Back to Journals » The Application of Clinical Genetics » Volume 19
Two Distinct Clinical Presentations of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD): Diagnostic Utility of Whole-Exome Sequencing in a Genetically Heterogeneous Disorder
Authors Górecki M
, Jaszczuk I, Lejman M
Received 12 July 2025
Accepted for publication 30 January 2026
Published 2 April 2026 Volume 2026:19 549665
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S549665
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Martin Maurer
Mateusz Górecki,1,2 Ilona Jaszczuk,3,4 Monika Lejman2
1Doctoral School of the Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland; 2Independent Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland; 3Department of Genetic Diagnostics, The University Children’s Hospital in Lublin, Lublin, Poland; 4Department of Cancer Genetics with Cytogenetic Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
Correspondence: Mateusz Górecki, Independent Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, University Children’s Hospital, Profesor Antoni Gębala Street 6, Lublin, 20-093, Poland, Tel +48 81 718 52 11, Email [email protected]
Abstract: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, genetically heterogeneous disorder with variable clinical presentation. In cases where traditional diagnostic tools such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) or nasal nitric oxide (nNO) measurement are inconclusive/unavailable, molecular diagnostics via whole-exome sequencing (WES) may provide essential insights. In this case report, we present two male infants with diverse phenotypes and genotypes. 1st patient was ultimately diagnosed with PCD thanks to WES, while 2nd patient was strongly suggestive of PCD. The 1st patient portrayed in his clinical history symptoms such as perinatal respiratory distress, situs inversus, and recurrent otitis media. He was found to carry a known pathogenic homozygous variant c.461A>C (p.His154Pro), in the CCDC103 gene. The second patient exhibited more complex phenotype, including diaphragmatic hernia, absence of the pericardium, significant delay in the motor development. WES identified two variants in both DNAH5 and DNAH9. Parental testing identified the maternal origin for the c.10243-6C>T (p.?) and c.308del (p.Phe103Serfs*31) variants in the DNAH9 gene and a paternal origin for the c.1206T>A (p.Asn402Lys) variant in the DNAH5 gene. The second variant c.5124G>T (p.Glu1708Asp) in the DNAH5 gene in the proband arose de novo. At the time of analysis, these variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or likely benign, with limited segregation data and no definitive functional validation. Although the genetic findings were not diagnostic on their own, the clinical picture (situs inversus, neonatal respiratory distress, recurrent infections) was strongly suggestive of PCD. Both cases illustrate the crucial role of WES in establishing a molecular diagnosis of PCD, particularly when the use of traditional diagnostic methods is inconclusive. Moreover, they demonstrate the value of genomic testing in guiding the clinical management and informing about prognosis in diseases like PCD.
Keywords: DNAH5, DNAH9, CCD103, WES, pediatric
Introduction
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, genetically heterogeneous disorder characterized by defective motility of the respiratory cilia.1 This impairment leads to symptoms such as chronic respiratory tract infections, chronic sinusitis, otitis media, conductive hearing impairment, and bronchiectasis. It is often associated with situs inversus (about 50% patients with PCD) or heterotaxy (up to 12% of patients with PCD).1,2 In the majority of individuals diagnosed with PCD, respiratory distress is evident shortly after birth, even in the cases of full-term delivery. This triggers the need for a prolonged oxygen supply due to hypoxaemia.1
The prevalence of PCD is estimated between 1 in 2000 and 1 in 40,000 live births, but according to some sources it is underdiagnosed.3 Its frequency is notably higher in Europe and it is estimated to affect between 1 in 10,000 and 1 in 15,000 patients.1
