Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18
Successful Treatment of Mucormycosis and Azole-Resistant Aspergillus Coinfection in a Diabetic Patient: A Case Report
Authors Zhao T, Fang Y, Wu Q, Shi M, Ni Y, Zou R, Liu M, Wu W, Su X
Received 1 April 2025
Accepted for publication 18 July 2025
Published 25 July 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 3689—3694
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S530615
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor Mora-Montes
Tingting Zhao,1 Yuan Fang,1 Qiuhui Wu,2 Minke Shi,3 Yueyan Ni,1 Ruyi Zou,1 Mengying Liu,1 Weiwei Wu,4 Xin Su1
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, People’s Republic of China; 4Dinfectome Inc., Nanjing, Jiansu, 210000, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xin Su, Email [email protected]
Objective: To report a case of coinfection with mucormycosis and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in a patient with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, highlighting successfully treated with high-dose posaconazole combined with liposomal amphotericin B and lobectomy.
Methods: A 52-year-old man who presented to our hospital with a 1-month history of fever accompanied by productive cough and sputum. He had type 2 diabetes with poor control of glucose level. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed rapidly progressive multiple cavities and consolidation in the lungs. Sputum culture showed azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, confirmed by whole genome sequencing, which revealed mutations in non-azole target genes (eg, CYP51A was wild-type). Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) at admission detected Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus microsporus, while histopathology of right upper lobe necrotic material on day 18 confirmed mucormycosis. The patients had previously received intravenous voriconazole (400 mg/d) combined with inhaled amphotericin B (10 mg twice daily) for 2 weeks without improvement. Upon admission, initial treatment with isavuconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, and caspofungin was also ineffective. Subsequently, high-dose posaconazole (600 mg/d) combined with liposomal amphotericin B was administered.
Results: Following the initiation of high-dose posaconazole and liposomal amphotericin B, the patient’s temperature normalized, and pulmonary exudates significantly improved. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) showed that posaconazole trough concentrations were maintained at 3– 4 mg/L without significant hepatic or renal toxicity. The main adverse effects observed were hypokalemia and anorexia. After 102 days of antifungal therapy, the patient underwent successful lobectomy, leading to complete resolution of symptoms.
Conclusion: This case demonstrated the good efficacy and safety of high-dose posaconazole combined with liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of azole-resistant Aspergillus and mucormycosis.
Keywords: invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, mucormycosis, azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, high-dose posaconazole, combination therapy
Introduction
The incidence rate of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in severely immunocompromised individuals ranges from 6% to 16%, with published mortality rates reported between 30 and 50%.1 Azole antifungals are the front‐line treatment for IPA, but due to the increase of long-term azole prophylaxis and treatment in immunocompromised patients, azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. is increasing,2 which brings new challenges and difficulties. Mucormycosis is a rare and challenging-to-diagnose fungal infection that often progresses rapidly. In recent years, advancements in molecular biology techniques have enabled increased detection of the disease. Characterized by a high mortality rate, mucormycosis requires timely intervention.3 When coinfection with two fungal species occurs simultaneously, such as azole-resistant Aspergillus and Mucoromycetes, it presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for clinicians. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus is a recognized risk factor for both aspergillosis and mucormycosis, primarily due to hyperglycemia-induced immune dysfunction and vascular damage. Here, we reported a complicated coinfection case of azole-resistant Aspergillus and mucormycosis, which was successful treatment of antifungal combination therapy with high-dose posaconazole (HD-POS) and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB).
Case Report
A 52-year-old man was admitted to our hospital on February 17, 2024, presenting with a one-month history of fever and cough. He had a known medical history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, managed with metformin and glipizide; however, his blood glucose levels remained poorly controlled.
The patient was 170 cm in height and weighed 75 kg. The physical examinations revealed crackles in the right upper lung lobe. Initial computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed groundglass nodules in the bilateral upper lobes (Figure 1A). A follow-up CT scan eight days later showed rapid progression with emerging cavities. Sputum smear tested positive for fungal elements, prompting initiation of intravenous voriconazole (400 mg/day) combined with inhaled amphotericin B (10 mg twice daily) for approximately two weeks. Despite therapy, the patient remained febrile, and subsequent CT imaging revealed enlarged infiltrative shadows and cavitary lesions (Figure 1B). Oral posaconazole (300 mg/day) was administered for three days without resolution of fever.
