence of recurrent mutations or population-related patterns. Moreover, no recurrence was observed in the exons affected by mutations, further supporting previous findings that did not identify mutation hotspots linked to specific phenotypic features or population backgrounds.3,5,6,8,9
In Patient 1, a compound heterozygous genotype in the TNXB gene — c.7222C>T (p.Pro2408Ser) and c.8780T>C (p.Ile2927Thr) — was identified, with both variants located in non-homologous exons (21 and 25). The c.7222C>T variant was absent from major population databases, including dbSNP and gnomAD. In contrast, c.8780T>C was reported in dbSNP (rs781570593) and found in gnomAD at a very low frequency (0.00003 in the non-Finnish European population). Neither variant was recorded in the LOVD database, and neither has been previously associated with clEDS. Segregation analysis confirmed that each variant was inherited from a different asymptomatic parent, establishing the trans configuration and supporting a recessive mode of inheritance. Although these variants have not been functionally characterised, their rarity in the general population, presence in functionally relevant exons, and consistency with the patient’s clinical presentation suggest a likely contribution to the disease. This case underscores the importance of considering unreported TNXB variants in patients with a compatible phenotype and highlights the role of segregation analysis in supporting their clinical significance.
In the case of patient 2, a compound heterozygous variants in the TNXB gene were found: c.[5947_5948delinsTT];[8300C>T], located in exons 17 and 24, respectively. The c.5947_5948delinsTT variant represents a novel frameshift mutation predicted to result in a truncated protein and likely undergo nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). This mechanism is consistent with previous reports suggesting that frameshift variants leading to NMD are associated with more severe phenotypes of clEDS patients.6 In contrast, the c.8300C>T variant is a missense substitution observed at low frequency in population databases and is of uncertain clinical significance (VUS). The variants were confirmed to be in trans, consistent with the expected autosomal recessive inheritance pattern of clEDS.
Interestingly, the patient’s mother and maternal grandfather, both heterozygous carriers of the c.5947_5948delinsTT frameshift variant, presented with mild joint hypermobility. No additional pathogenic variants in TNXB or other genes associated with connective tissue disorders were identified. At this stage of the study, it remains unclear whether the mild phenotype observed in heterozygous relatives results from haploinsufficiency, as previously reported in some individuals with heterozygous TNXB mutations, or reflects unrelated etiologies beyond the scope of this study. It is also possible that an undetected pathogenic variant on the second allele (eg, a deep intronic mutation not captured by routine diagnostic methods) may contribute to the phenotype.4,21
The patient’s father, a carrier of the c.8300C>T missense variant, did not exhibit any signs or symptoms consistent with EDS. Similar observations were made in the families of Patients 1 and 2, whose heterozygous parents also harboured TNXB missense variants without phenotypic expression. Yamaguchi et al reported comparable findings, describing mild phenotypes (including skin involvement and joint hypermobility) in heterozygous relatives of clEDS patients with frameshift mutations; however, detailed clinical data were not available for all affected family members.9
These findings together highlight the potential pathogenic role of frameshift variants leading to NMD, such as c.5947_5948delinsTT, and show the variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance seen in heterozygous carriers.6 Due to the small sample size, it is not easy to draw definitive conclusions. Further research is needed to clarify the role of TNXB frameshift mutations in the pathogenesis of mild connective tissue symptoms.
Conclusion
This study presents the first Polish patients diagnosed with classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (clEDS), contributing to the growing knowledge on the disorder’s clinical variability and genetic basis. The identification of variants in non-homologous TNXB exons reduces the risk of diagnostic misinterpretation caused by TNXA pseudogene homology, consistent with previous findings.
Importantly, our results support the observation that heterozygous TNXB mutations — particularly frameshift variants — may be associated with mild connective tissue symptoms in some patients and their relatives. This observation is consistent with previous reports describing mild phenotypes in patients carrying heterozygous TNXB variants.
Despite many years of molecular investigations of EDS patients in our laboratory — including TNXB sequencing and MLPA analysis — only two individuals with compound heterozygous pathogenic TNXB variants have been identified in our cohort. This underscores the extreme rarity of clEDS and the challenges in its genetic diagnosis.
Acknowledgments
Linkowska K., Grzybowski T. and Haus O. were supported by the UMK Research University Excellence Initiative, Poland, for the “Bioinformatics in medical and population genomics” group.
Funding
This work was supported by Excellence Initiative – Research University (IDUB) funds, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work.
References
1. Brady AF, Demirdas S, Fournel-Gigleux S, et al. The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175(1):70–8. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31550
2. Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175(1):8–26. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31552
3. Kaufman CS, Butler MG. A mutation in the TNXB gene causes moderate to severe Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. World J Med Genet. 2016;6(2):17. doi:10.5496/wjmg.v6.i2.17
4. Zweers MC, Bristow J, Steijlen PM, et al. Haploinsufficiency of TNXB is associated with hypermobility type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(1):214–217. doi:10.1086/376564
5. Micale L, Guarnieri V, Augello B, et al. Novel TNXB variants in two Italian patients with classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Genes. 2019;10(12):967. doi:10.3390/genes10120967
6. Rymen D, Ritelli M, Zoppi N, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome due to a novel TNXB variant. Genes. 2019;10(11):843. doi:10.3390/genes10110843
7. Okuda-Ashitaka E, Matsumoto KI. Tenascin-X as a causal gene for classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Front Genet. 2023;14:1107787. doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1107787
8. Green C, Ghali N, Akilapa R, et al. Classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: a clinical description of 20 newly identified individuals with evidence of tissue fragility. Genet Med. 2020;22(10):1576–1582. doi:10.1038/s41436-020-0850-1
9. Yamaguchi T, Yamada K, Nagai S, et al. Clinical and molecular delineation of classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome through a comprehensive next-generation sequencing-based screening system. Front Genet. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1234804
10. Castori M, Tinkle B, Levy H, Grahame R, Malfait F, Hakim A. A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175(1):148–157. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31539
11. van Dijk FS, Ghali N, Demirdas S, Baker D. TNXB-related classical-like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. 1993.
12. Bristow J, Carey W, Egging D, Schalkwijk J. Tenascin‐X, collagen, elastin, and the Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2005;139C(1):24–30. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30071
13. Matsumoto KI, Aoki H. The roles of tenascins in cardiovascular, inflammatory, and heritable connective tissue diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.609752
14. Jiang H, Lei R, Ding SW, Zhu S. Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinf. 2014;15(1):182. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-182
15. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv preprint arXiv:13033997. 2013.
16. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–1303. doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110
17. Poplin R, Ruano-Rubio V, DePristo MA, et al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. 2017.
18. Erik Garrison GM. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Preprint arXiv:12073907. 2012.
19. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):122. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
20. Liu X, Wu C, Li C, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP v3.0: a one-stop database of functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and Splice-Site SNVs. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(3):235–241. doi:10.1002/humu.22932
21. Wilson GN, Tonk VS. Clinical-genomic analysis of 1261 patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome outlines an articulo-autonomic gene network (Entome). Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024;46(3):2620–2643. doi:10.3390/cimb46030166
© 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
