Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 18

Sneddon-Wilkinson Disease Induced by COVID-19 Vaccine: An Unusual Presentation

Authors Cao R ORCID logo, Xu T ORCID logo

Received 21 February 2025

Accepted for publication 24 May 2025

Published 3 June 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1375—1378

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S524100

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg



Riqu Cao, Tianhong Xu

Department of Dermatology, Hangzhou Third People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Tianhong Xu, Department of Dermatology, Hangzhou Third People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Sneddon–Wilkinson disease (SWD) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by distinctive hypopyon pustules that predominantly affect flexural and intertriginous regions. The triggers for the disease are multifarious. Here, we report a case of SWD induced by a COVID-19 vaccine with erythema and crust, which was successfully treated with compound glycyrrhizin, leading to complete remission. And we propose that the mechanism behind vaccine-induced SWD may be associated with the ACE2 expression on keratinocytes.

Keywords: Sneddon–Wilkinson disease, subcorneal pustular dermatosis, vaccine, COVID-19

Introduction

Sneddon–Wilkinson disease (SWD), a rare neutrophilic dermatosis, was first described by SNEDDON and WILKINSON in 1956, now considered as a “classical” subtype of subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD).1 It is characterized by crops of superficial hypopyon vesiculopustules on the trunk, intertriginous and flexural areas of the extremities.2 Skin biopsy shows sterile collections of neutrophils in the uppermost layers of the epidermis.3 The diagnosis is based on the clinical symptoms and histologic findings after excluding other diseases like IgA pemphigus, pustular psoriasis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, etc. Drug exposure history, family history of psoriasis, direct immunofluorescence and histologic feature would contribute to distinguish SWD from other diseases.

The etiology of SWD is unknown, and some researchers view it as a reaction pattern in the skin that may result from systemic diseases, including underlying paraproteinemia, myeloma, or rarely, lymphomas or solid tumors. A few cases of SWD have been associated with systemic infections such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, despite the absence of direct skin involvement.4 Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been reported heterogeneously, including urticaria, vitiligo and erythema nodosum,5–7 here we describe a case of a young woman with SWD secondary to COVID-19 vaccine presenting atypical manifestations that was successfully treated by compound glycyrrhizin with no recurrences.

Case Report

A 29-year-old woman presented to our dermatology department with recurrent erythema and desquamation that she had experienced for four months. She had no significant medical history, apart from the fact that she had received a third dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine 8 days before the eruption.

The rash initially manifested as a dry and flaking skin which did not respond to the application of a moisturizing cream. Two months later, erythematous plaques developed in the groin, antecubital fossae, and periumbilical region (Figure 1a), turning into crusts (Figure 1b). The patient experienced similar but self-resolving symptoms after prior vaccine doses, leading to initial underestimation of the severity of her condition.

Figure 1 (a) Erythema on the chelidon at first. (b) erythematous plaques with annular crust. (c) Subcorneal pustules filled with neutrophils and neutrophils migrate from blood vessels to the underside of the stratum corneum (hematoxylin and eosin, ×10). (d) Follow-up visit without recurrence.

When we examined the patient on the first visit to our department, we observed that the underarms, chelidons, and groins were involved, presenting with circinate superficial scaling, central hyperpigmentation, and peripheral erythema. Laboratory tests, such as an antinuclear antibody panel, blood count values and rheumatoid factors, were normal. Bacterial cultures and serologic tests for pemphigus (anti-desmoglein antibodies) and pemphigoid (BP180 and BP230 antibodies) were negative. A skin biopsy showed the stratum corneum layer split from the rest of the epidermis because of the accumulation of neutrophil above the stratum spinosum, and it could be clearly observed neutrophils migrated from dermal capillaries and clumped together in spinous layer to the subcorneal layer (Figure 1c). No parakeratosis, acanthosis or psoriasiform hyperplasia as well as apparent spongiosis were observed. Directed immunofluorescence staining including IgG, IgM, IgA and C3 were not observed. We confirmed the diagnosis of Sneddon–Wilkinson disease and prescribed a compound glycyrrhizin for 2 months. Erythema had subsided, leaving a slight hyperpigmentation with no adverse effects (Figure 1d). There was no recurrence after 2 years of follow-up, and no flaccid pustules were observed during this period.

Discussion

Sneddon–Wilkinson disease is an inflammatory condition characterized by the infiltration of subcorneal neutrophils.8 The etiology of SWD is not completely clear; some cases are associated with systemic or extracutaneous conditions such as inflammatory disease and hematologic disorders.9 In rare cases, induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection10 and COVID-19 vaccines,11 the affected population associated with COVID-19 in above cases are relatively young with mild symptoms, and the condition could generally be cured with conventional therapy without recurrence. As is known to all, inactivated COVID-19 vaccines contain viruses whose genetic material has been destroyed but can still trigger an immune response,12 we suspect there are certain antigens both COVID-19 virus and vaccine have that could trigger certain SWDs.