Upon admission, laboratory tests showed elevated C-reactive protein (81 mg/L) and Aspergillus IgG antibody levels (128.0 IU/L). During bronchoscopy, fungal elements were visualized through brush cytology and microscopic examination (Figure 2). Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) identified Aspergillus fumigatus (5227 reads, average depth 373) and Rhizopus microspores (1366 reads, average depth 195), which was performed on the DIFSEQ-200 platform with 50bp single-end sequencing. Galactomannan antigen (GM) testing of BALF was elevated at 3.4. Both BALF and sputum cultures grew Aspergillus fumigatus resistant to voriconazole (MIC = 4 mg/L) and itraconazole (MIC = 16 mg/L), with reduced susceptibility to posaconazole (MIC = 1 mg/L). Whole genome sequencing (Average sequencing depth 48X) of the isolate revealed mutations, but none in the azole target gene CYP51A (Table 1).
|
Table 1 Mutations of This Strain of Aspergillus Fumigatus |
|
Figure 2 Bronchoscope brushing cells in cytological diagnosis: fungal hyphae can be seen (red arrow). |
Antifungal therapy was escalated to intravenous amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD; 5mg/kg/d, 300 mg/day), inhaled amphotericin B (10 mg/day), and isavuconazole (600 mg/day for 48 hours, then 200 mg/day). Fever transiently resolved but recurred at 39°C in the second week. Caspofungin was added as combination therapy without clinical improvement. Repeat bronchoscopy on hospital day 18 identified necrotic debris obstructing the right upper apical and left upper lobe bronchi (Figure 3A and B). The histopathology of necrotic material showed mucormycosis. Endobronchial instillations of amphotericin B deoxycholate were performed for 3 times, but this approach did not appear to work. On day 19, ABCD was substituted with L-AmB (6mg/kg/d, 400 mg/day) due to severe nausea, vomiting, and hypokalemia. GM of BALF was also elevated at 3.36 on day 18 and 1.45 on day 24. Isavuconazole was increased to 600 mg/day on day 26, resulting in mild fever reduction but exacerbated gastrointestinal toxicity. By day 31, hemoptysis developed alongside worsening infiltrates and pleural effusion (Figure 1C). Surgical resection was declined due to bleeding and infection risks.
On day 35, the antifungal strategy was adjusted to the intravenous injection of high-dose posaconazole (HD-POS, 300 mg bid) combined with L-AmB. The patient’s hemoptysis improved and body temperature gradually dropped to normal after 1 week. The follow-up CT revealed improvement of the infiltrative shadows (Figure 1D). The patient then continued HD-POS on 51st day as a monotherapy. The main side-effect was anorexia and hypokalemia. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of POS was administrated. The POS trough concentrations maintained 3–4mg/L. On day 70, sputum culture had finally turned negative. A follow-up CT scan on day 81 demonstrated continued improvement (Figure 1E). The patient’s physical condition was further improving, and surgical resection will be performed after the further reduction in size of consolidation. By day 126, a subsequent CT scan (Figure 1F) revealed stabilization of the consolidation, which was comparable in size to the findings observed on day 81. Given the patient’s significantly improved clinical status, a left lingular segmentectomy and right upper lobectomy (Figure 3C) were performed via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) on June 25 (137 days after initial admission). Postoperatively, the patient received a high-dose posaconazole (HD-POS) regimen for 10 days, followed by a standard dose of posaconazole (300 mg once daily) for 3 weeks. Follow-up radiological evaluation one month later showed no evidence of active infection (Figure 1G), and the patient was deemed cured. Notably, after admission to our hospital, blood glucose levels were managed with Insulin Aspart and Insulin Glargine. Fasting blood glucose ranged from 4.7 to 9.3 mmol/L, and postprandial blood glucose ranged from 5.1 to 14.8 mmol/L.