Currently, mutations in more than 40 genes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PCD, involving genes encoding different proteins (axonemal, cytoplasmic or regulatory proteins. These proteins are essential for ciliary structure and function.4 Among the most frequently mutated genes in PCD is the DNAH5 gene, which accounts for approximately 15–28% of genetically confirmed cases in two original cohort studies.1,5,6 Mutations in this gene typically disrupt the outer dynein arms, which are crucial for effective ciliary beating.6 While DNAH5 mutations represent the most frequent cause of PCD (15–28%), mutations in DNAI1 are also recurrently observed, and contribute to approximately from 4% up to 13% of cases - depending on the cohort that was studied.5,6 In addition to dynein-related genes, mutations in genes such as CCDC39 and CCDC40 (encoding components of the nexin–dynein regulatory complex) also form the genetic background of PCD. They are associated with inner dynein arm defects and phenotypes that present with more severe lung diseases.4
Mutations in another gene - CCDC103, such as the p.His154Pro variant, have also been linked to PCD. This mutation disrupts the oligomerization process of the CCDC103 protein, which is essential for the proper assembly and function of the dynein arm complexes. Above mentioned disruption results in defects, particularly affecting the inner (or both) dynein arm structures.7
The diagnosis of PCD is challenging due to its clinical and genetic heterogeneity, symptoms that overlap with other respiratory conditions and limitations of traditional diagnostic methods. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) measurement, high-speed video microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are commonly used diagnostic tools. However, some patients may not be accurately diagnosed with these traditional methods alone.8,9 This applies especially to the patients without evident ultrastructural defects. For instance, approximately 30% of individuals with PCD may exhibit normal ciliary ultrastructure, as assessed by electron microscopy.9
Advances in molecular genetics, especially the use of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), have significantly improved the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. WES enables the identification of rare or novel pathogenic variants in known and novel genes associated with PCD. This provides crucial insights for accurate diagnosis and tailored patient management.10 In the study by Loges et al, WES enabled the identification of biallelic loss-of-function variants in the DNAH9 gene in individuals with laterality defects and subtle ciliary dysfunction.10
This report presents two clinically distinct cases of PCD, diagnosed thanks to WES, highlighting the genetic and clinical complexity of this condition. The study emphasizes also the value of comprehensive genetic testing, which is a necessary way to precise diagnosis of rare conditions, like PCD.
Case Presentation
Case 1
A male infant, born from the fourth pregnancy and third delivery at 39th week of gestation via cesarean section, presented with perinatal respiratory distress. Birth measurements were: weight - 3350g, body length - 53 cm, head circumference - 35 cm, chest circumference - 34 cm; and Apgar score - 10. The course of the pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes in the mother, treated with insulin.
The patient was referred to the Clinical Genetics Department at 10 months of age due to situs inversus, dextrocardia (previously evaluated in the pediatric cardiology department), recurrent respiratory tract infections, and chronic otitis media with effusion.
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES) in a certified clinical laboratory, using the Twist Human Core Exome Plus Kit and Illumina technology, achieving an average depth of 100× across target regions.
WES identified a known pathogenic homozygous variant c.461A>C (p.His154Pro) in the CCDC103 gene. Parental testing confirmed biallelic inheritance. Genetic testing of the siblings revealed carrier status in the sister, 7 years older, and a normal result in the brother, 2 years older. Based on the clinical picture and molecular findings, the patient was diagnosed with PCD, type 17.
At his most recent follow-up visit at the age of 3 years and 8 months, the patient remained under the care of the National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (Rabka-Zdrój, Poland). He exhibited recurrent lower respiratory tract infections and chronic otitis media (currently with a third tympanostomy). Physical examination showed: height 96 cm (75–90 percentiles according to WHO standards for the physical development of children aged 0–5 years), weight 15.3 kg (75–90 percentiles), an umbilical hernia, and a left retractile testis. The child follows a full diet and does not suffer from constipation. The boy receives daily saline inhalations and bronchodilator treatment with salbutamol. The appearance of the patient (Case 1) at current age is presented in the Figure 1.
