Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 18
Tofacitinib as a Novel Therapeutic Option for Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Case Report and Mechanistic Insights
Authors Li X, Zhang J, Zhang L, Gu H, Zhai Z, Zhang M
Received 29 April 2025
Accepted for publication 3 August 2025
Published 18 August 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1953—1958
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S536993
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg
Xiang Li,1 Juan Zhang,2 Lian Zhang,1 Hongzhi Gu,1 Zhifang Zhai,1 Mingwang Zhang1
1Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pediatrics, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Zhifang Zhai, Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Mingwang Zhang, Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Abstract: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV), a life-threatening autoimmune blistering disorder mediated by pathogenic anti-desmoglein antibodies, manifests clinically with extensive cutaneous and mucosal vesicles, bullae, and erosions. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, a substantial subset of patients develop refractory disease requiring advanced therapies. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/3 inhibitor, demonstrates broad immunomodulatory effects through interference with cytokine signaling pathways. We report the case of a 50-year-old male with recalcitrant PV who achieved sustained remission following adjunctive tofacitinib therapy. Combination therapy with tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) and prednisone (60 mg/day) enabled successful corticosteroids withdrawal within 5 months, achieving complete clinical remission (PDAI=0) and serological improvement (Dsg1/Dsg3 antibodies reduced by 64.5%/75.8%). Longitudinal immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed attenuated phospho-STAT3 and phospho-STAT6 in post-treatment lesional skin compared to baseline. Proteomic profiling of PV lesions (n=3) versus healthy controls (n=3) identified 198 differentially expressed proteins (fold change > 1.5, p< 0.05), with KEGG pathway analysis revealing predominant enrichment in JAK-STAT signaling, IL-17-mediated inflammation, and lymphocyte differentiation pathways. Independent validation in an expanded cohort (5 PV vs 5 controls) confirmed constitutive JAK-STAT hyperactivation: phospho-STAT3 (7.2± 1.64 vs 1± 0, p< 0.001) and phospho-STAT6 (9.6± 1.34 vs 1.2± 0.45, p< 0.001) were markedly elevated in untreated PV lesions. These findings posit tofacitinib as a promising steroid-sparing agent in PV management, potentially through multimodal inhibition of pathogenic cytokine networks. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these observations.
Keywords: pemphigus vulgaris, JAK-STAT pathway, tofacitinib, targeted immunotherapy, proteomic profiling
Introduction
Pemphigus vulgaris (PV), characterized by IgG autoantibodies against desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3, disrupts epidermal adhesion through complex immune dysregulation.1 Emerging evidence implicates Th2/Th17 cytokine polarization (IL-4, IL-17, IL-21) and downstream JAK-STAT signaling in sustaining autoantibody production and inflammatory cascades.2–5 Tofacitinib mechanistically targets this axis by selectively inhibiting JAK1 and JAK3, thereby disrupting signaling pathways critical for B-cell activation and differentiation into autoantibody-producing plasma cells, including those mediated by IL-4, IL-10, and IL-21.6,7 Despite theoretical rationale, clinical evidence supporting JAK inhibition in PV remains limited to anecdotal reports.8,9 This study provides the first comprehensive characterization of tofacitinib’s therapeutic potential in steroid-dependent PV, coupled with mechanistic insights from proteomic and phosphoprotein analyses.
Case Report and Analysis of Molecular Mechanism
Case Report
A 50-year-old male with a 5-year history of PV presented with recurrent erosive lesions involving the trunk and limbs. The diagnosis was histologically confirmed through hematoxylin-eosin staining demonstrating suprabasal acantholysis, direct immunofluorescence showing IgG/C3 deposition, and elevated serum anti-Dsg1/Dsg3 antibody titers (173.5 U/mL and 175.67 U/mL, respectively). Despite previous therapies including cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine, the patient experienced repeated relapses during prednisone tapering (40–25 mg/day). At current presentation, physical examination revealed extensive erythematous plaques with multiple ruptured vesicles and crusted erosions, corresponding to a Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) score of 19 (Figure 1a and b).
The patient was initiated on combination therapy with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily and prednisone 60 mg daily. Progressive clinical improvement was observed during follow-up: by the third month of treatment, prednisone had been successfully tapered to 10 mg daily with resolution of active blistering, and complete clinical remission (PDAI=0) was achieved by month five (Figure 1c and d). Concomitant serological analysis revealed a 64.5% reduction in anti-Dsg1 (61.6 U/mL) and 75.8% reduction in anti-Dsg3 (42.52 U/mL) antibody levels. Despite persistent seropositivity exceeding normal thresholds, prednisone was discontinued at month five while maintaining tofacitinib monotherapy (5 mg twice daily). Notably, no new lesions emerged throughout the treatment course, with sustained remission observed during subsequent follow-up. The therapeutic regimen demonstrated favorable tolerability, with no hematologic abnormalities, hepatic dysfunction, or infectious complications reported over six months of observation.
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Efficacy of Tofacitinib Treatment
Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of lesional skin biopsies obtained from the patient before treatment and at 5-month follow-up (PDAI=0) demonstrated reduced expression of phospho-STAT3 and phospho-STAT6 following combinational administration (Figure 2a–d).
Proteomic profiling of lesional skin from 3 PV patients and 3 healthy controls identified 198 differentially expressed proteins (fold change >1.5, p<0.05). Notably, STAT1, STAT3, and STAT6 were upregulated in PV lesions compared to controls (Figure 3a and Table S1). KEGG pathway analysis revealed enrichment of these proteins in immune-related pathways including JAK-STAT signaling, IL-17-mediated inflammation, and lymphocyte differentiation pathways (Figure 3b and Table S2).