Discussion
Aspergillus fumigatus is a ubiquitous pathogen which can cause aspergillosis, especially in immunodeficient patients. Azoles have been the frontline of therapy in infections with Aspergillus fumigatus. In recent years, the emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus has become a serious problem worldwide.4 The frequency of itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates was 4.4% in China.5 The development of resistance may be linked to either long-term use of azole antifungals in patients, but it can also occur in newly treated patients which is associated with selection pressure of the fungicides in the environment.6 In azole-naive patients, the resistance maybe responsible to the extensive use of azole fungicides in the environment.7 Mucormycosis, a rare fungal infection primarily affecting the lungs or the rhino-orbital-cerebral area, particularly occurs in immunocompromised individuals or those with diabetes mellitus.8 Within the Mucorales order, Rhizopus species are the most frequent etiology of mucormycosis, with Rhizopus microsporus being a significant pathogen. It can induce acute invasive infections in humans by germinating and evading the host’s immune defenses.9 The patient we reported was newly diagnosed and suffered from co-infection of Aspergillus and mucormycosis (Rhizopus microspores), which posed a greater therapeutic challenge.
As recommended by Ullmann et al, combination therapy with HD-POS and L-AmB is a viable strategy for azole-resistant aspergillosis.10 In this case, the combination therapy was started immediately after the co-infection was confirmed, and L-AmB was given in high dose (400mg/d), but the therapeutic response was suboptimal. In the absence of effective antimicrobial agents, escalating drug doses to achieve higher plasma concentrations may be a viable strategy. In a case report with a lung transplant recipient, the concentration of isavuconazole did not achieve steady state plasma concentration with 600 mg/d within first 2 days and maintenance dose of 200 mg once daily. Then the daily dose was increased to 600 mg/d for 2 weeks, achieving a steady-state level and demonstrating good efficacy and safety.11 In our case, the patient’s body temperature normalized within the first week, likely due to elevated plasma concentrations of isavuconazole. However, when the dose was increased to 600 mg/day in the fourth week, only a slight reduction in body temperature was observed, while chest imaging and symptoms remained unchanged. Additionally, the patient experienced severe nausea and vomiting, prompting consideration of posaconazole (POS).
POS is characterized by its high tissue concentration, with intracellular levels reported to be 40- to 50-fold higher than extracellular levels in previous studies.12 This suggests that POS can achieve higher concentrations in lung tissue. Schauwvlieghe et al retrospectively evaluated the use of oral HD-POS (600 mg/day, with an interquartile range of 400–750 mg/day) in patients with azole-resistant aspergillosis and other refractory mold infections, demonstrating favorable efficacy and tolerable side effect.13 They reported trough plasma concentrations of POS reaching 3–4 mg/L, significantly higher than the guideline-recommended levels (>1 mg/L).14 According to this case, HD-POS (600 mg/day) was initiated on day 35 after admission, with continued administration of L-AmB. TDM confirmed a steady-state plasma concentration of POS at 3–4 mg/L. Subsequently, the patient’s body temperature gradually normalized, and CT imaging showed significant improvement. The primary adverse events (AEs) were anorexia and hypokalemia, consistent with previously reported findings.13
Resistance mechanisms of Aspergillus involve Cyp51 genes, efflux pumps and other signaling pathways related to biofilm formation, mitochondrial or stress response, while which factor plays a major role, more isolates are needed to study.15 The large majority of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates harbour TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations in the Cyp51A gene,13,16 but no mutations were found in the Cyp51A gene in our report. The gene hmg1 has been involved in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway which is similar to Cyp51 genes.4 Cdr1B gene and AtrF gene are both ATP Binding Cassette transporters which mediate the efflux of toxic compounds associated with azole resistance.7 Other mutations in our case including Cyp52A, Cyp54A, Cyp55A, Cyp56A, Cyp60A have not been reported. The resistance mechanism needs further study.