|
Figure 1 Appearance of the patient (Case 1) at current age (3 years and 8 months) - normal growth and psychomotor development. |
Case 2
The second patient is a male infant born from the second pregnancy and first delivery at 38 weeks of gestation by cesarean section. He had a birth weight of 2620g, body length 50 cm, head circumference 34 cm and chest circumference 28 cm. His Apgar score was 7. The course of the pregnancy was complicated by bleeding in the first trimester and recurrent reproductive tract and urinary tract infections in the mother. Prenatal ultrasound examination of the fetus at 16 weeks’ gestation showed hernia of the umbilical cord. Amniocentesis was performed at 20 weeks’ gestation. Comparative genomic hybridisation to microarray (aCGH) study revealed a normal balanced male karyotype: arr(X,Y)×1, (1–22)×2. Echocardiography of the fetus showed mesocardia with the apex of the heart directed to the right.
He was referred to the Clinical Genetics Department at 12 months of age due to multiple congenital anomalies, including situs inversus, dextrocardia, absence of the pericardium, pulmonary hypoplasia, suspected pentalogy of Cantrell and recurrent respiratory infections. After birth, he underwent a three-stage surgical procedure to close the diaphragmatic hernia and close the abdominal wall at the site of the umbilical hernia with a 12 cm wide hernia sac containing loops of intestine, a fragment of the liver and a fragment of the spleen.
On physical examination at 12 months of age, the child’s height was 71 cm (<3rd percentile), weight was 7300 g (<3rd percentile) and head circumference was 42.5 cm (<3rd percentile). Dysmorphic features included mild occipital asymmetry, closed anterior fontanelle, hypotelorism, tented upper lip and retrognathia. Postoperative scars were visible on the chest and abdomen. The testes were retracted. A delay in motor development was also noted - he only sat with assistance. A delay in speech development was also present - the patient was only just babbling.
Multispecialty evaluations were conducted and the patient has visited following departments: cardiology, surgery, hematology, neurology, nutrition, gastroenterology, and rehabilitation. He was fed by nasogastric tube for 17 months.
Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in a certified clinical laboratory, using the Twist Human Core Exome Plus Kit for target enrichment and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform (2×100 bp).
Whole exome sequencing (WES) identified two variants in each of the dynein-related genes, DNAH5 and DNAH9. Parental testing identified the maternal origin for the c.10243-6C>T (p.?) and c.308del (p.Phe103Serfs*31) variants in the DNAH9 gene and a paternal origin for the c.1206T>A (p.Asn402Lys) variant in the DNAH5 gene. The second variant c.5124G>T (p.Glu1708Asp) in the DNAH5 gene in the proband arose de novo. All four variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or likely benign, based on current ClinVar data. No definitive pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were detected.
Additionally, due to two episodes of thrombosis, a thrombophilia panel was performed. Heterozygous variants were detected in the MTHFR gene: c.665C>T and c.1286A>C. Further hematological evaluation and periodic serum homocysteine monitoring were recommended.
At the age of 2 years and 4 months, the patient’s weight was 10 kg (<3rd percentile). The patient walked independently, speech development was progressing intensively. Figures 2 and 3 portray the patient’s (Case 2) phenotype.
|
Figure 2 Case 2 - the patient after the three-stage surgical procedure - muscle hypotonia can be seen. |
|
Figure 3 Appearance of the patient (Case 2) showing few dysmorphic features: thickened frontal suture, hypotelorism, tented upper lip. |
Additional Diagnostic Methods Regarding Case 1 and Case 2
Due to limited access, diagnostic tests such as nasal nitric oxide (nNO) measurement, high-speed video microscopy (HSVM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were not performed. The diagnosis was established through clinical evaluation and was confirmed by Whole-Exome Sequencing. In both cases, trio WES was performed, including the patient and both biological parents. In Case 1, additional testing of siblings was carried out: the patient’s sister was found to be a heterozygous carrier of the pathogenic variant in the CCDC103 gene, whereas the brother did not carry the variant. In Case 2, the patient is an only child, and no additional family members beyond the parents were tested. The summary of all relevant variants identified by whole-exome sequencing (WES) in both Case 1 and Case 2 is presented in Table 1.
|
Table 1 Summary of All Relevant Variants Identified by Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) in Both Case 1 and Case 2 |
Discussion
The genetic diversity of PCD is increasingly recognized as a cause of the broad clinical spectrum of this disorder. The two cases described in this report illustrate how patients may present with some common features of PCD, as well as some different clinical symptoms at the same time. Moreover, the patients carried distinctly different underlying genotypes.