To validate these findings, IHC quantification was performed on an independent cohort of 5 PV patients and 5 healthy controls. PV lesions exhibited significantly higher staining intensity scores for phospho-STAT3 (7.2 ± 1.64 vs 1 ± 0, p<0.001) and phospho-STAT6 (9.6 ± 1.34 vs 1.2 ± 0.45, p<0.001) compared to normal skin (Figure 3c–g). These results corroborate the proteomic data, confirming hyperactivation of JAK-STAT signaling in PV pathogenesis.
Discussion
Tofacitinib’s therapeutic potential in PV may stem from its capacity to simultaneously block multiple cytokine pathways implicated in disease pathogenesis. Experimental studies have demonstrated this JAK1/3 inhibitor effectively suppresses signaling of IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-21 - key cytokines driving Th2/Th17 polarization and autoantibody production in PV.10–12 Our clinical observations align with Tavakolpour’s hypothesis proposing JAK inhibition as a viable strategy for refractory PV.7 To date, only two cases of JAK inhibitor treatment in PV patients have been reported: one with nail improvement8 and the other with oral mucosal lesion amelioration.13 This case represents the first reported use of corticosteroid combined with tofacitinib for managing refractory PV, wherein adjunctive tofacitinib therapy enabled successful prednisone tapering to discontinuation (from 60 mg/day to 0 over 5 months) while maintaining complete clinical remission through tofacitinib monotherapy.
Mechanistically, our integrated analysis reinforces the role of JAK-STAT dysregulation in PV pathogenesis. Juczynska et al previously demonstrated elevated JAK/STAT proteins expression in both cutaneous and mucosal PV lesions compared to healthy tissues,14,15 a finding corroborated by our proteomic data showing STATs upregulation in skin lesions and validated through cohort-level phosphoprotein quantification. The observed attenuation of STAT3/6 phosphorylation post-tofacitinib treatment aligns temporally with clinical remission, suggesting JAK-STAT pathway modulation as a plausible contributor to therapeutic efficacy. However, causality requires further validation given potential off-target effects or involvement of parallel pathways.
Several limitations merit emphasis. First, residual anti-Dsg antibody titers despite clinical remission highlight tofacitinib’s preferential suppression of effector immune responses rather than elimination of autoreactive B-cell clones, necessitating long-term immunologic monitoring. Second, the single-arm design precludes definitive efficacy conclusions. Third, the 6-month follow-up period limits assessment of delayed adverse events, particularly given JAK inhibitors’ known association with opportunistic infections and thromboembolic risks. Larger controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings and establish safety profiles in PV populations.
Conclusion
This case demonstrates successful corticosteroid withdrawal and sustained remission in refractory PV through adjunctive tofacitinib therapy. Mechanistic analyses revealed JAK-STAT pathway hyperactivation in PV lesions, with tofacitinib attenuating STAT phosphorylation and modulating pathogenic cytokine networks, supporting its role as a steroid-sparing agent.
Ethics Statement
Approval for this study was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University. Informed consent for publication of the case details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 82373461). We thank the patient for her permission to publish this information.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.
References
1. Schmidt E, Kasperkiewicz M, Joly P. Pemphigus. Lancet. 2019;394:882–894. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31778-7
2. Fang H, Li Q, Wang G. The role of T cells in pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19:102661. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102661
3. Liu T, Li S, Ying S, et al. The IL-23/IL-17 pathway in inflammatory skin diseases: from bench to bedside. Front Immunol. 2020;11:594735. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.594735
4. Huang D, Zhang Y, Kong L, et al. Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune bullous diseases. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1220887. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1220887
5. Kowalski EH, Kneibner D, Kridin K, et al. Serum and blister fluid levels of cytokines and chemokines in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. Autoimmunity Rev. 2019;18:526–534. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.03.009
6. Lin X, Li X, Zhai Z, et al. JAK-STAT pathway, type I/II cytokines, and new potential therapeutic strategy for autoimmune bullous diseases: update on pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1563286. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1563286
7. Tavakolpour S. Tofacitinib as the potent treatment for refractory pemphigus: a possible alternative treatment for pemphigus. Dermatol Ther. 2018;31:e12696. doi:10.1111/dth.12696
8. Vander Does A, Gamret AC, Yosipovitch G. Nail loss in mild to moderate pemphigus vulgaris. Skin Appendage Disord. 2022;8:504–507. doi:10.1159/000525462
9. Chen X, Pan Y, Jin X, et al. Effective response of pemphigus erythematosus to treatment with baricitinib. Am J Ther. 2024:10–97. doi:10.1097/mjt.0000000000001768
10. Gao W, McGarry T, Orr C, et al. Tofacitinib regulates synovial inflammation in psoriatic arthritis, inhibiting STAT activation and induction of negative feedback inhibitors. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2016;75:311–315. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207201
11. Kubo S, Yamaoka K, Kondo M, et al. The JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, reduces the T cell stimulatory capacity of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2014;73:2192–2198. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203756
12. Zhang H, Watanabe R, Berry GJ, et al. Inhibition of JAK-STAT signaling suppresses pathogenic immune responses in medium and large vessel vasculitis. Circulation. 2018;137:1934–1948. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030423
13. Hren MG, Khattri S. Upadacitinib leading to resolution of refractory mucosal erosions in a case of pemphigus vulgaris. Int J Dermatol. 2024;64(4):736–737. doi:10.1111/ijd.17464
14. Juczynska K, Wozniacka A, Waszczykowska E, et al. Expression of JAK3, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 in pemphigus vulgaris. Immunol Res. 2020;68:97–103. doi:10.1007/s12026-020-09122-y
15. Ociepa K, Danilewicz M, Wągrowska-Danilewicz M, et al. Expression of the selected proteins of JAK/STAT signaling pathway in diseases with oral mucosa involvement. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;24:323. doi:10.3390/ijms24010323
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