Conclusion
For patients with Aspergillus infection who are failed in initial treatment, drug resistance testing should be performed immediately and mixed infection should be considered at the same time. This case of co-infection with azole-resistant Aspergillus and Rhizopus microsporus underscores the need for comprehensive microbial profiling in refractory fungal infections. Combination therapy with HD-POS and L-AmB may be a viable treatment strategy in such cases. Additionally, TDM for posaconazole is crucial to prevent drug-related AEs. This case highlights the importance of microbial documentation, including culture, serum, and tNGS, in guiding therapy for fungal co-infections. Further investigation into the resistance mechanisms of Aspergillus is necessary to inform optimal treatment approaches.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Consent for Publication
This case was a part of routine clinical practice at our institution and didn’t require specific approval to publish the case details. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank Dinfectome Inc., Nanjing, China for providing the help in targeted next-generation sequencing.
Funding
This work was supported by the Project of Natural Science Foundation of China (82270019, 82070011), and General Program of Clinical Research, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (2023-LCYJ-MS-18).
Disclosure
WWW is the employee of Dinfectome Inc. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Lamberink H, Wagemakers A, Sigaloff KC, van Houdt R, de Jonge NA, van Dijk K. The impact of the updated EORTC/MSG criteria on the classification of hematological patients with suspected invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(8):1120–1125. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.026
2. Bosetti D, Neofytos D. Invasive aspergillosis and the impact of azole-resistance. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2023;1–10. doi:10.1007/s12281-023-00459-z
3. Cornely OA, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Arenz D, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(12):e405–e421. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30312-3
4. Rivelli Zea SM, Toyotome T. Azole‐resistant Aspergillus fumigatus as an emerging worldwide pathogen. Microbiol Immunol. 2022;66(3):135–144. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12957
5. Deng S, Zhang L, Ji Y, et al. Triazole phenotypes and genotypic characterization of clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in China. Emerging Microbes Infect. 2017;6(1):1–6. doi:10.1038/emi.2017.97
6. Dauchy C, Bautin N, Nseir S, et al. Emergence of Aspergillus fumigatus azole resistance in azole‐naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their homes. Indoor Air. 2018;28(2):298–306. doi:10.1111/ina.12436
7. Jeanvoine A, Rocchi S, Bellanger A, Reboux G, Millon L. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus: a global phenomenon originating in the environment? Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses. 2020;50(5):389–395. doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2019.07.014
8. Yuan F, Chen J, Liu F, Dang Y, Kong Q, Sang H. Successful treatment of pulmonary mucormycosis caused by Rhizopus microsporus with posaconazole. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26:1–4. doi:10.1186/s40001-021-00602-x
9. Itabangi H, Sephton-Clark PC, Tamayo DP, et al. A bacterial endosymbiont of the fungus Rhizopus microsporus drives phagocyte evasion and opportunistic virulence. Curr Biol. 2022;32(5):1115–1130.e1116. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.028
10. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S, et al. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:e1–e38. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.002
11. Dvořáčková E, Zajacová A, Havlín J, et al. Demonstration of the Rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring of Isavuconazole: a case report with a lung transplant recipient. Prague Medical Report. 2023;124(4):444–448. doi:10.14712/23362936.2023.34
12. Campoli P, Al Abdallah Q, Robitaille R, et al. Concentration of antifungal agents within host cell membranes: a new paradigm governing the efficacy of prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(12):5732–5739. doi:10.1128/AAC.00637-11
13. Schauwvlieghe AF, Buil JB, Verweij PE, et al. High‐dose posaconazole for azole‐resistant aspergillosis and other difficult‐to‐treat mould infections. Mycoses. 2020;63(2):122–130. doi:10.1111/myc.13028
14. Ashbee HR, Barnes RA, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Gorton R, Hope WW. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(5):1162–1176. doi:10.1093/jac/dkt508
15. Pérez-Cantero A, López-Fernández L, Guarro J, Capilla J. Azole resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus: update and recent advances. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(1):105807. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.09.011
16. Snelders E, Camps SM, Karawajczyk A, et al. Triazole fungicides can induce cross-resistance to medical triazoles in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31801. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031801
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