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Case 1 and Case 2
In the first case, a homozygous CCDC103 p.His154Pro mutation was identified. This missense variant has been described as a mutation which is prevalent in UK individuals of South Asian origin (mostly Pakistani) and was also found in an Irish Traveller family.7
The p.His154Pro variant impairs oligomerization of the CCDC103 protein, resulting in a reduced protein-folding ability.7 Importantly, individuals with this variant often display a non-diagnostic or even normal ciliary ultrastructure on transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which may delay or conceal diagnosis using traditional methods.7 In the Irish Traveller family described by Casey et al, affected individuals with p.His154Pro homozygosity showed inconsistent ciliary ultrastructure - from normal to completely absent dynein arms. This depicts the limitations of relying on TEM method alone in the process of diagnosis.11 These findings clearly support and justify the use of genetic testing in suspected PCD even when the standard diagnostics are inconclusive.
The second patient carried variants in DNAH5 gene, the most commonly mutated gene in genetically confirmed PCD cases, and DNAH9 - a gene associated with milder or atypical phenotypes.1,10 Loges et al reported that biallelic pathogenic variants in the DNAH9 gene may result in laterality defects with no or only mild respiratory symptoms, often remaining undiagnosed without the aid of genetic sequencing.10 In recent work by Al-Mutairi et al, the authors systematically investigated five individuals with confirmed primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) from three unrelated Arabic families, identifying several novel pathogenic variants in the DNAH5 gene.12 Using a combination of whole-exome sequencing, segregation analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and immunofluorescence (IF), they confirmed the pathogenicity of these variants. In all five cases, TEM revealed complete absence of outer dynein arms, and IF analysis confirmed the lack of DNAH5 protein in the ciliary axoneme. Particularly relevant to our case, the authors emphasized that compound heterozygous missense variants in DNAH5, even when not previously classified as pathogenic, may cause classical PCD phenotypes when supported by functional and clinical evidence. Furthermore, in silico prediction tools, including REVEL, DANN, MutPred, and PolyPhen-2, showed high pathogenicity scores for such variants, reinforcing their role in disease causation. These findings support our interpretation that the de novo missense variant in DNAH5 identified in Case 2 (c.5124G>T, p.Trp1708Cys), despite limited data in current databases, may still be disease-causing when occurring with another variant in trans. In our case, this is further supported by the phenotypic consistency, including situs inversus, congenital heart defects, and chronic respiratory infections.
Concerning the DNAH9 variants in Case 2, both variants were maternally inherited. DNAH9 has been recognized as a causative gene in milder or atypical PCD phenotypes, particularly those involving laterality defects.10
Although the variant c.10243-6C>T is currently classified as likely benign in ClinVar, its impact has not been fully functionally evaluated. Similar variants have been associated with PCD in the literature. Isa et al presented a case with a novel DNAH9 gene mutation in a compound heterozygous state (the DNAH9 variant c.11086C>T p.(His3696Tyr) causing an amino acid change from His to Tyr at position 3696 and the DNAH9 variant c.7150G>A p.(Gly2384Arg) causing an amino acid change from Gly to Arg at position 2384).13 These variants according to SIFT MutationTaster were disease-causing (c.11086C>T) or deleterious and disease-causing (c.7150G>A). It is worth to underline that above mentioned variants were classified as of uncertain significance according to ACMG guidelines.