Experiments in animals have shown that SARS-CoV-2 virus relies on obligate receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), to enter cells, inducing infection.13 And a high expression of ACE2 has been observed in keratinocytes,14 which indicates that keratinocytes are more likely to be infected by the virus than other cells with less ACE2. Upon infection, infected cells would release inflammatory cytokines to recruit large numbers of granulocytes,15 which may reveal the neutrophil aggregation and pustule formation in SWDs. Since the vaccine of COVID-19 has the similar structure with the COVID-19 virus, the mechanism of vaccine-induced SWD may be the same. In addition, other neutrophilic cutaneous reactions induced by COVID-19 vaccine including Sweet syndrome,16 facial pustular neutrophilic eruption,17 as well as generalized pustular psoriasis18 already have been reported.

Conclusion

In the present case, the patient had a red rash after the first injection of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, but she did not raise concerns, and with increased exposure, the symptoms were more severe, although causality cannot be definitively established, the temporal association with vaccination and absence of other potential triggers strongly suggest a vaccine-related etiology. The case underlines that COVID-19 vaccination may act as a trigger for atypical SWD with a good prognosis following standard treatment, and explains the probable link between SWD and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Patient Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Institutional Review Board Approval

This study received approval from the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Hangzhou Third People’s Hospital and the approval consent number was 2025KA001.

Funding

There is no funding to report.

Disclosure

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Sneddon IB, Wilkinson DS. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis. Br J Dermatol. 1956;68(12):385–394. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1956.tb12774.x

2. Gillihan R, Merritt J, Beers P, Longo MI. Hypopyon pustules of Sneddon-Wilkenson disease. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58(5):605–606. doi:10.1111/ijd.14294

3. Pujol RM, Wang CY, El-Azhary RA, Su WP, Gibson LE, Schroeter AL. Necrolytic migratory erythema: clinicopathologic study of 13 cases. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(1):12–18. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.01844.x

4. Bohelay G, Duong TA, Ortonne N, Chosidow O, Valeyrie-Allanore L. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis triggered by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a rare clinical association. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(5):1022–1025. doi:10.1111/jdv.12446

5. Judd A, Samarakoon U, Wolfson AR, Banerji A, Freeman EE, Blumenthal KG. Urticaria after COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine hesitancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11(3):958–960. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.010

6. Tsai TF, Ng CY. COVID-19 vaccine-associated vitiligo: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary referral center and systematic review. J Dermatol. 2023;50(8):982–989. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.16799

7. Maranini B, Ciancio G, Corazza M, Ruffilli F, Galoppini G, Govoni M. Erythema nodosum after COVID-19 vaccine. Reumatismo. 2022;74(1). doi:10.4081/reumatismo.2022.1475

8. Bonifati C, Trento E, Cordiali Fei P, Muscardin L, Amantea A, Carducci M. Early but not lasting improvement of recalcitrant subcorneal pustular dermatosis (Sneddon-Wilkinson disease) after infliximab therapy: relationships with variations in cytokine levels in suction blister fluids. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30(6):662–665. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01902.x

9. Watts PJ, Khachemoune A. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis: a review of 30 years of progress. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17(6):653–671. doi:10.1007/s40257-016-0202-8

10. Iurillo A, Yumeen S, Imbriano D, et al. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis following SARS-CoV-2 infection. RI Med J. 2023;106(10):51–53.

11. McCoy T, Shamsian D, Pan A, Sivamani RK. Sneddon-Wilkinson disease following COVID-19 vaccination. Dermatol Online J. 2023;29(1). doi:10.5070/D329160218

12. Gao Q, Bao L, Mao H, et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science. 2020;369(6499):77–81. doi:10.1126/science.abc1932

13. Jackson CB, Farzan M, Chen B, Choe H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(1):3–20. doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x

14. Xue X, Mi Z, Wang Z, Pang Z, Liu H, Zhang F. High expression of ACE2 on keratinocytes reveals skin as a potential target for SARS-CoV-2. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(1):206–209.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2020.05.087

15. Liang Y, Li H, Li J, et al. Role of neutrophil chemoattractant CXCL5 in SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced lung inflammatory innate immune response in an in vivo hACE2 transfection mouse model. Zool Res. 2020;41(6):621–631. doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.118

16. Ben Rejeb S, Beltaifa D, Dhaoui A, Derbel F, Bellil K. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induced Sweet syndrome: a case report. Tunis Med. 2021;99(12):1188–1191. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.12.009

17. Merrill ED, Kashem SW, Amerson EH, et al. Association of facial pustular neutrophilic eruption with messenger RNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(9):1128–1130. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2474

18. Elamin S, Hinds F, Tolland J. De novo generalized pustular psoriasis following Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(1):153–155. doi:10.1111/ced.14895

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.