The diagnosis of PCD in Case 2 was based both on WES, as well as on the clinical image. The findings were suggestive of PCD but we acknowledge that additional functional assessments such as nNO and HSVM were not performed, which limits the diagnostic certainty. This is a limitation that clearly affects the proper diagnosis.
Shamseldin et al identified biallelic pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in known PCD genes in 38 of 56 families, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 68% based on WES.14 This finding underscores the utility of genomic testing not only for diagnosis confirmation but also for the information about genotype-phenotype relationships, management strategies, and the ability to conduct accurate genetic counseling for families.
Clinical Features and Prevalence
PCD is most commonly characterized by neonatal respiratory distress, persistent wet cough, nasal congestion, otitis media, and situs anomalies.1,8 In a large multicenter study, Leigh et al identified four highly predictive features of PCD: neonatal respiratory distress, chronic wet cough, persistent nasal congestion, and laterality defects. The presence of at least three of these markers yielded a diagnostic specificity above 96%.8 Our first patient presented with three of these four key features. This finding supports the clinical suspicion of PCD even before the genetic testing.
The second patient showed a more complex phenotype, but also had situs inversus, chronic respiratory symptoms, and neonatal distress, meeting the same predictive threshold.
A meta-analysis by Goutaki et al estimated the prevalence of chronic cough and sputum production at over 85%, with otitis media affecting roughly 74% of PCD patients.3 Bronchiectasis and neonatal respiratory distress were each present in more than half of the cases, while situs abnormalities occurred in approximately 50%.3
The clinical profiles of both of our patients align well with this symptom spectrum. They illustrate the importance of early recognition and diagnosis, especially in atypical or syndromic presentations.
The comparison between phenotypic features (mutations in CCD103, DNAH5, DNAH9) according to OMIM and our cases is clearly portrayed in Table 2.
|
Table 2 Phenotypic Features According to OMIM Versus Case 1 and Case 2 |
Differential Diagnosis of PCD
PCD often presents with chronic respiratory symptoms that overlap with several more common pediatric and adult conditions, making differential diagnosis essential. Disorders that should be considered include: cystic fibrosis, primary immunodeficiencies, bronchial asthma, bronchiectasis of other etiologies.18 Neonatal respiratory distress - particularly when persistent and unexplained is a characteristic feature of PCD but may also occur in congenital heart diseases and other structural abnormalities.19
Importantly, low levels of nasal nitric oxide (nNO), a non-invasive biomarker, are useful in distinguishing PCD from other conditions. Shapiro et al demonstrated that patients with PCD (including those with situs ambiguus or heterotaxy), consistently exhibit significantly reduced nNO levels, even compared to patients with complex cardiac anomalies without ciliary dysfunction.19 Additionally, high-speed video microscopy and TEM can help differentiate PCD from secondary ciliary dyskinesias (eg. caused by infection or inflammation). These methods enable to reveal cilia immobility, partial loss or invalid structure of cilia, although normal ultrastructural findings on TEM do not exclude the disease.18
Given the clinical overlap with other chronic respiratory diseases, awareness of the characteristic constellation of symptoms combined with laterality defects or a family history should prompt targeted diagnostic testing to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment delays.
The Role of Next Generation Sequencing in PCD Diagnosis
WES has emerged as a highly valuable tool in the diagnostic workflow for PCD, especially in cases where traditional diagnostic methods do not yield conclusive results or are unavailable. Oh et al demonstrated a diagnostic yield of 17% using WES alone in a cohort of 47 Korean patients clinically suspected of PCD. The yield was even higher when WES was combined with TEM findings.20 Importantly, nearly half (47.1%) of the identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were novel. This fact underlines the utility of WES in uncovering previously unreported mutations.20 Similarly, Black et al emphasized the advantages of WGS and WES in detecting not only single-nucleotide variants but also structural variants that may be missed by targeted gene panels. These methods increase the molecular diagnostic yield in genetically heterogeneous conditions like PCD.21 Their study showed that in seven of eight patients, WGS successfully identified pathogenic variants in known PCD genes such as DNAH5, DNAAF4, and DNAH11.21 Together, these findings support the incorporation of WES into early stages of the PCD diagnostic algorithm, especially in the situations, when advanced ultrastructural or functional testing is limited.
Prognosis and Quality of Life in PCD
Despite earlier assumptions that PCD is a mild respiratory disorder, recent studies have shown that affected children may experience significant respiratory morbidity, including reduced lung function. Rubbo et al demonstrated that children with PCD in England had lower mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values (76.8% predicted) compared to children with cystic fibrosis, especially in younger age groups. Nearly one-third of the patients affected with PCD required intravenous antibiotic therapy within the previous 12 months.22 Moreover, about 24% of children required hearing aids due to moderate or profound hearing loss. What is more, patients with impaired nutritional status (low BMI) demonstrated poorer lung function.22
Beyond physiological parameters, PCD substantially impacts patient’s quality of life (QOL).23 As highlighted by Yılmaz and Akgün, the chronic burden of symptoms, intensive daily treatments, and complications such as infertility contribute to diminished health-related QOL (HRQOL). This concerns particularly the physical and emotional domains.23 Standardized assessment tools such as the PCD-QOL questionnaire can reveal how PCD may affect above mentioned aspects of the patient’s daily life and well-being.23 Therefore, timely diagnosis, personalized care plans and psychological support are crucial to gain long-term outcomes and maintain high QOL in affected individuals.
Conclusion
This study highlights the diagnostic and genetic complexity of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) in early childhood, based on two distinct clinical cases. In Case 1, a homozygous pathogenic variant in CCDC103 confirmed the diagnosis. In Case 2, rare heterozygous variants in DNAH5 and DNAH9 were detected, but their pathogenicity and clinical relevance remains uncertain due to limited evidence and the absence of confirmed biallelic inheritance. These findings support the use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) as a key component of the diagnostic process in suspected PCD, particularly when standard tests such as nasal nitric oxide measurement or ultrastructural analysis are unavailable. As shown in recent studies, some variants initially classified as VUS may prove clinically significant when integrated with phenotype and segregation data. Therefore, careful genotype–phenotype correlation and follow-up analyses are essential in rare, heterogeneous disorders such as PCD.
AI Statement
The authors acknowledge the use of Generative AI tools (Grammarly Grammar Checker, ChatGPT4o) only for the purpose of English language correction and improvement.
Ethical Approval Statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin, Poland (committee reference number: KE-0254/69/04/2024).
Consent for Publication
The consent for the publication has been obtained from the parents of the patients (their official guardians), according to the applicable regulations in Poland (the patients are under 16 years of age). The parental consent included publication of the images.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to kindly thank the medical laboratory scientists, who conducted genetic testing and provided reliable results. The authors would like to express the gratitude towards the patients and their parents for their participation in this study.
Funding
This study was funded by the Medical University of Lublin. The university was not involved in any role during the writing and submission of the manuscript.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Lucas JS, Davis SD, Omran H, Shoemark A. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in the genomics age. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(2):202–10. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30374-1
2. Shapiro AJ, Leigh MW. Value of transmission electron microscopy for primary ciliary dyskinesia diagnosis in the era of molecular medicine: genetic defects with normal and non-diagnostic ciliary ultrastructure. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2017;41(6):373–385. doi:10.1080/01913123.2017.1362088
3. Goutaki M, Meier AB, Halbeisen FS, et al. Clinical manifestations in primary ciliary dyskinesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(4):1081–1095. doi:10.1183/13993003.00736-2016
4. Horani A, Ferkol TW. Advances in the genetics of primary ciliary dyskinesia: clinical implications. Chest. 2018;154(3):645–652. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.05.007
5. Failly M, Bartoloni L, Letourneau A, et al. Mutations in DNAH5 account for only 15% of a non-preselected cohort of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Med Genet. 2009;46(4):281–286. doi:10.1136/jmg.2008.061176
6. Hornef N, Olbrich H, Horvath J, et al. DNAH5 mutations are a common cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia with outer dynein arm defects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(2):120–126. doi:10.1164/rccm.200601-084OC
7. Shoemark A, Moya E, Hirst RA, et al. High prevalence of CCDC103 p.His154Pro mutation causing primary ciliary dyskinesia disrupts protein oligomerisation and is associated with normal diagnostic investigations. Thorax. 2018;73(2):157–166. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-209999
8. Leigh MW, Ferkol TW, Davis SD, et al. Clinical features and associated likelihood of primary ciliary Dyskinesia in children and adolescents. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(8):1305–1313. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-748OC
9. Shapiro AJ, Davis SD, Polineni D, et al; For American Thoracic Society Assembly on Pediatrics. Diagnosis of primary ciliary Dyskinesia. An official American thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(12):e24–e39. doi:10.1164/rccm.201805-0819ST
10. Loges NT, Antony D, Maver A, et al. Recessive DNAH9 loss-of-function mutations cause laterality defects and subtle respiratory ciliary-beating defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103(6):995–1008. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.10.020
11. Casey JP, Goggin P, McDaid J, et al. A case report of primary ciliary dyskinesia, laterality defects and developmental delay caused by the co-existence of a single gene and chromosome disorder. BMC Med Genet. 2015;16:45. doi:10.1186/s12881-015-0192-z
12. Al-Mutairi DA, Alsabah BH, Pennekamp P, et al. Novel pathogenic variants of DNAH5 associated with clinical and genetic spectra of primary ciliary dyskinesia in an Arab population. Front Genet. 2024;15:1396797. doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1396797
13. Isa HM, Alkharsi FA, Busehail MY, et al. A novel DNAH9 gene mutation causing primary ciliary dyskinesia with an unusual association of Jejunal Atresia in a Bahraini Child. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32964. doi:10.7759/cureus.32964
14. Shamseldin HE, Al Mogarri I, Alqwaiee MM, et al. An exome-first approach to aid in the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Hum Genet. 2020;139(10):1273–1283. doi:10.1007/s00439-020-02170-2
15. CILIARY DYSKINESIA, PRIMARY, 17; CILD17 [homepage on the internet]. Available from: https://www.omim.org/entry/614679.
16. CILIARY DYSKINESIA, PRIMARY, 3; CILD3 [homepage on the internet]. Available from: https://omim.org/entry/608644.
17. CILIARY DYSKINESIA, PRIMARY, 40; CILD40 [homepage on the internet]. Available from: https://www.omim.org/entry/618300.
18. Castillo M, Freire E, Romero VI. Primary ciliary dyskinesia diagnosis and management and its implications in America: a mini review. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1091173. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1091173
19. Shapiro AJ, Davis SD, Ferkol T, et al; for Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium. Laterality defects other than situs inversus totalis in primary ciliary dyskinesia: insights into situs ambiguus and heterotaxy. Chest. 2014;146(5):1176–1186. doi:10.1378/chest.13-1704
20. Oh J, Lee JS, Park MS, et al. Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia via whole exome sequencing and histologic findings. Yonsei Med J. 2024;65(1):48–54. doi:10.3349/ymj.2023.0238
21. Black HA, de Proce SM, Campos JL, et al; for Scottish Genomes Partnership. Whole genome sequencing enhances molecular diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024;59(12):3322–3332. doi:10.1002/ppul.27200
22. Rubbo B, Best S, Hirst RA, et al; for English National Children’s PCD Management Service. Clinical features and management of children with primary ciliary dyskinesia in England. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(8):724–729. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-317687
23. Yılmaz Ö, Akgün M. Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: ready for quality of life assessment. Turk Thorac J. 2017;18(2):27–28. doi:10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2017.17012
© 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
